Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets wrong about Europe
What Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gets wrong about Europe
Jan 13, 2026 4:35 AM

During her interview with 60 Minutes on Sunday, newly sworn in Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez justified her vision of democratic socialism by invoking a caricature of Europe.

When asked if she wanted to turn the United States into a version of Venezuela or the Soviet Union, Ocasio-Cortez demurred with an incredulous smile. “What we have in mind,” she said, according to the transcript, “and what of my — and my policies most closely re— resemble what we see in the U.K., in Norway, in Finland, in Sweden.”

True, one can find strands of socialism in European social democracy. However, one could equally cite European precedent to abolish the minimum wage, allow partial privatization of Social Security, establish continent-wide free trade, institute a low flat-rate property tax, give parents school choice, and limit abortions to the first trimester.

The past and present of Europe, including the celebrated Scandinavian nations, do mend the programs of Ocasio-Cortez and other socialists.

For instance, Ocasio-Cortez told Anderson Cooper that under her ideal tax system:

Your tax rate, you know, let’s say, from zero to $75,000 may be ten percent or 15 percent, et cetera. But once you get to, like, the tippy tops –on your 10 millionth dollar – sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent.

This would both overstate and understate the reality of European taxation. For instance, in the UK, the top marginal tax rate is 45 percent.

Other nations, such as Denmark, have top marginal rates closer to the range the congresswoman envisions. However, its top tax rate of 60 percent kicks in at $60,000, rather than $10 million. Contrary to the congresswoman, funding the social welfare state weighs heavily on the middle class.

This ignores the significant burden imposed by the Value Added Tax (VAT), which accounts for about 25 percent of the price of virtually every item sold. This kind of regressive tax, which punishes the poor and struggling the most, is a hallmark of Scandinavian systems.

Similarly, she would raise the corporate tax rate to 28 percent – higher than Finland (20 percent), Denmark, Sweden (22 percent), and Norway (23 percent). Europe’s average corporate tax rate is 18.38 percent, below the U.S. rate of 21 percent.

Several transatlantic writers have tried to underscore that Scandinavia cannot be properly described as fully socialist, much less Europe as a whole. Nima Sanandaji wrote two books establishing this case: Debunking Utopia: Exposing the Myth of Nordic Socialism and Scandinavian Unexceptionalism.

mon misconception,” he explained in the pages of National Review, “is that the Nordic countries became socially and economically successful by introducing universal welfare states funded by high taxes. In fact, their economic and social success had already materialized during a period when these bined a small public sector with free-market policies. The welfare state was introduced afterward.”

Johan Norberg, a Stockholm native and senior fellow at theCato Institute, told a similar story about his country in the PBS specialSweden: Lessons for Americafor PBS (which you can watch in its entirety here). The social welfare programs enacted in the 1960s stalled Swedish economic growth to half the rate of other developed countries. Taxes sometimes exceeding 100 percent of e for individuals and businesses. And interest rates briefly rose as high as 500 percent. The economic downturn of the 1990s led Sweden to scale back government interventionism – for instance, reforming the nation’s pension system.

Scandinavian nations came to understand that they needed to unleash the power of the free market to fund their robust social programs. Denmark (12), Sweden (15), and the Netherlands (17) now rank higher than the United States (18) on the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom.

The fact that these nations contribute little to their own national defense similarly enables them to fund social welfare programs. The United States cannot expect this advantage.

Furthermore, some European programs would meet with Ocasio-Cortez’s disfavor. For instance, “Across OECD countries, of the 12% of students who are enrolled in private government-dependent schools, around 38% of them attend schools run by a church or other religious organisation, 54% attend schools run by another non-profit organisation, and 8% attend schools run by a for-profit organization,” the OECD reports.

While Europe may have higher tax rates and a heavier tax burden, its social spending requires heavy taxation of the middle class. Scandinavian nations would resist some of the business regulations favored by democratic socialists. Ocasio-Cortez would likely look askance at school vouchers funding religious or for-profit private schools (as would I, for different reasons). Even with these concessions European economic growth lags behind the U.S., while its unemployment rate exceeds ours.

Christians who seek to be both “factually correct” and “morally right” must know this history, and its consequences.

Warriner / . Editorial use only.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
On Call Through Video
We are continuing to interview people in different areas of work to showcase what being On Call in Culture looks like on a daily basis. Today we introduce Rachel Bastarache Bogan, video editor for SIM. Learn more about Rachel at As a child, Rachel was surrounded by creativity including music and painting. Her favorite gift was a “box full of opportunity” that someone had filled with random knick knacks from a craft store. When she was five years old, she...
Musings for Good Friday
A marvellous and mighty paradox has thus occurred, for the death which they thought to inflict on Him as dishonour and disgrace has e the glorious monument to death’s defeat. ~ Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Word. Job in the Old Testament called out to God begging for a mediator or advocate, begging for somebody who could understand the depth of his affliction and agony (Job 9). Such is the beauty of Christ that he came not to teach...
Who Keeps the Keepers?
Sam Gregg’s response to President Obama’s latest invocation of the “my brother’s keeper” motif brings out one of the basic problems with applying this biblical question to public policy. As Gregg points out, the logic of the president’s usage points to the government as the institution of brotherly love: But who is the “I” that President Obama has in mind? Looking carefully at his speech, it’s most certainly not the free associations munities that Alexis de Tocqueville thought made 19th-century...
Events of Note Next Week
Here are some events worth noting next week: On Wednesday, April 11, Victor Claar will join us for an Acton on Tap. Victor Claar is a professor of economics at Henderson State University in Arkansas, and previously taught for a number of years at Hope College. I’ll be introducing Victor and the topic for the evening, “Envy: Socialism’s Deadly Sin.” We’ll begin to mingle at 6pm, and the talk mence at 6:30, followed by what’s sure to be some lively...
Jayabalan: Vatican Statement Shows Business and Faith Compatible
Reporter Carol Glatz of the Catholic News Service has a story on the new Vatican document titled “Vocation of the Business Leader: A Reflection” aimed at educators, entrepreneurs and business people. Glatz interviews Kishore Jayabalan, director of Acton’s Rome office, who praised the document for its pastoral approach: “It’s trying to encourage and inspire business people” and prompt them to “think about how to incorporate their faith more into what they do,” Jayabalan told Catholic News Service. It shows that...
Commentary: Leviathan, Civil Society and National Morality
Don’t blame the culture wars for the recent debates about contraception, says Phillip W. De Vous in this week’s Acton Commentary (published Apr. 4), the real culprit is statism.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weeklyActon News & Commentaryand other publicationshere. Leviathan, Civil Society and National Morality byPhillip W. De Vous Political campaigns in every era have included talk of morality and moral principles in general. They rarely shy away from discussing even very specific moral...
Rev. Sirico Responds to NPR’s ‘Christian Is Not Synonymous With Conservative’
Jon Erwin, director of the pro-life October Baby movie, was recently interviewed by National Public Radio and, in the background article that panied the audio, the network reported his view that Christians didn’t feel very e in Hollywood’s munity. This provoked a lot ment by NPR listeners about what, really, a Christian is. The title of the NPR article, “‘October Baby’ Tells A Story Hollywood Wouldn’t” probably had something to do with that. Ombudsman Edward Schumacher-Matos followed up the interview...
Consumers Acting Badly
I found this video on NPR’s ‘Planet Money’ intriguing. A young woman reflects on the cost of her wedding dress, which she’s obviously worn once. She recognizes that there is enormous emotional attachment to this garment, but there is something going on in terms of how much she spent; she just can’t quite put her finger on it. She eventually finds out that she probably over-paid by about $1200. She believes she has been ripped off. There are a few...
Jimmy Carter, Liberation Theologian
I came across this news story via Catholic World News. And this intriguing passage about President Carter’s disagreements with Pope John Paul II: Carter wrote that he exchanged harsh words with the late Pope John Paul II during a state visit over what Carter classified as the Pope’s “perpetuation of the subservience of women.” He added, “there was more harshness when we turned to the subject of ‘liberation theology’.” I haven’t read the book, so I’m awfully curious to know...
Market Economies with Churches and Market Economies without Churches
Zhao Xiao, a government economist in China, on the differences between market economies with Churches (like the U.S.) and market economies without churches (like China): Is it not integrity that you are pursuing? Then you ought to know: places with faith have more integrity. For China’s crawling economic reforms, this ought to be an important inspiration. Market economies with churches are different in another respect from those without: in the former, it is much easier to establish monly respected system....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved