Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
Jun 10, 2026 12:52 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: A marginal tax rate is the amount of tax paid on an additional dollar of e.

The Explanation: What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?

For most Americans, the question is surprisingly difficult to answer. The reason we don’t know our tax rate is because we have a progressive system of taxation on e—and most of us don’t fully grasp the concept of marginal tax rates.

Fortunately, the concept is easy to understand once you get past the confusing jargon. Let’s unpack what it means.

First, we need to understand the term “tax rate.” This is simply the ratio of tax to the amount being taxed. The ratio is almost always expressed as a percentage, so instead of saying the tax rate ratio is 1:10 we just say the tax rate is 10 percent. That means for every dollar I’d be taxed 10 cents (1:10 or 10%).

In American we have a progressive tax rate system. To say our system of taxation is “progressive” does not mean that political progressives (i.e., liberals) designed it or prefer it (though it mostly was and they generally do). A progressive tax merely means that the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. So for e tax, the tax rate progresses from low-to-high as a person’s e increases.

The third thing we need to know is the meaning of “marginal” in marginal tax rates. Marginal is a key concept in economics, but for now when you hear the term “marginal” just think of it as “additional.” For example, the marginal (additional) tax rate is the additional tax on the marginal (additional) e you earn.

Now we have only one more concept to add: tax brackets. (For our purposes we will focus solely on the federal tax brackets.) The federal system of taxation on e is progressive and marginal, which means we do not pay the same tax rate on every dollar of our e. (Read that sentence again, because failure to understand that point is the reason most people get confused about tax rates.)

Think of tax brackets as buckets sitting on a staircase that hold specific amounts of your e. The first bucket on the bottom step says “$0-$100 – Tax at 10 percent”, the second bucket on the second step says “$101-200 – Tax at 20 percent”, and so on up the staircase. Once you fill up the first bucket the additional (marginal) dollar (the 101st dollar) progresses into the next bucket, and so on up the staircase. This is an image of a progressive system of marginal tax rates that includes several tax brackets.

Now let’s move to a real-world example by looking at the marginal tax rates for Becky, an unmarried worker. The following is the tax brackets for 2018 (they’ll be changing in 2019) for individuals:

10% for e $0 to$9,525

12% for e $9,526 to $38,700

22% for e $38,701 to $82,500

24% for e $82,501 to $157,500

32% for e $157,501 to $200,000

35% for e $200,001 to $500,000

37% for e $500,000+

What is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $8,000 a year? That one is easy: 10 percent. But what is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $10,000 a year? That is trickier. Since Becky has two tax rates we have to calculate her average tax rate.

The first $9,525 Becky earned goes into the first bucket (the 10% bracket) while the next $475 dollars goes into the second bucket (the 12% bracket). So on the first $9,525 she paid $952.50 in taxes and on the $475 she paid $57. Altogether she paid $1,009.50 in taxes. The ratio of 1,009.50:10,000 equals an average tax rate of 10.1 percent.

And this is why people get confused. If you ask Becky what her marginal tax rate is she’ll look at the chart and answer (correctly) that it’s 12 percent. She may therefore assume that she pays an e tax rate of 12 percent. In reality, she only pays the 12 percent rate on the additional e over $9,525 that she’s earned—the $475. But if you ask Becky our original question—“What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?”—she will likely say 12 percent.

In a way, that makes sense. We assume that we should be able to look at the IRS’s tax bracket chart and determine our tax rate. But the chart only tells us about our marginal rate (i.e., the tax we pay on our last few dollars of our e) and does not reveal the average rate (i.e., the tax we pay, on average, on all our e).

Calculating our average tax rate plicated—it just requires some multiplication and addition. Let’s look at one more example, Becky’s unmarried boss Bob, who earned $100,000 in e. To calculate Bob’s average tax rate we must divide up his $100,000 e into each of the buckets (i.e., tax brackets). Let’s start by putting a number on each dollar, from 1 to 100,000.

In the 10% bucket we put $9,525 (dollars #1 to #9,525); in the 12% bucket we put $29,174 (dollars #9,526 to #38,700); in the 22% bucket we put $43,799 (dollars #38,701 to #82,500); and in the 24 percent bucket we put $17,499 (dollars #82,501 to #157,500). Now we just need to multiply the amount in each bucket by the tax rate for that bracket and add up each column:

10% x $9,525 = $952.50

12% x $29,174 = $3,500.88

22% x $43,799 = $9,635.78

24% x $17,499 = $4,199.76

$952.50 + $3,500.88 + $9,635.78 + $4,199.76 = $18,288.92

Bob owes a total tax of $18,288.92, which means his average tax rate is 18.3 percent (total tax paid ($18,288.92) / total e ($100,000)).

Why it Matters: We now understand how to use marginal tax rates to calculate the average tax rate we pay on our e. But why is this important for Christians to know? There are at least two reasons.

The first reason is that all of our e belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. While God doesn’t require us to know the exact percentage of how much we are paying in taxes, knowing our average tax rate can give us a clearer picture of how many resources we have—after “rendering to Caesar” (Mark 12:17)—to use for God’s other purposes.

The second reason is that all of our time belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. For many workers, whether they are salaried or paid hourly, the level of additional e they earn is correlated with the additional time they spend on their work. Every individual has to decide for themselves how much of this resource God wants them to spend on additional work. But they should make the decision based on accurate assessment of the facts. Often, a misunderstanding of how marginal tax rates works leads them to assume additional work is not worth the effort.

Let’s look at one last example. Barney earns $38,000 and assumes (erroneously) that since his marginal tax rate is 12 percent, that he’s paying a total tax rate of 12 percent, which would be a tax of$4,560 (in reality he’s only paying $4,369.50). Barney’s boss tells him that by taking on an extra three hours each month he can earn $40,000 per year. Barney looks at the IRS chart and notices the raise would make his marginal tax rate 22 percent. He assumes (again, erroneously) that the raise would force him to pay taxes of $8,800 (22% x $40,000).

Since he thinks he was paying $4,560 he believes the raise would require him to pay $4,240 in additional taxes. He thinks he’d have to pay more than twice as much in taxes as he’d earn from the $2,000 raise! (This may seem far-fetched but I assure you someone you know thinks this way about taxes.)

The reality is that Barney only pays the higher rate on his additional (marginal) e ($1,300). So instead of paying $4,240.00 more after the raise, he only pays $286 more. What Barney doesn’t understand is that moving to a higher tax bracket never causes you tohave a lower net e.

Knowing how marginal tax rates affect Barney’s pay doesn’t tell us whether he should work more, but it can help him make a better informed decision.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• Your marginal tax rate will always be higher than your average tax rate, unless you are in the lowest tax bracket—then the marginal rate (since there is only one) is equal to the average rate. A helpful rule of thumb is that whatever your highest marginal tax bracket is, your average tax rate will be at least several percentage points lower than that.

• Just as the marginal tax rate applies to your marginal (additional) e — the e you put in the last few buckets (brackets)—so too do tax deductions. As economist Jodi Beggs explains:

The same principle holds in reverse for tax deductions- if you make $50,000 and have a $100 tax-deductible expenditure (ignore the standard deduction for now), your taxable e decreases by $100 and your taxes owed decrease by $25, in effect giving you a discount on your expenditure equal to your marginal tax rate. Note again that it was only this last tax bracket, or your marginal tax rate, that was relevant in calculating the effect of the tax deduction.

• Tax deductions are valuable because they lower your taxable e. But tax credits even better. Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reduction of your e tax liability. If your marginal tax rate is 22% and you get a $100 deduction, you save $22. In contrast, a $100 tax credit saves you $100. As the IRS says, “A tax credit is always worth more than a dollar-equivalent tax deduction, because deductions are calculated using percentages.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Putting a Leash on the Freedom of Parents and the Imaginations of Children
My parents should have been jailed for child neglect. At least that’s what would be their fate if I were growing up today. Fortunately for them (and for me), I was a child during the 1970s, a time when kids were (mostly) free to explore the world. At age seven I was allowed to wander a mile in each direction from my home. By age nine I was exploring the underground sewers and drainage system of Wichita Falls, Texas. When...
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
During last night’s Oscar ceremony, Best Supporting Actresswinner Patricia Arquette used her acceptance speech to rail against unfair pay for women: To every women who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time … to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America. The wage equality that Arquette is referring to is the gender wage gap—the difference...
Florist Chooses Conscience Over Settlement
Last year Washington State’s Attorney General sued Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts on the basis of consumer protection. Florist Barronelle Stutzman had refused to sell flowers to a long time customer when the arrangements were to be used for a same-sex marriage ceremony. Although Stutzman did not have any qualms about serving serving gay customers, she “didn’t want to be involved in a same-sex marriage.” “I just put my hands on his and told [the customer who made the request] because...
Religious Activists Push Back Against ‘Blunt Instrument’ of Fossil Fuels Divestment
Your faithful correspondent last week exposed the fossil-fuel divestment endgame of religious shareholder activists. As You Sow President Danielle Fugere sees her group’s activities as awareness-raising exercises for climate change, but AYS’s alignment with environmentalist and divestment firebrand Naomi Klein suggests they’d settle for nothing less than nationalizing panies. This week, I’m happy to report another group frequently called to task in this space, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, opposes the AYS divestment onslaught. Reporting in last week’s Wall...
Does Innovation Triumph Over Regulation?
Do government regulations squelch marketplace innovation? A new study from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Nathan Goldschlag and George Mason University’s Alex Tabarrok says, “Not really.” According to Ryan Young at the Competitive Enterprise Institute: …the underlying institutions of social cooperation, market exchange, and dynamism are strong enough that federal regulation has, according to Goldschlag and Tabarrok’s analysis, so far been unable to squelch them. Just as a balloon pressed on one end pushes air to the other end, people will...
Economic Freedom Isn’t Enough
We know that, for economies to thrive, people must be free to start their own businesses without taxing regulations, that free trade must be the de facto means of doing business, and that cronyism and corruption must be eradicated. But that’s not enough. At the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, blogger (and former Acton intern) Elise Amyx says we have to have human flourishing as well. Economic freedom is only ponent of human flourishing. We should think about it...
First Comprehensive Health Study Of Trafficking Victims Reveals Complex Needs
The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the International Organization for Migration has just published the prehensive study regarding the health of human trafficking victims. The study, which looked at men, women and children, reveals that victims of both labor and sex trafficking have severe plex health concerns. The study was carried out in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam, working with people who had been rescued and were entering programs for victims of human trafficking. Researchers asked participants about...
Marie Harf May Have Stumbled Into Something
I do not believe Marie Harf is an eloquent speaker, but I did think her “jobs for ISIS” remarks made some sense. We know that in American cities, for instance, if young men do not have education and jobs, they get into mischief. The kind of mischief that includes gangs and drugs and violence. Why would we expect that young men in Libya, Iraq, and elsewhere would be any different? Apparently, I’m not the only one. While others have sneered...
How Anti-Catholic Bias From 140 Years Ago Affects Our Religious Freedom Today
Eleven years ago this week, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Locke v. Davey that continues to have a detrimental impact on religious liberty. But the seeds for that ruling were planted 140 years ago, in another attempt to curb religious liberty. When James Blaine introduced his ill-fated constitutional amendment in 1875, he probably never would have imagined the unintended consequences it would have over a hundred years later. Blaine wanted to prohibit the use of state funds...
Radically Communitarian Islam
Graeme Wood’s excellent piece in The Atlantic has justly been making the rounds for the past week or so. It is well worth reading with a number of insights and points that strike at the heart of the contemporary conflict between modernity and religious violence. mend “What ISIS Really Wants” to your reading. (Rasha al Aqeedi’s “Caliphatalism,” which looks more closely at the situation in Mosul, makes a panion read.) One of the elements of Wood’s piece that stuck out...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved