Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
We now have proof higher minimum wages hurt the poor
We now have proof higher minimum wages hurt the poor
Dec 6, 2025 3:51 PM

In 2014 the city of Seattle announced it would be raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour. The minimum wage would increase from the state’s $9.47 minimum to as high as $11 on April 1, 2015. The second phase-in period started on January 1, 2016, when the minimum wage reached $13 for large employers. Under the law, by 2021 all businesses must raise the minimum wage for theirworkers to $15.

At the time I noted that while this policy was foolish, it would provide a benefit for the rest of the country:

The effect on the citizens of Seattle will be almost entirely harmful. But it will provide a natural experiment on the effect of raising the minimum wage laws that the rest of American can learn from. Anyone who isn’t already convinced that increasing the minimum wage has a detrimental impact on employment and harm minority workers will, in a few years, have solid proof. We will all be able to look to Seattle to see the difference between good, albeit naive, intentions and sound economic policy.

I also predicted the policy would have three specific negative effects: unemployment would increase for low-wage workers; employers will discriminate against low-skill workers; and young African Americans will have a harder time getting jobs.

This week we got solid proof of the impact of the raise. The city of missioned a study by a group of economists at the University of Washington to study the impact of the wage increases. Yesterday, the National Bureau of Economic Research published the results as a working paper. Here’s what we now know:

1. Unemployment increased for low-wage workers — While jobs for high-wage workers ($19 or more per hour) were increasing, the employment prospects for low-wage workers fell. (The one exception was in the restaurant industry, which we’ll consider below.) The number of low-wage jobs declined by 6.8 percent, which represents a loss of more than 5,000 jobs.

2. Low-wage workers had to work fewer hours — The basic laws of supply and demand tell us that when the cost of a good or service rises, people use less or substitute more. This is exactly what happened to the demand for low-wage labor. As the researchers note, the data,

[S]uggests that low-wage labor is a more substitutable, expendable factor of production. The work of least-paid workers might be performed more efficiently by more skilled and experienced manding a substantially higher wage. This work could, in some circumstances, be automated. In other circumstances, employers may conclude that the work of least-paid workers need not be done at all.

3. Low-wage workers made less money —Because the wage increase reduced their demand, low-wage workers worked fewer hours and made less money. According to the researchers, the average low-wage employee was paid $1,897 per month. “The reduction in hours would cost the average employee $179 per month, while the wage increase would recoup only $54 of this loss, leaving a net loss of $125 per month (6.6 percent), which is sizable for a low-wage worker.”

4. The restaurant industry is an outlier — Dig in to almost any study that finds increasing the minimum wage doesn’t reduce jobs, and you’ll find mon factor: they all use the restaurant industry as a proxy for low-wage workers. As the researchers point out, “Previous literature has not examined the entire low-wage labor market but has focused instead on lower-wage industries such as the restaurant sector, or on stereotypically lower productivity employees such as teenagers.” When the researchers looked at data from all low-wage jobs, the impact of the minimum wage became much more apparent.

These findings are what many economists from across the political spectrum predicted would happen after such a large increase in the minimum wage. And yet many are still unwilling to accept the reality that their preferred policy just doesn’t work as intended.

How long then will we stand by and let the poor suffer because the economic illiteracy of people who have “good intentions”? All of us, but especially Christians, have a duty to speak up on behalf of the urban poor. We should be clamoring for this minimum wage law to be repealed before the law of unintended consequences goes fully into effect.

Seattle has shown that the “Fight for $15” leads to failure. Now it’s time to set aside utopian economics and launch a real fight to protect low-wage workers.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Education as liberation: 4 priorities for reform
With the recent appointment and confirmation of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, the movement for educational choice has plenty of reasons for optimism. Throughout the nomination process, opponents of DeVos ridiculed the school-choice movement for caring little about quality, equality, and opportunity, ignoring that these are the precise drivers of advocates for school choice. Given the abounding confusion and misrepresentation, I was reminded of a wonderful talk given by Professor Howard Fuller at the American Enterprise Institute, in which...
Can you spare 12 minutes to learn the pillars of a free society?
Communicating the underlying pillars of a free and virtuous society is sometimes like describing the Kingdom of God: We can envision it, but detailing its operations to non-believers can be difficult. (This is largely for the same reason – both are so rarely observed upon earth.) Thankfully, the London-based Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) has finished releasing a series of brief videos that describe the six pillars of a free society. Dr. Steve Davies, Head of Education at IEA, details...
What you should know about deadweight loss
Note: This is post #24 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. When prices are controlled, the mutually profitable gains from free trade cannot be fully realized, creating what is known as deadweight loss. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok shows how to calculate deadweight loss using our example of a price ceiling on gasoline. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed....
The unique way economic revival in ‘flyover country’ may affect the Dutch elections
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte speaks as Geert Wilders looks on. (Richard van Elferen. CC BY 2.0.) As a wave of populism sweeps from Donald Trump’s Oval Office to the Brexit-ravaged headquarters of the European Union in Brussels, observers look to next week’s Dutch elections. Current polls show Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom (PVV) slipping a few seats behind Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s (VVD) – but, like Donald Trump, Wilders could outperform...
Economist as prophet vs. savior
What do economists actually know? What can they possibly know? Assuming his usual role as the insider skeptic, economist Russ Roberts ponders those questions at length, concluding that far too much economic analysis is conducted and promoted with far too little humility. bination of economics with statistics in plex world promises a lot more than it delivers,” Robertswrites. “We economists should be more humble and honest about the reliability and precision of statistical analysis.” This is especially true in an...
5 facts about the Brexit vote and Scottish independence
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon meets with members of European Parliament. On Monday night, Parliament passed a bill allowing Prime Minister Theresa May to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Union under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. On the same day, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon called for Scotland to hold a second referendum on declaring independence from the UK. Here are five facts you should know about these momentous developments within the transatlantic alliance: 1. The bill...
Video: Micah Watson on C.S. Lewis and democracy
On February 9th, the Acton Institute ed Micah Watson to the Mark Murray Auditorium to speak on the topic of “C.S. Lewis vs. Democracy” as part of the 2017 Acton Lecture Series. Watson, an associate professor of political science and the William Spoelhof Teacher-Scholar Chair at Calvin College, guides us through an examination of the political thought of the brilliant and celebrated author known primarily for his works offiction and Christian apologetics. Lewis was skeptical of the ability of democratic...
Why “opportunity zones” are an opportunity to expand cronyism
Embed from Getty Images Bad policy is not transformed into good policy simply because it’s advocated by good people with good intentions. This should be obvious—especially to conservatives—yet it’s a lesson we continually have to relearn. Consider, for example, the case of “opportunity zones.” As National Review reported, last month a bipartisan group of congressmen introduced a new bill called the Investing in Opportunity Act (IOA), which would will allow investors to temporarily delay paying capital-gains taxes on their investments...
What are the unintended consequences of American protectionism?
Protectionism is often associated with patriotic zeal and concern for America. While citizens should certainly have concern for their nation, protectionist measures do not necessarily secure the economic results desired. Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, writes about the unintended effects of protectionism in a recent article for The Stream. These policies often hurt the very people they’re meant to help. Gregg, while admitting protectionism may be well-intended, indicates the superiority of free trade in bringing about human flourishing. Samuel...
5 Facts about the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
On Mondaythe Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its report on the projected effects of the House Republican plan to replace the Affordable Care Act. Here are five facts you should know about the federal agency that “scores” legislation: 1. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is an independent, nonpartisan federal agency within the legislative branch that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process. (The CBO can sometimes be confused with the Office of Management and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved