Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Young People Aren’t Becoming Conservatives. Here’s Why.
Young People Aren’t Becoming Conservatives. Here’s Why.
Jan 8, 2026 1:00 PM

America’s biggest voting block doesn’t think conservatives “care.” To win, we have to change that.

Read More…

Almost everyone has heard the cynical political adage, generally attributed to Winston Churchill, that “Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains.” While the sentiment is lighthearted at its core, it municates a popular piece of political wisdom: as people get older and buy into the social outlets that promote faith and family, they tend to support more conservative policies, presumably to conserve the institutions they’re part of and the social capital they’ve accrued. It’s an attractive notion, and one that makes intuitive sense—obviously a single 21-year-old in an entry-level job is going to have different politics than a 40-year-old white collar worker with two kids. Moreover, American dynamism offers the kind of opportunity where you can be both in a lifetime.

Yet, is the conventional wisdom holding true for America’s youngest voters today? It’s no secret that both Millennials and Generation Z overwhelmingly vote Democratic—and it’s a real liability for Republicans, who are slowly waking up to the reality that America’s soon-to-be-largest voting block hates them. The old adage would indicate that there’s a generational ing, and conservatives would have you believe that the Millennial/Gen Z voting block can be flipped Republican (while their activist organizations insult Gen Z as a bunch of kids who want free stuff). Yet I’d posit that such optimism is, at best, only half-justified.

The growing social radicalism promoted by militant progressives and the shaky-at-best economic track record of the current administration are liabilities that may eventually turn off younger voters, particularly those of the working class. And if that’s not enough, don’t forget that 71% of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track, a trend that’s more or less mirrored in young voters. A shift ing, and this is the half-justification I’m talking about: the Millennial/Gen Z voting block will likely turn away from the most extreme fringes of progressivism. This is a e change, and one that advocates of individual liberty and human flourishing should be pursuing and encouraging.

Here’s the hard part: it doesn’t mean they’re ing conservative.

“Almost 7 in 10 Americans today say this country is not on the right track, we have to do something different,” then-AEI president and social scientist Arthur Brooks told audiences in 2014. “The problem is, they’re not all running to a new solution. Why? Because they don’t trust conservatives.” He gave that speech in 2014, and the numbers are exactly the same as they are now. Could it be, in an era when less than two-fifths of Americans believe that Republicans are honest and ethical, that the problem is the same as well?

America’s youngest voters are operating from a position of deep dissatisfaction with American politics—this we know. In the short term, it may serve to pull the Millennial/Gen Z voting block away from the fringes of social progressivism. But in the long term, that doesn’t mean they’re landing in the arms of conservatives. It’s not enough to convince Millennials and Gen Z that progressive answers won’t make them happier, healthier, or safer. We have to convince them that we actually have better answers that aren’t rooted in social regression or retribution. So how do we reach those young voters?

Be honest about the conservative stereotypes. Young people have learned a great deal of negative stereotypes about conservatives beyond the broad categories of unethical and dishonest: for example, we (speaking as a conservative myself) don’t care about gun deaths, we’re anti-immigrant, we want women to die in back alley abortions, etc. We cannot persuade generations that grew up being told about the evils of conservatism by simply ignoring those preconceptions. We have to do our homework and call out these ideas where they exist, because that’s what audience analysis is all about. We have to convince a generation that thinks we lack ethics and honesty that we care about these things. That means we have to actually care about them—and care about them enough to engage with the blind spots in their worldview.

Realize that we can’t insult our way to agreement. “Gen Z Is Gen FREE!” proclaims an advertisement from one of America’s most prominent conservative activist groups. The assumption is a tired and overplayed one—America’s youngest generations are lazy, entitled, and don’t want to work. I present to you the idea that perpetuating negative stereotypes is not a particularly effective method of persuading these young people to a cause. Furthermore, I invite you to think about this: What if conservatives who want to win the hearts and minds of voters under 30 spent as much energy talking about my generation’s drive for justice, ability to use social media to create change, and participation in morally charged activism as they did talking about our youth, inexperience, and entitlement? If we started seriously trying that, we might get something more than agreement—like enthusiasm or even passion. It’s hard even to imagine what a world like that would look like.

Go into the places we’re not expected and be conservative. GOP presidential candidate and senator Tim Scott recently made headlines by going on the notoriously left-wing talk show The View to lay out his views on race. “Progress in America is measured in generations. My grandfather [was] born in 1921 in Salley, South Carolina. When he was on a sidewalk, a white person ing, he had to step off and not make eye contact,” explained Scott. “Yesterday’s exception [on racial equality] is today’s rule.” Scott pulled no punches as to his views on the progressive race narrative, ments previously made by View hosts as “dangerous, offensive, disgusting message[s].” This is where conservatives have to go—places where they do not typically appear but, for the sake of breaking through the echo chamber, absolutely have to be. And once they’re there, like Scott, they need to be unapologetically conservative in an expressive, personable, and unwavering fashion.

Young voters will not listen to conservatives unless they believe that they care. And they will not know that conservatives care unless they realize that we understand the negative perceptions that still cling to us. They will not believe that conservatives care if they get nothing but insults from us. And they will not hear caring messages from conservatives unless we go into the places where we’re ideologically outnumbered and outgunned and make the best case for our ideas that we can.

Sound hard? As a member of Gen Z myself, it’s going to be. But the alternative is that America’s largest voting block goes through life not merely distrusting us but living in a world of fundamental misperceptions about who we are and what we stand for. It’s a long game and plex one. But it’s the game that’s before us—we walk away from the field at our peril.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What do stock markets do?
Note: This is post #89 in a weekly video series on basic economics. pany can raise money and create new investment by selling shares through an initial public offering (IPO). When you buy pany’s shares on the stock market, though, no new investment is created. So what exactly do stock markets do? In this video by Marginal Revolution University,Alex Tabarrok explains how stock markets serve as a financial intermediary and serves as a key institution encouraging new businesses. (If you...
Sen. Elizabeth Warren brings government muscle to corporate ‘accountability’
It was in Godfather III where Al Pacino as Michael Corleone said it first and said it best: “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!” Before we were able to put away our party hats after celebrating the Supreme Court’s Janus decision in June, Missouri rejected a right-to-work measure at the state’s primary ballot box last week. And now Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wants to do a federally legislated end run around Janus with a...
The bright side of the trade war with China?
“This year marks the 40th anniversary of one of the most consequential anti-poverty programs in human history,” says Rev. Ben Johnson in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Now, there is evidence that its spillover effects may lift millions more out of dire need.” The new openness to enterprise, private property, and investment led to China’s meteoric economic rise. Now, Donald Trump’s tariffs are encouraging manufacturers to take their factories elsewhere. Ian Chen, CEO of a Chinese technological exporter, said that Trump’s...
Income inequality and the ‘Groupon Theory of Morality’
For many years I was unable to understand the reasoning behind the claims that e inequality is a moral issue that only applies at the group level. Then it came to me like an epiphany—or more accurately, as a Groupon email. According to Wikipedia, the Groupon works as an assurance contract: If a certain number of people sign up for an offer, then the deal es available to all; if the predetermined minimum is not met, no one gets the...
James V. Schall on Islam and the West
Pope Benedict XVI made an fortable claim in his 2006 Regensburg address: contemporary Muslim terrorism may owe something to Islam’s conception of God. A year later, Father James V. Schall SJ wrote a book about the address which, as Acton Director of Research Samuel Gregg says, placed it in the wider context of a set of religious and philosophical challenges that many Westerners still can’t bring themselves to address: Over the past sixteen years, Schall has written numerous articles on...
10 things political scientists know that we don’t
“If economics is the dismal science,” says Hans Noel, an associate professor at Georgetown University, “then political science is the dismissed science.” Most Americans—from pundits to voters—don’t think that political science has much to say about political life. But there are some things, notes Noel, that “political scientists know that it seems many practitioners, pundits, journalists, and otherwise informed citizens do not.” Here are excerpts from Noel’s list of ten things political scientists know that you don’t: #1. It’s The...
Would Jesus take an Uber?
New York City has enacted the first-ever government cap on the number of vehicles licensed to ride-sharing services like Uber or Lyft. On Tuesday, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the bill imposing a one-year moratorium on new licenses, establishing a minimum wage for drivers – and touching off an international debate among Christians and others about the morality of Uber. “As the council was considering the legislation, some in my church circles discussed avoiding ride-sharing as a way to love...
The Parable of the Long Spoons explains free markets
“How can we explain this emporiophobia—a fear of markets—given the overwhelming evidence that such institutions provide the greatest wealth, health and happiness for humankind?” When economics professor Paul Rubin asked that questionhe answered by saying that we need to shift the metaphor of markets from petition” to “cooperation.” Cooperation isn’t just more important in the economic sphere—it’s also mon. We cooperate with everyone involved in making all the products we buy and sell, millions of people we’ll never know. […]...
Introduction to the ‘Principles Project’
A young professor panies his mentor to a private meeting of economists from around the country. As they take their seats the host says, “To start us off, let’s have a few rounds of the best jokes.” An elderly woman stands up and says “37,” and everyone laughs. Another yells “49,” and the crowd cackles hysterically. This goes on for a while, when the young man turns to his senior and says, “I don’t get it, numbers aren’t funny.” His...
Radio Free Acton: Econ Quiz on pensions and public debt; Upstream on Frida Kahlo and Stalinism
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, host Caroline Roberts speaks with Dave Hebert, Professor of Economics at Aquinas College for another Econ Quiz segment on the topic of pensions and state debt. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to Phil Terzian, a writer for The Weekly Standard, on the blind spots in the legacy of Frida Kahlo as well as our modern understanding of Stalinism. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Read...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved