Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Young People Aren’t Becoming Conservatives. Here’s Why.
Young People Aren’t Becoming Conservatives. Here’s Why.
Jan 25, 2026 12:47 AM

America’s biggest voting block doesn’t think conservatives “care.” To win, we have to change that.

Read More…

Almost everyone has heard the cynical political adage, generally attributed to Winston Churchill, that “Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains.” While the sentiment is lighthearted at its core, it municates a popular piece of political wisdom: as people get older and buy into the social outlets that promote faith and family, they tend to support more conservative policies, presumably to conserve the institutions they’re part of and the social capital they’ve accrued. It’s an attractive notion, and one that makes intuitive sense—obviously a single 21-year-old in an entry-level job is going to have different politics than a 40-year-old white collar worker with two kids. Moreover, American dynamism offers the kind of opportunity where you can be both in a lifetime.

Yet, is the conventional wisdom holding true for America’s youngest voters today? It’s no secret that both Millennials and Generation Z overwhelmingly vote Democratic—and it’s a real liability for Republicans, who are slowly waking up to the reality that America’s soon-to-be-largest voting block hates them. The old adage would indicate that there’s a generational ing, and conservatives would have you believe that the Millennial/Gen Z voting block can be flipped Republican (while their activist organizations insult Gen Z as a bunch of kids who want free stuff). Yet I’d posit that such optimism is, at best, only half-justified.

The growing social radicalism promoted by militant progressives and the shaky-at-best economic track record of the current administration are liabilities that may eventually turn off younger voters, particularly those of the working class. And if that’s not enough, don’t forget that 71% of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track, a trend that’s more or less mirrored in young voters. A shift ing, and this is the half-justification I’m talking about: the Millennial/Gen Z voting block will likely turn away from the most extreme fringes of progressivism. This is a e change, and one that advocates of individual liberty and human flourishing should be pursuing and encouraging.

Here’s the hard part: it doesn’t mean they’re ing conservative.

“Almost 7 in 10 Americans today say this country is not on the right track, we have to do something different,” then-AEI president and social scientist Arthur Brooks told audiences in 2014. “The problem is, they’re not all running to a new solution. Why? Because they don’t trust conservatives.” He gave that speech in 2014, and the numbers are exactly the same as they are now. Could it be, in an era when less than two-fifths of Americans believe that Republicans are honest and ethical, that the problem is the same as well?

America’s youngest voters are operating from a position of deep dissatisfaction with American politics—this we know. In the short term, it may serve to pull the Millennial/Gen Z voting block away from the fringes of social progressivism. But in the long term, that doesn’t mean they’re landing in the arms of conservatives. It’s not enough to convince Millennials and Gen Z that progressive answers won’t make them happier, healthier, or safer. We have to convince them that we actually have better answers that aren’t rooted in social regression or retribution. So how do we reach those young voters?

Be honest about the conservative stereotypes. Young people have learned a great deal of negative stereotypes about conservatives beyond the broad categories of unethical and dishonest: for example, we (speaking as a conservative myself) don’t care about gun deaths, we’re anti-immigrant, we want women to die in back alley abortions, etc. We cannot persuade generations that grew up being told about the evils of conservatism by simply ignoring those preconceptions. We have to do our homework and call out these ideas where they exist, because that’s what audience analysis is all about. We have to convince a generation that thinks we lack ethics and honesty that we care about these things. That means we have to actually care about them—and care about them enough to engage with the blind spots in their worldview.

Realize that we can’t insult our way to agreement. “Gen Z Is Gen FREE!” proclaims an advertisement from one of America’s most prominent conservative activist groups. The assumption is a tired and overplayed one—America’s youngest generations are lazy, entitled, and don’t want to work. I present to you the idea that perpetuating negative stereotypes is not a particularly effective method of persuading these young people to a cause. Furthermore, I invite you to think about this: What if conservatives who want to win the hearts and minds of voters under 30 spent as much energy talking about my generation’s drive for justice, ability to use social media to create change, and participation in morally charged activism as they did talking about our youth, inexperience, and entitlement? If we started seriously trying that, we might get something more than agreement—like enthusiasm or even passion. It’s hard even to imagine what a world like that would look like.

Go into the places we’re not expected and be conservative. GOP presidential candidate and senator Tim Scott recently made headlines by going on the notoriously left-wing talk show The View to lay out his views on race. “Progress in America is measured in generations. My grandfather [was] born in 1921 in Salley, South Carolina. When he was on a sidewalk, a white person ing, he had to step off and not make eye contact,” explained Scott. “Yesterday’s exception [on racial equality] is today’s rule.” Scott pulled no punches as to his views on the progressive race narrative, ments previously made by View hosts as “dangerous, offensive, disgusting message[s].” This is where conservatives have to go—places where they do not typically appear but, for the sake of breaking through the echo chamber, absolutely have to be. And once they’re there, like Scott, they need to be unapologetically conservative in an expressive, personable, and unwavering fashion.

Young voters will not listen to conservatives unless they believe that they care. And they will not know that conservatives care unless they realize that we understand the negative perceptions that still cling to us. They will not believe that conservatives care if they get nothing but insults from us. And they will not hear caring messages from conservatives unless we go into the places where we’re ideologically outnumbered and outgunned and make the best case for our ideas that we can.

Sound hard? As a member of Gen Z myself, it’s going to be. But the alternative is that America’s largest voting block goes through life not merely distrusting us but living in a world of fundamental misperceptions about who we are and what we stand for. It’s a long game and plex one. But it’s the game that’s before us—we walk away from the field at our peril.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ginsburg and Hale: Creating new laws from the bench
In a mentary, Trey Dimsdale looks at winsome celebrity jurists Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Brenda Hale, heroines of the left wing project to change how constitutional law is understood in the United States and the United Kingdom. The careers of these jurists raise questions about the proper role of those who sit on the bench, Dimsdale writes. The approach adopted by Hale and Ginsburg should be viewed with skepticism rather than celebration. Of course, injustice may be reflected in a...
Video: Andrew Klavan on reintroducing our culture to the truth
On October 15th, the Acton Institute celebrated its 29th anniversary with a dinner at the J.W. Marriott hotel in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The keynote address for the evening was delivered by Andrew Klavan, the award-winning author and screenwriter. Klavan shared the story of his journey from atheism to faith in Jesus Christ, and laid out his views on how to reach out to a culture that has largely abandoned not only Biblical truth, but the very idea of truth itself....
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Young Europeans’ views of totalitarianism
Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, International, wrote recently in Forbes to give his thoughts on a recent survey that examined young Europeans’ attitudes toward various strains of totalitarianism. Attitudes in different countries vary, of course, and – unsurprisingly munism is viewed more favorably in countries that were never behind the Iron Curtain than in many eastern ones where the historical memory of it lives on. I have been reading most of the fundraising appeals sent out by think tanks and...
Acton Line podcast: The morality of ‘Joker’; How Clarence Thomas is changing SCOTUS
The new super villain drama ‘Joker’ has shattered box office records and gained much controversial media attention along the way. Set to top $900 million worldwide, the dark film from director Todd Phillips and actor Joaquin Phoenix is already being heralded as the biggest R-rated movie ever. So why has ‘Joker’ been such a hit? Christian Toto, award winning movie critic and editor at Hollywood in Toto, breaks it down, explaining how the film touches on themes like mental illness,...
Book review: ‘Apostles of Empire: The Jesuits and New France’
In a new piece published at The Catholic World Report, Acton’s Samuel Gregg reviews “Apostles of Empire: The Jesuits and New France,” by Bronwen McShea, Associate Research Scholar with Princeton University’s James Madison Program. In “Apostles of Empire,” McShea details the history of Jesuit missionary efforts that took place in North America during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and brings attention to how the Jesuits’ missionary efforts were coupled with the advancement of French political and economic ambitions. Gregg writes:...
Rev. Richard Turnbull: Parliament’s moral failure on Brexit
UK Parliament has twice denied Prime Minister Boris Johnson a vote on a Brexit deal favored by the majority of British citizens. The latest efforts to delay Brexit have created “a modern moral crisis in one of the world’s foremost democratic nations,” writes Rev. Richard Turnbull, director of the Centre for Enterprise, Markets, and Ethics (CEME) in Oxford. Turnbull chronicles the head-spinning events that have taken place in Westminster since Parliament’s rare Saturday session in a new article for he...
Wealth creation and the Reformed confessional tradition
I have been working as part of the Moral Markets project for the past couple of years, and as the formal end of the project looms, some of the outputs of the project ing to fruition. This includes a recent article that I co-authored, “The Moral Status of Wealth Creation in Early-Modern Reformed Confessions.” This piece appears as part of a special issue of Reformation & Renaissance Review co-edited by Wim Decock and Andrew M. McGinnis on the theme, “Interconfessional...
Rev. Richard Turnbull: Brexit deal, last step before freedom?
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has negotiated a new agreement to leave the European Union on October 31. A British observer, who has read the plan, says it embodies a significant improvement over the deal former PM Theresa May saw defeated thrice by historic margins in Parliament. “Overall, these improvements represent a real step in the direction of free trade and hence are to be ed,” writes Rev. Richard Turnbull, in a new essay written for the Acton Institute’s Religion...
Why you’re richer than you think (and Jeff Bezos is poorer)
One of the most plaints against capitalism holds that real wages have stagnated since the 1970s. Meanwhile, CEOs such as Amazon’s Jeff Bezos earn more money than ever. The charge surfaced as recently as the fourth Democratic presidential debate, last Tuesday. “As a result of taking away the rights of working people and organized labor, people haven’t had a raise – 90 percent of Americans have not had a raise for 40 years,” said Tom Steyer (whose earnings rank somewhat...
Adam Smith and a life well-lived
Over at Law & Liberty I had the pleasure of reviewing Ryan Patrick Hanley’s new book, Our Great Purpose: Adam Smith on Living a Better Life. I highly mend it: Ryan Patrick Hanley’s latest book offers an accessible, erudite, and concise introduction to Adam Smith in full, the moral philosopher of wisdom and prudence. In Our Great Purpose, Hanley eschews the extensive reference apparatus and jargon that is so characteristic of contemporary scholarship. Instead, Hanley has taken an approach that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved