Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Why great men are almost always bad men
Why great men are almost always bad men
May 1, 2026 5:18 PM

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is the most famous quote by the English Catholic historian Sir John Dalberg-Acton. But what exactly did he mean by it?

That particular es from a letter to Bishop Creighton in which Lord Acton explains that historians should condemn murder, theft, and violence mitted by an individual, the state, or the Church. Here is the context:

I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. s, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.

Here are the greatest names coupled with the greatest crimes; you would spare those criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice, still more, still higher for the sake of historical science.

Lord Acton is saying that rather than excuse “great men” because of the burdens placed upon them by their office or authority, we should judge them even more harshly than we would actions of mon man or woman. It’s ironic that Acton had to tell this to a bishop since the Bible has quite a lot to say about abuse of power. Yet even Christian tend to thinkthat we are immune to the temptations of power and that if we were give more authoritywe wouldn’t abuse it.

Haveyou ever imagined what you’d do if you were made ruler of the world (or at least a small country)? Your first inclination is likely to be to use your power as a benign dictator to enact positive reforms that would make everyone better off. So why don’t actual rulers do the same? Why don’t they act in a rationals ways like we would if we had their power?

The main reason, asCGP Grey explains in this clever video, is that no person can rule alone. Because of that, rulers(and powerful people in general) have incentives to use—and abuse—their power in ways that tend to lead to corruption.

(If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed. You can adjust the speed at which the video plays by clicking on “Settings” (the gear symbol) and changing “Speed” from normal to 1.25, 1.5 or 2.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Peaceful transfer of power is more important than Biden or Trump
Whether rooting for Joe Biden or Donald Trump, all Americans should hope for a peaceful transfer of power on January 20. While the U.S. has historically enjoyed peaceful transfers, many pundits have predicted scenarios of uncertainty after the election. A peaceful e is endangered by forces both on the Right and the Left. For one half of the nation, a Biden win would spell disaster, while for the other half, a Trump win would initiate the five stages of grief....
Race and covenant: recovering the religious roots of American reconciliation
In January 1862, Frederick Douglass, a former slave who became America’s greatest sociopolitical prophet of the nineteenth century, declared that America was facing Armageddon. “The fate of the greatest of all Modern Republics trembles in the balance.” God was in control of the nations, and America was particularly a subject of His providence. “We are taught as with the emphasis of an earthquake,” Douglass told his listeners at Philadelphia’s National Hall, “that nations, not less than individuals, are subjects of...
‘For Love of Neighbor’: the documentary that explores authentic Christian political witness
In the heat of each political season, we are bombarded by arguments about which candidate is the moral choice and which political platform is patible with Christian values and beliefs. Such arguments typically place a heavy emphasis on specific issues and policies – and rightly so. But throughout our debates about short-term goals and final es, we should also consider the more foundational aspects of such actions. As Christians, our political responsibility involves more than filling circles on ballots or...
Do economists agree?
Listen to politicians or cable news, and you will get the impression that economics is merely a thin veil for partisanship, the greatest mercenary discipline for justifying any policy. You can seemingly find at least one economist to agree with you; liberal economists favor liberal policies, while conservative economists favor conservative policies. While there are certainly some economists who make their discipline mercenary to politics, there is a surprising amount of agreement within the discipline. Jay Richards makes the case...
A British view of the 2020 presidential election
When es to elections, my preference is for an “ideas person” – someone who can articulate a vision for political and economic liberty, a constitutionalist, someone with a moral outlook informed by faith and advocacy for small government. I am usually disappointed. Ideas people are rarely elected – in the UK, the last such example was Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister from 1979-1990. She understood that, in the same way that a household must balance its budget, so too must...
How Amy Coney Barrett could save America
Although Amy Coney Barrett has only been a Supreme Court justice for a matter of days, she has the potential to act as the harbinger of a renewed America. She is not only potentially a new role model for working women, but she may also serve as the apostle who introduces Americans to a refreshingly positive view of their own Constitution. In the process, she may reverse the nation’s headlong rush to embrace socialism. With her unassailable credentials, personal popularity,...
The browning of the Golden State
Native Californians used to tell ers to the state a little joke: “Of course, California has four seasons: earthquake, brushfire, mudslide, and drought.” Alas, that dark humor is too accurate to be funny anymore. Progressive environmental policies have so deleteriously impacted the state’s ability to manage its infrastructure and husband its bounteous resources that the Golden State is withering brown. California was once our richest and most beautiful state. It became the nation’s most populous, because it was a land...
DOJ: Government grants induced Christians to commit fraud
Even the federal government now admits that its federal financial aid policy is so immoral it can turn theology students into criminals. The Justice Department accuses a Christian theological institute of creating phantom students in order to cash in on federal college funding. According to prosecutors, the North Carolina-based Apex School of Theology set up a satellite in Georgia to serve students in Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. There’s just one problem: There were no students. The DOJ says that Apex’s...
Kamala Harris’ ‘Equality vs. Equity’ video endorses injustice and discrimination
With 48 hours to go before the 2020 election, the Biden campaign unveiled a rare, cogent glimpse into its philosophy and plans should it prevail. Naturally, it did e from Joe Biden but from an animated video narrated by Kamala Harris titled “Equality vs. Equity.” The ticket made the unusual decision to close its campaign by taking a firm stance against equality. On Sunday, Harris tweeted out a video showing a white mountain climber beginning well above a black mountain...
After her ‘Vanity Fair’ shoot, AOC must hear this speech from Fr. Robert Sirico
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has touched off fresh controversy in a Vanity Fair cover story. Although she called the president of the United States a “motherf—er” and expresses her interest in seeking a “higher position” in politics, what caught the public imagination is its panying photo shoot in which the democratic socialist’s apparel in no way resembled the clothing of the proletariat. AOC wore clothing designed byAliette, Carolina Herrera, Wales Bonner, Christian Louboutin, and a $2,850 dress from Loewe, which the magazine...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved