Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
WiFi and Other Inalienable Human Rights
WiFi and Other Inalienable Human Rights
Jan 28, 2026 2:22 PM

When you think about basic human rights, what is the first thing es to mind? The right to life? The right to liberty? The right to WiFi?

If that last one wasn’t on your list it may be a sign that you’re old. As Maryland governor Martin O’Malley recently told CNN, young people today believe that “WiFi is a human right.” O’Malley apparently agrees, adding that, “There is an opportunity there for us as a nation to embrace that new perspective.”

While I’ll concede that WiFi may be a basic human need (it’s certainly on the list of my own hierarchy of needs), it’s hard to see why it would be a human right. A human right is generally considered a right that is inalienable and fundamental and to which a person is inherently entitled simply because they are a human being. Are we really entitled to WiFi simply because we’re human?

While it’s easy to mock O’Malley’s claim, it does raise the question of just what exactly does qualify as a human right.

In a world where few people can agree on anything, it’s not surprising that there is no clear consensus on what constitutes a human right. About the closest the world has e to unanimity on the issue is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948.

Below I’ve individually broken out each of the rights listed by the UN as fundamental to all humanity. Before looking at the list, though, take a guess at how many of rights you expect to see on the list.

According to the UDHR, all humans have the right,

To life.To liberty.To security of person.To be free from slavery.To be free from involuntary servitude.To be free from torture.To be free from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.To recognition everywhere as a person before the law.To equal protection of the law.To an effective remedy by petent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.To not be subject to arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile.To a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal.To be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which one has had all the guarantees necessary for one’s defense.To be free from arbitrary interference with one’s privacy, family, home, or correspondence.To be free from attacks upon one’s honor and reputation.To the protection of the law against such interference or attacks upon’s one’s privacy, honor, or reputation.To freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.To leave any country, including one’s own.To return to one’s country.To seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.To a nationality.To change one’s nationality.To marryTo found a family.To free and full consent in choosing one’s spouse.To own property alone as well as in association with others.To be free from being arbitrarily deprived of one’s property.To freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.To change one’s religion or belief.To manifest, either alone or munity with others and in public or private, one’s religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance.To freedom of opinion and expression.To seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media.To freedom of peaceful assembly and association.To be free pulsion to belong to an association.To take part in the government of one’s country.To equal access of public services in one’s country.To a secure society.To work.To free choice of employment.To just and favorable conditions of work.To protection against unemployment.To equal pay for equal work.To just and favorable remuneration ensuring for himself and one’s family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.To form and to join trade unions for the protection of one’s interests.To rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.To a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of one’s family, including food, clothing, housing, medical care, and necessary social services.To security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond one’s control.To free elementary education.To equal access of higher education based on merit.To choose the kind of education that shall be given to one’s children.To participate in the cultural life of munity.To enjoy the arts.To share in scientific advancement and its benefits.To the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary, or artistic production of which he is the author.To a social and international order in which human rights and freedoms can be fully realized.

Are there any rights you think shouldn’t have been included? And what inalienable rights — other than WiFi — do you think are missing from the list?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bono, Babel, and the Myth of Economist as Savior
Bono, lead singer of U2 and co-founder of charity-group ONE, recently offered some positive words about the role of markets in reducing global poverty and spurring economic development (HT): The Irish singer and co-founder of ONE, a campaigning group that fights poverty and disease in Africa, said it had been “a humbling thing for me” to realize the importance of capitalism and entrepreneurialism in philanthropy, particularly as someone who “got into this as a righteous anger activist with all the...
Acton Commentary: Desiccated Christianity
“When Christian institutions attempt to mitigate promise this understanding of their mission–often as the result of the political pressure–they morph into shadowy versions of their former selves,” writes Rev. Robert A. Sirico.In this week’s Acton Commentary (published October 24), Rev. Sirico explains that by losing theChristological dimension,Christiancharitable work es essentially secular.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Desiccated Christianity byRev. Robert A. Sirico Mother Teresa was once asked...
Monks, Beer, and the Labor of their Hands
Fr. Z’s Blog has a great post highlighting the Benedictine Monks at Norcia and their new brew. Here is the motto from the Birra Nursia site. Wonderful stuff, really: plete harmony with the centuries old tradition, the monks of Norcia have sought to share with the world a product which came about in the very heart of the monastic life, one which reminds us of the goodness of creation and the potential that it contains. For the monks of Norcia,...
Is Religious Freedom a “Natural Right”?
Over at The Claremont Institute, Hadley Arkes considers whether religious freedom is a “natural right.” His exploration of the question is lengthy plex and, as with everything Prof. Arkes writes, worthy of serious consideration. Here is his conclusion: It may be jarring in some quarters to say it, but it is eminently reasonable to be a theist, and quite as reasonable to understand that not everything done in the name of religion and theism is reasonable and defensible. What else...
ResearchLinks – 10.26.12
Call for Papers: “Intellectual Property and Religious Thought” University of St. Thomas School of Law, April 5, 2013. The University of St. Thomas will hold a conference titled “Intellectual Property and Religious Thought,” on April 5, 2013, co-sponsored by the Terrence J. Murphy Institute for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy and The University of St. Thomas Law Journal. The conference will be held at the University of St. Thomas School of Law building in downtown Minneapolis. Call for Papers:...
A State That Co-opts and Crushes Civil Society?
John Zmirak, author and Editor-in-Chief of The Intercollegiate Review, wants voters to know exactly what is at stake in the looming Presidential election. In a guest blogger piece at the National Catholic Register, Zmirak pointedly states that the choice between the two candidates isn’t just about whose economic agenda seems more reasonable or who won which debate: …it’s about what America means: At heart of our Constitutional democracy is the freedom of individuals, even those with unpopular opinions, to pursue...
Equality of Opportunity vs. Sameness of Opportunity
Conservatives should embrace the cause of equality of opportunity, says David Azerrad, not sameness of opportunity. [W]e must not confuseequalityof opportunity withsamenessof opportunity. Equality of opportunity is a moral imperative and a requirement of just government. Spending money on programs that aim to expand opportunity for the poor is a charitable pursuit to which some may aspire but which government is not bound to deliver. Justice demands that we uphold the rule of law, secure the rights of all, and...
The Moral Paper Route
AEI recently held a contest challenging people to make a video that could articulate a moral case for free markets in two minutes or less. The $40,000 top prize was won by Jared Fuller with this entry, “The Moral Paper Route.” At AEI’s Values & Capitalism blog, Julia Thompson talks to Fuller about the making of the video. ...
Tracing the Logic of Liberalism
In the Western world there are conservative liberals, liberal liberals, and radical liberals, says David T. Koyzis, but all adhere to the basic principles of liberalism: The liberalism of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Of Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill. After all, the Declaration of Independence is a liberal document, unquestioningly accepting that popular consent stands at the origin of political authority. As Alasdair MacIntyre has put it, in the Western world there are conservative liberals, liberal liberals, and...
Samuel Gregg: Paul Ryan’s Way
Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, notes in a recent NRO article that vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan has avoided “emotivist nonsense” and presented a clear moral vision for our country. Among other things, Ryan, ever so politely but unambiguously, underlined the immense damage inflicted by sometimes well-intentioned government welfare programs upon those in need. Yet he did so in a manner that detailed the economic costs but also went beyond a narrowly materialist reckoning. Ryan pointed to the manifold ways...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved