Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
Apr 26, 2025 12:39 AM

In what presumably was a misguided attempt to have Aaron Sorkin pen their newest round of armor-piercing media talking points, the White House sent adviser Dan Pfeiffer to the set of CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper armed to the teeth with explosive political metaphors meant to describe the GOP’s position on debt-ceiling negotiations.

TAPPER: You saw — and this is the final question. You saw today a new Bloomberg News poll indicating that the American people support by a 2-1 margin its right to require spending cuts when negotiating the debt ceiling.

I understand that Keystone and other provisions that the Republicans are talking about attaching to the debt ceiling are not related, but why not cut some spending?

PFEIFFER: The Republicans — we are for cutting spending. We’re for reforming our tax code. We’re for reforming our entitlements.

What we’re not for is negotiating with people with a bomb strapped to their chest. We’re not going to do that. So, if they want to have a discussion about how we reduce our deficits, how we help the middle class, how we give them a better bargain, lift the debt ceiling, take the full faith and credit of the United States off the table and let’s have a discussion.

I don’t think — that’s not a plicated thing. What they’re doing is unprecedented. Imagine a scenario years from now, different Congress — we agree to their demands now. A year from now, maybe they want to privatize Medicare. Maybe four years from now, there’s a Democratic Congress and a Republican president, and the e forward and say, if you don’t raise taxes to levels that you don’t want, then we’re going to cause the economy to blow up.

We cannot live in a world where one-half of one branch of government can extract their demands that have been rejected by voters and can’t pass under normal circumstances or they are going to blow up the economy.

(You can watch the full exchange right here.)

Geez! I guess if they want to buy themselves some leverage and room to negotiate with this tough-nosed administration, perhaps Republicans ought to tell the White House that they’ve used lethal chemical weapons to eliminate the entire population of certain cities?

Follow the “logic” here:

The Left is demanding that the debt ceiling limit be removed. They’re vaguely promising spending-cut fidelity in return. The only reason the debt ceiling is even an issue is because the federal government continues to over-spend at unprecedented, unsustainable levels. The primary reason the Left wants the debt ceiling removed is so that more spending can ensue (as has happened 100% of the time in the past).

And because not everyone believes in their pledge to cut – because some would like there to be guaranteed restraints applied to what Thomas Sowell would call the “unconstrained” vision of the Left – these doubters/haters are labeled fiscal terrorists and likened to soulless animals who use mentally handicapped children to blow up crowded Middle Eastern markets.

But I thought the Right was solely responsible for the coarsening of political discourse in the country? Isn’t that what the host of The Rachel Maddow Show each night on MSNBC incessantly claims?

Listen, we’re all big boys and girls here. What Pfeiffer said isn’t the crime of the century. Words don’t mean that much in politics anyway.

But actions do.

For a moment, forget who you voted for. Forget Right and Left. Forget my witty Aaron Sorkin jab that started off this post.

Instead, dwell on the undeniable fact that we are trillions of dollars in debt as a nation. Mull over the reality of a future America that, on its current trajectory, is fundamentally worse off than the one the Baby Boomers, Gen X-ers and we Millennials inherited. Think of the account we will have to give, who have been blessed by our Maker with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the freest nation in history, as we stood idly by as Rome burned (and people we elected to represent us poured gasoline on the fire).

Our problem is not this-or-that political maneuver by either party. It’s ungratefulness and ingratitude in the face of unimaginable blessing. It’s the laziness that leads us to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the reckless decisions being made by our proxies in Washington. It’s the systematic failure of stewardship at nearly every turn in our society.

This “bomb strapped” ing from the mouth of an empty political suit is merely emblematic of the utter lack of seriousness most Americans have about the trouble we are in. Millions have closed their eyes and hoped this would all go away with the casting of one ballot here, or the support of cutting programs that don’t personally impact them over there.

The worst part? I’m chief among them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved