Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about the time value of money
What Christians should know about the time value of money
Dec 5, 2025 3:45 PM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

The Term: Time Value of Money

What It Means: The time value of money (TVM) is the concept that because of potential earning capacity, money available at the present time is worth more than the same amount at a future time.

Why It Matters: Would you rather receive $100 today or $100 one year in the future? You probably don’t have to consider the question too long before deciding the obvious answer is that you’d prefer the money today. But why is that the case? Because even if you’re unfamiliar with the concept, you likely have an intuitive understanding of the time value of money.

Money is more valuable today than tomorrow for two reasons: inflation and interest.

Inflation is the general increase in prices. If prices rise 5 percent a year, then a dollar you earn today will only be able to purchase 95 cents worth of the same goods and services a year from now. So when the inflation rate is high and rising you are usually better off not only having the dollar today but also spending that dollar as soon as possible.

But what if there is nothing you want to spend it on this year? That’s where the second factor — interest es in. Some people are willing to pay you in the future for the dollar you loan them today. They either believe they can use the money to earn more money (e.g., buying a car so they can e an Uber driver) or they are willing to sacrifice future money to purchase something they want today (i.e., a mortgage on a home).

Here’s why interest makes money in the present time even more valuable than in the future. Let’s say the simple interest rate is 10 percent a year, which means someone is willing to pay 10 cents a year for every dollar you loan them. If I borrow $100 from you at 10 percent a year, then next year you’ll have $110. (If the inflation rate is 5 percent, then your purchasing power is reduced to $105, which is still $5 more than it would have been.) So if someone gives you $100 today you can loan that money out and earn $110 —$10 more than if you had waited to accept the gift next year.

In Matthew 25, Jesus tells the Parable of the Bags of Gold which relies on an understanding of the time value of money:

To one [servant he] gave five bags of gold, to another two bags, and to another one bag, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. The man who had received five bags of gold went at once and put his money to work and gained five bags more. So also, the one with two bags of gold gained two more. But the man who had received one bag went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.

“After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. The man who had received five bags of gold brought the other five. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with five bags of gold. See, I have gained five more.’

“His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’

“The man with two bags of gold also came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with two bags of gold; see, I have gained two more.’

“His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’

“Then the man who had received one bag of gold came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed. So I was afraid and went out and hid your gold in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.’

“His master replied, ‘You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest. [Emphasis added]

While this parable is about the Kingdom of God and not about investing, the story does provide us useful framework for financial stewardship. If we are responsible stewards of the disposable e we have today, we will consider whether it is better to save and invest our extra resources to create more wealth that can be used for God’s purposes in the future.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• We gain a better understanding of the time value of money — and can make more prudent decisions about the future value of money — when we understand the inflation rate. But many of us who lived through periods of high inflation tend to overestimate the year-to-year rates of inflation. For example, many people would estimate the current annual inflation rate to be 4 percent or higher. But in reality it hasn’t been that high since 2007, when it was 4.1 percent. Since 2012 the rate has been under 2 percent, and was only 0.7 percent last year. By overestimating the inflation rate we my underestimate how much we can benefit from investments at even modest interest rates.

• There is a basic formula that can help you calculate the time value of money. The variables you need for the calculation are:

FV = Future value of money

PV = Present value of money

i = interest rate

n = number pounding periods per year

t = number of years

Based on these variables, the formula for TVM is:

FV = PV x (1 + (i / n)) ^ (n x t)

For example, if we invest $10,000 for one year at 10 percent interest the future value of that money is:

FV = $10,000 x (1 + (10% / 1) ^ (1 x 1) = $11,000

We can also use these variable to find the value of the future sum in present day dollars. For example, the value of $5,000 one year from pounded at 7 percent interest:

PV = $5,000 / (1 + (7% / 1) ^ (1 x 1) = $4,673

Note: You can use an online financial calculator to make the calculation easier.

• The time value of money depends not only on interest rate, inflation rate, and time horizon, but how many times pounding calculations puted each year. For example, using the $10,000 example above, if the number pounding periods is increased to quarterly, monthly or daily, the ending future value calculations are:

Quarterly Compounding: FV = $10,000 x (1 + (10% / 4) ^ (4 x 1) = $11,038

Monthly Compounding: FV = $10,000 x (1 + (10% / 12) ^ (12 x 1) = $11,047

Daily Compounding: FV = $10,000 x (1 + (10% / 365) ^ (365 x 1) = $11,052

Over time, this change pounding rates can have an significant impact on savings and investment.

• Earlier we noted that people tend to prefer money today to money in the future. There is one especially noteworthy exception: tax refunds.

Let’s say you get a tax refund of $1,200. That would mean you paid about $100 more in taxes every month than you needed to cover your tax payment. Instead of getting that $100 every month and saving it (thereby earning interest), you are loaning the federal government that money at a zero percent rate, and asking them to return it to you after April 15 the following year.

It is rational or prudent for people to give interest-free loans to the government every month? Probably not. But some people do it as a type of forced savings plan. Because they do not believe they are disciplined enough to save small amounts every month (and earn the interest), they give it to the government to hold for them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter
Our series on the year in review continues with the third fourth of 2006: July “Isn’t the Cold War Over?” David Michael Phelps I’ve got an idea for a new . Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off...
2006 in Review, 1st Quarter
This series will take a representative post from each month of the past year, to review the big stories of the past twelve months. First things first, the first quarter of 2006: January “Who is Pope Benedict XVI?,” Kishore Jayabalan Despite his many writings, scholarly expertise and long service to the Church as Prefect of Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, there’s still much of an unknown quality surrounding Pope Benedict XVI…. February “The Mohammed...
2006 in Review, 2nd Quarter
Our series on the year in review continues with the second quarter: April “Surprise! Evangelical Politics Isn’t Univocal,” Jordan J. Ballor So from issues like immigration to global warming, the press is eager to find the fault lines of evangelical politics. And moving beyond the typical Jim Wallis-Jerry Falwell dichotomy, there are real and honest disagreements among evangelicals on any number of political issues…. May “How Do You Spell Relief?” Jordan J. Ballor If Congress really wants to address the...
Buyer’s Remorse
A climatologist reflects on his visit to AGU’s conference last week. Salient bit here: What I see is something that I am having a hard time labeling, but that I might call either a "hangover" or a "sophomore slump" or "buyers remorse." None fit perfectly, but perhaps bination does. I speak for (my interpretation) of the collective: {We tried for years – decades – to get them to listen to us about climate change. To do that we had to...
Remembering Gerald Ford
The Acton Institute’s offices are right across the Grand River from the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum (and what will be Ford’s final resting place). Having passed these sites every day for several years on my walk to work, news of the ex-president’s death was especially poignant. National Review Online offers an interesting symposium on Ford’s presidency and legacy. From the other side of the ideological divide, Newsweek provides several retrospective pieces. A striking thing about Ford that I hadn’t...
A Reflection on the Incarnation
Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president of the Acton Institute, passes along a Christmas message over at Phi Beta Cons on National Review Online. Reflecting on the Incarnation, Sirico says, “This belief teaches us to take seriously human history, its institutions, economies and social relationships, for all of this, and more, is the stuff from which human destiny is discovered and directed.” At the Christmas staff meeting Rev. Sirico passed on similar thoughts to us, and concludes with this, which I...
Single-payer Schemes=Supply Shortages
Go to this page to watch a short video highlighting the story of one man’s fight against Canada’s health system. The film is focused on the defects of socialized medicine and so, naturally, does not deal with the serious problems existing in other systems (such as the United States). But it is an effective display of a problem that every attempt to manipulate prices encounters: how to make supply meet demand. ...
Story of an Entrepreneur
I like this feature on John Scharffenberger in this week’s U.S. News and World Report. It captures in anecdotal form almost all of the ingredients in entrepreneurial success. There is disregard for “conventional wisdom” and there is hard work and dedication. The author doesn’t articulate it this way, but there is also an ethical concern for quality product and the good of the customer. Entrepreneurial success isn’t as simple as all that, however. There is also “luck and timing,” and,...
Recidivism and Reform: Competing Views of the State’s Role in Prison
In this week’s mentary, I reflect on the past year’s developments for InnerChange Freedom Initiative, a ministry of Prison Fellowship. In June a federal judge in Iowa ruled against IFI’s work at Iowa’s Newton facility. In his ruling (PDF here), the judge wrote that the responsibility bating recidivism is “traditionally and exclusively reserved to the state.” This means that since reducing recidivism is a “state function,” anyone working bat recidivism is by definition a “state actor.” Panopticon blueprint by Jeremy...
Never a Countdown on Effective Compassion
The “10 years after welfare reform” articles of this past summer are old news, of course. Not surprisingly, indications were that, like any public policy, reform hadn’t been the all-time poverty solution, but that policies had, in fact, helped a significant number of people to move themselves to self-sufficiency. A recent Wall Street Journal series highlighted the broad range of issues related to moving out of poverty. panion piece to the December 28 entry, “Economists Are Putting Theories to Scientific...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved