Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians Should Know About Consumption
What Christians Should Know About Consumption
Dec 21, 2025 3:16 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

The Term: Consumption

What it means: Consumption is the use of goods and services by households.

Why it Matters: Consumption is an ugly word for a beautiful concept.

Since the Middle Ages, the word “consumption” has referred to wasting diseases, such as tuberculosis, which “consume” the body. More recently, consumption has often been confused with consumerism, a useful and related term that has regrettably taken on a wholly negative connotation.

But in its most basic economic sense, consumption is a purely neutral term that refers to the use of goods and services by households. If you arrange for a babysitter to watch your toddler so that you can eat a steak dinner with your spouse, you are “consuming” both goods (the steak) and services (the babysitter’s time and attention). While you pay for these goods and services it’s merely their use that marks them as “consumption.” e back to that point in a moment.)

Consumption is arguably the first (or maybe second) economic concept mentioned in the Bible. After creating Adam and Eve and giving them the cultural mandate (“Be fruitful and increase in number;fill the earthand subdue it.”), God says to them,

“I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” (Gen. 1:29)

Notice that Adam and Eve were required to work and allowed to consume even before they had an e. This is they way most of us start out in life. As toddlers and children we may have been required to perform work (e.g., clean your room, mow the lawn), but our work was unlikely to be tied directly to our ability to consume. A ten-year-old boy may earn only a few dollar from his paper route but consume food, housing, and transportation that costs hundreds of dollars a month.

This is why consumption is a better indicator of well-being and human flourishing than e, or even wealth. A good example of this is found in the recent movie The Martian. While he is stranded on Mars, the astronaut Mark Watney is technically still earning an e from NASA. But that money doesn’t do him much good when he is stuck on a planet without supermarkets. What matters most for Whatney’s life is his ability to consume goods and services necessary for survival—not how much he has in his checking account.

This is also why Christians should be aware of the importance of consumption as an indicator of well-being. Consumption levels can often tell us much more about the welfare of our neighbors than other relevant factors, such as e or expenditures. For instance, a poor farmer who owns his home and has a reliable garden and access to livestock may have almost no e, little expenditure, and yet be able to consume adequate levels of both food and housing. A poor person in the city, however, may be consuming food by receiving foodstuffs for free through a soup kitchen and yet may be homeless and unable to “consume” necessary housing. Keeping an eye on consumption—and how the goods and services are obtained—helps us to better determine the type and level of need our neighbors may have.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• The importance of consumption to human flourishing is the primary reason many economists argue that, though both groups are essential, consumers should take priority over producers. As Adam Smith wrote in his book, The Wealth of Nations:

Consumption is the sole end and purpose of all production; and the interest of the producer ought to be attended to only so far as it may be necessary for promoting that of the consumer. The maxim is so perfectly self evident that it would be absurd to attempt to prove it.

For more on this point, see my post “For the Good of Mankind, Side With the Consumer.”

• Many other important economic concepts are directly connected to consumption. For instance, savings is when we set aside a portion of our current e, and forgo consumption today, so that we can consume more in the future.

• Decisions about consumption have a profound affect on our choices about work, e, savings, investment, etc. Generally speaking, people prefer a relatively stable path of consumption and tend to make decisions based on that preference. For instance, a newly-married couple may go into debt to purchase housing and furniture based on the assumption that they will be able to pay it off later as their es increase. Similarly, in order to maintain a similarity of lifestyle in their latter years, people contribute to retirement accounts. This process is known as “consumption smoothing.” In both cases, going into debt and saving, the intention is to maintain a minimal standard of consumption over the course of one’s lifetime. We do this by “smoothing out” both the highs and lows of our lifetime consumption patterns.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Dodd-Frank: The Other Serious Threat
At least es at us head on. The greater legislative threat may be the one that most Americans have never heard of. Economist Scott Powell and Acton friend Jay Richards explain in a new piece in Barron’s: While Obamacare received more attention, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, also known as Dodd-Frank after its Senate and House sponsors, … unleashed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to operate with unprecedented power. Dodd-Frank became law in...
Did 2,362 Millionaires Get Unemployment Checks in 2009? (Answer: Yes they did.)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), a group that works exclusively for the U.S. Congress, issued a report with one of the greatest titles I’ve ever seen on a government document: Receipt of Unemployment Insurance by e Unemployed Workers (“Millionaires”) Now the first nine words are nothing special, typical policy-wonk speak. But whoever added in the word “millionaires” with scare quotes and parentheses is a genius. Most people would have been nodding off around the word “Insurance” but seeing millionaires (that’s...
Video: Colorado Priest Condemns Socialism at GOP Assembly
You might get goose bumps watching this fiery speech by Fr. Andrew Kemberling. After all, it is not every day we hear a wholesale condemnation socialism from a priest on the “pulpit” of a conservative political rally! This vociferous pastor from St. Thomas More parish in Centennial, Colo., delivered an impassioned address last May. It may be old news, but the video has gained enormous popularity and even gone viral (over 1.3 million views) just one month before the U.S....
Mr. President, it isn’t your job to ‘channel’ America’s genius, grit and determination
One line from last night’s debate leapt out at me. It wasn’t a stumble amidst the cut and thrust of open debate. It was during President Obama’s closing statement—400 words that I’m guessing he and his staff crafted with painstaking care. About half way through his summation, the president gave his vision of government in a nutshell. He said that “everything that I’ve tried to do, and everything that I’m now proposing for the next four years,” was “designed to...
Get the Audio Edition of Defending the Free Market
The audio book version of Rev. Sirico’s Defending the Free Market has just been released, and is available at Amazon. If you haven’t bought book yet (or even if you have) you’ll want to download a copy today. ...
The New York Times Doesn’t Understand Freedom of Religion
In a model of Orwellian doublespeak, the New York Times published an editorial yesterday defending the ridiculous decision by U.S. District Judge Carol E. Jackson to dismiss the lawsuit filed earlier this year by Frank O’Brien and his O’Brien Industrial Holdings LLC. O’Brien had challenged the requirement that businesses offer employees contraception coverage through health care insurance, claiming it unconstitutionally violated his religious beliefs and the Catholic philosophy he applied in running his business. Not so, say the NYT editors,...
On Call with Dr. Pamela Casson
Dr. Pamela Casson, a pediatrician in Colorado Springs, knows what it means literally to be “On Call.” This week she shares with us in this video interview with Jon Hirst how she sees God working through her in her work with families, children and the world around her. Thank you Pamela for giving us an inside look at how you see your work as blessing the world. ...
Stop Apologizing for Our Liberties
You cannot apologize to a fanatic, says Lee Harris. It only serves to convince him that he was right all along: The last few weeks have witnessed a peculiar and disturbing spectacle: An American administration that has spent a great deal of time and energy apologizing for our liberties—in particular, for what many would regard as the foundation of all our other liberties, namely, the freedom to express our minds as we see fit. This signature freedom, of which Americans...
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Two Kingdoms, and Protestant Social Thought Today
Jordan Ballor’s paper, “Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Two Kingdoms, and Protestant Social Thought Today,” just made the Social Science Research Network’s current Top Ten download list for Philosophy of Religion eJournal. From the abstract: Last century’s Protestant consensus on the rejection of natural law has been quested in recent decades, but Protestant social thought still has much work to do in order to articulate a coherent and cogent witness to contemporary realities. The doctrine of the two kingdoms has been put...
Acton Commentary: Obama Administration Leaves Human Trafficking Victims Out in the Cold
“Most of us enjoy an economy where we can purchase with ease the things we need and enjoy. However, there is no moral justification for mercialization of some things; human beings are not products to be bought and sold,”writes Elise Hiltonin the latest Acton Commentary (published October 3).The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Obama Administration Leaves Human Trafficking Victims Out in the Cold By Elise Hilton Imagine...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved