Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
Oct 9, 2024 11:13 AM

On Tuesdaymorning, UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that she is proposing a snap election for Parliament on June 8. The House of Commons is likely to authorize the vote on Wednesday, leaving just 49 days until the third national election in three years. Here’s what you need to know.

Why is Theresa May calling for this vote now?

May says political opposition from the Labour Party, Scottish nationalists, and “unelected members of the House of Lords” is undermining her ability to negotiate favorable terms for the UK’s departure from the European Union. Speaking outside 10 Downing Street on Tuesday morning, the prime minister said their “political game-playing … jeopardises the work we must do to prepare for Brexit at home and it weakens the government’s negotiating position in Europe.”

Postponing the election, May said, means that campaigning will not ramp up as she is concluding Brexit terms and setting the conditions of the UK’s future access to the EU’s single market.

Why does the House of Commons have to authorize the election?

The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act of 2011 states that national elections will be held only once every five years. The last national election was held in 2015, and the next one was scheduled for 2020. However, two-thirds of the House of Commons’ 650 members can vote to allow a snap election. May said she will ask for that vote on Wednesday. Opposition party leaders support the call.

What issues will be the most important in the campaign?

May will campaign on Brexit, Brexit, Brexit – saying that her opponents are endangering the fragile state of talks with Brussels. Polls show an increasing number of Remain voters wish politicians would “get on” with the business of extricating the UK from the EU in the most advantageous way. “The country ing together, but Westminster is not,” May said. “Division in Westminster will risk our ability to make a success of Brexit, and it will cause damaging uncertainty and instability to the country.” Remain voters, meanwhile, see this as the closest opportunity they will have to hold a second national referendum on EU membership.

May’s chief opponents hope to emphasize domestic issues, such as the intensifying crisis of medical care provided by the National Health System (NHS). Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn promised to run a campaign “challenging the economic narrative that says there have to be huge cuts in public expenditure” and calling on taxpayers to “invest in the future, invest in infrastructure.” Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon vowed to oppose the “increasingly right-wing direction” of May’s government, including opposing “the hardest possible Brexit … more austerity and deeper cuts” to the budget.

Who is likely to win?

Barring a radical upheaval in the electorate – which is always a possibility – May looks to win in a landslide. A YouGov poll performed for the Times this week shows May with an astonishing 21-points lead over Corbyn. That marks Labour’s lowest rating since Margaret Thatcher’s victory in 1983. YouGov forecasts a shift of as many as 56 seats from Labour to the Tories in June. A victory would extend May’s term as prime minister until 2022.

What does the election mean for the nation’s future?

The pound surged to its highest level in months after the announcement. (It briefly dipped this morning over fears May planned to resign.)

Long-term, it strengthens Theresa May’s hand, internally and externally.

“Some are worried that this will allow Mrs. May to push ahead with a ‘super-hard’ Brexit that inflicts unnecessary damage on the economy,” wrote Julian Jessop of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA). “But these fears are difficult to square with the government’s increasingly moderate rhetoric on many issues – notably migration. Instead, the Conservative leadership is likely to use the election as a chance to secure a mandate for the type of Brexit that most people appear to want. There is already plenty of evidence that the public are swinging behind Mrs. May’s more conciliatory approach.”

Politically, it will give PM May – who was never elected in a national election – a popular mandate to pursue Brexit and carry out her domestic agenda. In 2015, David Cameron won election as prime minister with a 17-seat majority. But he opposed Brexit and stepped down after Remain lostlast June’s Brexit referendum, 52-48.Up to a dozen Tory backbenchers have rebelled against May’s plans on Article 50 and school reform. Former MP Paul Goodman argues that the Conservative Party’s candidate selection rules will allow May to remake the party in her own image.

However, Jessop worries that one negative byproduct of the snap election is that parties will “simply mitments from previous manifestos even though the case for them is (now) weak.” Since there is little time to craft new policy proposals, parties will simply recycle outdated planks, artificially extending their intellectual lives.

Since May’s Tory Party has been governing, its members enjoy a significant advantage in formulating detailed plans for the election they are all but certain to win.

BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The smoking culture
This story from The Boston Globe (via Arts & Letters Daily) relects on the changing place of tobacco in contemporary American society. The efforts of various municipalities and anti-smoking activists have largely managed to turn the cigarette into a symbol of knavery rather than gentry. As A.S. Hamrah recounts, “Smokers were once thought to make the best conversationalists, the best soldiers, even the best husbands.” The merits of tobacco have been celebrated, for example, by J.R.R. Tolkien in his Lord...
Complexities of government funding
Thorny issues arise when non-profits take government funding, especially when said non-profits have an explicitly Christian (and evangelistic) purpose. Case in point: “The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit yesterday against the Department of Health and Human Services, accusing the Bush administration of spending federal tax dollars on an abstinence education program that promotes Christianity,” aka Silver Ring Thing. I first heard about the Silver Ring Thing via a special documentary broadcast on NPR, “With This Ring: Pledging Abstinence.” All...
E-Libraries
A story in the Sunday New York Times highlighted the move of the undergraduate library at the University of Texas at Austin to a predominantly electronic collection. mon reference materials like dictionaries will remain in hard copy, all other stacks of books “will be dispersed to other university collections to clear space for a 24-hour electronic mons, a fast-spreading phenomenon that is transforming research and study on campuses around the country.” This move should not be taken as indicative of...
Mayorial mischief
In a row over the Freedom of Information Act, Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick‘s administration has finally acknowledged expense information first requested by media outlets nearly two years ago. According to the Detroit Free Press, documents were turned over last month, “But in dozens of instances, pages were missing, or information on the city-supplied records was blacked out.” Now that the Free Press has obtained unedited plete copies of the parison of the two sets of papers shows, “The information blacked...
Rev. Gerald Zandstra takes leave from Acton
Rev. Gerald Zandstra, director of programs at the Acton Institute, has taken a leave of absence to enter the race for the U.S. Senate. This story quotes Jerry, and sizes up the campaign. ...
The President’s council on bioethics
Here’s a list of the current members of the President’s Council on Bioethics, whose interest area is sure to e more and more important ing years, courtesy The Thing Is. ...
Freaks and chimeras
My more detailed response to last week’s NYT editorial defending chimera research is posted over at WorldMagBlog. ...
Good intentions aren’t enough
Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Frank Beckmann today on Detroit-based WJR about faith and politics, emphasizing the proper role of religion in society as providing a solid moral foundation with which to approach political, social, economic decisions. Sirico also talks with the emergence of what Pope Benedict XVI refers to as the dictatorship of relativism – an idea which views the expression of religion as an impedance on liberty – and suggests an understanding of the integration between faith and...
‘Differences between being an Evangelical and being a Republican’
An excellent reflection on the role of Christianity and its relation to political loyalties from Joe Carter at the evangelical outpost (no longer online). The key conclusion: “As a fellow traveler of the GOP, I find myself walking side by side with the party toward the same goals. But at other times our paths will diverge and I must follow where my conscience as a Christian conservative leads me. After all, to stand with Christ means that I can’t always...
Who wants the EU?
Political leaders in Europe who have tied their fortunes to the creation of the new EU superstate are now dismissing the growing sentiment against the metastasizing, power-hungry bureaucracy in Brussels as “whims of changing opinion polls or referendums.” That’s from German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who finds it increasingly difficult to bully his countrymen into the deal. Here’s how a story in Der Spiegel describes the mood of voters: Citizens are quickly ing wary of the transfer of power to a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved