Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
What Christians should know about marginal tax rates
Apr 11, 2026 7:34 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: A marginal tax rate is the amount of tax paid on an additional dollar of e.

The Explanation: What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?

For most Americans, the question is surprisingly difficult to answer. The reason we don’t know our tax rate is because we have a progressive system of taxation on e—and most of us don’t fully grasp the concept of marginal tax rates.

Fortunately, the concept is easy to understand once you get past the confusing jargon. Let’s unpack what it means.

First, we need to understand the term “tax rate.” This is simply the ratio of tax to the amount being taxed. The ratio is almost always expressed as a percentage, so instead of saying the tax rate ratio is 1:10 we just say the tax rate is 10 percent. That means for every dollar I’d be taxed 10 cents (1:10 or 10%).

In American we have a progressive tax rate system. To say our system of taxation is “progressive” does not mean that political progressives (i.e., liberals) designed it or prefer it (though it mostly was and they generally do). A progressive tax merely means that the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. So for e tax, the tax rate progresses from low-to-high as a person’s e increases.

The third thing we need to know is the meaning of “marginal” in marginal tax rates. Marginal is a key concept in economics, but for now when you hear the term “marginal” just think of it as “additional.” For example, the marginal (additional) tax rate is the additional tax on the marginal (additional) e you earn.

Now we have only one more concept to add: tax brackets. (For our purposes we will focus solely on the federal tax brackets.) The federal system of taxation on e is progressive and marginal, which means we do not pay the same tax rate on every dollar of our e. (Read that sentence again, because failure to understand that point is the reason most people get confused about tax rates.)

Think of tax brackets as buckets sitting on a staircase that hold specific amounts of your e. The first bucket on the bottom step says “$0-$100 – Tax at 10 percent”, the second bucket on the second step says “$101-200 – Tax at 20 percent”, and so on up the staircase. Once you fill up the first bucket the additional (marginal) dollar (the 101st dollar) progresses into the next bucket, and so on up the staircase. This is an image of a progressive system of marginal tax rates that includes several tax brackets.

Now let’s move to a real-world example by looking at the marginal tax rates for Becky, an unmarried worker. The following is the tax brackets for 2018 (they’ll be changing in 2019) for individuals:

10% for e $0 to$9,525

12% for e $9,526 to $38,700

22% for e $38,701 to $82,500

24% for e $82,501 to $157,500

32% for e $157,501 to $200,000

35% for e $200,001 to $500,000

37% for e $500,000+

What is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $8,000 a year? That one is easy: 10 percent. But what is Becky’s tax rate if she earns $10,000 a year? That is trickier. Since Becky has two tax rates we have to calculate her average tax rate.

The first $9,525 Becky earned goes into the first bucket (the 10% bracket) while the next $475 dollars goes into the second bucket (the 12% bracket). So on the first $9,525 she paid $952.50 in taxes and on the $475 she paid $57. Altogether she paid $1,009.50 in taxes. The ratio of 1,009.50:10,000 equals an average tax rate of 10.1 percent.

And this is why people get confused. If you ask Becky what her marginal tax rate is she’ll look at the chart and answer (correctly) that it’s 12 percent. She may therefore assume that she pays an e tax rate of 12 percent. In reality, she only pays the 12 percent rate on the additional e over $9,525 that she’s earned—the $475. But if you ask Becky our original question—“What is the tax rate you pay on your current e?”—she will likely say 12 percent.

In a way, that makes sense. We assume that we should be able to look at the IRS’s tax bracket chart and determine our tax rate. But the chart only tells us about our marginal rate (i.e., the tax we pay on our last few dollars of our e) and does not reveal the average rate (i.e., the tax we pay, on average, on all our e).

Calculating our average tax rate plicated—it just requires some multiplication and addition. Let’s look at one more example, Becky’s unmarried boss Bob, who earned $100,000 in e. To calculate Bob’s average tax rate we must divide up his $100,000 e into each of the buckets (i.e., tax brackets). Let’s start by putting a number on each dollar, from 1 to 100,000.

In the 10% bucket we put $9,525 (dollars #1 to #9,525); in the 12% bucket we put $29,174 (dollars #9,526 to #38,700); in the 22% bucket we put $43,799 (dollars #38,701 to #82,500); and in the 24 percent bucket we put $17,499 (dollars #82,501 to #157,500). Now we just need to multiply the amount in each bucket by the tax rate for that bracket and add up each column:

10% x $9,525 = $952.50

12% x $29,174 = $3,500.88

22% x $43,799 = $9,635.78

24% x $17,499 = $4,199.76

$952.50 + $3,500.88 + $9,635.78 + $4,199.76 = $18,288.92

Bob owes a total tax of $18,288.92, which means his average tax rate is 18.3 percent (total tax paid ($18,288.92) / total e ($100,000)).

Why it Matters: We now understand how to use marginal tax rates to calculate the average tax rate we pay on our e. But why is this important for Christians to know? There are at least two reasons.

The first reason is that all of our e belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. While God doesn’t require us to know the exact percentage of how much we are paying in taxes, knowing our average tax rate can give us a clearer picture of how many resources we have—after “rendering to Caesar” (Mark 12:17)—to use for God’s other purposes.

The second reason is that all of our time belongs to God—and we are called to be good stewards of his resources. For many workers, whether they are salaried or paid hourly, the level of additional e they earn is correlated with the additional time they spend on their work. Every individual has to decide for themselves how much of this resource God wants them to spend on additional work. But they should make the decision based on accurate assessment of the facts. Often, a misunderstanding of how marginal tax rates works leads them to assume additional work is not worth the effort.

Let’s look at one last example. Barney earns $38,000 and assumes (erroneously) that since his marginal tax rate is 12 percent, that he’s paying a total tax rate of 12 percent, which would be a tax of$4,560 (in reality he’s only paying $4,369.50). Barney’s boss tells him that by taking on an extra three hours each month he can earn $40,000 per year. Barney looks at the IRS chart and notices the raise would make his marginal tax rate 22 percent. He assumes (again, erroneously) that the raise would force him to pay taxes of $8,800 (22% x $40,000).

Since he thinks he was paying $4,560 he believes the raise would require him to pay $4,240 in additional taxes. He thinks he’d have to pay more than twice as much in taxes as he’d earn from the $2,000 raise! (This may seem far-fetched but I assure you someone you know thinks this way about taxes.)

The reality is that Barney only pays the higher rate on his additional (marginal) e ($1,300). So instead of paying $4,240.00 more after the raise, he only pays $286 more. What Barney doesn’t understand is that moving to a higher tax bracket never causes you tohave a lower net e.

Knowing how marginal tax rates affect Barney’s pay doesn’t tell us whether he should work more, but it can help him make a better informed decision.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• Your marginal tax rate will always be higher than your average tax rate, unless you are in the lowest tax bracket—then the marginal rate (since there is only one) is equal to the average rate. A helpful rule of thumb is that whatever your highest marginal tax bracket is, your average tax rate will be at least several percentage points lower than that.

• Just as the marginal tax rate applies to your marginal (additional) e — the e you put in the last few buckets (brackets)—so too do tax deductions. As economist Jodi Beggs explains:

The same principle holds in reverse for tax deductions- if you make $50,000 and have a $100 tax-deductible expenditure (ignore the standard deduction for now), your taxable e decreases by $100 and your taxes owed decrease by $25, in effect giving you a discount on your expenditure equal to your marginal tax rate. Note again that it was only this last tax bracket, or your marginal tax rate, that was relevant in calculating the effect of the tax deduction.

• Tax deductions are valuable because they lower your taxable e. But tax credits even better. Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reduction of your e tax liability. If your marginal tax rate is 22% and you get a $100 deduction, you save $22. In contrast, a $100 tax credit saves you $100. As the IRS says, “A tax credit is always worth more than a dollar-equivalent tax deduction, because deductions are calculated using percentages.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
When will the whole world have universal access to basic education?
Education—even at the most basic levels—not only makes poor countries richer, it also saves lives. For example, if sub-Saharan Africa were achieving universal lower secondary education for women by 2030, it would prevent up to 3.5 million child deaths from 2050-2060. Achieving universal upper pletion across the globe by that date would also prevent up to 50,000 disaster-related deaths per decade by 2040-2050. And by universalising upper secondary education in low e countries, the world could increase per capita earnings...
The idea equation for economic growth
The key to creating economic flourishing is economic growth and the key to creating long-term economic growth is to create new ideas. But whatis the key to creating ideas that lead to innovation? EconomistAlex Tabarrok says the idea equation goes like this:Ideas = Population x Incentives x Ideas/per hour This equation is a useful way to lay out the factors affecting idea production, says Tabarrok in the video below. When we understand the factors behind production, then we can better...
The economics of sainthood
On Sunday, Mother Teresa of Calcutta became St. Teresa (though Pope Francis said, “We will continue to call her Mother Teresa.”). Mother Teresa was the 29th saint canonized by Pope Francis during his three-year pontificate. While 29 may sound like a lot, Francis’s per-year average (9.7) is just slightly more than Pope Benedict’s pace (6.4 a year) and much, much slower than Pope John Paul II, who averaged 18.2 a year. Still, the increase in the rate of saint-making means...
Justice, Torah and the Minimum Wage
This question of whether government should mandate a higher minimum wage is not a new one, says Curt Biren in this week’s Acton Commentary. In fact, es up in ancient Jewish texts — related to property rights, labor law and charity law: Economists have studied the idea, but they often disagree on its impact. Some can cite statistics that purportedly show that there is no marked decline in employment. Others have data to prove that the imposition of higher minimum...
Rise of the ‘super-neo-reverse Malthusians’
The doom delusions of central planners and population “experts” are well documented and refuted, ranging fromthe early pessimism of the Rev. Thomas Robert Malthustothe morefanatical predictions of Paul Ehrlich. Through these lenses,population growth is a driver of poverty, following from a framing of the human person asa strain and a drain on society and the environment. As Michael Mattheson Miller has written, such thinking suffers from a zero-sum mindset wherein the economy (or any web of human relationships) is a...
Interview: The Christian case for libertarianism
Is it possible to be both a Christian and a libertarian? In a ing book, Called to Freedom: Why You Can Be Christian & Libertarian, six Christian libertarians offer an emphatic, “yes,” exploring key tensions and challenging a mon critiques (whether from conservative Christians or secularlibertarians). The project is currently seeking funds via Indiegogo, where you can donate or pre-order your copy. Having already discussed the topic on numerous occasions with two of the book’s authors – Jacqueline Isaacs and...
Explainer: What you should know about the Constitution Party platform
Note: This is the fifthin a series examining the positions of several minorparty and independent presidential candidates onissues covered by the Acton Institute. A previous series covered the Democratic Party platform (see here and here) and the Republican Party Platform (see here and here). Although minor parties—often called “third parties” to distinguish them from the dominant two—have always been a part of American politics, the dissatisfaction with the Republican and Democratic parties in the current election season has led some...
Differing views on economic growth
Economic Growth in the U.S. has slowed pared to historical averages according to recent reports from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Some are claiming that this is okay and that it is “normal” while there are others who disagree and understand that economic growth is essential to a prospering society. This division among people on how they view economic growth also represents a division among the two major political parties on how they view economic growth. Director of Research here...
Mike Rowe interviews Charles Koch on work, cronyism, and criminal justice reform
Mike Rowe was recently criticized for his new partnership with Charles Koch, CEO of Koch Industries, whose philanthropy for conservative and libertarian causes routinely garners controversy, despite its tremendous fruits. Rowe, himself an increasingly provocative figure, recently interviewed Koch on their core areas of collaboration, including work, the trades, cronyism, higher education, and criminal justice reform. Koch on the politicization of “work ethic”: Unless you learn to work by the time you’re in your 30s, you’re never that productive. So...
Audio: Paul Bonicelli on WOOD Radio
Acton Institute Director of Programs Paul Bonicelli walked a few blocks down the road here in Grand Rapids, Michigan this morning for an in-studio interview with host Justin Barclay on WOOD Radio’s West Michigan Live. Paul is a recent addition to Acton’s staff and does a fine job of introducing himself, and also provides a preview of Acton’s ing fall events calendar. You can listen to the full interview via the audio player below. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved