The latest edition of Econ Journal Watch has a symposium, co-sponsored by the Acton Institute, on the question, “Does Economics Need an Infusion of Religious or Quasi-Religious Formulations?”
In his essay “Joyful Economics“, Victor V. Claar reflects upon his life as a Christian and how it has connected to his work as an academic economist. Claar offers a few suggestions about the distinct contributions Christian economists can make in this field of study:
First, Christian economists simply municate to the caring public the usefulness of the economic way of thinking.They also must convey the existing evidence regarding what works—and whatdoes not—in addressing the world’s deepest hurts and needs. Far too few Christians understand much economics, and consequently their policy activism onbehalf of the Christian church is badly misguided. Jordan Ballor (2010) gives aconcise contemporary overview of this phenomenon.
I have spent the last few municating the best available economicwisdom to caring Christians. Economics in Christian Perspective is a prime example.Another example is Fair Trade? Its Prospects as a Poverty Solution (Claar 2010), a missioned by the Acton Institute. In the book I unpack—for well intendedbelievers—the story of fair trade as related to coffee. In preparing themanuscript I read literally everything I could find in EconLit about fair trade, andthen wove all of the available research into a narrative that could be read by anyonecurious about it.
[. . .]
This is one of the reasons that the work of the Acton Institute has eso significant. The Acton Institute has always worked very diligently to, in theirwords, “connect good intentions with sound economics.” Historically the ActonInstitute has also been highly ecumenical, working to connect with believers andnonbelievers alike. They understand that both the message and the tone of anargument matter, because without serious engagement there will be few victoriesin winning others to the miraculous usefulness of the price system and the marketorder.
Read more . . .