Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Why the media lynched the Covington kids (and why they’ll do it again)
Why the media lynched the Covington kids (and why they’ll do it again)
Jan 24, 2026 9:54 PM

No one following the news could have missed the media’s misguided hysteria over students from Covington Catholic High School allegedly surrounding and taunting an American Indian activist. However, not only was the erroneous feeding frenzy – which included incitement to violence against minors – predictable, but its repetition is inevitable.

On Saturday, a story went viral that the previous day the Covington kids, wearing MAGA hats, had left the March for Life only to barge into the Indigenous People’s March and humiliate American Indian activist Nathan Phillips by chanting, “Build that wall!” A short video segment seemed to show a young man “smirking” in Phillips’ face.

The minors were immediately denounced by leftist media outlets but also by pro-life advocates, National Review – even their own school administration and diocese.

Then more video footage came to light, and a fuller picture emerged. A YouTube video recording more than an hour before the encounter shows that Phillips approached the minors, not vice-versa. The children had chanted spirit songs from their Catholic high school in Kentucky; no footage contains any chant for a border wall.

And the kids chanted to drown out hate, not to engage in it. They had been the victims of railing racial and religious slurs hurled at them by a hate group known as the Black Hebrew Israelites. The anti-Semitic sect – which believes blacks are God’s Chosen People, a mirror image of the twisted Christian Identity movement – called the Pope a pedophile and used racial stereotypes against the Kentucky schoolchildren.

The media appear to have gotten the story precisely backwards.

Here are the reasons why the media and cultural influencers jumped to the worst possible conclusions about Catholic schoolchildren – and why it will happen again.

1. The Catholic students are losers at internationality/identity politics. Endless denunciations of the teenagers, festooned with discussion of “privilege,” reveal a vital truth: In the intersectional lexicon, Christian males from non-diverse rural areas are the bottom of the ladder. Having imbibed a steady diet of anti-Western identity politics from their undergraduate days, journalists needed no reflection to discern the heroes and villains. The story virtually wrote itself. A CNN contributor even saddled the children with the entire collective guilt of segregation:

The MAGA-hat wearing Covington Catholic High School students mocking Elder Nathan Phillips at the Indigenous Peoples March in Washington are direct descendants of the white privilege that empowered white kids to mock Elizabeth Eckford at Little Rock Central High School in 1957. /tQroBf6aPb

— Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) January 19, 2019

After the story became murkier, The Washington Post published an article on “The Catholic Church’s shameful history of Native American abuses.” (If Roman Catholics are hostile to indigenous peoples, it e as news to St. Kateri Tekakwitha.) The message was clear: Even if the Church Militant didn’t do anything to deserve punishment this time, undoubtedly the Church Triumphant had. Condemning innocent Catholics would right the scales of historical injustice.

Now most critics have belatedly acknowledged that, whatever excesses or misjudgments these teens and their chaperones may have made in their response, they did nothing that equaled the torrent of abuse and intimidation rained upon them.

But this confession will do nothing to prevent future internet lynch mobs rushing to judgment, because there is no sign the cultural elites have jettisoned the identity politics that provoked their prejudiced responses in the first place.

Culturally predisposed to look down on young, conservative Kentuckians, they merely assume they missed the mark this time. They would do well to reflect on C.S. Lewis, who warned against judging based on anything other than deserts. To condition our reaction to others on anything other than their behavior is the opposite of justice. It is doubly ironic that the story broke on a weekend when the nation honors the man who insisted people be judged “not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

2. It reflected badly on Catholic schools and Christian education in general. The Covington showdown came as the Left engaged in one of its more public spats with Catholic or private Christian education (if not a prolonged war with Catholicism and Christianity itself).

Just days earlier, the media condemned Second Lady Karen Pence for teaching at a Christian school whose sin lies in its virtue: It demands that all students and teachers believe in Jesus and model biblical morality. The New York Times described this as an institution that “bars LGBT students and teachers,” and the hashtag #ExposeChristianSchools trended.

Prior to that, the media sought to portray Brett Kavanaugh as the misogynistic product of Catholic schools suffused with patriarchy. After the Covington event, Anne Helen Petersen, a writer at BuzzFeed, explicitly linked the two on Twitter:

One theme of the conversations over the past 24 hours = how deeply familiar this look is. It’s the look of white patriarchy, of course, but that familiarity — that banality — is part of what prompts the visceral reaction. This isn’t spectacular. It’s life in America. /TmziDwAjYA

— Anne Helen Petersen (@annehelen) January 21, 2019

Catholic schools are inconvenient for statists for numerous reasons: They demonstrate the ings of public schools; they teach traditional values; and if they are faithful to their Church’s teachings, they oppose socialism. With Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez elevated to the status of cultural icon, – they must be discredited – even if Catholic publications such as America publish AOC’s writings without qualification. The Covington video gave the cultural Left a chance to demean Catholic schools and the Left did not let it go to waste.

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Leftists will continue to war with Christians as long as they proclaim that there is a higher law than that enforced by government, even if this is less than honest.

3. It undermined the inalienable right to life. Recognizing the innate human dignity of all life is the cornerstone of Western civilization. Cultural leftists may begin by undermining the right to property but inevitably support encroaching the right to life. From their perspective, it came as a serendipity that this occurred at the March for Life, the largest demonstration on behalf of the inalienable right to life.

Actress Alyssa Milano applied the kids’ purported prejudice to the pro-life movement as a whole:

Let’s not forget—this entire event happened because a group of boys went on a school-sanctioned trip to protest against a woman’s right to her own body and reproductive healthcare. It is not debatable that bigotry was at play from the start.

— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) January 21, 2019

Bigotry ruled the day – against Christians whose school taught the pillars of Western civilization and human flourishing. History shows that those who oppose Christian values and inalienable rights will use any cudgel to beat Christians, literally and figuratively. Those inculcated in intersectionality will readily repeat these poorly sourced charges. And as long as our present cultural darkness reigns, bias will blight the lives of young, innocent, non-favored people again and again.

Caveat lector.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Victor Claar on whether Trump’s budget is un-Christian
Victor Claar speaks at Acton University On Saturday, Victor Claar, Professor of Economics at Henderson State University and Affiliate Scholar at the Acton Institute, joins host Julie Roys and Jenny Eaton Dyer of Hope Through Healing Hands on Moody Radio’sUp For Debateto discuss how Christians should respond to President Trump’s first budget proposal, especially as it relates to proposed cuts in US foreign aid. Dyer argues that Christians should be deeply concerned about the proposed cuts, while Claar argues that...
Marine Le Pen’s economics unite populist Right and far-Left
Emmanuel Macron may have won the first round of the French presidential elections on Sunday, but Marine Le Pen won a political victory of her own. The statist undercurrent running through her nationalist and populist policies successfully bridged the gap between France’s “far-Right” and socialist Left, according to Marco Respinti in a new essay for Religion & Liberty Transatlantic. Mainstream French politicians have sought bine disparate ideological strands since at least Charles de Gaulle, who presented his foreign policy as...
Acton books distributed to schools by Theological Book Network
The Acton Institute recently donated a number of titles on faith, work, and economics to the Theological Book Network which will distribute them to its partner institutions in what it calls the ‘Majority World’ (‘Majority World’ is a term coined to replace earlier sometimes anachronistic or misleading terms like ‘Third World’ or ‘Developing World’). The Theological Book Network is a Grand Rapids based non-profit, mitted to the creation and development of Majority World leaders by providing access to educational resources...
Samuel Gregg on the fracturing of France
With the first round of the French election results in, and no major candidates even managing to get a quarter of the total votes, two candidates remain: Marine Le Pen of the National Front, a populist and nationalist party, and Emmanuel Macron, the center-Left candidate of the “En Marche!” (“On Our Way”) political party. Samuel Gregg covers the current politically disjointed state of Francein a new article for First Things. He maintains an attitude of skepticism and uncertainty towards France’s...
Why J.D. Vance is bringing venture capital to the Rust Belt
As Americans continue to face the disruptive effects of economic change, whether from technology, trade, or globalization, many have wondered how we might preserve or revivethe regions that have suffered most. For progressives and populists alike, the solutions are predictably focused on a menu of government interventions, from trade barriers to wage minimums to salary caps to a range of regulatory constraints. For conservatives and libertarians, the debate has less to do with policy and more to do with the...
More than compassion needed for Europe’s refugees
“Irrespective of the political forces at play,” says Trey Dimsdale in this week’s Acton Commentary, “there is no arguing with the fact that such a large number of displaced immigrants presents a monumental humanitarian crisis in which survival es the initial, but not final, concern.” Prior to 2014, fewer than 300,000 refugees and migrants arrived in the European Union each year. Due to war and unrest in the Middle East and North Africa, that relatively slow trickle more than quadrupled...
Taxes on unhealthy food do nothing but hurt the poor
Throughout history, societies have found peculiar ways to reinforce social hierarchies and class-based discrimination. mon way is to prohibit certain social classes from being able to purchase a good. These types of laws that regulate permitted consumption of particular goods and services are known as sumptuary laws. A prime example is the 16th-century French law that banned anyone but princes from wearing velvet. Modern America is mitted to the appearance of egalitarianism to make laws that directly ban poor people...
Price Controls and Communism
Note: This is post #30 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What happens when price controls are used munist countries? As Alex Tabarrok explains, all of the effects of price controls e amplified: there are even more shortages or surpluses of goods, lower product quality, longer lines and more search costs, more losses in gains from trade, and more misallocation of resources. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5...
Remembering Kate O’Beirne
Longtime Acton Institute friend and supporter Kate O’Beirne passed away this past weekend. Below are Father Robert Sirico’s thoughts on this plished woman: I feel like I have always known Kate O’Beirne, so the passing of this woman of keen intellect, sharp wit and fearless rhetoric in confronting the nostrums of our day leaves me feeling very, very sad. It is painfully sad to think that the occasions of sharing National Review cruises or panel discussions with her or having...
Humans care about economic fairness, not economic inequality
A new study published in the science journal Nature Human Behaviour finds that in most situation people are unconcerned about economic inequality as long as distributions of wealth are fair: There is immense concern about economic inequality, both among the munity and in the general public, and many insist that equality is an important social goal. However, when people are asked about the ideal distribution of wealth in their country, they actually prefer unequal societies. We suggest that these two...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved