Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Toward an economics of abundance: How the cross triumphs over scarcity
Toward an economics of abundance: How the cross triumphs over scarcity
Dec 2, 2025 12:40 PM

For many, economics is ultimately about solving the problem of scarcity—determining how to best use and distribute limited resources. Yet, as some economists are beginning to understand, human creativity and innovation are increasingly allowing us to triumph over such scarcity.

As Christians, it’s a tension that’s all too familiar, from creation (abundance) to the fall (scarcity) to the resurrection (abundance) to the here and now (+ not yet). plicated.

In a new short film from The Bible Project, we get a clearer picture of that broader biblical story, allowing us to better understand our current calling as creative image-bearers and generous contributors in a world of seeming constraints.

“Creation is an expression of God’s generous love,” the narrators explain. “He is the host and humans are his guests in a world of opportunity and abundance. And we’re called to keep the party going—to spread his goodness. This is a beautiful picture. But it’s not the way people experience in the world. Rather, we find a world of scarcity and struggle—not abundance.”

In the garden, Adam and Eve were intimately familiar with God’s abundance, collaborating with their Creator in a world that was all at once tangible and transcendent. Even still, they failed to trust the giver of the gift, looking instead to their own designs and fears about the future.

It wasn’t that they actually saw lack in the world around them. They simply lost sight of the true source of all that was good and true. “Our scarcity problem isn’t caused by a lack of resources,” the narrators explain. “Rather, the problem is our mindset that God can’t be trusted. ‘Maybe God is holding out on me. Maybe there isn’t enough and maybe I need to take matters into my own hands.’”

In doubting the overflow of God’s abundance, we necessarily put our trust in something else—ourselves—leading us to inevitably walk in the ways of self-focus and self-protection. “Once we’re deceived into that mindset of scarcity,” they continue, “we can justify the impulse to take care of me and mine before anyone else, and that leads to envy and anger, violence, and a world where it seems like there’s not enough. The party is over; it’s turned into a battleground.”

But while we may have been content to confine ourselves to the battlefield, God didn’t give up so easily. He sought to restore all that was broken, responding not from the context of fear and scarcity, but of extravagant abundance. He didn’t set out to simply give us a “piece of the pie” and see how we manage. He gave his very own son.

Jesus defeated the lie that “there isn’t enough.” Wherever he went, scarcity was subverted and love was multiplied. Born into a broken world, he bore witness to how a life might be lived as if the original party never stopped—always giving, always restoring, always loving. Whatever the material constraints and corresponding anxieties, he reminded us to “consider the lilies” and “seek first the kingdom.”

“Jesus lives with the conviction that there is enough, and that our generous host can be trusted,” the narrators explain. “His mindset of abundance allowed him to live sacrificially and generously, even towards his enemies. And Jesus called his followers to trust in God’s abundance, like Him…He’s inviting us to live by a different story, one that is built on trust in God’s goodness and love.”

Through his death and resurrection, Jesus revealed the upside-down economics of God’s abundance, in all of its confounding beauty and mystery: “God’s love can turn death into life, and scarcity back into abundance,” redeeming our spirits, reorienting our imaginations, and transforming the work of our hands and the fruits of our labor.

“When you believe there’s enough, you start to see opportunities for generosity everywhere—with our time and money, our attention,” the narrators conclude. “One of the most important ways that we can experience the abundance of God’s new creation is sharing with others because of our trust that God is the generous host.”

Such generosity needn’t be limited to “acts of charity,” of course. When we observe growth trends across the global economy, we see that such abundance is not the result of greed or narrow self-preservation, but rather, of sharing—trading and exchanging and collaborating in an intricate web of creative human fellowship. “Work plants the seed; civilization reaps the harvest,” writes Lester DeKoster. “We plant; God gives the increase to unify the human race.”

Much of this “sharing” is happening regardless of a conscious “trust that God is the generous host,” of course. Thus, how much more abundance might manifest if we were to simply deepen and widen our perspectives. How might we bear better witness to the source of such blessings, illuminating what’s available from the giver who gave us our giving natures in the first place?

We are still bound to encounter and experience that age-old tension—living in the redemptive reality of the cross even as we navigate and seek to restore imperfect systems and broken relationships in a fallen world. But as we go about that task—creating, trading, serving, and sharing—we ought not over-elevate the earthly constraints that we face. All is gift.

Whether in our families, neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, or elsewhere, we have the opportunity to mirror and embody the extravagance of the God who created, gave, and taught us there is always enough.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Since Christ Died for Us
Yesterday my son asked me why today is called “Ash Wednesday.” In that question I could hear the echoes of another question, “Since Christ has died for us, why do we still have to die?” The latter question is found in the Heidelberg Catechism, and the brief but poignant answer has stuck with me since I first encountered it. First, the catechism clarifies that our death does not have redemptive power: “Our death does not pay the debt of our...
No Olympic Dream: Monti’s wake up call to Italy
On Valentine’s Day, just one day before having to tender its application to the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, Italy’s pragmatic Prime Minister Mario Monti showed no romantic spirit by canceling his nation’s dream to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. In a last-minute decision made Feb. 14, Prime Minister Monti explained at a press conference that the already overburdened Italian taxpayers simply cannot afford to finance the estimated $12.5 billion to bring the 2020 Olympic Games to Rome. “I...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Happiness is Subjective
One of the conclusions from last mentary was that the government shouldn’t be in the business of promoting a particular vision of the good life in America. That’s not to say that the government doesn’t have some role in promoting mon good or making some normative judgments about the good life. But it shouldn’t get anywhere near the level of specificity of promising a family, home, college education, and retirement for all. In part this is because while moral good...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Madison on Religious Conscience
The HHS Mandate is troubling to so many simply because it’s a clear Constitutional violation. Any basic understanding of Constitutional rights and our religious freedom sees that this is primarily about religious liberty, and not solely an issue concerning contraceptives or Roman Catholics. Last week we heard from James Madison on religious liberty in my post “Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?” In 1792, Madison wrote an essay titled “Property” in the National Gazette. This is a brilliant piece by Madison...
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
Gleaner Tech #2: The Global Village Construction Set
[Note: This is the second in an occasional series ongleaner technology.] The Global Village Construction Setis a collection of 40 machines needed to “create a small civilization with forts…like a life-size Lego set.” ...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved