Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Work as holy war: The spiritual power of a cruciform economics
Work as holy war: The spiritual power of a cruciform economics
Dec 28, 2025 8:14 AM

With the emergence of the faith-work movement, we’ve seen great strides in helping Christians connect their daily work with their spiritual calling, leading many to shift their attitudes and actions when es to economic stewardship.

But as we rightly relish in our renewed understanding of the spiritual value of work and vocation, do we recognize the spiritual warfare that it actually involves? It’s one thing to say “God cares about our work.” It’s another to believe that He wields it as a weapon in battle against Satan himself.

In a new series at the Green Room, Greg Forster points our imaginations in this direction, calling work unto God an act of “holy war,” based in part on 1 John 3:8: “The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.”

“He won the victory for us on the cross, of course,” Forster writes. “But as our work es cruciform it es a vehicle of the cross’ power, a weapon in Christ’s hands, forged for the holy war…Our work works out of Jesus’ work to destroy the devil’s work.”

In his first few posts, Forster explains the basis for all this, beginning with God’s restoration of the human heart and the broader reconciliation of human relationships. In the latest, he applies this more directly to our work. Relying on definitions from Dallas Willard and Lester DeKoster, Forster reminds us that, for the Christian, work is fundamentally an act of service — of making ourselves useful to others, whether they be customers and coworkers or those who we support in our families and households.

According to Forster, this basic mindset and lifestyle of radical service is what constitutes and distinguishes a Christian’s economic action when es to spiritual battle:

Why is service to others at the center of attention? Because that is what makes work a primary force for justice and reclaiming the world from Satan. Working to serve yourself is fine but it doesn’t distinguish us from the world as such. Working to serve others does.

Of course, one may reply that worldly people also serve others with their work. That is God’s sustaining grace to the fallen world, by which he keeps the image and likeness of God from being erased by our sin. So we must take care to distinguish mere participation in service to others (which may have any motivation) with a really intentional service to others.

This is why the intentionality of instrumentality is so important. The question is, how high a priority do you give to serving others as opposed to serving yourself?

Intentionality is critical. Just because work and economic exchange are part of God’s divine plan doesn’t mean that we ought to blindly proceed with little thought or concern, so long as “needs are being met.”

Throughout the faith-work movement, there’s plenty of talk about “finding meaning in the mundane,” and rightly so. Yet when we look at our work through the lens of spiritual warfare, we also begin to see that the mundane rhythms of daily work have just as much potential to be meaningfully dark.

As Forster explains, much of this depends on the ways in which we work and how we orient our hearts, not just our hands.

If we work to serve others for the sake of what we get out of it, we are advancing the kingdom of darkness — even if “what we get out of it” is not something crass and materialistic, like money or power, but something more cultured and refined, like self-expression, or even the advancing of a good cause that we like for worldly reasons.

If we work for the good of others for the sake of the good of others, we are reclaiming the world from Satan.

Forster is keen to note that service to “others” is not enough in and of itself. “Ultimately we must serve God with our work,” he explains. “He is the first and last and most important ‘other’ to be served.”

Indeed, in our daily work this is the actual power and these are the actual implications behind the message of work as service to neighbor and God. Whether we’re negotiating a trade, starting a business, inventing or assembling a widget, cleaning a building, cooking a meal, parenting a child, or teaching a second-grade classroom, the underlying spiritual battle continues, whether we choose to see it or not.

“One is lifted by the Spirit over the chasm between the kingdom of self and the kingdom of God, or else not,” Forster concludes. “And every moment of every day on the job is another choice between kingdoms.”

Image:Satan before the Lord,Corrado Giaquinto

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Dunn, Oikonomia, and Assault Weapons: Misappropriating a Principle?
Update (1/31/2013): David Dunn Responds to my post, Fr. Gregory’s post, and others: here. Original post: David J. Dunn yesterday wrote an interesting piece arguing for a ban on assault weapons from an Orthodox Christian perspective (here). First of all, I am happy to see any timely Orthodox engagement with contemporary social issues and applaud the effort. Furthermore, I respect his humility, as his bio statement reads: “his views reflect the diversity of Orthodox opinion on this issue, not any...
Canons and Guns: An Eastern Orthodox Response to a HuffPo Writer
Several of my friends on Facebook pages posted a link to David Dunn’s Huffington Post essay on gun control (An Eastern Orthodox Case for Banning Assault Weapons). As Dylan Pahman posted earlier today, Dunn, an Eastern Orthodox Christian, is to mended for bringing the tradition of the Orthodox Church into conversation with contemporary issues such as gun control. As a technical matter, to say nothing for the credibility of his argument, it would be helpful if he understood the weapons...
The Academy’s Rage Against Capitalism
Over at Ricochet, Peter Robinson broaches the oft asked question about intellectuals and their disdain and rage against capitalism. Robinson unearthed Robert Nozick’s, “Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?” Nozick declared, The schools, too, exhibited and thereby taught the principle of reward in accordance with (intellectual) merit. To the intellectually meritorious went the praise, the teacher’s smiles, and the highest grades. In the currency the schools had to offer, the smartest constituted the upper class. Though not part of the official...
Review: Theodore Dalrymple on ‘Becoming Europe’
Theodore Dalrymple, contributing editor of the City Journal and Dietrich Weissman Fellow of the Manhattan Institute, has recently reviewed Samuel Gregg’s new book, ing Europe at the Library of Law and Liberty. Dalrymple observes: In this well-written book, Samuel Gregg explains what can only be called the dialectical relationship between the interests of the European political class and the economic beliefs and wishes of the population as a whole. The population is essentially fearful; it wants to be protected from...
Business Entrepreneur Focuses on Catholic Education
Frank Hanna III, CEO of Hanna Capital, LLC, has made Catholic education a special focus. In an interview with the National Catholic Register, Hanna spoke of the challenges, changes and reasons to champion religious education: The more I looked into the issues of society, the more I became convinced that a lot of our societal failings happen much sooner; so much of the foundation of our failure was happening in our educational system. And that’s what actually got me thinking...
Subsidiarity ‘From Above’ and ‘From Below’
I have wrapped up a brief series on the principle of subsidiarity over at the blog of the journal Political Theology with a post today, “Subsidiarity ‘From Below.'” You can check out the previous post, “Subsidiarity ‘From Above,'” as well as my introductory primer on the topic as well. For those who might be interested in reading some more, you can also download some related papers: “State, Church, and the Reformational Roots of Subsidiarity” and “A Society of Mutual Aid:...
Crisis and Constitution: Hitler’s Rise to Power
In March 1933, through various political maneuvers, Adolf Hitler successfully suppressed Communist, Socialist, and Catholic opposition to a proposed “Enabling Act,” which allowed him to introduce legislation without first going through parliament, thus by-passing constitutional review. The act would give the German executive branch unprecedented power. “Hitler’s rise to power is a sobering story of how a crisis and calls for quick solutions can tempt citizens and leaders to subvert the rule of law and ignore a country’s constitutional safeguards,”...
Makers, Takers, and Representation without Taxation
The American minister Jonathan Mayhew (October 8, 1720 – July 9, 1766) is credited with coining the phrase “No taxation without representation.”My review of Nicholas Eberstadt’s A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic appears in the current issue of The City(currently available in print). Eberstadt makes some important points about the sustainability of our society given current trends in our national polity. The most salient feature, contends Eberstadt, is that “the United States is at the verge of a symbolic...
Samuel Gregg: The RJ Moeller Show and ‘Becoming Europe’
Acton’s Director of Research and author ing Europe, Samuel Gregg, was featured yesterday on The RJ Moeller Show. Gregg talked about America’s drift towards “social democracy” and other economic themes in his new book; Moeller gives more detail at this post at Values & Capitalism. Click on the audio link below to hear the show. [audio: ...
Does the Generosity of Black Americans Explain the Racial Wealth Gap?
One of the most astounding economic statistics is the wealth gap between black and white Americans. According to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data from 2009, the total wealth (assets minus debts) of the typical black household was $5,677 while the typical white household had $113,149. Why is the median wealth of white households 20 times that of black households? Plummeting house values were the principal cause, says Pew Research. Among white homeowners, the decline was from $115,364...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved