Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Understanding Bolsonaro
Understanding Bolsonaro
Jan 1, 2026 7:26 AM

When Jair Messias Bolsonaro walked into TV Cultura’s studio in July, no one had any idea of ​​the political tsunami that would engulf Brazil 90 days later.

The “Roda Viva” is the oldest talk show on Brazilian television; a group of eight journalists sit on a wheel-shaped bench and in the center lies the interviewee. That Monday, Bolsonaro spoke about how he would toughen criminal laws, turn back the sexual revolution, and restore Christian morality. He admitted to not understanding much about economics; that said, he has been well advised.

The retired army officer repeats the same performance on a similar TV program promoted by Rede Globo, the giant. Bolsonaro was asked what he thought about the military dictatorship which ruled Brazil between 1964 until 1985. He reminded an astonished group of journalists that one of the most effusive supporters of the 1964 military coup was the founder of Globo, Roberto Marinho. He then challenged them to call their boss’s father a coup-plotter.

These are examples of how the man most likely to be Brazil’s next president has been setting fire to the political status quo.

Bolsonaro began his political career in the City Council of Rio de Janeiro. In 1990 he became member of Brazil’s House of Representatives. His main platform was always the issue of fighting crime and defending the right to bear guns. Representing one of the most violent regions of Brazil, his message has found widespread acceptance.

As a legislator, bined social conservatism with statist and protectionist policies. He was a kind of “big state conservative.” His behavior was the one of a Latin American populist: the strong man who solves everything.

It was, however, the internet which made Bolsonaro famous. By standing against the political correctness via, his videos on YouTube and Facebook have e a pop culture phenomenon.

In 2014, a double crisis hit Brazil. On the one hand, there was an economic crisis triggered by the neo-Keynesian politics of President Dilma Rousseff; on the other, there was political turmoil following from investigations into corruption in the state pany, Petrobras. One crisis began to feed the other.

Soon after, Dilma Rousseff was removed from office. Corruption investigations engulfed the entire political class, starting with Rousseff’s successor, Michel Temer. The two crises intensified the revolt against established politics.

It was in this context of besieged Bastille that Jair Bolsonaro emerged as a real alternative of power.

Bolsonaro’s unusual appeal does not only stem from his ideas. His campaign has been chaotic and amateurish, and clearly lacks central coordination. He relies on the Internet and social media networks rather than television to speak his message. His party, the Social-Liberal Party, was created exclusively for this presidential election. Bolsonaro’s campaign also lacks experienced politicians and voting strategists. Instead, his campaign is advised by seven army generals and a dozen outsiders mand surprisingly strong networks.

Pundits predicted that Bolsonaro would fade and that conservative votes would drift back to the Social-Democrats. The polls, however, showed his resilience. On September 6, he was the victim of a knife attack that put him in a hospital bed for the rest of the campaign. Once more, pundits predicted that Bolsonaro was done. Once again, they turned out to be wrong as Bolsonaro started to rise slowly but steadily. He skyrocketed in the last week of the campaign and won the first round.

Bolsonaro did not reach the necessary threshold of 50 percent plus one vote. Nonetheless, it is very likely that he is going to win the election in three weeks’ time because a second-placed candidate has never succeeded in the second round. The most recent polls put Bolsonaro in front by 16-percentage-points.

Where should we place Bolsonaro on the ideological map? To begin with, Bolsonaro is a populist, and like all populists, he does not have ideological clarity. We know that he believes in social conservatism. He is a conservative according to Karl Mannheim’s definition of the word, someone that stands up to protect a present social structure in jeopardy.

Bolsonaro is, however, also in favor of free markets. His conversion to free-market ideas is something new and has to be understood in the general context of the Brazilian center-right. Today’s Brazilian Right is anti-globalist, pro-free market, and traditionalist. His economic adviser, Paulo Guedes, is a prominent banker and economist educated in the University of Chicago.

Assuming Bolsonaro is elected president, his ideological outlines will start to e more precise. It is doubtful that he is going to rule as a conservative purist because there are many Brazilian political variables that tend to push policies in a more centrist or pragmatic direction. Many believe that the main contribution of Bolsonaro and the new Brazilian Right will be to reshape national politics, turning Brazil into a “normal country”: one where people can vote either on the left or the right knowing that the rules of the democratic game will not change regardless of the electoral e.

home page image:Brazil – The first 100% Brazilian oil platform. wikimedia

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work and Culture: where we meet in the glory of God
David Clayton, permanent artist-in-residence at Thomas More College of Liberal Arts, has written an appealing piece at The Way of Beauty, that connects the seemingly unlikely arenas of liturgy and economics. His thoughts are based on The Wellspring of Worship, by Jean Corbon, in which Corbon associates work and culture to the human experience of worship and liturgy. Clayton admits that linking liturgy and economics may be a stretch, but upon further examination shows that, with a proper understanding of...
Should Churches Get Tax Breaks?
The New York Times’ “Room for Debate” feature highlights religious freedom this week by asking the question: “Should Churches Get Tax Breaks?” The contributors, who span the continuum of opinions on the issue, include Susan Jacoby, Christopher L. Eisgruber and Lawrence Sager, Winnie Varghese, Dan Barker, and Mark Rienzi. Jacoby, who recently debated the merits of Christianity in American politics and Grand Rapids’ Fountain Street Church, is an advocate for secularism and author of The Age of American Unreason. Jacoby...
Bringing the Church to Work
Why the disconnect between work and worship? To reckon with this question, the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics (IFWE) blog recently launched a series on “Work and the Church Today.” In part one, Hugh Welchel, Executive Director of the IFWE, addresses the widening distance between the pew and the cubicle and, in response, prods the Church to invest itself in the lives of its businesspeople. Without any integration of faith and work, he says, professionals will continue to feel...
The Impious Legacy of US Education
Virgil's Aeneas fleeing the sack of Troy with his father on his shoulders and leading his son by the hand. “Even the conventional everyday morality,” writes Vladimir Solovyov, demands that a man should hand down to his children not only the goods he has acquired, but also the capacity to work for the further maintenance of their lives. The supreme and unconditional morality also requires that the present generation should leave a two-fold legacy to the next,—in the first place,...
Charity Begins at Home
In a paper at the symposium I noted in yesterday’s post, Richard Helmholtz described the application of natural law in a particular case in which the judges observed that “charity begins at home,” since “it is a natural impulse to do good to one’s own family.” Because of the wonders of digital publishing and public libraries, I was able to borrow an ebook version of Winter’s Bone from my local library. As I noted yesterday, there’s a scene in the...
Are Islam and Liberal Democracy Compatible?
This was the topic of our latest Campus Martius discussion group at the Istituto Acton office in Rome. Our guest speaker was law professor David Forte, who presented some of the challenges in furthering liberal democracy in Muslim-majority countries. Having studied and spoken on Islamic law for many years, Prof. Forte is no extremist on the question and had been generally optimistic about the democratization of the Muslim world. In the wake of the “Arab spring” and increasing persecution of...
The Irony of Vanderbilt University’s Religious Discrimination
Recently, a Christian student group at Vanderbilt University has been told by the school’s administration that it will lose its recognized status on campus unless the group removes its requirement that its leaders have a mitment to Jesus Christ.”Administrators at the school had previously ruled thatreligious organizations must now allow any Vanderbilt student to be a candidate for a leadership office, regardless of religious beliefs or sexual orientation. For example, a Christian student group would be forced to allow the...
Will the Future Be More Religious and Conservative?
Over on The American, Eric Kaufmann, a professor of politics at the University of London, argues that population change is reversing secularism and shifting the center of gravity of entire societies in a conservative religious direction: The growing Republican fertility advantage largely derives from religion. In the past, people had children for material reasons—many kids died young, and fresh hands were needed to work the land and provide for parents in their old age. Today, we live in cities and...
The Income Inequality We Ignore
Over on First Things, Michael W. Hannon, David J. Pederson, and Peter A. Blair write about the injustices of inequality. In many parts of their short article they had me nodding in agreement. But as with much that is written about e and wealth inequality, the article makes assertions that seem to have no basis in economic reality. For instance, the authors seem to claim that e inequality leads to power inequality which “harms civic friendship.” Charles Murray’s research in...
Bigger and Better: 2012 Acton University
You only have a few days left to visit the website and register for the 2012 Acton University conference – the registration deadline is next Friday, May 18. Guided by distinguished, international faculty, Acton University is a four day experience (June 12-15) held in Grand Rapids, Mich. During the conference, our goal is to offer you an opportunity to deepen your knowledge and integrate rigorous philosophy, Christian theology and sound economics. If you have ever had the opportunity to attend...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved