Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Xi Jinping manipulates history on his way to a third term
Xi Jinping manipulates history on his way to a third term
Apr 8, 2025 4:02 AM

Is Xi a second great Red Emperor? His growing influence and use of raw power even to rewrite history seem to suggest so.

Read More…

China’s Xi Jinping has already served longer than any U.S. president other than Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And Xi is likely to pass FDR in just a couple years. The Chinese president and Chinese Communist Party general secretary has secured the support necessary for a third term—expected to be followed by a fourth and even fifth one, should Xi, currently 68, live long enough.

In mid-November, the CCP Central Committee, made up of nearly 400 regular and alternate members,approved a resolutionon the CCP’s “major achievements and historic experiences.” Only the third such measure in the party’s 100-year history, it elevates Xi to the pantheon that heretofore included only Mao Zedong, who led the CCP to victory and ruled until his death in 1976, and Deng Xiaoping, who gained control shortly after Mao’s death and muscled through the economic and social reforms that transformed the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

Xi’s political sanctification process has been ongoing for some time. A few years ago,the CCP enshrined“Xi Jinping Thought” in the constitution, along with that of Mao. Officials were ordered to study the newly sacred word. The latest resolution claims thatthe PRC has“made historic achievements and undergone historic transformations” under Xi, resolving problems that others could not solve. The measure’s purpose is to prepare for Xi’s third term.According to Victor Shihof the University of California (San Diego): “He wants to really highlight his own contribution to the development of the party, that also will seal his legitimate rule over China in the foreseeable future.”

Xi’s role is presented as moving China forward. Mao, known asthe (first) Red Emperor, famously declared thatthe PRC had “stood up”after “the century of humiliation” at the hands of Western colonial powers. Next, Deng took the anti-Marxian position that theChinese people should“get rich.” Decades later, Xi shifted China’s direction again, extending CCP authority over nominally private business in the name ofcreating a fairer economy. (Thegelding of Alibaba’s Jack Maserved as a powerful warning to lesser business moguls.) The Chinese leader is offering abroader ongoing programto “get strong.”

To advance his agenda, Xi is rewriting history, munist leaders are wont to do. The Economist explains: “Mr. Xi’s predecessors used history differently in their resolutions. In 1945 Mao justified a purge of his enemies, blaming them for past mistakes so he could position himself as the unquestioned leader. In 1981 Deng’s resolution said that Mao had made serious mistakes and that the Cultural Revolution of 1966-76 had been a ‘grave blunder,’ causing chaos. By criticizing Mao, albeit cautiously, Deng rebuilt public support for the party and freed his hand to pursue free-market reforms.”

Now Xi is trending a bit closer to Mao, though without the latter’s unpredictable mania for chaos, and away from Deng, mitted to retain the essentials of a market system. What will not change is the PRC’s relentless determination to ignore its terrible totalitarian disasters. Beijing has emerged as a great power because of what Xi refuses to admit: the dramatic dismantlement of Mao’s legacy.

In February the party issued a new historical airbrush. As The Economist describes it: “It touches only briefly on the Cultural Revolution. It does not mention the famine caused by the Great Leap Forward that killed tens of millions, nor any casualties in the crushing of the pro-democracy protests at Tiananmen Square in 1989. The section on Mr. Xi’s tenure takes up more than a quarter of the book. Mr. Xi’s predecessors, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, are given much less space.”

The CCP turned 100 earlier this year. There are four critical phases of Chinese history that the party consistently falsifies. The first is the conduct of the war. munists were interested in power, not people. Frank Dikötter writes this ofthe CCP’s military campaign: “To conquer key cities in the industrial northeast, manders laid siege to civilian populations. ‘Turn Changchun into a city of death,’ proclaimed Lin Biao, one of Mao’s most successful strategists, in 1948. By the time the metropolis fell five terrible months later, 160,000 batants had died of starvation.”

Although Mao proclaimed the new PRC government on October 1, 1949, power still had to be consolidated across the world’s most populous yet largely rural nation. During this time,Dikötter explains, millions were murdered and millions more imprisoned as part of campaigns against “landlords,” “counter-revolutionaries,” and others. Mao was intent on destroying preexisting relationships, writes Dikötter, “so that nothing would stand between the people and the party. … Nobody was to stand on the sidelines. Everybody was to have blood on their hands.”

The next critical period came in 1958, the“Great Leap Forward.”Mao, an intellectual who knew little about farming merce, was determined to simultaneously collectivize the former and industrialize the latter. The result was almost beyond description, theHolodomor in Ukraine, only tenfold.The result wasruinous famine, economic failure, and mass starvation. munism revealed itself at its worst: a callous, distant party elite, whose members ate and lived well and engaged in social engineering enforced by the power to detain, torture, and execute. Accounts of the time aresimultaneously horrifying, mind-numbing, and enraging. Estimates of resulting deaths range up to 46 million.

The final mad Mao campaign was the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. This campaign was triggered by his eclipse. Pushed aside after the cataclysmic Great Leap Forward, heforced his way back into powerby triggeringa furorofambitious revenge, ideological purification, party purge, social collapse, and civil war.The eternal imageof the Cultural Revolution is that of frenzied “Red Guards” waving Mao’s little Red Book, often brutalizing and killing “capitalist roaders” and others deemed to be mitted to the revolution. Millions, including Liu Shaoqi, the country’s president, whom Mao blamed for pushing the “Great Helmsman” aside, were imprisoned, tortured, and/or murdered. The human horror ended only on Mao’s death in 1976 and the subsequent purge of his chief acolytes, most notably theGang of Four.

Even though Mao’s political heirs agreed on ending his reign of terror, they bitterly fought for control, during which Deng, oft purged and rehabilitated under Mao, gained predominance. Since Mao could not easily be written out of Chinese history, the CCPpronounced his record to be 70% good, a judgment embodied in theparty’s 1981 historical resolution. That for someone responsible for tens of millions of deaths, 65 millionaccording totheBlack Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Some estimates go even higher. Yet Mao’s visage currently graces the PRC’s currency, his picture adorns the Gate of Heavenly Peace in Tiananmen Square, andhis mausoleum dominates Tiananmen. Although his continuedpublic presenceoffendsmany Chinese, Xi has moved Mao closer to his previous saintly status andpunished criticismof munist icon.

The final tragedy airbrushed from Chinese history is the 1989 massacre of protesters demanding political liberalization. Although the students in Tiananmen Square received the greatest attention, the protests were widespread andincluded workersas well. The ewas a close-run affair, as Deng ousted two successive party chairmen for being relative liberals. The purge that followed was fearsome, thoughthe China that emerged, while authoritarian, did not return to Maoism. The latter process had to wait another three decadesfor Xiand his rewrite of Chinese history.

Xi Jinping can manipulate the past, but he cannot control the future. Indeed, opposition to his rebirth as the second Red Emperorhas proved sufficientforXi to denouncehis critics. He will not rule forever, and on his departure from office, through retirement, death, or purge, his legacy might be speedily dismantled. With Xi falling far short of Mao or Deng in importance—he has created little more than a personal dictatorship, despite his ostentatious self-adulation—there might be a rush to airbrush “Xi Jinping Thought” out of politics and the constitution. That could revive support for moving toward a more liberal society.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
One More Reason the Government Shouldn’t Subsidize Ethanol
Excerpts from Clifford Krauss’ article in the New York Times (cross-posted at )… The ethanol boom of recent years — which spurred a frenzy of distillery construction, record corn prices, rising food prices and hopes of a new future for rural America — may be fading. Only last year, farmers here spoke of a biofuel gold rush, and they rejoiced as prices for ethanol and the corn used to produce it set records. panies and farm cooperatives have built so...
C.S. Lewis vs. Sigmund Freud
Awhile back, I finished reading Armand Nicholi’s book, The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life. Dr. Nicholi is an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard and has taught a seminar on Freud & Lewis at Harvard for the past 35 years. The course eventually led to this book and a PBS series by the same name. The book is an interesting read for anyone modestly interested in one or...
The Uniqueness of Christian Ecology – Abundance
"Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will they go among so many?" [John 6:9] Among all the many good things going on last weekend in Boise, I (and a few others) noticed something a bit disconcerting. The way many of the topics were covered shows how prone Christians are to being consumed by doom and gloom messages of scarcity and lack and overpopulation and an "ever smaller earth." While it’s...
Patterson Stops Too Short In Jena Six New York Times Piece
Orlando Patterson, professor of sociology at Harvard University, penned a challenging piece on Jena 6 and our current racial tensions. I have learned much from Patterson over the years. For example, he was the first person to help me realize that we often confuse issues of race and class in America by assuming the race as the single variable accounting for the cyclical plight of poor blacks. In a September 30th New York Times op-ed piece Patterson rightly says that...
Mugabe: Rotten from the Start
An interesting article in the Los Angeles Times detailing how badly wrong Robert Mugabe’s supporters in the West have been from the very beginning (requires “free” registration; may I suggest BugMeNot?): From the beginning of his political career, Mugabe was not just a Marxist but one who repeatedly made clear his intention to run Zimbabwe as an authoritarian, one-party state. Characteristic of this historical revisionism is former Newsweek southern Africa correspondent Joshua Hammer, writing recently in the liberal Washington Monthly...
GodblogCon 2007
The Acton Institute is a sponsor of this year’s Godblogcon, a conference that “will equip you with a working knowledge of new media technologies and its impact on society, empowering your ministry to employ quickly and easily new media technologies to engage culture for the cause of Christ.” GodblogCon 2007 will be in Las Vegas on November 8-9. Blogging luminaries like Joe Carter, La Shawn Barber, and Al Mohler will be speaking, and the conference will also be a part...
Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South
Related to last week’s post about Reformed education and Pentecostalism, I point you to this post by Rod Dreher, who discusses his interview with Josiah Idowu-Fearon, the Anglican Archbishop of Kaduna state in Nigeria. Dreher relates the following: Pentecostalism is growing like wildfire, but there’s less to it than you might think. He said that in many cases, people are drawn to the emotional experience, and can tell you exactly when they gave their life to Jesus — but can’t...
Faith, Funding, and Substance Abuse
Why might there be “increasing participation by religious organizations in offering substance abuse treatment funded by federal government vouchers”? Perhaps because, at least in part, “A program’s faith element relates to the people they serve and the type of help they provide, as programs with more explicit and mandatory faith-related elements are likely to be substance-abuse programs.” Thus, the more explicitly faith-filled substance abuse programs will increasingly face a special temptation to take federal funds for such purposes. And this...
Two Perspectives on Climate Change
These two brief essays provide a good juxtaposition of two perspectives that view immediate and mandated action to reduce carbon emissions as either morally obligatory or imprudent. For the former, see Vaclav Havel’s, “Our Moral Footprint,” which states rhetorically, “It is also obvious from published research that human activity is a cause of change; we just don’t know how big its contribution is. Is it necessary to know that to the last percentage point, though? By waiting for incontrovertible precision,...
Reinhold Niebuhr, the Ecumenical Movement, and a Global Government
Perhaps not from its inception, but certainly in the post-WWII era, the global Christian ecumenical movement, as represented by groups like the World Council of Churches, the Lutheran World Federation, and the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, has been increasingly dominated by Marxist economics, liberation theology, and transformationalist ethics. Much of this was mediated through the influence and work of Reinhold Niebuhr. Niebuhr in part observed the reality that since there was no single government above nation-states which could restrict...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved