Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
Mar 31, 2025 8:11 AM

The game of Monopoly has brought generations of people together, even as it’s somehow managed to tear friends and family apart. Indeed, amid all the fun and frivolity, it’s still a cut-throat game driven by luck, exploitation, and money-lust.

Just like the actual marketplace, right?

Alas, despite being “just a game,” Monopoly has surely done its share of feeding the various pop-culture caricatures of plete with a twirly-mustached mascot. But despite those subtle distortions, perhaps it can still teach us something — showing us what the market is by showing us what it is not.

When es to the basic mechanics of the game, Monopoly inhabits a peculiar world wherein exchange is only “free” in the most limited sense, and where there is almost always a winner and a loser. Economist Russ Roberts describes it as the “ultimate zero-sum game,” in which “whoever has the most toys wins and winning means taking everything belonging to everyone else.”

Under such rules, Roberts argues, Monopoly’s version of “capitalism” is just as the naysayers proclaim: an “unrelentingly gloomy system of exploitation where the rich eventually wear everyone else down”:

You profit only by taking from others. The assets of its world are fixed in number. Yes, you can build houses or hotels, but somehow, the greater the supply of places to live, the HIGHER the price, an absurd contradiction to real-world economic life. In Monopoly, hotels never get a makeover and railroads, unlike Amtrak, are always profitable.

In Monopoly, getting rich and succeeding in business es from exploiting unlucky suckers who randomly enter your life. There’s no role for hard work or creativity — figuring out what customers might want to buy that isn’t being offered by petitor. There’s petition.

But while the basic economics of gameplay may indeed stray from reality, what about the behavior of the players therein? What about the peting and fighting for more wealth and power, irrespective of cost or consequence to one’s neighbor?

Unfortunately, as unethical, irrational, and unproductive as such behavior may be, the underlying attitudes are far closer to reality than many of us would like to believe. Even still, they presents a false view of the way God intended us to view and approach our work and creative collaborations. On this, we have plenty to learn, as well.

In a Karam Lecture for the Oikonomia Network, Eric Tully of Trinity International University parses out those lessons from a Christian perspective, using Monopoly as an example of how not to think about faithful work and stewardship in the global economy.

In Monopoly, “we just temporarily set aside normal standards of right and wrong,” Tully observes. “We embrace greed and just focus on money and crushing all the other players. It brings out the worst in some of us.”

To demonstrate how this might translate into reality, Tully points to the financial and housing crisis of 2008, the toxic ingredients of which were stirred together with the logic and imagination worthy of petitive Monopoly master.

“Politicians forced banks to make loans to people who could not repay,” he reminds us. “Predatory banks made irresponsible, risky loans in order to bolster their bottom line. People were greedy, bought much more than they could afford, and took on huge debt. It was the pursuit of goods instead of goodness, and it was a disaster.”

For Tully, such extremes are helpful in reminding us that, as Christians, the purpose of our economic activity isn’t self-provision, self-protection, or the accumulation of personal wealth. Rather, “when we fear the Lord, we value righteousness over wealth,” he says. “Second, we promote justice. And third, we are generous to those in need.”

The economic rules and realities of the day are far different than those in Monopoly and so are our moral and spiritual priorities therein. We not only have the privilege of engaging in free and open exchange in a free and open society, not bound by chance or sneering, money-hungry property owners. We have the privilege of pursuing our freedom with the truth and love of the Gospel.

Image: John Morgan, Monopoly (CC BY 2.0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Shoeing Horses in Detroit: How Unions Are Hindering A City’s Revival
Anyone who’s been to Detroit in recent years knows it’s a mess. Acres and acres of abandoned houses, a population decline of 25% in the past 10 years, an astronomical crime rate, and the city is literally leaking money to the tune of some $200 million in two months. Back in March, Gov. Rick Snyder appointed bankruptcy attorney Kevyn Orr as the city’s emergency financial manager, and Orr has just released his report on the city’s financial state. Before we...
The IRS and the Tea Party: A Confederacy Theory
When I was a young Marine I learned that when manding officer says, “I wish” or “I desire,” these expressions have the force of a direct order and should be acted upon as if they had given a direct order. If our CO were to say, even in musing to themselves, “I wish there was something that could be done about that,” we knew we should jump into action. But what sort of action was called for? And should we...
Happy Smothers, I Mean, Mother’s Day
Augustine observes that humans are constituted in large part by their sociality. As he puts it in the City of God, “For there is nothing so social by nature as this race, no matter how discordant it has e through its fault.” I have written that a corollary of the natural law is a vision of society as one based on mutual aid. This includes economic exchange as well as the economy of gifts and the corresponding gratitude, as I...
Community Colleges Lower Standards And Cheat Students
Higher education is in serious trouble. Plagued with the pressures of escalating costs and retention challenges, all sorts of perverse incentives are being introduced that are changing the quality of the education delivered. In an effort to save money, many college students make the choice to spend their first two years at munity college and then transfer to a traditional school to finish out their college degree. Instead of being driven by education quality, students are making decisions on the...
How to Integrate Work and Discipleship in Your Congregation
Over at The High Calling, Michael Kruse observes that many pastors and church leaders are now looking for a “programmatic strategy” for helping their congregations integrate work and discipleship. The problem, Kruse argues, is that such a strategy doesn’t exist: As leaders, we need to realize that to make faith and discipleship integrated in our congregations, we cannot do itwith our congregation’s existing knowledge and skills, requiring those in our congregation (including ourselves) to make a shift in our values,...
Lower the Age of Consent to Thirteen? Why Stop There?
Barbara Hewson, a London barrister, has made the call for lowering the age of sexual consent in the United Kingdom from 16 to 13. Her reasoning (if one may call it that) is that the current age of consent leads to the harassment and “persecution of old men.” She also believes that under-age victims should have no right to anonymity, and that law based on the best interests of the child should not trump the “rights” of men who like...
Anti- ‘Social Justice’ Shareholder Resolutions
There has been ample evidence presented in the past several years to suggest shareholder activism exhibited via proxy resolutions not only wastes time but, as well, corporate funds. And yet, unions and “social justice” advocates such as the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and As You Sow perpetuate the practice to the detriment of panies. And, according to a recently released study, this activism also works to the shareholders’ detriment as well. In effect, these proxy resolutions shoot the shareholder...
Gerson on the Common Good
Michael J. Gerson’s ium to Jim Wallis’ book on mon good includes this curious paragraph: Nearly every Christian tradition of social ethics passes two sorts of justice. The first is procedural justice: giving people what they deserve under contracts and the law. The second is distributive justice: meeting some needs just because human beings are human beings. This is not the same thing as egalitarianism; confiscation is passion. But distributive justice requires a decent provision for the vulnerable and destitute....
Video: This is Angola
Yahoo! Sports recently posted this interesting video about the Angola Prison Rodeo. In theVolume 22, Number 3 issue of Religion & Liberty, Ray Nothstine had a chance to go to Angola and interview Burl Cain, the longest serving warden. During the interview Cain says: I cannot change our reputation because it still makes people shudder, “Angola.” Life magazine called it the bloodiest prison in America. And we can’t shirk the reputation because the people e here are so violent. People...
Less Ayn Rand, More Wilhelm Röpke
Some Christian free market enthusiasts mistakenly believe we have to make a choice between socialism and Randianism. But as Joel Miller points out, there are far better intellectual leaders than Ayn Rand. Wilhelm Röpke is a prime example: Capitalism has had many defenders. Some, rather than being anti-religious like Rand, are self-consciously Christian. Rand’s contemporary, Wilhelm Röpke, is one such example. Looking back at the tremendous upheavals of the first half of the twentieth century, many responded by embracing socialism,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved