Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christ’s kingship means for religious liberty
What Christ’s kingship means for religious liberty
Oct 9, 2024 4:28 AM

In the newly translated Pro Rege: Living Under Christ the King, Volume 1, Abraham Kuyper reminds us that Christ is not only prophet and priest, but also king, challenging us to reflect on what it means to live under that kingship in a fallen world.

Written with the aim of “removing the separation between our life inside the church and our life outside the church,” Kuyper reminds us that “Christ’s being Savior does not exclude his being Lord,” and that this reality transforms our responses in every corner of cultural engagement, both inside the church walls in across business, educations, the arts, and so on.

Kuyper was writing tothe church in the Netherlands over 100 years ago, but over at Gentle Reformation, Barry York helpfully connects the dots to the American context, particularly as it relates to the current debates over religious libertyand our lopsided emphasis on worshipwithin the church.

“You can sing whatever you want in church, but you e out of church and act on those beliefs—at least not with any special protection from the law,” York writes, pointing to a recent doctrine from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. “That legal viewpoint—already put into action in recent court and regulatory rulings—threatens public funding and tax breaks that now support Christian colleges, K-12 schools, poverty-fighting organizations and other charities.”

And yet, “Christ is our Sovereign King, who demands loyalty in every area of our lives,” York continues, pointing to the following sentiment from Kuyper:

The confession of Christ’s kingship has been so enormously weakened and diluted—not only among those who have fallen away from the faith of their fathers, but also among believers—that it sometimes seems to have been forgotten even in the preaching of the word. Although great homage is paid to the Lord as Prophet and High plete devotion and loyalty to him as the anointed King no longer grips the hearts of the people. His kingship has disappeared from view, even among believers.

Indeed, the church mustn’t allow its allegiances mitments to shift according to the whims and pressures of the world around us, legal, cultural, or otherwise, receding into fortable walls of the church where religious action is deemed “polite” or “appropriate.”

For Kuyper, such a recession is due in large part to the forces of modernity and the illusion of power es with technological strength. “A human kingship imperceptibly came to power, leaving no place for the kingship of Christ,” he writes. “That kingship of humanity established a throne of glory for itself in the world cities, and from that seat it now rules over entire nations and peoples by what people refer to as the modern spirit of the age.”Within its walls, the church still maintains its light, Kuyper continues, but even there, the songs “have diminished in tenor and tone.” Everywhere else, “it is clear that Jesus’ kingship has been suppressed in the life of the nations.”

In our own modern context, we see a similar inward focus, with many Christians hailing policies like the Johnson Amendment as their #1priority, even as businesses and cultural institutions are faced with a range coercive threats to prostrate their consciences and religious convictions before the state.

As York explains, our cultural engagement ought not be influenced by the arm-twistingpolicies of the day, driven by tax incentives, government mandates, or acceptance by some cultural priesthood. We ought tofight for religious freedom even as we take action, and that action will be far more transformative if we maintain a proper view of Christ as King:

If we are going to have any hope of reversing the trend of shrinking religious liberty in our time and place, Christians today must recover the theology of Christ’s kingdom that Kuyper…advocated. It is because enough did understand Christ as King that Christians have, for centuries, started hospitals, universities, schools, soup kitchens, newspapers, businesses, and even entire governments. Because enough Christians understood Christ as King, they have continuously worked to reform the secular institutions and systems in which they labor Monday through Saturday.

If Christians believed their faith only obliged them to worship, they would have done none of those cultural things. But they have. Generation after generation.

Christians didn’t start any of those institutions for the tax write-offs. They didn’t start them because judges or legislators first gave them the OK. Christians have been active culturally only because they were first loyal spiritually to their King. Good theology, more than public policy, spurs Christians to create and redeem the culture around them. We need true belief more than tax breaks. We need persevering faith more than public funding.

As that underlying belief and “persevering faith” moves into action and maintains its pace, transforming everysphere of society and illuminating truth, goodness, beauty along the way, the world will benefit both here and now and on into the not yet.

Only when we truly worship Christ as King, not just in the walls of the church, but through the work of our hands and the word of our testimony, will the world get a glimpse of just what the King’sKingdom is all about.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Speaking of Obligations…
“You are obliged to love your neighbor as yourself, and loving him, you ought to help him spiritually, with prayer, counseling him with words, and assisting him both spiritually and temporally, according to the need in which he may be, at least with your goodwill if you have nothing else.” —Catharine of Siena (1347–1380), from The Dialogue HT: Christian History & Biography ...
Vatican Statement on … Chocolate?
Well, not exactly. Althought Archbishop John Foley, President of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications—and a “self-proclaimed ‘chocoholic'”—did address a gathering of Nestle executives on the subject of the morality of advertising. Given that a conscientious parent can hardly watch even a daytime sporting event on TV with his children in light of the low moral quality of advertising, I’d say it’s a subject worthy of attention. A couple of Foley’s statements: It frankly surprises me that as women rightly...
COE Review from the Mises Institute
Thomas Woods from the Mises Institute blog has posted his thoughts on the Call of the Entrepreneur. Woods praises the film saying, “For once, the moral dimension of entrepreneurial activity is brought to the fore and celebrated. For once the heroes are creators, not political hacks.” If you haven’t yet heard about the film, check out the trailer at ! ...
UAW v. MoveOn.org, CAFE v. Cap-and-Trade
It happened last week. In response to Rep. John Dingell’s decision to hold of off consideration of an energy bill that would include new corporate average fuel economy, or CAFE, standards, instead favoring directly targeting greenhouse gas emissions: “That brought a warm response from MoveOn.org, the liberal group that picketed Dingell’s office Wednesday over his stance on global warming and fuel economy standards. At Dingell’s Ypsilanti office, about half a dozen MoveOn supporters received an unexpected e from roughly 60...
Gerson on Obama at the UCC
In today’s WaPo, former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson opines on Senator Barack Obama’s recent address to a gathering of UCC faithful (HT). In “The Gospel Of Obama,” Gerson writes, “By speaking at a gathering of the United Church of Christ — among the most excruciatingly progressive of Protestant denominations — he was preaching to the liberal choir. And he did not effectively reach out to an evangelical movement in transition.” Gerson bases this judgment on the contention, citing a Pew...
The End of Work
Why do we work? When labor and toil is so often unfulfilling and troublesome, why keep on? For pagans, no doubt the answer is given in the book of Matthew: “Do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them.” A non-Christian view of work is one oriented toward survival. And that’s why a non-Christian...
Global Warming Consensus Alert: Hips Don’t Lie!
Well, I just got back from the Transformers movie (mini-review: pletely ridiculous, but it has Peter Cullen as the voice of Optimus Prime and lots of stuff blowing up, so it’s worth at least the matinee price, if you’re into that kind of thing), mowed the lawn (sorry – not carbon-neutral), and now I’ve stumbled upon the broadcast of Live Earth on Bravo. According to Al Gore, the concerts are not about fundraising, but are occurring simply to “raise awareness”...
Miller on the Milk Wars
Henry I. Miller, a doctor and fellow at the Hoover Institution, author of The Frankenfood Myth, weighs in on the milks wars over the artificial hormone rBST. In “Don’t Cry Over rBST Milk,” Miller writes, “Bad-faith efforts by biotechnology opponents to portray rBST as untested or harmful, and to discourage its use, keep society from taking full advantage of a safe and useful product.” Whether or not scientific studies show that the use of rBST is as safe as not...
Government Gambling on the Poor
The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) has published a paper titled, “Taxing the Poor: A Report on Tobacco, Alcohol, Gambling, and Other Taxes and Fees That Disproportionately Burden e Families” (PDF). The paper highlights state lotteries as particularly regressive taxes: “The dollar amount spent on the lottery by the e individuals (earning less than $10,000 annually) is twice as much as the highest earners (earning more than $100,000 annually).” I wrote a piece reacting to a poll with a...
Why Christian Education?
From Luther’s exposition of the mandment in his Treatise on Good Works (1520), alluding to King Manasseh’s actions in II Kings 21: What else is it but to sacrifice one’s own child to an idol and burn it when parents train their children more in the love of the world than in the love of God, and let their children go their own way and get burned up in worldly pleasure, love, enjoyment, lust, goods, and honor, but let God’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved