Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Which is a real dystopia, the U.S. or Venezuela?
Which is a real dystopia, the U.S. or Venezuela?
Jan 17, 2026 7:51 AM

As Americans contemplate a “Green New Deal” and British schoolchildren skip school by the thousand to demand (more) government action on climate change, a little-noticed op-ed gives us a glimpse into a genuine dystopia. The author warns that this nightmare scenario will not unfold “The Day After Tomorrow” but has already taken place, for years, in the squalid homes and empty stores of socialist Venezuela.

In the West, the stereotype of a Christian crackpot warning “The End is Near” on a sandwich board sign has been replaced with dark, Green visions of an environmentalist conflagration. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez captured the nation’s attention when she said last month, “The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change, and your biggest issue is – your biggest issue is, ‘How are we gonna pay for it?’ And like, this is the war, this is our World War II.”

Less reported is what she said three sentences later: “How are we saying take it easy when the America that we’re living in today is so dystopian, with people sleeping in their cars so they can work a second job without health care, and we’re told to settle down?”

The congresswoman’s description of the United States as an economically depressed dystopia bears little resemblance to the contemporary American landscape, where unemployment is at historic lows and wages are rising. However, let’s accept her rather bare definition of a dystopia as a place in which it is impossible to provide for basic needs while working two jobs.

Enter Daniel Di Martino, a young writer who enjoys considerably less exposure than “AOC” but, based on his newest article, deserves a wider readership. Di Martino left Venezuela for the United States and is currently a college student in Indiana – and he warns that left-wing proposals for massive government intervention in the economy turned his homeland into a “nightmare.”

In an article published at USA Today on Friday morning, he wrote:

I didn’t need to look at statistics to see this, but, rather, at my own family. When [Hugo] Chavez took office in 1999, my parents were earning several thousand dollars per month between the two of them. By 2016, due to inflation, they earned less than $2 per day. If my parents hadn’t fled the country for Spain in 2017, they’d now be earning less than $1 per day,the internationaldefinitionof extreme poverty. Even now, the inflation rate in Venezuela is expected to reach10 million percentthis year.

Venezuela has e a country where a woeful number of childrensufferfrom malnutrition, and where working two full-time jobswill pay for only six poundsof chicken a month.

In the course of the article, he describes how nationalization of vital industries led to weekly power outages and his home going without water for weeks at a time. While he says that no one proposal of itself – from nationalized healthcare to a wealth tax – will necessarily destroy the U.S. economy by itself, “if all or most of these measures are implemented, they could have the same catastrophic consequences for the American people that they had for Venezuela.” (Please take the time to read the article in full here.)

Taxation drives out business; socialism destroys innovation; and paying for the programs by printing money (Modern Monetary Theory) devalues currency and devours families’ life savings. Di Martino warns specifically that “Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed paying for the [Green New Deal] proposal by asking the Federal Reserve toprint money. This is exactly what produced Venezuela’s nightmare.”

The nightmare – or dystopia, if you prefer that term – is the mirror image of the fanciful dream that government alone can solve all human problems. One expert, or a few technocrats, have all the answers to plan for the happiness and well-being of millions, or billions, or people – but their plans require unquestioning obedience. The late Presbyterian minister Marvin R. Vincent of Union Theological Seminary wrote that if Christ had accepted the Satanic temptation to turn stones into bread, he would have said, in effect:

As I cannot live without bread, so My kingdom cannot thrive so long as men’s worldly needs are unsupplied. My administration must be a turning of stones into bread. It must make men happy by at once miraculously removing all want and suffering from the world, and inaugurating an era of worldly prosperity.

Marxism promises all this, but at the price of freedom. The offer of guaranteed, meager daily rations in exchange for absolute allegiance emanates from demonic sources. “We know that this has not been Christ’s policy,” Rev. Vincent continued. “Social prosperity is based on righteousness.”

That has been the genius of the West’s historical economic system. Capitalism incentivizes people to engage in spontaneous cooperation. The free market rewards high-quality, conscientious, and diligent service to meet the needs and desires of others. The synergy of service creates greater abundance and social harmony.

Di Martino warns us that rejecting these pillars of a sound society leads to dystopia.

He ought to know. He’s seen a real one.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Will socialized health care in the US kill Canadians?
Don Surber thinks so, and it’s hard to argue his point when you see stories like this: More than 400 Canadians in the full throes of a heart attack or other cardiac emergency have been sent to the United States because no hospital can provide the lifesaving care they require here. Most of the heart patients who have been sent south since 2003 typically show up in Ontario hospitals, where they are given clot-busting drugs. If those drugs fail to...
Some problems with Protestantism
Following up on our discussion of the Pew survey on the American religious landscape, I have a few thoughts as to what plagues American Protestantism, particularly of the evangelical variety, and it has to do precisely with the “catholicity” of Protestantism. To the extent that people are leaving Protestantism, or are searching for another denomination within the broadly Protestant camp, I think there are at least two connected precipitating causes. (A caveat: there are many, many individual and anecdotal exceptions...
Red China struggles to go green
OSD’s Annual Report to Congress on the Military Power of the People’s Republic of China has some illuminating – and somewhat staggering – insight on the current state of affairs with respect to China’s environment and how it influences their national strategic policies. It’s a fascinating look at how the munist nation is dealing with the realities of ing a global superpower. Under the heading “Developments in China’s Grand Strategy, Security Strategy, and Military Strategy” the document includes this bullet:...
Imprisonment and government expenditures
There’s a lot of consternation, much of it justified, about the news that now 1% of the population of the United States is incarcerated. Especially noteworthy is parison of the rate of imprisonment with institutionalization in mental health facilities over the last century. But a breathless headline like this just cannot pass without ment: “Michigan is 1 of 4 states to spend more on prison than college.” Given the fact that policing, including imprisonment, is pretty clearly a legitimate function...
Hug your favorite liberal today
Founda study on sociobiology in The Economist (of all places). This passage on the development of liberal vice conservative tendencies was worth a chuckle: Dr Wilson and Dr Storm found several unexpected differences between the groups. Liberal teenagers always felt more stress than conservatives, but were particularly stressed if they could not decide for themselves whom they spent time with. Such choice, or the lack of it, did not change conservative stress levels. Liberals were also loners, spending a quarter...
Rome seminar on Populorum Progressio
Last week, I had the pleasure to attend one of the Acton Institute’s seminars here in Rome. Located at the campus of the Pontifical University of Regina Apostolorum, the seminar drew more than 100 religious and lay persons from all over the world. It was apparent that the topic was not only an interesting one, but also a personal one for many in the room. The presentations dealt with the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio forty years later. Asking the pertinent...
Where do we go from here?
Matt Stone asks the question: What do you think are some of the challenges that remain for Christian environmental theology? I am presuming here that, if you’re the sort of Christian that likes a blog like mine, you’re not the sort of Christian who needs to have the dots joined between Christian ethics, creation care and environmental theology. But where do we go beyond the basic joining of the dots? How much more remains to be done… [snip] Personally I...
The Faith book blog tour
The PowerBlog has been selected as one of the host blogs for Chuck Colson’s blog tour, promoting his new book, The Faith. It’s an honor to be included among other luminaries of the blogosphere like The Dawn Treader, , and Tall Skinny Kiwi. A bit about the book: In their powerful new book The Faith, Charles Colson and Harold Fickett identify the unshakable tenets of the faith that Christians have believed through the centuries—truths that offer a ground for faith...
Buckley on law and Christian morality
From a CT interview in 1995 by Michael Cromartie: Certain things which the market authorizes simply in terms of law are unchristian and ought not to be done. The big issue today has to do with the fidelity of marriages. The tendency now to leave your wife because you have an infatuation with a younger woman of tenderer flesh is an enormous temptation. It’s carnal, and it’s also easy to justify with all the solipsistic reasoning that we hear today....
Review: Reagan & Thatcher
Nicholas Wapshott’s new book Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: A Political Marriage offers a fresh look at the political relationship and friendship of two profound leaders in the late 20th Century. While the biographical information is not new for those who have read extensive biographies of Reagan and Thatcher, the author examines some of the deep disagreements the two leaders had in foreign policy. While there were arguments between the two over the Falklands War, Grenada, sanctions, and nuclear disarmament,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved