Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘War On Women’ Seeks To Infantilize Women, Keep Them Dependent
‘War On Women’ Seeks To Infantilize Women, Keep Them Dependent
Jul 20, 2026 10:26 AM

One of my jobs when I was in college was doing tech work (lights and sound) for a small but busy theater. I enjoyed the work, and most of my co-workers, not to mention the opportunity to meet the varied and creative people who came to perform. One of my co-workers, though, was a first-class jerk. His hands “wandered,” he said inappropriately sexual things to me and harassed me. When I finally figured out that he was targeting me, I told him to not only knock it off, but if he didn’t, I’d call his wife and let her know exactly what he was doing. He never bothered me again. This situation did not require a bill to passed in Congress, nor a sexual harassment seminar for all employees. It required me to stand up for myself.

When Sandra Fluke testified before a House panel on the need for employers to pay for women’s contraception in 2012, her testimony was celebrated by radical feminists and decried by women who believed we should be responsible for our own healthcare. It’s interesting to note how the President of the United States reacted to the whole situation. President Obama called Ms. Fluke to tell her that her parents should be proud of her. Huh? Ms. Fluke wasn’t some 4th-grade girl who stood up to bullies. She’s an adult, making adult choices and decisions. Why did the president feel it necessary to bring her parents into the discussion?

After the Supreme Court ruling regarding Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods, we saw this weird outcry from radical feminists: “Keep the government out of the bedroom!” “Employers shouldn’t make medical decisions for us!” but both government and employers should pay for birth control and abortions. What do these women want? To be able to be adults, making decisions – both health and economic – for themselves or have Big Brother foot the bill? Women, we are told, need government to help us plan our families, get an education, get a paycheck equal to our male counter-parts, and raise our children.

While women and girls in other nations are facing death because of their religious choices, trying to get an education or simply because they are female, American feminists have created a “war on women” that infantilizes women and seeks to keep them dependent on employers, the government and entitlement programs. Abby McCloskey and Aparna Mathur, atU.S. News and World Report, note that many government policies are holding women back, and no one – least of all radical feminists – are talking about it.

Take the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office reported that there will be 2.5 million fewer full-time job equivalents by 2024 as a result of new taxes and incentives in the health care law. Most of those who leave their jobs are likely to be women, because women are more responsive to tax rates than men. In economist-speak, they have a higher labor supply elasticity, which is the consistent result of numerous economic models. According to economist Glenn Hubbard, the marginal tax rates from subsidy phase-outs in the health care law could reach 50 percent for some earners, before e and payroll taxes are accounted for. As a result, many women are likely to scale back their work hours or stop working all together.

The health care law has only exacerbated the already problematic tax code for women. Married women arguably face higher marginal tax rates than any demographic. Tax credits, such as the Earned e Tax Credit and the child care tax credit, are based on family e, not individual e. As a result, the return to work by a woman, usually the secondary earner, is less if she is married. A recent study by Melissa Kearney and Lesly Turner shows how a family headed by a primary earner making $25,000 a year will take home less than 30 percent of a spouse’s earnings because of taxes and the phase-out of benefits. This is hardly an incentive to work.

McCloskey and Mathur speak of how government makes working for women less and less appealing. The federal government gives child care incentives to women on welfare, and a slow economy recovery is hard on anyone trying to find work that pays well.

Taken together, these work disincentives create a big and unfortunate feedback loop. Women’s shorter time in the labor force – because of children, tax treatment, benefit phase-outs and a bad economy – decreases their investment in jobs-skills and experience. As a result, many women find themselves stuck in low-paying, low-promotion jobs.

Does this sound like a plan that supports women? Or does it sound like a plan that holds women back and keeps them dependent?

Teen and “tween” girls are especially vulnerable in our sex-saturated society. Obsessed with “selfies” and the use of technology, these girls often have no idea of the ramifications of putting themselves out there on the internet. The case of Anji Dean, an Oregon teenager, highlights the dangers young girls face. Dean went missing in late June, leaving behind a note saying, “If you’re reading this, I’m either missing or dead.” Following an intense social media campaign aimed at finding her, the young woman was found and brought home.

Police believe that she was the victim of a human trafficking ring. A woman identified as Jennifer told KGW that Anji introduced herself using her real name but then asked to be called “Daisy.” She reportedly told Jennifer that people were looking for her and she was being forced to do things she did not want. Jennifer tried to help her, but Anji disappeared before that could happen.

“She said she was in a bad situation and needed to get out,” Jennifer added.

Lauren Galley, the 19 year old founder of Girls Above Society, speaks candidly to teens about the threats posed by the internet:

Have you ever met a cute and charming guy at the mall or at a football game, or found yourself answering a text from someone you randomly met–and suddenly got “weird” vibes? If so, it is very possible you were targeted for human trafficking. Being a teen, I know how easy it is to say “It will never happen to me,” but if you are a young female living in the Houston area, it is extremely important to be aware of your surroundings. This does not mean you need to live in fear. As long as you educate yourself and take the necessary precautions, you should be safe from sketchy strangers (especially the ones you would never expect, like the good-looking ones.)

Traffickers use a variety of means to carry out their mission. One of their targets is young girls with low economic status. These parents oftentimes are working more than one job, leaving their children for extended lengths of time without proper supervision. Another method is outright kidnapping and luring girls into a dangerous situation. Traffickers use a variety of tactics which vary from affection and love, to something as simple as food, or finding a lost pet.

Search the website of “Our Bodies, Ourselves” and Planned Parenthood’s site for teens and see if you find the same information. Nope, instead you’ll find information on gender orientation, abortion, birth control and reproductive justice. Which brings us right back to Sandra Fluke, testifying,

Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.

It’s a shame that the radical “War on Women” isn’t focusing on real issues that face real women, and choosing to educate and empower women to be self-sufficient, smart and mature. Instead, the “War on Women” is about keeping women dependent of massive government pay-outs, tax disincentives for working and caring for their own children, and failing to bring to light real issues that put women in harm’s way, both here and abroad. Women: it’s time to stand on our own two feet. Don’t let anyone tell you that the only way for you to get ahead is for the government to pay you to get there. Don’t let your safety take a back seat to your self-image. Don’t turn over your life choices, your mistakes and what you’ve learned from them or your plishments to anyone else. As the late Maya Angelou once said, “A wise woman wishes to be no one’s enemy; a wise woman refuses to be anyone’s victim.”

Let’s be wise women, not dependent ones.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bulgaria embraces flat tax and freedom
The speaker for the Seventeenth Acton Institute Annual Dinner is former Estonian Prime Minister, Dr. Mart Laar. One of the economic reforms Laar implemented in Estonia was a flat tax. After what was described as a brilliant economic turnaround, other countries have followed Estonia’s lead on flat tax policies and free market policies in general. Russia, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Romania, and Macedonia also have flat taxes for e. The country of Bulgaria is now introducing a flat tax rate...
Markets and Their Importance to the Electorate
I have argued for many years now that free markets are intrinsically good. I have tried to engage this issue with Christians but many are either not interested or do not see any importance in the pursuit. I know markets can e bad masters when people lack virtue. I also know that the alternatives to free markets have littered the twentieth century with more death than any single cause in human history. (Think socialism, fascism and Marxism.) And representative democracy,...
Economics and Happiness
Chuck Colson locates the perennial problem of human unhappiness with the inability to perceive where happiness es from. There’s the economic argument that while “increased prosperity can’t make you happy, it can, ironically, contribute to unhappiness,” an argument which Colson says, “doesn’t tell us anything about what makes people happy in the first place. Thus, it can’t tell us why increased prosperity doesn’t translate into increased happiness.” As I’ve noted before, the economic argument is helpful for locating a source...
Global Warming Consensus Alert
Today brings disturbing news of new consensus that seems to be developing: Modern women want men who are keen on recycling rather than good at making wisecracks, a survey said. The poll for men’s magazine Nuts said going green is now the main way to a woman’s heart, with a “good sense of ing in second. Oh great – a clean, tidy, and humorless future. Thanks, ladies. Thanks a lot. ...
Romney’s Religion
Michael Gerson’s “What Matters About Romney’s Religion” in today’s Washington Post: There is a long tradition of American leaders who believe that religion is so personal it shouldn’t even affect their private lives. But this rigid separation between religious conviction and public policy lies outside the main current of American history. Abraham Lincoln’s theology, while hardly orthodox, was not his “own private affair.” “Nothing stamped with the divine image and likeness,” he asserted, “was sent into the world to be...
Bucer, “The Sixth Law: Poor Relief”
Readings in Social Ethics: Martin Bucer, De Regno Christi (selections), in Melanchthon and Bucer, Book II, Chapter XIV, “The Sixth Law: Poor Relief,” pp. 306-15. References below are to page number. Giving aid to the needy in the church is a manifestation of an attribute of the church, for “without it there can be no munion of saints” (307).What the church and its representatives are and are not responsible for: “First, they [deacons] should investigate how many really indigent persons...
‘I Am Not Afraid of Death’
Alexander Solzhenitsyn Der Spiegel has published a far ranging interview with Alexander Solzhenitsyn in which the great writer “discusses Russia’s turbulent history, Putin’s version of democracy and his attitude to life and death.” It is very much worth the read. Once again, e away from an encounter with Solzhenitsyn’s thought and marvel at his courage, his dedication to his art, and the almost indestructible quality of this man, now 88. In the current Religion & Liberty, I reviewed the new...
“We Doubt, We’re Out, Get Used to It”
Hey everybody, Richard Dawkins is selling T-shirts! Get ’em while they’re hot! One of my favorite bloggers, Allahpundit (who just happens to be an athiest himself), calls this “…a new stage in the transformation of ‘new atheism’ from rational argument to aggrieved identity group,” and has this to say about the t-shirts themselves Some of menters call this sort of thing evangelical atheism but a moron with a scarlet “A” on his chest really isn’t trying to convert you. He’s...
Acton Media Update
Dr. Jay Richards made an appearance on the Steve Deace show yesterday on central Iowa’s 50,000 watt blowtorch of a radio station, WHO in Des Moines. The topic of conversation was climate change, and you can listen to the interview by clicking right here (3.2 mb mp3 file). More: Jay also put in an appearance on Knucklehead Radio today on the same topic. You can listen to that one right here (2.5 mb mp3 file). ...
Our Counter-Majoritarian Constitution
In his review of Sanford Levinson’s Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It) in the Claremont Review of Books, Randy Barnett highlights some of the same features of the US political structure as particularly unique that Lord Acton emphasized. In conclusion Barnett writes of our Constitution: It is counter-majoritarian by design. Precisely because the founders feared majoritarian fecklessness and abuse, they inserted the veto points to which Levinson objects. Most people...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved