Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘War On Women’ Seeks To Infantilize Women, Keep Them Dependent
‘War On Women’ Seeks To Infantilize Women, Keep Them Dependent
Mar 25, 2026 8:57 AM

One of my jobs when I was in college was doing tech work (lights and sound) for a small but busy theater. I enjoyed the work, and most of my co-workers, not to mention the opportunity to meet the varied and creative people who came to perform. One of my co-workers, though, was a first-class jerk. His hands “wandered,” he said inappropriately sexual things to me and harassed me. When I finally figured out that he was targeting me, I told him to not only knock it off, but if he didn’t, I’d call his wife and let her know exactly what he was doing. He never bothered me again. This situation did not require a bill to passed in Congress, nor a sexual harassment seminar for all employees. It required me to stand up for myself.

When Sandra Fluke testified before a House panel on the need for employers to pay for women’s contraception in 2012, her testimony was celebrated by radical feminists and decried by women who believed we should be responsible for our own healthcare. It’s interesting to note how the President of the United States reacted to the whole situation. President Obama called Ms. Fluke to tell her that her parents should be proud of her. Huh? Ms. Fluke wasn’t some 4th-grade girl who stood up to bullies. She’s an adult, making adult choices and decisions. Why did the president feel it necessary to bring her parents into the discussion?

After the Supreme Court ruling regarding Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods, we saw this weird outcry from radical feminists: “Keep the government out of the bedroom!” “Employers shouldn’t make medical decisions for us!” but both government and employers should pay for birth control and abortions. What do these women want? To be able to be adults, making decisions – both health and economic – for themselves or have Big Brother foot the bill? Women, we are told, need government to help us plan our families, get an education, get a paycheck equal to our male counter-parts, and raise our children.

While women and girls in other nations are facing death because of their religious choices, trying to get an education or simply because they are female, American feminists have created a “war on women” that infantilizes women and seeks to keep them dependent on employers, the government and entitlement programs. Abby McCloskey and Aparna Mathur, atU.S. News and World Report, note that many government policies are holding women back, and no one – least of all radical feminists – are talking about it.

Take the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office reported that there will be 2.5 million fewer full-time job equivalents by 2024 as a result of new taxes and incentives in the health care law. Most of those who leave their jobs are likely to be women, because women are more responsive to tax rates than men. In economist-speak, they have a higher labor supply elasticity, which is the consistent result of numerous economic models. According to economist Glenn Hubbard, the marginal tax rates from subsidy phase-outs in the health care law could reach 50 percent for some earners, before e and payroll taxes are accounted for. As a result, many women are likely to scale back their work hours or stop working all together.

The health care law has only exacerbated the already problematic tax code for women. Married women arguably face higher marginal tax rates than any demographic. Tax credits, such as the Earned e Tax Credit and the child care tax credit, are based on family e, not individual e. As a result, the return to work by a woman, usually the secondary earner, is less if she is married. A recent study by Melissa Kearney and Lesly Turner shows how a family headed by a primary earner making $25,000 a year will take home less than 30 percent of a spouse’s earnings because of taxes and the phase-out of benefits. This is hardly an incentive to work.

McCloskey and Mathur speak of how government makes working for women less and less appealing. The federal government gives child care incentives to women on welfare, and a slow economy recovery is hard on anyone trying to find work that pays well.

Taken together, these work disincentives create a big and unfortunate feedback loop. Women’s shorter time in the labor force – because of children, tax treatment, benefit phase-outs and a bad economy – decreases their investment in jobs-skills and experience. As a result, many women find themselves stuck in low-paying, low-promotion jobs.

Does this sound like a plan that supports women? Or does it sound like a plan that holds women back and keeps them dependent?

Teen and “tween” girls are especially vulnerable in our sex-saturated society. Obsessed with “selfies” and the use of technology, these girls often have no idea of the ramifications of putting themselves out there on the internet. The case of Anji Dean, an Oregon teenager, highlights the dangers young girls face. Dean went missing in late June, leaving behind a note saying, “If you’re reading this, I’m either missing or dead.” Following an intense social media campaign aimed at finding her, the young woman was found and brought home.

Police believe that she was the victim of a human trafficking ring. A woman identified as Jennifer told KGW that Anji introduced herself using her real name but then asked to be called “Daisy.” She reportedly told Jennifer that people were looking for her and she was being forced to do things she did not want. Jennifer tried to help her, but Anji disappeared before that could happen.

“She said she was in a bad situation and needed to get out,” Jennifer added.

Lauren Galley, the 19 year old founder of Girls Above Society, speaks candidly to teens about the threats posed by the internet:

Have you ever met a cute and charming guy at the mall or at a football game, or found yourself answering a text from someone you randomly met–and suddenly got “weird” vibes? If so, it is very possible you were targeted for human trafficking. Being a teen, I know how easy it is to say “It will never happen to me,” but if you are a young female living in the Houston area, it is extremely important to be aware of your surroundings. This does not mean you need to live in fear. As long as you educate yourself and take the necessary precautions, you should be safe from sketchy strangers (especially the ones you would never expect, like the good-looking ones.)

Traffickers use a variety of means to carry out their mission. One of their targets is young girls with low economic status. These parents oftentimes are working more than one job, leaving their children for extended lengths of time without proper supervision. Another method is outright kidnapping and luring girls into a dangerous situation. Traffickers use a variety of tactics which vary from affection and love, to something as simple as food, or finding a lost pet.

Search the website of “Our Bodies, Ourselves” and Planned Parenthood’s site for teens and see if you find the same information. Nope, instead you’ll find information on gender orientation, abortion, birth control and reproductive justice. Which brings us right back to Sandra Fluke, testifying,

Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.

It’s a shame that the radical “War on Women” isn’t focusing on real issues that face real women, and choosing to educate and empower women to be self-sufficient, smart and mature. Instead, the “War on Women” is about keeping women dependent of massive government pay-outs, tax disincentives for working and caring for their own children, and failing to bring to light real issues that put women in harm’s way, both here and abroad. Women: it’s time to stand on our own two feet. Don’t let anyone tell you that the only way for you to get ahead is for the government to pay you to get there. Don’t let your safety take a back seat to your self-image. Don’t turn over your life choices, your mistakes and what you’ve learned from them or your plishments to anyone else. As the late Maya Angelou once said, “A wise woman wishes to be no one’s enemy; a wise woman refuses to be anyone’s victim.”

Let’s be wise women, not dependent ones.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The FAQs: Religious Liberty and the Little Sisters of the Poor
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments todayin a casefrom religious nonprofit groups challenging thefederal government’s contraceptive/abortifacient mandate. Here is what you should knowabout that case. What is this case, and what’s it about? The case the Supreme Court will hear, Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. bines seven challenges to the Health and Human Services’ (HHS) contraceptive/abortifacient mandate. To fulfill the requirements of the Affordable Healthcare Act (aka ObamaCare) the federal government passed a regulation...
Video & Audio: Todd Huizinga On The New Totalitarian Temptation
Acton’s Director of International Outreach Todd Huizinga has been quite busy since therelease of his bookThe New Totalitarian Temptation: Global Governance and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe.Last week Thursday, he continued to talk about this topic in an Acton Lecture Series address that we’re pleased to share with you today on the PowerBlog. Additionally, we’ve posted audio of Todd’s hour-long appearance last night on WBZ Boston’s “Nightside” show with host Dan Rea after the jump. ...
Work Is Not About You: How Theology Can Save Us from Trade Protectionism
It’s e rather predictable to hear progressives promote protectionist rhetoric on trade and globalization. What’s surprising is when it spills from the lips of the leading Republican candidate. Donald Trump has made opposition to free trade a hallmark of his campaign, a holethat petitors have been slow to exploit. Inthemost recent CNN debate, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich eachechoed their own agreement in varying degrees, voicing slight critiques ontariffs but mostlyaffirmingTrump’s ambiguous platitudesabout trade that is“free but fair.”...
Rev. Sirico: When politicians want your money
In the Detroit News, Rev. Robert A. Sirico, co-founder and president of the Acton Institute, offers mentary on the two-year battle with the city of Grand Rapids over the institute’s exempt status under state property tax law (see the March 15 Acton news release, “Acton Institute Prevails in Property Tax Dispute with City of Grand Rapids” for background). In his opinion piece, Rev. Sirico writes: We were assured earlier from then-City Attorney Catherine Mish that it all wasn’t political, but...
When the American Colonists Experimented with Socialism
Do you remember the story about colonial Americans experimenting with socialism? Probably not. It’s a tale that rarely finds its way into the textbooks of high school and college students. Indeed, I had been out of school nearly 20 years when I first heard about it. If your not familiar with this part of American history, this short video by Larry Schweikart will fill you in on explains what happened when the early settlers who arrived at Plymouth and Jamestown...
The EU: Global Judicial Despotism and the International Criminal Court
“Americans’ instinctively refuse to recognize as legitimate any international organization, law or treaty that claims any authority over Americans above the U.S. Constitution,” says Todd Huizinga in this week’s Acton Commentary, “particularly if that organization, law or treaty contradicts the Constitution or violates Americans’ constitutional rights.” In the American system, it is because sovereignty rests in the people that the U.S. government does not have a right to transfer sovereignty to any other organization, government or group of governments. But...
Not a nanoparticle of science in this shareholder resolution
Sometimes clearer heads prevail, but at considerable costs to individual stock portfolios and corporations who have to mount a defense against uninformed, nuisance shareholder resolutions. Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission slowed the progressive roll of religious activist group As You Sow by denying an AYS proxy resolution seeking a detailed nanoparticle risk assessment by Mondelēz International Foodservice. Mondelēz successfully convinced the SEC that its use of food whitener titanium dioxide (TiO2) in its Dentyne Ice chewing gum does...
Rev. Sirico to appear on America’s News HQ on Easter Sunday
On Sunday, March 27, Acton’s President and Co-founder, Rev. Robert Sirico will join Shannon Bream and Leland Vittert on Fox News’ America’s News HQ. He will offer an Easter reflection ment on any significant breaking news. You can catch him between 1 and 2PM Eastern. America’s News HQ on Fox News Channel reports the latest national and world news. It reports expert insight on health, politics and military matters. ...
Anti-GMO Activists: ‘Heartless, Callous and Cruel’
Former Indiana Governor and current Purdue University President Mitch DanielsIf it seems your writer is obsessing over genetically modified organisms in this space, it’s only because the progressive side of the equation won’t let it go. Team Anti-GMO includes the radicalized religious shareholder activists of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and As You Sow. Whether it’s misrepresenting the science or ignoring pletely, these groups celebrate every GMO labeling initiative and perform handstands every time a mits to producing organic...
What Would Lord Acton Think of Superman?
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is the most famous quote by the English Catholic historian Sir John Dalberg-Acton. It also appears to be the overriding theme of the teaser-trailer for the new movie Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. The quote is even stated directly in the trailer in a voiceover (by actress Holly Hunter). Is it applicable in this context? Would Lord Acton agree that absolute power has corrupted Superman? I think he would. That...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved