Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What a Chinese economist learned from American churches
What a Chinese economist learned from American churches
Jan 8, 2026 5:45 PM

“Only through awe can we be saved. Only through faith can the market economy have a soul.” -Zhao Xiao

When French diplomat and historian Alexis de Tocqueville visited America in the 1830s, he marveled at the “associational life” of munities, noting the particular influence of religion and local churches. “Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power,” he wrote. “…The safeguard of morality is religion, and morality is the best security of law as well as the surest pledge of freedom.”

Nearly two centuries later, Zhao Xiao, a visiting government economist from China has made a series of similar observations, most notably in a 2002 paper titled, “Market Economies With Churches and Market Economies Without Churches.”

In his travels, Xiao sought to uncover the secret of American prosperity, asking, “Where does the greatest difference between China and America lie?” paring and contrasting a number of areas and features — real estate development, the science and technology sector, financial systems, political and legal systems, etc. — Xiao concludes that the clearest difference is found in America’s churches.

“Truth be told,” he writes, “from the east coast of the US to the west coast, from towns to cities, in any place you look you will find that this country’s most numerous structure is none other than the church. Churches, and only churches, are Americans’ center; they are the very core that binds Americans together.”

Xiao’s e at a time when American Christianity and church attendance is at an all-time low. Nevertheless, America’s heritage of religious belief may still serve as a cultural foundation. “These days Chinese people do not believe in anything,” he explains. “They don’t believe in god, they don’t believe in the devil, they don’t believe in providence, they don’t believe in the last judgment, to say nothing about heaven. A person who believes in nothing ultimately can only believe in himself. And self-belief implies that anything is possible — what do lies, cheating, harm, and swindling matter?”

Alas, despite the recent strides toward freedom and prosperity in China, Xiao decries its “hobbled market ethics,” leading to culture of dishonesty and plicated web of corruption and collusion between government and business. “The market economy can only discourage idleness,” he explains. “It cannot discourage people from lying or causing harm.” Indeed, he continues, without a proper economic understanding or moral imagination, “it may entice people to be industrious in their lies, industrious in bringing harm to others, and to pursue wealth by any means.”

In addition to Christianity’s moral framework, Xiao has also noted that China would benefit from its “spirit of contracts” and “spirit of universal love.”

The first thing it will bring is a spirit of contracts. We know that, whether it is a market economy or a constitutional system, behind them all is a civilization based upon rules. So what we need is a group of people who observe rules. Only then can this system work with highest efficiency. And this spirit of contracts, es from belief in Christianity, because we know that in the Bible, for instance, there are the Ten Commandments. These are contracts God signed with humans.

The second thing it will bring is the spirit of universal love. There is no culture that can match Christianity’s degree of prizing love, because what it emphasizes is a form of unconditional love, a love for everyone, including those who are not lovable, including those who have hurt you or oppressed you. You have to love them, regardless of whether they are good or bad to you, regardless of whoever they are, you must love them. So this kind of love is a sign of the openness of modern society and modern civilization.

In the end, Xiao is optimistic that his countrymen already see the value of “market ethics.” For China, it’s more about the hands-on work of“cultural reconstruction.”

Modern economics—modern politics—modern culture form the trinity of the market economy. Seeking the fruits of the market economy, Chinese society ultimately will travel the road of cultural reconstruction, investing in market ethics. It is fortunate that in Chinese society there is already recognition that integrity is the cornerstone of the market economy, but establishing a good cornerstone is no simple matter…

Reality unquestionably requires us to move forward another few steps. The first is cultural transformation. We must find a cultural patible with the modern free market economy. To achieve this, we may unearth from our own long-standing traditional culture a set of ethics that patible with modern economics, or we may use absorption and introductions from elsewhere to recreate our cultural DNA.

Given China’s decreasing faith in an munistic philosophy of life and the hundreds of millions of Chinese that have recently converted to Christianity in the years since Xiao’s travels (including Xiao himself), the path to establishing that “cultural cornerstone” seems well within sight.

Image: “Pray” by Allen LI(CC BY 2.0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Happy Patriots’ Day
Patriots’ memorates the opening battles of the American Revolution at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775. It is officially celebrated in Massachusetts and Maine, and is now observed on the third Monday in April to allow for a three day weekend. Patriots’ Day is also the day upon which the Boston Marathon is held and the Boston Red Sox are always scheduled to play at home with the only official A.M. start in Major League Baseball. My Patriots’ Day...
Market and Government Failure
An essay of mine appears today over at the First Things website as part of their “On the Square: Observations & Contentions” feature. In “Between Market and State,” I explore the dialectic logic of market and government “failure,” which functions in part to provide us with a false dilemma: our solution to social problems must lie with either “market” or “state.” I work out this logic in the context of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, and conclude that non-profits play a...
Notre Dame, Georgetown and President Obama
The Detroit News published a column yesterday that I wrote about Catholic identity and the controversies sparked by President Obama’s visit to Georgetown and his planned speech at Notre Dame. National Review Online also published a variation of the same column last week under the title, The Catholic Identity Crisis. Here’s the Detroit News column: President Barack Obama made an ment on economics during his April 14 speech at Georgetown University. “We cannot rebuild this economy on the same pile...
Acton Commentary: Religious Freedom Doesn’t Mean Religious Silence
The First Amendment rights of religious groups are under assault in the public square. As Kevin Schmiesing reminds us in today’s Acton Commentary, “History’s tyrants recognized the progression that some of us have forgotten: Where people are free to act according their conscience, they will demand the right to determine their political destiny.” Read mentary at the Acton Website ment on it here. ...
PBR: Rwanda and Reconciliation
This year April 6th marked the 15th anniversary of beginning of the genocide in Rwanda. Catherin Claire Larson, a senior writer and editor at Prison Fellowship Ministries, has written a new book called As We Forgive: Stories of Reconciliation from Rwanda, which focuses on how such wounds opened up fifteen years ago are being healed today. (Larson’s book is inspired by the award-winning film of the same name, which debuted in April 2008. Comment carried an interview with Laura Waters...
PBR: The End of Poverty
This Sunday I’ll be giving a talk at Fountain Street Church on the life and work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. His unfinished Ethics is a tantalizing work, full of insights and conundrums. Here’s what he writes in the essay, “On the Possibility of the Church’s Message to the World,” with regard to the church’s engagement in social justice: Who actually says that all worldly problems should and can be solved? Perhaps to God the unsolved condition of these problems may be...
Orthodox Christianity And Capitalism — Are They Compatible?
Kevin Allen, host of The Illumined Heart podcast on Ancient Faith Radio, interviews writer, attorney, and college professor Chris Banescu, an Orthodox Christian, about the economic, moral and spiritual issues surrounding the market economy. Kevin asks: Does the capitalist system serve “the best interests of Christians living the life of the Beatitudes?” Listen to Chris Banescu on Orthodox Christianity and Capitalism: [audio: Read “A Primer on Capitalism” on Chris’ personal Web site. He is also the author of two articles...
April Fools and April 15th
Just in time for April 1st and April 15th, let’s talk about taxes. On April 1st, the excise tax on cigarettes was increased dramatically—from $.39 to $1.01 per pack. It’s fitting that this occurred on April Fools’ Day, since it served to break President Obama’s campaign pledge not to increase “any form of” taxes on any family making less than $250,000 per year. Independent of breaking a campaign promise, such a tax is attractive for non-smokers since the costs are...
Acton Commentary: “Despotism – The Soft Way”
Sam Gregg marks the 150th anniversary of the death of Alexis de Tocqueville whose great work “Democracy in America” warned about the dangers of fortable servility. “The American Republic,” Tocqueville wrote, “will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.” Read mentary at the Acton website ment on it here. ...
Acton Commentary – “Earmarks: Don’t Mend Them, End Them”
In this piece John Pisciotta, a professor of economics at Baylor University, offers a number of sound reasons for getting rid of earmarks on appropriations bills, including their tendency to invite corruption. “Those who seek them are tempted to skirt the law to win favor with a legislator so as to be graced with an earmark,” he writes. “We should not be surprised that a handful of former members of Congress now receive free room and board at federal prisons.”...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved