Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Why you’re richer than you think (and Jeff Bezos is poorer)
Why you’re richer than you think (and Jeff Bezos is poorer)
Jan 8, 2026 10:58 PM

One of the most plaints against capitalism holds that real wages have stagnated since the 1970s. Meanwhile, CEOs such as Amazon’s Jeff Bezos earn more money than ever.

The charge surfaced as recently as the fourth Democratic presidential debate, last Tuesday. “As a result of taking away the rights of working people and organized labor, people haven’t had a raise – 90 percent of Americans have not had a raise for 40 years,” said Tom Steyer (whose earnings rank somewhat higher than average).

This dichotomy stokes our sense of moral outrage (and, were we honest, envy), especially given the behavior of certain high-profile CEOs. But this narrative is so tantalizing that few bother to ask the pivotal question: Is it true?

Are you better off than you were 4(0) years ago?

This is one of many cases in which it’s possible to lie with statistics. Even pure mathematics refuse to yield a straight answer. According to one measure of inflation, wages have only grown three percent since 1979, but using a different measure shows wages rising 15 percent.

But arithmetic does not capture the overall picture for a few reasons.

First, both measures exclude non-wage benefits like employer-provided health insurance or pension plans. These make up 31 percent of pensation today.

But this also fails to gauge real purchasing power. The point of e is to enable consumption. By many measures, wages go a lot further today than in the last days of disco.

Proof is as close as your microwave. Madsen Pirie of the Adam Smith Institute in London explains that the microwave was patented in 1945:

Raytheon originally called their cooker a “Radarange,” and produced early models weighing 750 lb and costing $5,000 (£56,000 in today’s money). Over the years the weight and the price came down, especially after the Japanese firm Sharp entered the market in 1961. Now the table-top device is ubiquitous, used for cooking and for reheating previously cooked foods.

A microwave in 1979 cost $400 (in 2015 dollars), which took 61 hours of work at the median wage. In 2015, the microwave cost $60 and could be purchased after three hours’ work. (You can still get it at that price today on Amazon.)

The same story holds true for a wide (forgive the pun) range of household appliances. Marian Tupy of the Cato Institute found that average prices for big-ticket items fell anywhere from 53 to 96 percent. The wonder of the market lowers costs while increasing production.

Technically, wages have been nearly static by some measures, but they purchase far more – a fact not captured by raw data. Taking that into account, wage growth looks far better than the narrative would have it.

What about Bezos?

On the other hand, Amazon owner Jeff Bezos may be a multi-billionaire, but his wealth rests on a more precarious foundation than most people believe.

Make no mistake: Bezos enjoys riches beyond the reach of most human beings. Bezos edged out Bill Gates and Warren Buffet atop the just-released Forbes 400list as the world’s richest man, with an estimated net worth of $114 billion. He’s wealthy enough that the $38 billion divorce settlement he paid this summer to his ex-wife, MacKenzie, catapulted her onto the Forbes list.

However, his wealth (and hers) exists mostly in the form of stock – specifically, stock in Amazon. As its stock price fluctuates, their wealth rises – or falls – in tandem.

There are additional troubles properly evaluating the true net wealth of stock holdings. This amusing video from the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) illustrates some of these:

Christians should care because, to get a true picture of economic activity, we must use “a perfect and just measure” (Deuteronomy 25:15).

ehrmann. This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved