Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
Nov 5, 2024 6:13 PM

During last night’s Oscar ceremony, Best Supporting Actresswinner Patricia Arquette used her acceptance speech to rail against unfair pay for women:

To every women who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time … to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.

The wage equality that Arquette is referring to is the gender wage gap—the difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings. Because she frames the issue as a matter of equal rights, Arquette presumably believes that the problem is caused by intentional discrimination.

The gender wage gap certainly exists, but there is considerable debate about the size of the gap and whether it is caused primary by discrimination or by other factors, such as education and work hours. Much of the confusion is caused by the use of misleading statistics by politically motivated groups. For example, last night the Department of Labor (DOL)posted on their Twitter account:

FACT: Women make 78% of what their male counterparts make. Learn more: #Oscars

To say that the Labor Department was being intentionally dishonest would require knowing their motives. It’s much easier to assume basic petence. For instance, the tweet claims the gap is 78 percent. But on the “Equal Pay” page they link to the gap is claimed to be 81 percent (“women earn about 81 cents on the pared to men”). Dig deeper onto the site and you’ll find other claims, such as that the gap is77 percent. The differences may seem small, but it reveals a significant problem when a government agency can’t even agree with itself about what the real number should be.

One number you won’t find on their “Equal Pay” page is 94 percent. That was the true wage gap found in a 2009 study by the economics consulting firm CONSAD ResearchCorporation, prepared for the Department of Labor. In the introduction to the report the Labor Department says, “the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap. The purpose of this report is to identify the reasons that explain the wage gap in order to more fully inform policymakers and the public.” That statement is rather prophetic since the DOL is now the one using “misleading ways to advance public policy agendas” related to the wage gap.

As this video by the Independent Women’s Forum explains, the causes of the gender wage gap are mostly based on individual preferences:

The gender wage gap isn’t the most pressing public policy issue even in the area of equal rights for women. But for those who are concerned about gender wage discrimination, there’s a simple solution: increased free petition. As AEI’s Andrew Biggs and Mark Perry explain,

Some gender discrimination in the labor market certainly does exist. But the best solution isn’t more lawsuits. In fact, the Obama administration’s proposal to shift the burden of proof in gender discrimination cases against employers would make hiring a female employee a potential legal liability for employers, and thus employers would hire fewer women.

What female workers need is a vibrant petitive workplace, since it petition that weeds out discrimination. When one employer discriminates against women, a new employer could earn a windfall profit by hiring an all-female workforce and paying them slightly more. … Several studies have shown that as industries faced petition, through either deregulation or international trade, the gender pay gap shrank. And the pay gap is larger in monopoly markets petition and smaller in start-ups and small businesses that must be productive in order to survive. Women need more markets, more enterprise, and more opportunity, not more regulation and litigation.

Maybe that’s what Arquette really meant, that women “need more markets, more enterprise, and more opportunity.” (It seems to have worked well for her.) If she had made that claim in her speech last night it would have been a positive proposal for advancing equal rights for women. And if she had spoken that truth to the Hollywood audience it would have been a performance worthy of another Oscar.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Are charter schools better than public schools?
In 1991 Minnesota passed the first law establishing charter schools in the state. Since then, a majority of states have some kind of charter school system. But what exactly is a charter school? And are they better for students? ...
Why we should reject the erroneous idea that ‘error has no rights’
A recent poll revealed that a near majority of Americans believe free speech should not be extended to extremist groups. Another poll found that a large number of citizens favor permitting the courts to fine news media outlets for publishing or broadcasting stories that are biased or inaccurate. (Almost half of Republicans (45 percent) would favor such a policy, and 35 percent say they simply haven’t heard enough to say.) And in Russia, the government has banned the religious group...
The connection between property rights and religious freedom
According to Founding Father James Madison, “the rights of persons and the rights of property” constituted the “two cardinal objects of government.” And the “most sacred form of property,” according to Madison, was an individual’s conscience since “other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and inalienable right . . .” Both property and conscience (religious freedom) have been considered foundational rights. But what exactly do they have mon? More than we may...
Czeslaw Milosz: Poet Laureate of Freedom
[A review of Milosz: A Biography by Andrzej Franasszek, edited and translated by Aleksandra and Michael Parker, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge University, 2017, 526 pp., $35] “What is poetry which does not save/Nations or people?” – Czeslaw Milosz (“Dedication”) In the 1970s – the last full decade before Poland finally freed itself from the shackles munist control –Lech Walesa, the leader of Solidarity, the Soviet bloc’s first trade union, was arrested on more than one occasion....
The costs and benefits of monopoly
Note: This is post #49 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What would happen if we eliminated patents for industries with high R&D costs, such as the pharmaceutical industry? Eliminating patents in this case may result in less innovation and, specifically, fewer new drugs being created, explains economist Alex Tabarrok. In this video by Marginal Revolution University he considers some of the tradeoffs of patents and looks at alternative ways to reward research and development such as patent...
Business as a calling
Do you live vocationally in your day job, even if you aren’t making a career of it? God’s calling on your life is not a maintenance request, the task is not finite, nor is it particular. Answer God’s call will transform your entire life—starting now, right where you are. ...
Booth: This reform would improve the ecological, and human, environment
To be good citizens, faithful people must examine policies’ results, not just their intentions.One overly intrusive environmentalist policy alone has prevented the poor from accessing adequate housing and, ironically, reduced the diversity of the environment. If excluding the vulnerable from the economy is evil, as Pope Francis has written, then new approaches are needed, writesPhilip Booth,a distinguished British professor of finance in a new essay forReligion & Liberty Transatlantic. He begins by opening an earnest dialogue with the pontiff’s social...
The human cost of the EU’s anti-GMO policy
Commentators have long said that banning genetically modified food (GMOs) harms human flourishing. Thanks to a new study, that harm can now be quantified. A study published in late July studies the impact of delaying the approval of GMOs in five nations: Benin, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda. The researchers – who hail from the Netherlands, Germany, South Africa, and the United States (surprisingly enough, from the University of California at Berkeley) – analyzed the effects of political decisions to...
Redemption Camp: A Nigerian megachurch builds its own city
As urbanization accelerates around the world, local municipalities and city planners are struggling to keep up with the pace. Sometimes and in some areas, it’s easier to work outside the government altogether. Such is the case for the Redeemed Christian Church of God in Lagos Nigeria, which has slowly developed a city of sorts over the past 30 plete with an independent power plant and privately managed security, infrastructure, and sanitation. “In Nigeria, the line between church and city is...
How much does crime pay?
The claim that “crime doesn’t pay” was an early slogan of the FBI. But while the claim may be a truism in the long run, in the short-term criminal activity can produce an parable to the earnings of a middle-class worker. At least that’s the finding of a new paper published in the journal Criminology. Holly Nguyen of Pennsylvania State University and Thomas Loughran of the University of Maryland-College Park attempt to gauge how much money people earn through criminal...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved