Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Willmoore Kendall can teach us about America
What Willmoore Kendall can teach us about America
Jan 11, 2026 10:24 AM

Willmoore Kendall defied the norms of many mainstream intellectual movements. Those who knew him recall a “typical strangeness” that characterized the man and his works. He was a solitary figure who has been largely forgotten in today’s conservative conversations. But, nonetheless, Kendall’s radically original ideas need to be rediscovered just as he was a “rediscoverer of the historic American political orthodoxy.” And what better time to engage his work than this, the fifty-second anniversary of his death.

Willmoore Kendall Jr. was born in 1909 in Konawa, Oklahoma, the son of a blind itinerant Methodist preacher, graduated high-school at the age of 13, earned a B.A. from the University of Oklahoma at 18, a M.A. Northwestern at 19 from and was named a Rhodes Scholar to Oxford at 21. In Europe he became enamored with the Trotskyite form munism and much of his early scholarship is littered with Marxist praise for planned economies, world revolution, and state intervention (such as government control of the press.) For example, he proclaimed that his “purpose in life was to e a great Socialist Publicist.” Even though he would later realize the error in his leftist dalliances, his central concern would always be with the defense of democracy and the rights of the people against elites. As a leftist, he feared the bastardized class scarecrow of Marx’s bourgeoisie while as a conservative he warned of the prying fingers of an all-knowing and ever-encroaching administrative state.

What turned Kendall away from the path of other prominent Americans leftists was his experience as a journalist in 1930s Spain. Historian George Nash would say after Kendall’s death that:

In the turbulent cockpit of Spanish political warfare, Kendall’s detestation of Stalin and the Moscow-oriented Communists grew. The dictatorial, totalitarian, anti-democratic aspects of Communism appalled him. He later told a friend that as Spain slid toward civil war he could tolerate the ‘Communists’ blowing up the plants of opposition newspapers. But when they deliberately killed opposition newsboys-this was too much!

Willmoore Kendall

It was then that Kendall realized the lengths that munist rades” would go in order to achieve their ends: even if that meant throwing out the basic tenets of morality. He would later say that “They munists] are incapable of participating in a democratic government.” He saw that the underlying philosophy munism (and of socialism in general) with its focus on revolution and usurpation of property rights was fundamentally patible with democracy, and particularly mismatched with the nature of the American republic. He fundamentally believed “that abrogation of the rights of property, save as this may be clearly necessary for the purposes set forth in the Preamble to the Constitution, is theft, and thus a violation of natural law,” and, a violation of the very nature of American society. “This theme –militant, promising hostility towards Communism –became one of the dominant features of his thought.”

Kendall would eventually return to the States and receive his Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Illinois writing his dissertation which would eventually e his only long book, John Locke and Majority Rule (1941). Within its pages he would explore and attempt to reconcile the contradiction between of democracy (that the people can do whatever they want) and liberty (certain rights are natural and guaranteed against everything, including from the majority of the people.) Kendall was a firm believer that democracy could function while both preserving the majority and the liberties of the individual.

Under the assumption that he was a generally left-leaning intellectual he was hired by Yale University (much to their surprise when they discovered that nothing could be farther from the truth,) and it was here that he made the impact for which he is most remembered. He was a larger than life influence upon two fathers of the conservative movement in the United States: William F. Buckley, Jr. and L. Brent Bozell Jr. In Buckley’s own words “The most influential professor at Yale – on me – was Willmoore Kendall.” It was Kendall who encouraged Buckley to write his famous God and Man at Yale, and was, in part, the impetus of the founding of National Review magazine where he was a senior editor for a number of years. But because of Kendall’s abrasive personality (he was once described by writer Dwight Macdonald as someone who could “get a discussion into the shouting stage faster than anybody I have ever known”) he grew estranged from Buckley and National Review.

In 1961, his tenure was bought out by Yale because of his conservative views and his tendency to alienate those around him for the equivalent of around two hundred thousand dollars. Kendall would eventually move to Texas, and help found the politics program at the University of Dallas where he would teach till his death. He died of a heart attack June 30th, 1967 at the age of 58.

During his stint at the University of Dallas, Kendall gave a series of lectures at Vanderbilt University that were turned into a book after his death called Basic Symbols of the American Political Tradition. Within its pages Kendall makes a claim that would horrify many social justice warriors of today: that the purpose of the American Republic is not to ensure equality or enact universal e. He held rather that the purpose of the American regime is to promote and uphold justice.

Kendall defines justice, like Aristotle, as giving to each man his due. He takes the reader on a journey through the documents that helped to found the United States starting with the Mayflower Compact and culminating in the Preamble of the Constitution, arguing that time and again justice (and honoring God) is among the most prominent principles in each of the documents he analyzes. Kendall reminds us that the Preamble to the Constitution is the framework through which we should view our republic. If we would only follow our distinctly American tradition laid out for us since 1620, Kendall believed we might yet save our republic. And a book like Basic Symbols might just be the book that will help Americans to reaffirm and mit to the universal principles which are contained within the Preamble of the Constitution and the unique way the American tradition interprets them.

It seems strange that discovering the thought and life of a small town Oklahoma boy might change how we think about our globalized world. With so much focus on the international level, who would think that Kendall, one of those “Appalachians to the Rockies conservatives” as he would put it, would be our guide to enable us to ask deeper questions about ourselves, our ideas, our country, and about the contemporary world. Yet, Kendall’s munism, firm defense of American democracy, his insistence on property rights, and emphasis on the centrality of Justice can teach us all about what it means to be a true American.

All photos public domain.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton University: A Student Perspective
This year’s Acton University was very successful, and we are still seeing its effects through blog posts, tweets, and Facebook messages. Some of our PowerBlog readers may be wondering what they missed out on, or would also like to think back a few weeks to their favorite Acton University moments. To listen to a favorite lecture, or to find out what was missed, remember that Acton University 2011 lectures can be purchased and downloaded for $1.99. Joe Gorra of the...
On Independence Day
It is no claim to Manifest Destiny, nor act of hyper-nationalism or xenophobic patriotism to say that America is the boldest, most liberal (in its original etymology), most successful and most prosperous experiment in human experience. To state thus is to state history. It behooves us, then, to recall Lord Acton’s axiom to the effect that “liberty is the delicate fruit of a mature civilization.” All who love freedom have their part to play in the cultivation of that fruit...
On the Relationship between Religion and Liberty
Earlier this year I was invited to participate in a seminar sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies and Students for a Free Economy at Northwood University. In the course of the weekend I was able to establish that while I wasn’t the first theologian to present at an IHS event, I may well have been the first Protestant theologian. In a talk titled, “From Divine Right to Human Rights: The Foundations of Rights in the Modern World,” I attempted...
Defending Free Markets and Private Property
Earlier this week on the Acton Institute Facebook page, Rev. Sirico’s archived article “What is Capitalism?” was posted and sparked a lively discussion between two people (click here to see our Facebook page and the discussion). This blog post is to serve as my response. Your idea munionism, at least from what I understand from ments, bears some resemblances munism which has the end goal of society or munity possessing property mon. This, however, doesn’t preserve human dignity properly; nor...
Coolidge and ‘the best ideas of democracy’
Coolidge If we are to maintain the great heritage which has been bequeathed to us, we must be like-minded as the fathers who created it. — Calvin Coolidge. The Wall Street Journal published today a timely, and much needed, reflection by Leon Kass on Calvin Coolidge’s address delivered at the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 1926. Kass asks: What is the source of America’s founding ideas, and their bination” in the Declaration? Many have credited European thinkers,...
Rev. Sirico on Helping the Poor
Rev. Robert A. Sirico was recently a guest on The Matt Friedeman Show where he discussed the difference between charity and socialism. He talks about not only how we should give, but also how we can best help the poor. Socialism, according to Rev. Sirico, is the forced sharing of wealth and drains morality out of good actions. A discussion of the Acts of the Apostles also takes place in the following YouTube clip that contains a segment from the...
Christian Hipsters and Economics
Anarchist punks are out and the socially-aware hipsters are in (even though they don’t want to say they’re “in”). A little over a decade ago, the hipster scene made its eback since the 1940s. Though e in all shapes and sizes, many contemporary hipsters can be found riding their fixed-gear bikes to the farmers’ market or at a bar in skinny jeans drinking Pabst Blue Ribbon. An interesting sub-category has emerged: Christian hipsters. According to Brett McCracken in an article...
Pope Addresses Rising Food Prices
Last week, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the annual conference of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, and expressed particular concern over rising food prices and the instability of the global food market. In his 2009 encyclical Caritas in Veritate, the pope issued this challenge: “The problem of food insecurity needs to be addressed within a long-term perspective, eliminating the structural causes that give rise to it and promoting the agricultural development of poorer countries.” Acton’s Director of Research Samuel Gregg...
Cosmos as Society in the Work of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew
In the current issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality (14.1), Brian K. Strow and Claudia W. Strow challenge the economic impact of our definition of society in their article, “Social Choice: The Neighborhood Effect.” It occurred to me that Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew implicitly challenges our definition of society on a different, though similar, level than Strow and Strow. Strow and Strow analyze the changing results of economic utility functions based upon one’s definition of human society. In his...
Religion & Liberty: An Interview with Wayne Grudem
Religion & Liberty’s spring issue featuring an interview with evangelical scholar Wayne Grudem is now available online. Grudem’s new book is Politics According to the Bible (Zondervan 2010). It’s a great reference and I have already made use of it for a mentaries and PowerBlog posts here at Acton. “I am arguing in the book that it is a spiritually good thing and it is pleasing to God when Christians can influence government for good,” Grudem declared in the interview....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved