Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
US to UK: Embrace ‘spirit’ of Declaration of Independence for Brexit
US to UK: Embrace ‘spirit’ of Declaration of Independence for Brexit
Feb 18, 2026 1:48 PM

On this Fourth of July, the U.S. ambassador to the UK has written an op-ed encouraging the government to embrace the spirit of the Declaration of Independence. Robert Wood Johnson’s op-ed points to the special relationship that grew up following our Revolution to strengthen Theresa May’s flagging resolve as Brexit talks lumber forward.

“Change calls for courage, conviction and confidence,” writes Ambassador Robert Wood Johnson in the Daily Mail. “And there is no finer example of that spirit in action than the Declaration of Independence which we celebrate today.”

Ambassador Wood draws clear parallels between U.S. independence and the reluctance of some Brits to cut ties with the European Union. Despite British encroachments on colonial liberties, including taxation without representation, “thousands and thousands of colonists wanted to remain. They strongly opposed breaking the union — not only did they feel British, even more importantly, it was Britain who bought their goods.”

But fueled with “a unity of purpose and a clarity of vision that drove them forward,” they began a process that would result in the creation of the world’s leading superpower – one that would help Great Britain save itself from totalitarianism in the twentieth century.

He then makes a seemingly counterintuitive claim:

The Revolutionary War was also the best thing that could have happened for the relationship between America and Britain.

Ultimately it paved the way for our great alliance as independent nations.

Likewise, even after Brexit, the UK will remain “bound to the EU not by institution but [by] shared values.”

The UK has much to offer the world, he writes, including “the most exciting entrepreneurs.” But it must strike out boldly to make the most of the opportunities that their ing independence could offer:

This isn’t a time for the UK to panic. It isn’t a time to fall into defeatism or to talk yourselves down. … You have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go in a different direction and define who you want to be and what you want to plish. That is an exciting opportunity. So hold your nerve Britain. This could be the start of something great.

I wish you all a happy Independence Day.

This administration’s tone could hardly contrast more with that of its predecessor. “When President Trump visits the UK in just over a week, he will be visiting a country which is as important to America’s future as it was to our past,” Johnson writes. “Our prosperity and security are intertwined with yours.” That contradicts the future promised by President Barack Obama during his April 2016 visit, when he said a post-Brexit UK would find itself “at the back of the queue” in U.S. trade and, it was implied, foreign policy. Ben Rhodes, a former Obama staffer, has revealed that Obama made that statement at the request of former UK Prime Minister David Cameron, whose administration supplied the precise wording.

The ambassador’s es, not only on the 242nd anniversary of U.S. independence from Great Britain, but as Theresa May’s government continues to “halt between two opinions” (I King 18:21) over Brexit. May has apparently abandoned hope of reaching a bespoke trade deal with the EU, but what she hopes for the future now seems unclear, even as Cabinet ministers will gather to thrash out the subject on Friday.

A government official told the Times that “Downing Street is moving towards the Norwegian model.” Norway has access to the Single Market but must accept most EU regulations, accept free movement of immigrants, and contribute to the EU budget but has no vote on the formation of those laws.

Meanwhile, May faces a brewing intraparty rebellion from Tories such as Jacob Rees-Mogg and Boris Johnson who envision an energetic and independent future for the UK post-Brexit. Some of these Brexiteers warned on Wednesday morning that, if May does not deliver on Brexit, the Conservative Party will be “toast.”

One might see that as a twenty-first-century way of saying the party must hang together, or they will all hang separately.

And one may also see it further proof of the Divine precept, “Where there is no vision, the people perish” (Proverbs 29:18).

You can read Ambassador Johnson’s full article here.

Happy Independence Day!

by John Trumbull, public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBR: Something for Nothing
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” The ARRA makes clear that we have not learned one great moral lesson: You can’t have something for nothing. Or, among economists, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. I’m not even sure that anybody is seriously arguing that most of the items contained in this bill constitute “stimulus.” Congress can genuinely stimulate the economy in two ways: decreasing taxes and...
PBR: Do We Need a New New Deal?
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Perhaps the most effective historical trope in pushing through the massive stimulus package on Capitol Hill has been the notion that if only the New Deal of the 1930s hadn’t had to wait more than three years for the election of FDR, the Great Depression might have been avoided. But have you ever wondered why the Great Depression persisted for so long?...
PBR: Public Good and the Faith-Based Initiative
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” I have little confidence in the future of the faith-based initiative because conservatives who gain office are unwilling to take any fire at all in order to advance the cause beyond concept. At the same time, liberals will be unable to make productive use of the idea because of giant fissures regarding public religion in their movement. In theory, President Obama would make an ideal person to...
PBR: A Mainline Bailout
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Under the Obama administration, the faith-based initiative will increasingly e a means to bailout flagging mainline and liberal denominations and ministries, who will have no problem modating their religious practices to secular standards. And in this we will see even clearer manifestation of the theocratic hopes of the religious left. ...
The Buckleyization of America
William F. Buckley, 1956: [I’d] sooner be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand members of the faculty of Harvard University. Rassmussen poll results, 2009: Forty-four percent (44%) voters also think a group of people selected at random from the phone book would do a better job addressing the nation’s problems than the current Congress, but 37% disagree. Twenty percent (20%) are undecided. ...
Roepke was right
In my Winter 2007 article on economic globalization for AGAIN Magazine, I quoted economist Wilhelm Roepke. (AGAIN is published by Conciliar Media Ministries, a department of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church of North America). Roepke: Economically ignorant moralism is as objectionable as morally callous economism. Ethics and economics are two equally difficult subjects, and while the former needs discerning and expert reason, the latter cannot do without humane values. In light of all that has happened with the U.S. economic...
An Alternative Stimulus
Washington is all atwitter about the “Stimulus,” which is currently being pushed through Congress (without being read by most members). Acton’s own Michelle Muccio e up with a plan of her own, and did a bit of independent research to see if her proposal would find any support: ...
An Economic Recovery for the Religious Left
Mark Tooley calls out “emerging church maestro” Brian Mclaren in a piece today in The American Spectator titled “A Real ‘Economic’ Recovery.” I was introduced to Brian McLaren in seminary when new students were required to read his books in introductory classes. Unfortunately, I was one of only a handful not impressed. He also lectured in person to a class I took, but honestly I don’t remember much about the lecture, except conservatives were generally denounced and “big oil” was...
PBR: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is poised to be signed into law after weeks of wrangling. Since we know that “budgets are moral documents,” then spending and stimulus bills must be as well. So this week’s PowerBlog Ramblings question is: “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Ramble on… Ramblings: Do We Need a New New Deal?Something for NothingDangerous Deficit SpendingGovernmental Accountability and Transparency? ...
PBR: On Faith
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Perhaps taking a cue from this week’s PBR question (or perhaps not), the On Faith roster of bloggers have been asked to weigh in on the following question this week: “Should the Obama Administration let faith-based programs that receive government grants discriminate against those they hire or serve?” Notable responses include those from Chuck Colson, Al Mohler, and Susan Brooks Thistlewaite, the latter of whom has these...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved