Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What did Emmanuel Macron offer the yellow vest protesters?
What did Emmanuel Macron offer the yellow vest protesters?
Dec 27, 2025 6:51 PM

After yellow vest protests raged in the streets of Paris for 23 consecutive weeks, French President Emmanuel Macron has responded with a package of tax cuts and decentralizing political reforms. Macron unveiled the proposals at the Elysée presidential palace in the first domestic press conference of since he took office.

The gilet jaunesprotests were named for the fluorescent yellow vests French motorists must wear when stopped at roadside; The New Republic likened the vests to “the armor of light” mentioned in Romans 13:12. Protests broke out last November over a proposed carbon tax hike and a government levy on diesel. Some protesters held signs that read,“Death to taxes” as they clogged traffic intersections.

Initially, Macron vowed he would“not change course, because the policy direction is right and necessary.”Though Macron relented and scrapped the carbon tax hike and increased the minimum wage by €100 ($113) a month, the protests morphed into a populist uprising against the self-described “Jupiterian” president. On Thursday a shriven president admitted his public persona is “always giving out orders, being hard, sometimes unfair,” before offering a package intended to assuage the movement well ahead of his possible 2022 re-election bid.

Here is what you need to know about his press conference:

Macron admitted the yellow vest protesters had ‘just’ concerns.

Macron has readily tied the movement to violence perpetrated by some of its fringe elements – a tactic he repeated on Thursday. However, he said Thursday that “I respect the yellow vests who came out into the streets at the beginning of this crisis.” Macron added that the protests reflected the nation’s “profound sense of fiscal, social, and provincial injustice,” and he did not want “the actions of some people eclipse the just demands that were … broadly supported.”

Macron offered $5.6 billion in tax cuts to the middle class.

Macron promised bination of tax cuts totaling €5 billion (approximately $5.57 billion U.S.). The plan will “cut taxes for a maximum number of citizens and especially those who are working, the middle-class,” Macron said. Prime Minister Édouard Philippe added that a “great national debate” – which has garnered two million ments and conducted munity meetings since January – “clearly shows us in which direction we need to go: we need to lower taxes and lower them faster.” Macron said the middle-class tax reductions would be offset by unspecified spending cuts, plugging corporate tax “loopholes,” and increased productivity.

A tax cut is overdue. Taxes consume a higher percentage of GDP in France than any other developed country, at 46 percent. There is room for spending cuts, since budget outlays take up 32 percent of French GDP – again, more than anywhere else in the OECD.

He defended his decision to abolish the wealth tax.

Macron stood by his decision to convert the nation’s wealth tax, the ISF, into a graduated national tax on real estate in 2017. “It was a reform tostimulate production, not a present for the rich,” he said. The wealth tax on those with €1.3 millionin assets, which socialist President François Mitterand introduced in 1982, imposed a net loss of €2.5 billion in 2017,accordingto Kedge Business School Professor Eric Pichet. Macron also placed a flat tax of 30 percent on capital gains – prompting Thomas Piketty to criticize the move publicly.

Macron, a former investment banker before ing Finance Minister under his socialist predecessor François Hollande, understands the importance of investment capital and productivity for the sluggish French economy. (Hollande, by contrast, said, “My real adversary … is the world of finance.”)

But Macron said Thursday he would evaluate the policy next year. “It will be re-evaluated in 2020. If it’s not efficient, we’ll amend it,” he said.

Macron promised to increase productivity…without changing the work week or early retirement age.

“We must work more. I’ve said it before,” Macron said during his address. “France works much less than its neighbors.” However, he said he would not touch France’s 35-hour work week, nor its retirement age of 62. The Financial Times hasspeculated this will cause him to scale back national holidays.

Macron promised to decentralize power from elite Paris to the countryside.

The president also said he would devolve power from the capital to more remote cities and villages, which have seen a steady drain of jobs and resources. Chief among these reforms will be scaling back the policy of dirigisme, essentially a highly centralized form of government intervention in the economy, radiating outward – and downward – from Paris. If implemented, this reform would be a rare and e example of subsidiarity.

Macron also vowed to “guarantee the access for all to health services and guarantee that no school or hospital will be closed without the mayor’s approval.”

President Macron will close the nation’s Ivy League school for government bureaucrats, the ENA.

Macron promised to close France’s elite finishing school for politicians, the École Nationale d’Administration (ENA), which has e a symbol of the perpetuation of cronyism. Macron signaled last week that he wanted to offer “chances to all of our young people on the basis of merit and not their social or family origins.” A full 70 percent of ENA students have parents in the cadres, or prestigious executive positions. “This is not a meritocratic system anymore,” Macron said Thursday. “We don’t need job-for-life protection.”

The nation’s free market advocates supported the reform, with caveats. “Yes, the removal of the ENA is a good measure, provided that the new administrative elites are trained and recruited differently,” wrote Agnès Verdier-Molinié, director of the think tank Fondation iFRAP, in Le Figaro. “France struggles to reform itself, because big [institutions] and unions almost always block” needed reforms.

Macron promised greater use of the civilian referendum and structural reform for Parliament.

President Macron wants to designate approximately one-fifth of Parliament seats to be elected by proportional representation, instead of a winner-take-all system like that of the United States. He said this will give greater representation to minority parties.

He also promised a greater role for citizens to call a referendum. But with an apparent eye on Brexit, he added, “I don’t believe in permanent referendums, because referendums don’t allow for difficult decisions at the time when they must be made.”

Macron promised to crack down on ‘political Islam.’

Macron singled out “political Islam” as the origin of “clannishness that has crept into some neighborhoods.” In those areas, some clerics, “in the name of religion, are pursuing a political project that wants to secede from our republic.”

Macron also proposed greater control of European borders.

Macron called on European nations to do a better job stopping illegal migration into the EU. “On the European level, we decided to mon borders,” he said. “It’s not working anymore.”

“To be ing, you need to have a house. So, we need borders,” he said. “We need borders to be respected. We need rules.”

Macron said that nations that refuse to enforce the EU’s border – and nations such as Hungary and Poland, which refuse to acceptthe quota of Middle Eastern migrants apportioned by Brussels – should be expelled from the Schengen area. “This is the basis upon which Schengen should be overhauled, even if it means having fewer states within Schengen,” he said.

How have the French people responded?

A poll found that 63 percent of the French public found themselves unconvinced by the conference, and only seven percent said Macron’s plans were “very convincing.” Les Républicains leader Laurent Wauquiez said the initiatives amounted to “marginal adjustments.” Socialist Party leader Oliver Faurecalled Macron’s “response small.” And Fondation iFRAP called his proposals a “poor harvest.”

Macron did not promise to run for re-election in 2022.

Macron, 41, is one of the most ambitious leaders in Europe. But after being swept into power in an historic election (over the massively unpopular National Front), his poll numbers have remained mired in the 20s or 30s, and both of his most recent predecessors have served only one term. He did not directly answer whether he will seek a second term, although there is little doubt about his intentions.

Macron misidentified the essence of French character.

“We are above all children of the Enlightenment. And it is from these debates, these deliberations, this capacity to contradict one another … that good solutions can emerge for the country,” Macron said in his address. “The art of being French is being rooted and universal, attached to history and origins but embracing the future.”

There seems to be something missing from his description of a nation once known as “the eldest daughter of the Catholic Church.”

Ironically, Macron had to postpone his speech one week, because the Notre Dame Cathedral fire broke out the morning that he was scheduled to give it. Apparently, even its smoldering ruins cannot draw Macron’s attention to the importance of faith to his country and to Europe as a whole.

French speakers can watch the press conference here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Americans May Think They Want ‘Free College’ — Until They Find Out What It Is
Earlier today I pointed out that a plurality of Americans support single-payer health care — until they found out what it is. I suspect the same may be true for “free college,” another proposal endorsed by Bernie Sanders and others on the political left who want America to be more like Europe. As Samuel Goldman explains, “Americans don’t actually want the kind of stripped-down higher education that couldbe providedat public expense.” The parison is useful. AWashington Postpiecerecently praised Germany for...
The Puzzle of Economic Growth
Why are some countries rich and others poor? The answer to that question plex – and hotly debated. But economist Alex Tabarrok outlines several key ingredients to consistent economic growth -productivity, incentives, institutions – and explains how they bined with factors such as a country’s history, ideas, culture, geography, and even a little luck. ...
Why Protectionism Is Like Drinking Salt Water
Protectionism, the practice of shielding a country’s domestic industries from petition by taxing imports, has a strong appeal for Americans because it seems so obvious. If the globalized economy is a zero-sum game, then a “win” for China in the form of increased manufacturing jobs is likely to be a “loss” for America. The solution would therefore be to prevent China from taking “our jobs.” But sometimes what seems like an obvious solution can exasperate the underlying problem. Imagine that...
The New Aristocrats: ‘Conspicuous Authenticity’ in the Free Society
Under the feudalistic societies of old, status was organized through state-enforced hierarchies, leaving little room for the levels of status anxiety we see today. For us, petition ranges wide and free, leading to multiple manifestations and a whole heap of status signaling. Suchsignaling is as old as the free society itself, of course. Whether sending theirchildren to fancy classes and fencing lessons, accumulating ever-expensive luxury goods, or boasting in the labels of their fair trade coffee and the nobility of...
The real foundations of secular ideologies
Henri de Lubac Writing for the Catholic World Report, Acton’s Director of Research Samuel Gregg, reflects on Cardinal Henri de Lubac, whom he calls one of the “greatest theologians” of the 20th century. Gregg also argues that de Lubac’s interest in how secular ideologies such as Marxism or socialism had such influence on the Western church would benefit us today. “As someone immersed in the history of theology,” Gregg says, “de Lubac understood that the antecedents of some of the...
Should Christians Help Kill the $100 Bill?
What if there was an easy-to-implement government policy that would hardly affect ordinary people but would make it substantially more difficult for criminals — from drug dealers to terrorists to human traffickers — to carry out their illicit trade? What if the policy simply required inaction from several Western governments, for them to stop doing what they’ve been doing? Does that sound like a crime-fighting policy Christians should support? The proposal is rather simple: Eliminate high denomination, high value currency...
Explainer: What You Should Know About Presidential Primaries
How are presidential candidates chosen? Political parties are independent organizations that choose who will be their candidate at a presidential nominating convention. (For the purpose of simplicity, this article will focus mainly on the two major U.S. political parties, the Democrats and Republicans). While many different types of people attend the conventions, they are formally a gathering of “delegates” — political party members chosen as representatives. The delegates (collectively known as the “delegation”) vote on who should be the party’s...
Americans Like Single-Payer Health Care — Until They Find Out What it Is
A plurality of Americans support “Medicare for All”, legislation endorsed by Bernie Sanders and other Democrats that would establish a universal single-payer health care system in the U.S. At least they do until they find out what“single-payer” really means. A recent AP poll found that 39 percent support and 33 oppose replacing the current private health insurance system in the U.S. with a single government-run and taxpayer-funded plan like Medicare for all Americans that would cover medical, dental, vision, and...
Video: Ryan T. Anderson On The Future of Religious Liberty In America
On February 11th, the Acton Institute ed Ryan T. Anderson, William E. Simon senior research fellow in American principles and public policy at The Heritage Foundation, to discuss the vitally important issue of religious liberty as part of the 2016 Acton Lecture Series. Anderson is the author of Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and ReligiousFreedom; in his lecture, he lays out the challenges and opportunities faced by religious Americans in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision...
No, Mr. Trump, You Can’t Fix the Deficit by Cutting ‘Fraud, Waste, and Abuse’
Every election season politicians are asked how they will fix our ever-growing budget crisis. And every season at least one politician gives the same trite answer: By cutting “fraud, waste, and abuse.” Politicians love the answer because it doesn’t offend any specific constituency. After all, there are no groups lobbying for more fraud, waste, and abuse (at least not directly). And voters love the answer because it fits with both the conservative perception that government is mostly wasteful and should...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved