Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
Feb 27, 2026 2:28 PM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: A marginal tax rate is the amount of tax paid on an additional dollar of e.

The Explanation: What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?

For most Americans, the question is surprisingly difficult to answer. The reason we don’t know our tax rate is because we have a progressive system of taxation on e—and most of us don’t fully grasp the concept of marginal tax rates.

Fortunately, the concept is easy to understand once you get past the confusing jargon. Let’s unpack what it means.

First, we need to understand the term “tax rate.” This is simply the ratio of tax to the amount being taxed. The ratio is almost always expressed as a percentage, so instead of saying the tax rate ratio is 1:10 we just say the tax rate is 10 percent. That means for every dollar I’d be taxed 10 cents (1:10 or 10%).

In American we have a progressive tax rate system. To say our system of taxation is “progressive” does not mean that political progressives (i.e., liberals) designed it or prefer it (though it mostly was and they generally do). A progressive tax merely means that the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. So for e tax, the tax rate progresses from low-to-high as a person’s e increases.

The third thing we need to know is the meaning of “marginal” in marginal tax rates. Marginal is a key concept in economics, but for now when you hear the term “marginal” just think of it as “additional.” For example, the marginal (additional) tax rate is the additional tax on the marginal (additional) e you earn.

Now we have only one more concept to add: tax brackets. (For our purposes we will focus solely on the federal tax brackets.) The federal system of taxation on e is progressive and marginal, which means we do not pay the same tax rate on every dollar of our e. (Read that sentence again, because failure to understand that point is the reason most people get confused about tax rates.)

Think of tax brackets as buckets sitting on a staircase that hold specific amounts of your e. The first bucket on the bottom step says “$0-$100 – Tax at 10 percent”, the second bucket on the second step says “$101-200 – Tax at 20 percent”, and so on up the staircase. Once you fill up the first bucket the additional (marginal) dollar (the 101st dollar) progresses into the next bucket, and so on up the staircase. This is an image of a progressive system of marginal tax rates that includes several tax brackets.

Now let’s move to a real-world example by looking at the marginal tax rates for Becky, an unmarried worker. The following is the tax brackets for 2018 (they’ll be changing in 2019) for individuals:

10% for e $0 to$9,525

12% for e $9,526 to $38,700

22% for e $38,701 to $82,500

24% for e $82,501 to $157,500

32% for e $157,501 to $200,000

35% for e $200,001 to $500,000

37% for e $500,000+

What is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $8,000 a year? That one is easy: 10 percent. But what is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $10,000 a year? That is trickier. Since Becky has two tax rates we have to calculate her average tax rate.

The first $9,525 Becky earned goes into the first bucket (the 10% bracket) while the next $475 dollars goes into the second bucket (the 12% bracket). So on the first $9,525 she paid $952.50 in taxes and on the $475 she paid $57. Altogether she paid $1,009.50 in taxes. The ratio of 1,009.50:10,000 equals an average tax rate of 10.1 percent.

And this is why people get confused. If you ask Becky what her marginal tax rate is she’ll look at the chart and answer (correctly) that it’s 12 percent. She may therefore assume that she pays an e tax rate of 12 percent. In reality, she only pays the 12 percent rate on the additional e over $9,525 that she’s earned—the $475. But if you ask Becky our original question—“What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?”—she will likely say 12 percent.

In a way, that makes sense. We assume that we should be able to look at the IRS’s tax bracket chart and determine our tax rate. But the chart only tells us about our marginal rate (i.e., the tax we pay on our last few dollars of our e) and does not reveal the average rate (i.e., the tax we pay, on average, on all our e).

Calculating our average tax rate plicated—it just requires some multiplication and addition. Let’s look at one more example, Becky’s unmarried boss Bob, who earned $100,000 in e. To calculate Bob’s average tax rate we must divide up his $100,000 e into each of the buckets (i.e., tax brackets). Let’s start by putting a number on each dollar, from 1 to 100,000.

In the 10% bucket we put $9,525 (dollars #1 to #9,525); in the 12% bucket we put $29,174 (dollars #9,526 to #38,700); in the 22% bucket we put $43,799 (dollars #38,701 to #82,500); and in the 24 percent bucket we put $17,499 (dollars #82,501 to #157,500). Now we just need to multiply the amount in each bucket by the tax rate for that bracket and add up each column:

10% x $9,525 = $952.50

12% x $29,174 = $3,500.88

22% x $43,799 = $9,635.78

24% x $17,499 = $4,199.76

$952.50 + $3,500.88 + $9,635.78 + $4,199.76 = $18,288.92

Bob owes a total tax of $18,288.92, which means his average tax rate is 18.3 percent (total tax paid ($18,288.92) / total e ($100,000)).

Why it Matters: We now understand how to use marginal tax rates to calculate the average tax rate we pay on our e. But why is this important for Christians to know? There are at least two reasons.

The first reason is that all of our e belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. While God doesn’t require us to know the exact percentage of how much we are paying in taxes, knowing our average tax rate can give us a clearer picture of how many resources we have—after “rendering to Caesar” (Mark 12:17)—to use for God’s other purposes.

The second reason is that all of our time belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. For many workers, whether they are salaried or paid hourly, the level of additional e they earn is correlated with the additional time they spend on their work. Every individual has to decide for themselves how much of this resource God wants them to spend on additional work. But they should make the decision based on accurate assessment of the facts. Often, a misunderstanding of how marginal tax rates works leads them to assume additional work is not worth the effort.

Let’s look at one last example. Barney earns $38,000 and assumes (erroneously) that since his marginal tax rate is 12 percent, that he’s paying a total tax rate of 12 percent, which would be a tax of$4,560 (in reality he’s only paying $4,369.50). Barney’s boss tells him that by taking on an extra three hours each month he can earn $40,000 per year. Barney looks at the IRS chart and notices the raise would make his marginal tax rate 22 percent. He assumes (again, erroneously) that the raise would force him to pay taxes of $8,800 (22% x $40,000).

Since he thinks he was paying $4,560 he believes the raise would require him to pay $4,240 in additional taxes. He thinks he’d have to pay more than twice as much in taxes as he’d earn from the $2,000 raise! (This may seem far-fetched but I assure you someone you know thinks this way about taxes.)

The reality is that Barney only pays the higher rate on his additional (marginal) e ($1,300). So instead of paying $4,240.00 more after the raise, he only pays $286 more. What Barney doesn’t understand is that moving to a higher tax bracket never causes you tohave a lower net e.

Knowing how marginal tax rates affect Barney’s pay doesn’t tell us whether he should work more, but it can help him make a better informed decision.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• Your marginal tax rate will always be higher than your average tax rate, unless you are in the lowest tax bracket—then the marginal rate (since there is only one) is equal to the average rate. A helpful rule of thumb is that whatever your highest marginal tax bracket is, your average tax rate will be at least several percentage points lower than that.

• Just as the marginal tax rate applies to your marginal (additional) e — the e you put in the last few buckets (brackets)—so too do tax deductions. As economist Jodi Beggs explains:

The same principle holds in reverse for tax deductions- if you make $50,000 and have a $100 tax-deductible expenditure (ignore the standard deduction for now), your taxable e decreases by $100 and your taxes owed decrease by $25, in effect giving you a discount on your expenditure equal to your marginal tax rate. Note again that it was only this last tax bracket, or your marginal tax rate, that was relevant in calculating the effect of the tax deduction.

• Tax deductions are valuable because they lower your taxable e. But tax credits even better. Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reduction of your e tax liability. If your marginal tax rate is 22% and you get a $100 deduction, you save $22. In contrast, a $100 tax credit saves you $100. As the IRS says, “A tax credit is always worth more than a dollar-equivalent tax deduction, because deductions are calculated using percentages.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
When Victoria Coates, Trump’s new NSC appointee, addressed the Acton Institute
Togetherwithhis appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, yet another Trump administration official has ties to the Acton Institute. The Washington Free Beacon reported today that President Trump has appointed Victoria C. G. Coates, Ph.D., to serve as senior director for strategic assessments at the National Security Council (NSC). Action Institute – THE CRISIS OF LIBERTY IN THE WEST THE BLOOMSBURY HOTEL * LONDON, UK An art historian by training, she has a long record of service in foreign...
‘Disturbing ideas’ of the Progressive Movement
In a new article at the Public Discourse, Acton’s director of research Samuel Gregg, reviews Thomas C. Leonard’s new book,Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, & American Economics in the Progressive Era. Leonard’s latest “details the progressive movement’s reliance on eugenics and race science as well as its effort to exclude the disabled, blacks, immigrants, the poor, and women from full participation in American society.” Gregg starts his article by noting both the positive and negative events that took place in the...
A businessman who builds low-cost private schools for the masses
Many plain about the poor quality of America’s public schools. ButBob Luddy didsomething about it. Tired of trying to convince North Carolina bureaucratsto improve the state’s public schools, Luddy built his own network of low-cost private schools that the government can’t meddle with. ...
Ending human trafficking through education and awareness
Today is the last day of National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month. But ending human trafficking through education and awareness is a year-round task. As the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work notes, we need morepublic education around the practice of human trafficking in order to help aid the more than 20 million victims who live as modern-day slaves. “Trafficking and modern-day slavery is an plex, monster of a problem,” says Annalisa Enrile, USC clinical associate professor. “Our...
Is economic speculation immoral?
Note: This is post #19 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Speculation is often considered to be morally dubious. But, can speculation actually be useful to the market process? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Tyler Cowen shows that speculation can actually smooth prices over time and increase human flourishing. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed. You can adjust the speed...
Acton Institute makes strong showing in annual think tank rankings
On January 26, the University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) released its 10th Annual Think Tank Report. This list ranks thousands of think tanks worldwide and ranks them in dozens of different categories. The “think tank of think tanks” has a rigorous ranking criteria which includes: “quality mitment of the think tank’s leadership,”“quality, number, and reach of publications,”“reputation with policymakers,”“media reputation,”“ability to produce new knowledge,”“financial stewardship,” and“impact on society.” Chatham House was named “Think Tank of...
Explainer: What you should know about executive orders
During his first week in office, President Trump has signed a number of executive orders, affecting a range of policies from trade to health care to immigration. Here is what you should know about executive orders: What is an executive order? An executive order is an official document, signed by the president, used to manage the Federal Government. Are executive orders legally binding? Yes, assuming they are limited to the scope of the executive action allowed by a president, an...
Explainer: President Trump’s executive order on reducing regulations and regulatory cost
What just happened? Today, President Trump signed an executive order titled, “Reducing Regulation And Controlling Regulatory Costs.” The stated purpose of the executive order is “to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required ply with Federal regulations.” What does this executive order do? The order requires that for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations must be identified for elimination, and that the “cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and controlled...
Report: Populism and autocracy undermining U.S. and global freedom
Protesters shouting nationalist and anti-immigrant slogans disrupt a tribute in Brussels, Belgium to victims of terrorist attacks. March 2016. Credit: Kristof van /AFP/Getty Images. Earlier today Freedom House released the 2017 edition of their flagship report, “Freedom in the World.” It was not positive. Titled “Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy,” it shows much erosion in various freedoms throughout the world. According to their website, Freedom House has published this important report since 1973 in order to...
Should the government cap CEOs’ salaries?
Ideas have consequences, but they do not have geographical boundaries.The latest example of this truth isUK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s proposal that the government impose amaximum annual salary on British residents – an“earnings cap” on how much anyone could earn in any givenyear. The idea enjoyed massive popularity in the United States during the Great Depression due to the charismatic support of one man: Senator Huey “Kingfish” Long. The Louisiana governor and senator claimed that his “Share Our Wealth”...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved