Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
Jan 31, 2026 12:34 PM

In what presumably was a misguided attempt to have Aaron Sorkin pen their newest round of armor-piercing media talking points, the White House sent adviser Dan Pfeiffer to the set of CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper armed to the teeth with explosive political metaphors meant to describe the GOP’s position on debt-ceiling negotiations.

TAPPER: You saw — and this is the final question. You saw today a new Bloomberg News poll indicating that the American people support by a 2-1 margin its right to require spending cuts when negotiating the debt ceiling.

I understand that Keystone and other provisions that the Republicans are talking about attaching to the debt ceiling are not related, but why not cut some spending?

PFEIFFER: The Republicans — we are for cutting spending. We’re for reforming our tax code. We’re for reforming our entitlements.

What we’re not for is negotiating with people with a bomb strapped to their chest. We’re not going to do that. So, if they want to have a discussion about how we reduce our deficits, how we help the middle class, how we give them a better bargain, lift the debt ceiling, take the full faith and credit of the United States off the table and let’s have a discussion.

I don’t think — that’s not a plicated thing. What they’re doing is unprecedented. Imagine a scenario years from now, different Congress — we agree to their demands now. A year from now, maybe they want to privatize Medicare. Maybe four years from now, there’s a Democratic Congress and a Republican president, and the e forward and say, if you don’t raise taxes to levels that you don’t want, then we’re going to cause the economy to blow up.

We cannot live in a world where one-half of one branch of government can extract their demands that have been rejected by voters and can’t pass under normal circumstances or they are going to blow up the economy.

(You can watch the full exchange right here.)

Geez! I guess if they want to buy themselves some leverage and room to negotiate with this tough-nosed administration, perhaps Republicans ought to tell the White House that they’ve used lethal chemical weapons to eliminate the entire population of certain cities?

Follow the “logic” here:

The Left is demanding that the debt ceiling limit be removed. They’re vaguely promising spending-cut fidelity in return. The only reason the debt ceiling is even an issue is because the federal government continues to over-spend at unprecedented, unsustainable levels. The primary reason the Left wants the debt ceiling removed is so that more spending can ensue (as has happened 100% of the time in the past).

And because not everyone believes in their pledge to cut – because some would like there to be guaranteed restraints applied to what Thomas Sowell would call the “unconstrained” vision of the Left – these doubters/haters are labeled fiscal terrorists and likened to soulless animals who use mentally handicapped children to blow up crowded Middle Eastern markets.

But I thought the Right was solely responsible for the coarsening of political discourse in the country? Isn’t that what the host of The Rachel Maddow Show each night on MSNBC incessantly claims?

Listen, we’re all big boys and girls here. What Pfeiffer said isn’t the crime of the century. Words don’t mean that much in politics anyway.

But actions do.

For a moment, forget who you voted for. Forget Right and Left. Forget my witty Aaron Sorkin jab that started off this post.

Instead, dwell on the undeniable fact that we are trillions of dollars in debt as a nation. Mull over the reality of a future America that, on its current trajectory, is fundamentally worse off than the one the Baby Boomers, Gen X-ers and we Millennials inherited. Think of the account we will have to give, who have been blessed by our Maker with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the freest nation in history, as we stood idly by as Rome burned (and people we elected to represent us poured gasoline on the fire).

Our problem is not this-or-that political maneuver by either party. It’s ungratefulness and ingratitude in the face of unimaginable blessing. It’s the laziness that leads us to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the reckless decisions being made by our proxies in Washington. It’s the systematic failure of stewardship at nearly every turn in our society.

This “bomb strapped” ing from the mouth of an empty political suit is merely emblematic of the utter lack of seriousness most Americans have about the trouble we are in. Millions have closed their eyes and hoped this would all go away with the casting of one ballot here, or the support of cutting programs that don’t personally impact them over there.

The worst part? I’m chief among them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Let the Hustlers Hustle
My latest for Acton Commentary. I’m also adding a couple of videos from Hotep and the Institute for Justice. Let the Hustlers Hustle By Anthony Bradley If necessity is the mother of invention, then there is nothing worse than quenching the entrepreneurial spirit of people seeking to improve their situation by imposing arbitrary third-party constraints. America’s unemployment problems linger because hustlers cannot hustle. For many, “hustling” connotes business activity that is shady, or even illegal. But in the munity it...
Reagan Centennial Roundup
Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute called Ronald Reagan a “sunny warrior for freedom” with “a clear sense of moral priority.” mentary was written a day after the former president’s death in 2004. If you walk into the Acton office you might notice a photo of Rev. Sirico and Acton executive director and co-founder Kris Mauren with Reagan at his former office in Century City, California. He holds a visible imprint at Acton. Sunday is Ronald...
Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s 105th Birthday
Today is the 105th anniversary of the birth of the German pastor and theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer. From the R&L archives: Bonhoeffer’s resistance to the Nazi regime included his support for and pastoral participation in the Confessing Church along with other prominent Protestant theologians like Karl Barth and Martin Niemöller, as well as his intricate association with the broader ecumenical movement. When the effectiveness of the Confessing Church’s opposition to Hitler was blunted and his efforts to bring the moral authority...
Hunter Baker Wins 2011 Novak Award
I’m pleased to report that Hunter Baker is the recipient of the 2011 Novak Award from the Acton Institute. Hunter is associate dean of arts and sciences and associate professor of political science at Union University in Jackson, Tenn., and author of The End of Secularism (Crossway Academic, 2009). From the release: With his writing and speaking in a variety of popular and academic contexts, Dr. Hunter Baker has made pelling prehensive case for the integration of the Christian faith...
The New Circuit Riders and the Bicycle Economy
God and Money passes along a news story about a church in Nebraska raising money “to buy motorcycles (probably not Harleys) for pastors in the African country of Tanzania. Pastors there serving multiple congregations cannot simulcast their sermons–they have to walk upwards of 60 miles to be with their flock.” It brings to mind the early American Methodist practice of sending out circuit riders. But it also illustrates the kinds of needs that can be met in unconventional ways. This...
Acton Lecture Series 2010: Sirico & Ballor
Wrapping up our recap of last year’s Acton Lecture Series, today we present two additional lectures for your enjoyment. The first was delivered in April of 2010 by Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico, and was entitled “Does Social Justice Require Socialism?” In this lecture, Sirico examined the increasing calls for government intervention in financial market regulation, health care, education reform, and economic stimulus in the name of “social justice”. And finally, we present Jordan Ballor’s lecture from July of...
Theology at Work & David W. Miller
Jordan Ballor already highlighted Rob Moll’s piece in today’s Wall Street Journal in his earlier post on business and Christian ministry. The piece quotes David W. Miller who was interviewed in the Winter 2008 issue of Religion & Liberty on the topic of theology at work. Earlier on the PowerBlog, I also posted a related PBS interview with Miller on corporate morality. Another great resource from the Religion & Liberty archives on theology and work is an interview with Laura...
Business as a Form of Christian Ministry
In a recent Acton Commentary, Stephen Grabill and Brett Elder reflect on the tension that often exists between conceptions of ministry in the church and in the world. They point especially to the Cape Town Commitment, which on the one hand identifies a “secular-sacred divide as a major obstacle to the mobilization of all God’s people in the mission of God.” But on the other hand, write Grabill and Elder, “The gulf between economics and theology in evangelical social engagement...
Some Thoughts on Social Media and Publishing
After hearing about an established Christian publisher recently launching an official blog for their products, I did some thinking about the relationship between the traditional publication outlets and social media. I’m sure that traditional publishers have a relatively large budget for print advertising, but it seems that they are very slow to hire professionals to do serious social media work, blogging, and online advertising. This seems true at least in the academic markets and relative to their print marketing outreach....
Don’t Knock the Laffer Curve
Michael Kinsley has a column up at The Politico in which he claims to debunk a series of Reagan myths. The one that annoys me the most is the one that is obviously and clearly incorrect and at the same time gets the least explanation from Kinsley. Here it is: 6. The Reagan tax cuts paid for themselves because of the Laffer Curve. Please. With every other “myth” Kinsley takes on, he at least feels the need to explain himself....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved