Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What you should know about the Graham-Cassidy Obamacare repeal bill
What you should know about the Graham-Cassidy Obamacare repeal bill
Dec 27, 2024 6:06 AM

What is Graham-Cassidy?

Graham-Cassidy is the shorthand title for a proposal introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Does this legislation “repeal and replace” Obamacare?

As with the previous three Republican proposals, the answer is yes and no (but overall, not really).

No, the Graham-Cassidy does pletely repeal Obamacare in toto and it merely replaces some aspects of the current law. But yes, it does repeal certain aspects of Obamacare and in some cases shifts the decision to the states. As Graham has said, “If you like Obamacare, you can re-impose the mandates at the state level. You can repair Obamacare if you think it needs to be repaired. You can replace it if you think it needs to be replaced. It’ll be up to the governors. They’ve got a better handle on it than any bureaucrat in Washington.”

What’s actually in the bill?

Here are some key changes that are included in the bill:

• Eliminates the fines for both the individual and employer mandate.

• Distributes some federal funding currently available under Obamacare directly to states in the form of block grants. This funding would expire in 2027.

• From 2020 to 2026, states would receive a set amount of federal funding to be used at their discretion for health care coverage.

• Cost-sharing subsidies the federal government pays to panies to lower the cost of some plans on the individual insurance markets and money some states receives to expand their Medicaid rolls would expire in 2020.

• Changes Medicaid from an open ended entitlement to a capped program. Starting in 2020 Medicaid funding for states will be per capita.

• Repeals the medical device tax.

• Allows states to apply for waivers that could change what qualifies as an essential health benefit.

• Allows states to apply for waivers that let insurers charge different premiums based on age.

• Individuals and families would be eligible to contribute more to their Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). For 2018, that would be an annual increase from $3,400 to $6,650 for individuals and $6,750 to $13,300 for families.

• Would allow HSAs to be used to pay insurance premiums.

• Would create a $146 billion fund in 2020, financed by keeping in place some Obamacare taxes.

• Allows states to institute work requirements for Medicaid.

• Prohibits federal funding for Planned Parenthood for one year, beginning when the bill is enacted.

Who opposes the bill?

In Congress, all Democrats and Republican Senator Rand Paul. “This bill keeps 90 percent of the spending of Obamacare and reshuffles it,’’ says Sen. Paul. “Really, when you look at how it reshuffles it, it does it just to take money from the Democrat states and give it to Republican states.’’

A group of 10 governors sent a letter to Congress opposing the bill, and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has also opposed it publicly.

Many panies oppose the bill as does the AARP, the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Diabetes Association, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, the Arthritis Foundation, the National Health Council and the March of Dimes.

Will the bill pass the Senate?

To pass, the legislation would need the support of 50 of the 52 Republican Senators. Sen. Paul has said he would vote no, and Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Shelley Moore Capito, (R-WV), and Rob Portman (R-OH) have not indicated their support for the bill.

The Senate has until September 30 to make changes to Obamacare with a simple majority using budget reconciliation bill.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Welfare Spending Equals $47,000 and a Ford Fiesta Per Family
When es to proving support for those in poverty, a significant number of economists, politicians, and pundits support direct transfer of money—just giving the poor cash. There are many moral and practical reasons I think that option is a suboptimal means of aiding the poorest of our neighbors. But it does have one substantial benefit: It’d be much cheaper and efficient than current welfare programs. As Daniel Halper at The Weekly Standard points out, the Senate Budget Committee finds that...
Orthodoxy and Natural Law: A Reappraisal
At Ethika Politika today, I examine the recent critique by David Bentley Hart in the most recent issue ofFirst Things of the use of natural law in public discourse in my article, “Natural Law, Public Policy, and the Uncanny Voice of Conscience.” Ultimately, I offer a measured critique—somewhat agreeing with, but mostly critical of Hart’s position—pointing out Hart’s oversight of the vital role of conscience in classic natural law theory. What I find so bizarre, and have for some time...
Ralph Baer and the Art of Innovation
In the video below, Ralph Baer, the “father of video games,” explains why he still invents at 90 years old. “What do you expect me to do?” he asks. He likens invention to the work of a painter. Would someone ask why a painter doesn’t retire? It’s what they love to do! Indeed, it is a calling. In The Entrepreneurial Vocation, Fr. Robert Sirico writes, Entrepreneurs, as agents of change, encourage the economy to adjust to population increases, resource shifts,...
Sirico: The Drama and Reality of Choosing a New Pope
In today’s The Detroit News, the Rev. Robert Sirico seeks to set aside some of the rumors, skewered Hollywood depictions, and media predictions that swirl around any papal conclave. Of course, this time is decidedly different, as the cardinals ing together not after the death of a pope, but one’s retirement. There is much talk throughout all the Church as to whom the next pope will be, and as Fr. Sirico points out, “[n]o one, not even the most well-informed...
Jayabalan: Possibility of a Non European Pope
Update: Video Interview with Kishore from Rome. Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith As the world awaits the beginning of the conclave, many are looking at non European Cardinals as potentials for the next pope. Channel News Asia points out that “68 per cent of the world’s Catholics currently from Latin America, Africa and Asia, there are increased calls for the next pope to be a non-European.” They asked Kishore Jayabalan, director of Acton’s Rome Office, to offer his thoughts on non Europeans...
Audio Roundup: Acton Vatican Experts on the Conclave
Acton president and co-founder, Rev. Robert Sirico, and Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, are currently in Rome for the ing papal conclave. Here’s a roundup of their observations, including thoughts on the legacy of Pope emeritus Benedict XVI. Rev. Sirico was recently on the Laura Ingraham show discussing Benedict XVI’s resignation and legacy with guest host, Raymond Arroyo. Rev. Sirico pointed out that in some ways this is an “era of firsts,” once a new pope is elected, there will...
Audio: Discussing ‘Becoming Europe’ on African-American Conservatives
Samuel Gregg recently spoke with Marie Stroughter from African-American Conservatives. They discuss Gregg’s new book, ing Europe: Economic Decline, Culture, and How America Can Avoid a European Future. Stroughter asked Gregg about the dichotomy between “cuddle capitalism” (the European social model) and a dynamic market economy. Gregg says that Americans are more and more choosing a ‘Europeanized’ economy favoring security over economic liberty. Listen to the full audio here: [Audio: You can purchase the hardcover or eBook version of ing...
Architecture, Human Flourishing, and Health Care
In a recent issue of Metropolis Magazine, Thomas de Monchaux tells the story of an amazing lesson about innovation that Americans can learn from Rwandans. This is no surprise, but readers will learn that burdensome government regulations stifle innovation and undermine human flourishing. De Monchaux recounts the story of Michael Murphy, executive director and co-founder of the Boston-based MASS Design Group, and Alan Ricks, MASS cofounder and COO, attempting to take what they learned from building health care facilitates and...
Creating a Culture That Lasts: Matthew Lee Anderson on ‘Radical Christianity’
I recently expressed my reservations about David Platt’s approach to “radical Christianity,” noting that, outside of embracing certain Biblical constraints (e.g. tithing), we should be wary of cramming God’s will into our own cookie-cutter molds for how wealth should be carved up and divvied out. In this month’s cover story inChristianity Today, my good friend Matthew Lee Anderson of Mere Orthodoxy does a nice job of summarizing some additional issues surrounding the broader array of “radical Christianity” books and movements....
Rand Paul Knows What We Know: Power Corrupts
After nearly 13 hours of speaking in an attempt to stall the confirmation of CIA Director nominee John Brennan, Sen. Rand Paul ended his filibuster. The filibuster is a grandiose method of legislative stalling, requiring the speaker to hold the floor, talking the entire time and not sitting down. In essence, one tries to talk a bill to death. The most famous fictitious depiction of the filibuster is probably is Frank Capra’s Mr. Smith Goes To Washington. Paul Rand, as...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved