Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
We now have proof higher minimum wages hurt the poor
We now have proof higher minimum wages hurt the poor
Dec 2, 2025 10:45 PM

In 2014 the city of Seattle announced it would be raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour. The minimum wage would increase from the state’s $9.47 minimum to as high as $11 on April 1, 2015. The second phase-in period started on January 1, 2016, when the minimum wage reached $13 for large employers. Under the law, by 2021 all businesses must raise the minimum wage for theirworkers to $15.

At the time I noted that while this policy was foolish, it would provide a benefit for the rest of the country:

The effect on the citizens of Seattle will be almost entirely harmful. But it will provide a natural experiment on the effect of raising the minimum wage laws that the rest of American can learn from. Anyone who isn’t already convinced that increasing the minimum wage has a detrimental impact on employment and harm minority workers will, in a few years, have solid proof. We will all be able to look to Seattle to see the difference between good, albeit naive, intentions and sound economic policy.

I also predicted the policy would have three specific negative effects: unemployment would increase for low-wage workers; employers will discriminate against low-skill workers; and young African Americans will have a harder time getting jobs.

This week we got solid proof of the impact of the raise. The city of missioned a study by a group of economists at the University of Washington to study the impact of the wage increases. Yesterday, the National Bureau of Economic Research published the results as a working paper. Here’s what we now know:

1. Unemployment increased for low-wage workers — While jobs for high-wage workers ($19 or more per hour) were increasing, the employment prospects for low-wage workers fell. (The one exception was in the restaurant industry, which we’ll consider below.) The number of low-wage jobs declined by 6.8 percent, which represents a loss of more than 5,000 jobs.

2. Low-wage workers had to work fewer hours — The basic laws of supply and demand tell us that when the cost of a good or service rises, people use less or substitute more. This is exactly what happened to the demand for low-wage labor. As the researchers note, the data,

[S]uggests that low-wage labor is a more substitutable, expendable factor of production. The work of least-paid workers might be performed more efficiently by more skilled and experienced manding a substantially higher wage. This work could, in some circumstances, be automated. In other circumstances, employers may conclude that the work of least-paid workers need not be done at all.

3. Low-wage workers made less money —Because the wage increase reduced their demand, low-wage workers worked fewer hours and made less money. According to the researchers, the average low-wage employee was paid $1,897 per month. “The reduction in hours would cost the average employee $179 per month, while the wage increase would recoup only $54 of this loss, leaving a net loss of $125 per month (6.6 percent), which is sizable for a low-wage worker.”

4. The restaurant industry is an outlier — Dig in to almost any study that finds increasing the minimum wage doesn’t reduce jobs, and you’ll find mon factor: they all use the restaurant industry as a proxy for low-wage workers. As the researchers point out, “Previous literature has not examined the entire low-wage labor market but has focused instead on lower-wage industries such as the restaurant sector, or on stereotypically lower productivity employees such as teenagers.” When the researchers looked at data from all low-wage jobs, the impact of the minimum wage became much more apparent.

These findings are what many economists from across the political spectrum predicted would happen after such a large increase in the minimum wage. And yet many are still unwilling to accept the reality that their preferred policy just doesn’t work as intended.

How long then will we stand by and let the poor suffer because the economic illiteracy of people who have “good intentions”? All of us, but especially Christians, have a duty to speak up on behalf of the urban poor. We should be clamoring for this minimum wage law to be repealed before the law of unintended consequences goes fully into effect.

Seattle has shown that the “Fight for $15” leads to failure. Now it’s time to set aside utopian economics and launch a real fight to protect low-wage workers.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
COE Review from the Mises Institute
Thomas Woods from the Mises Institute blog has posted his thoughts on the Call of the Entrepreneur. Woods praises the film saying, “For once, the moral dimension of entrepreneurial activity is brought to the fore and celebrated. For once the heroes are creators, not political hacks.” If you haven’t yet heard about the film, check out the trailer at ! ...
NY Times Reports That Americans Ages 17 to 29 Are Increasingly Leaning Left
The New York Times reports today that: More than half of Americans ages 17 to 29 — 54 percent — say they intend to vote for a Democrat for president in 2008. They share with the public at large a negative view of President Bush, who has a 28 percent approval rating with this group, and of the Republican Party. They hold a markedly more positive view of Democrats than they do of Republicans. Young Americans are more likely than...
Americans Giving at Record Numbers
Charitable giving in America has risen for the third consecutive year. The picture behind this recent report is rather interesting. Due to the absence of natural disasters, both nationally and internationally, large giving to major relief projects declined. Giving to human services also fell. The giving of corporate America rose only 1.5%. But in a shift from previous years giving to the arts and to cultural and humanities organizations grew rather significantly. The lion’s share of giving is still done...
Media Bias and the ‘Fairness Doctrine’
The confluence of two recent headline-making stories has the potential to impact the practice of free speech, political or otherwise, in this country. First, let’s discuss the question of media bias that has surrounded the offer made by Rupert Murdoch to purchase the Wall Street Journal. The closure of the deal appears imminent, now that the formation of an independent board has been agreed upon. NPR’s Morning Edition covered this story in detail yesterday, with a piece by David Folkenflik...
Supreme Court Rejects Decorating Public Schools Like Racial Christmas Trees
In the vision of Dr. Martin Luther King, the Supreme Court today struck down a move to use race to determine which students attend certain schools and which one who will not. Students will not be assigned to schools according to the color of their skin. We are finally approaching King’s dream. Hopefully, this will end the tremendously failed race-based busing programs nationwide. The 5-4 ruling rejected racial decorating programs in Louisville, Kentucky, and Seattle, Washington. CNN reports: The court...
Gerson on Obama at the UCC
In today’s WaPo, former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson opines on Senator Barack Obama’s recent address to a gathering of UCC faithful (HT). In “The Gospel Of Obama,” Gerson writes, “By speaking at a gathering of the United Church of Christ — among the most excruciatingly progressive of Protestant denominations — he was preaching to the liberal choir. And he did not effectively reach out to an evangelical movement in transition.” Gerson bases this judgment on the contention, citing a Pew...
You’ve Heard It Before…
You’ve heard it from us before: Good intentions are not enough. Now hear it from a piece in the Columbia Journalism Review, “The Obscured Continent,” which takes a look at the special issue of Vanity Fair devoted to Africa (HT: Poynter Online). The piece begins by depicting the two major approaches to international development (compare to my “Henderson” model). “In the end, it’s hard to avoid the feeling that the only thing it actually achieves is to convince us of...
Closing the Credibility Gap
If denominations want to demonstrate leadership over social issues like the environment they must have a good track record leading folks in spiritual matters within their own congregations. After all, if they can’t handle the Great Commission, how effective can their mission work possibly be? ~ If you read history you will find that the Christians who did most for the present world were just those who thought most of the next. The Apostles themselves, who set on foot the...
Vatican Statement on … Chocolate?
Well, not exactly. Althought Archbishop John Foley, President of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications—and a “self-proclaimed ‘chocoholic'”—did address a gathering of Nestle executives on the subject of the morality of advertising. Given that a conscientious parent can hardly watch even a daytime sporting event on TV with his children in light of the low moral quality of advertising, I’d say it’s a subject worthy of attention. A couple of Foley’s statements: It frankly surprises me that as women rightly...
The End of Work
Why do we work? When labor and toil is so often unfulfilling and troublesome, why keep on? For pagans, no doubt the answer is given in the book of Matthew: “Do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them.” A non-Christian view of work is one oriented toward survival. And that’s why a non-Christian...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved