Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘Worth More than Many Sparrows’
‘Worth More than Many Sparrows’
Mar 19, 2025 9:29 AM

“Animals are less valuable than human beings,” says John Martin, Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine at University College London (UCL). This seemingly uncontroversial statement is under fire, as Helene Guldberg at sp!ked writes, “There seems to be an emerging consensus within the munity that we should reject the philosophical outlook that says humans are ‘categorically superior’ to animals.”

Keith Burgess-Jackson, who blogs at The Conservative Philosopher, says he is “an egalitarian about interspecific value,” and passes along the following quote:

For many philosophers, the consideration that may loom largest here is the stubborn conviction that the lives of normal humans must be of greater value than the lives of many, if not all, nonhuman animals. Perhaps that conviction is unjustified; it has not yet been very satisfyingly defended. (David DeGrazia, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996], 248)

Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer is famous for equating the moral value of animals with newborn human beings, although he claims that “the aim of my argument is to elevate the status of animals rather than to lower the status of any humans” (Practical Ethics, p. 77).

In defending the position that humans are to be valued more than animals, Martin asks the right question: “What is a human being?” He argues that the answer “requires both a biological and a philosophical analysis – in tandem,” and that “what sets us apart from all other animals… is our ability to generate creative, abstract thought – ‘and with that, poetry, music and the social networks that bind us together’.” In this, Martin is partly right. But the answer to his question needs a theological as well as biological and philosophical analysis.

I’m not necessarily inclined to go the route that Martin does in claiming that abstract rational thought and creativity is what gives human unique moral value. After all, angels (and demons) presumably have far greater rational capacities than we humans. In this sense surely we are “a little lower than the heavenly beings” (Psalm 8:5 NIV). Even though angels have more powerful intellects, God seems to place a higher value on human beings, “For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham’s descendants” (Hebrews 2:16 NIV). It may well be that there are other created beings, including angels, that surpass human abilities in the areas of creative abstract thought, and thus I do not believe Martin’s proposed basis for the valuation of human beings is adequate.

Instead, the dignity and value of the human person must be based on the recognition that human beings are created in the image of God, the imago Dei (Genesis 1:26). When God makes his covenant with Noah, it is to this image that he refers when delineating the norms of justice: “And from each man, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man. Whoever sheds the blood of man, / by man shall his blood be shed; / for in the image of God / has God made man” (Genesis 9:5-6 NIV). The image of God has often been taken to include the rational and creative faculties as well as the social munal aspects of human nature to which Martin refers, but is not limited to these features.

Whatever it means for human beings to be made in God’s image, this is what separates us from all other creatures, whether plant, animal, or angelic. This is the unique defining characteristic of what it means to be human, and is relevant despite whatever other similarities or differences we might share with other created beings.

This is not to say that animals therefore have no value, but only that their value is relative to that of human beings. All of Martin’s conclusions, such as that vivisections are necessary and morally praiseworthy, do not necessarily follow from the premise that humans are of greater value than animals. In this sense, Singer is right to argue against plete devaluation of animal life, even if his solution of equating human and animal value is wrongheaded.

The Bible teaches a relative hierarchy of created life, with plants at the bottom, having a primarily instrumental value as food for beings with the breath of life. Animals possess the “breath of life” and therefore have some non-instrumental value of their own. This is why even when God instrumentalizes animal life in Genesis 9, there are still limits placed on human dominion in this area: “But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it” (Genesis 9:4 NIV). All this has important implications for animal research, especially human-animal hybrid, or chimera, research.

Human beings are not properly valued when animals are simply equated with human life, but neither are animals rightly viewed pletely stripped of some measure of independent dignity, albeit relatively less than that of human life. After all, as Jesus says, we are “worth more than many sparrows” (Matthew 10:31 NIV).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Gerald Zandstra takes leave from Acton
Rev. Gerald Zandstra, director of programs at the Acton Institute, has taken a leave of absence to enter the race for the U.S. Senate. This story quotes Jerry, and sizes up the campaign. ...
Good intentions aren’t enough
Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Frank Beckmann today on Detroit-based WJR about faith and politics, emphasizing the proper role of religion in society as providing a solid moral foundation with which to approach political, social, economic decisions. Sirico also talks with the emergence of what Pope Benedict XVI refers to as the dictatorship of relativism – an idea which views the expression of religion as an impedance on liberty – and suggests an understanding of the integration between faith and...
Mayorial mischief
In a row over the Freedom of Information Act, Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick‘s administration has finally acknowledged expense information first requested by media outlets nearly two years ago. According to the Detroit Free Press, documents were turned over last month, “But in dozens of instances, pages were missing, or information on the city-supplied records was blacked out.” Now that the Free Press has obtained unedited plete copies of the parison of the two sets of papers shows, “The information blacked...
E-Libraries
A story in the Sunday New York Times highlighted the move of the undergraduate library at the University of Texas at Austin to a predominantly electronic collection. mon reference materials like dictionaries will remain in hard copy, all other stacks of books “will be dispersed to other university collections to clear space for a 24-hour electronic mons, a fast-spreading phenomenon that is transforming research and study on campuses around the country.” This move should not be taken as indicative of...
Complexities of government funding
Thorny issues arise when non-profits take government funding, especially when said non-profits have an explicitly Christian (and evangelistic) purpose. Case in point: “The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit yesterday against the Department of Health and Human Services, accusing the Bush administration of spending federal tax dollars on an abstinence education program that promotes Christianity,” aka Silver Ring Thing. I first heard about the Silver Ring Thing via a special documentary broadcast on NPR, “With This Ring: Pledging Abstinence.” All...
‘Differences between being an Evangelical and being a Republican’
An excellent reflection on the role of Christianity and its relation to political loyalties from Joe Carter at the evangelical outpost (no longer online). The key conclusion: “As a fellow traveler of the GOP, I find myself walking side by side with the party toward the same goals. But at other times our paths will diverge and I must follow where my conscience as a Christian conservative leads me. After all, to stand with Christ means that I can’t always...
The smoking culture
This story from The Boston Globe (via Arts & Letters Daily) relects on the changing place of tobacco in contemporary American society. The efforts of various municipalities and anti-smoking activists have largely managed to turn the cigarette into a symbol of knavery rather than gentry. As A.S. Hamrah recounts, “Smokers were once thought to make the best conversationalists, the best soldiers, even the best husbands.” The merits of tobacco have been celebrated, for example, by J.R.R. Tolkien in his Lord...
Freaks and chimeras
My more detailed response to last week’s NYT editorial defending chimera research is posted over at WorldMagBlog. ...
The President’s council on bioethics
Here’s a list of the current members of the President’s Council on Bioethics, whose interest area is sure to e more and more important ing years, courtesy The Thing Is. ...
Who wants the EU?
Political leaders in Europe who have tied their fortunes to the creation of the new EU superstate are now dismissing the growing sentiment against the metastasizing, power-hungry bureaucracy in Brussels as “whims of changing opinion polls or referendums.” That’s from German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who finds it increasingly difficult to bully his countrymen into the deal. Here’s how a story in Der Spiegel describes the mood of voters: Citizens are quickly ing wary of the transfer of power to a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved