Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What you should know about the President’s Cabinet
What you should know about the President’s Cabinet
Mar 21, 2026 3:12 PM

Note: This is the first in a weekly series of explanatory posts on the officials and agencies included in the President’s Cabinet.

When Obamacare was signed into law in 2010, the Catholic nuns didn’t expect it would affect their religious liberty. Nor did they suspect that in a few years the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would restrict their freedom of conscience. Yet it was that Cabinet-level government agency that issued a mandate requiring the women to disregard their deeply held convictionsby providing health care coverage for contraceptives and abortifacients. Even though it would have caused no harm to give the nuns an exemption to the mandate, the federal agency refused to back down until forced to do so by the Supreme Court.

The attempted coercion of the Little Sisters of the Poor was a wake-up call for many Christians. The expansive power of government agencies was being used in an unprecedented manner to control and restrict liberties many Americans had taken for granted. And the case raised even greater concerns: If HHS could threaten religious freedom, what could even more powerful federal agencies do?

Unfortunately, many Americans have only a basic understanding of what the President’s Cabinet even is, much less how it can affect our lives. To increase awareness, this weekly series will explain the functions of Cabinet-level departments, consider how they can expand or restrict liberties, and look at the men and women President-elect Trump has nominated to lead these agencies.

But first, here are answers to some basic questions you might have about the Cabinet.

Why is it called a Cabinet?

In 17th century usage, a “cabinet” referred to a “private room where advisors meet.” That led to the modern definition of “a body of persons appointed by a head of state or a prime minister to head the executive departments of the government and to act as official advisers.”

What departments constitute the Cabinet?

The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments: the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General.

There are also several “Cabinet-level officials” who are not part of the Cabinet: the White House Chief of Staff, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Director of the Office of Management & Budget, the United States Trade Representative (who is given the title of ambassador), the Ambassador for the United States Mission to the United Nations, the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration.

Why are the members of the Cabinet called Secretaries?

With some exceptions (e.g., Attorney General), the Cabinet-level departments are referred to as Secretaries. This usage dates back to the 1590s when the original meaning of a “person entrusted with secrets” was applied to “ministers presiding over executive departments of state.”

What law authorizes or requires there to be a Cabinet?

The U.S. Constitution doesn’t require the president to have a formal Cabinet, though the ‘Opinion Clause’ (Article II, Section 2) does outline the role of such a group: “[The President] may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.

Although the Cabinet is not required by law, the general structure has been in place since the presidency of George Washington.

Does Congress have to approve the president’s Cabinet appointments?

The Senate does, through their “advise and consent” role. The Inferior Officers Clause (Article II, Section 2) states that “the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”

While The Supreme Court has never clearly defined what constitutes “Heads of Departments,” the judicial branch has regularly deemed it applicable to Cabinet-level officials.

How much do Cabinet headsget paid?

The pay of Cabinet headsis set by law (5 U.S.C. § 5312) as being Level I of the Executive Schedule, which is currently $203,700 a year. (More than Senators and Congressional Representatives ($174,000) but less than the Vice President ($235,000), House and Senate majority/minority leaders ($193,400), or Speaker of the House ($223,500).)

Why are Cabinet officials in line for the presidency?

If neither the President or the Vice President can “discharge the powers and duties of the office” because of death or incapacitation, then Congress is tasked by the Twentieth Amendment to determine who shall act as President.

In 1947, Congress updated the Presidential Succession Act (3 U.S.C.§19) which clarifies that:

If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is no President pro tempore to act as President under subsection (b) of this section, then the officer of the United States who is highest on the following list, and who is not under disability to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President shall act as President: Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Homeland Security.

During the Cold War, it became mon practice for the President to choose a designated survivor (or designated successor) during certain events when the President, Vice President, and Cabinet are gathered at a single location, such as during State of the Union addresses and presidential inaugurations. The designated survivor is protected by the Secret Service at an undisclosed and protected location for the entirety of the event.

Previous and ing posts in this series:Secretary of State,Secretary of the Treasury,Secretary of Education, Secretary of Labor,Secretary of Defense, Attorney General,Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce,Secretary of Health and Human Services,Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Energy,Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Homeland Security

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Blogroll roundup
A few items of interest from friends on our blogroll: The Evangelical Ecologist and Dignan’s 75 Year Plan react to news about Michael Crichton’s visit with President Bush.GetReligion writes on the government closing of a newspaper in Russia.Mere Comments talks about burgeoning threats to the dignity of human life, and the disarray of contemporary evangelical responses.No Left Turns discusses “Crunchy Cons.”Persecution Blog passes along concerns about the Bush administration policy toward Israel and the effect on Arab Christians living in...
Does black history have a future?
As America celebrates Black History Month, Anthony Bradley looks at the forces that threaten the very foundation of black society in this country. “Two aspects of pre-civil rights-era black history — strong men and strong families — will have to be recovered if we wish to have any black history in the future,” Bradley warns. Read the mentary here. ...
Hollywood and capitalism
Clive Cook has a terrific article in the March 2006 Atlantic Monthly that is worth reading in its entirety. But here’s my favorite paragraph: What is most striking, so far as the movies’ treatment of capitalism goes, is not the hostility of films whose main purpose is actually to indict corporate wickedness (Wall Street, Erin Brockovich, A Civil Action, The Insider, The Constant Gardener, and so forth). It is the idea of routine, reckless corporate immorality—maintained as though this premise...
Good intentions and unsound economics
This Sunday I went to Mass at a parish I’d never attended before. I was quite pleasantly surprised—the music wasn’t bad, the rubrics were followed, the homily focused on the gospel, they chanted the Agnus Dei, and prayed the prayer to St. Michael afterward; not apparently liberal and better than many typical “suburban rite” parishes. But, during the petitions, one of the prayers was for leaders of nations, that they would eradicate poverty. Here is a classic example of the...
The ‘ecumenical’ alternative
If you’re looking for more insight on, or perhaps simple confirmation of, the economic agenda of the ‘ecumenical’ movement (the World Council of Churches [WCC] the World Alliance of Reformed Churches [WARC], et al.), here’s an insightful little tidbit from Ecumenical News International: Pacific islanders are a source of hope for other munities seeking a munal economy based on sharing and cooperation, participants at a global church gathering have heard. During the 14-23 February ninth assembly of the World Council...
Schall on wealth and poverty
The Jesuit journal In All Things devoted its Winter 2005-06 issue to the question of poverty in the United States. The issue brings together a number of perspectives from Jesuits, both liberal and conservative. The Rev. James V. Schall, S. J., contributed an article titled “On Wealth and Poverty,” one which the journal editors have described thematically as “choosing not to be poor.” Here is Schall’s article in its entirety: The most famous book in economics is The “Wealth” of...
The religion and schools debate, Scotland version
This story in the UK’s Education Guardian is remarkable for its links to a number of issues. In contrast to the American system, Britain’s permits “faith” schools that are part of the government system. Thus, this Scottish “Catholic” school is, in the American usage, a “public” school. Now that 75% of its students are Muslim, some Muslims are demanding that the school switch its faith allegiance. One of the obvious issues is the Islamicization of Europe. Here is a Catholic...
Christianity and civilization
Today’s mentary by Chuck Colson gives a brief review and survey of Rodney Stark’s The Victory of Reason. Concludes Colson: “This book will you give you some very good ammunition to answer those critics e up with the same tired, old arguments about the fact that Christianity held back the progress of civilization. Nonsense. The evidence is exactly the opposite.” For previous discussion of Stark’s thesis on the PowerBlog, check out these posts: Christian Reason and the Spirit of Capitalism...
Fumbling with fundamentalism
One of the religion beat’s favorite canards is to implicitly equate what it calls American Christian “fundamentalism” with what it calls Muslim or Islamic “fundamentalism.” After all, both are simply species of the genus. For more on this, check out GetReligion (here and here) and the reference to a piece by Philip Jenkins, which notes, Also, media coverage of any topic, religious or secular, is shaped by the necessity to plex movements and ideologies in a few selected code-words, labels...
The world is not enough
Not satisfied simply with privately-funded space flights, the X Prize Foundation is currently drafting rules for a lunar lander challenge. The foundation is looking ments from the public on the current draft, and here are some of the details according to : According to draft rules for the lunar lander petitors will be challenged to build a vehicle capable of launching vertically, travel a distance of 328 to 656 feet (100 to 200 meters) horizontally, and then land at a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved