Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Toppling statues tears at the 3 pillars of the West
Toppling statues tears at the 3 pillars of the West
Feb 2, 2026 12:45 AM

Were he alive today, what would C.S. Lewis say about the ongoing, violent riots and church desecration being led by “trained Marxists”? As it turns out, we know. The answer lies in a letter that Lewis wrote about UK social protests 80 years ago, which reads as though it were a news dispatch from Portland’s federal courthouse.

Christians should have keen interest in his views on this topic. The current unrest, which kicked off 63 days ago, has expanded its circle of destruction from toppling public statues to church iconoclasm. As I wrote recently at Intellectual Takeout:

Let it never be said that Shaun King of Black Lives Matter has no influence. On June 22, Kingcalledfor BLM protesters to desecrate all depictions of a European-looking Jesus, essentially inviting thewholescale vandalismof every Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox parish in the world. Within 24 hours, misguided activists half a world apart obeyed.

The reality is that the oldest continuous Christian art tradition does not depict Jesus as a “white European,” and the Western art tradition has at times shown itself remarkably inclusive. (Read the details here.)

But since its publication, the profanation campaign has only intensified. Earlier this month, a statue of Christ in Whitefish, Montana, was doused in brown paint and made to hold flags saying, “Rise Up” and “#BLM.” Rioters have increasingly targeted places of worship.

The bad news is that too many faith leaders have been silent about their flocks’ suffering. The good news is that the words of Christian statesmen echo through the ages, shedding light and offering direction for our present crises.

At least three faithful leaders have addressed the mass looting and civil unrest we are facing, as I note in my new article, “C.S. Lewis, Leo XIII, and Clarence Thomas on Riots” at Providence magazine. Pope Leo XIII has clear instructions for leaders about protecting property inRerum Novarum. Justice Clarence Thomas’ has repented of his own painful history with rioting. But as usual, C.S. Lewis captures the moment best.

In the early days of World War II, young activists had begun decrying the UK’s excesses during the Great War. C.S. Lewis brought his brilliant insights to the issue in a 1940 letter to the editor subsequently published in his book, God in the Dock, under the title, “Dangers of National Repentance.” When people repent of other people’s sins — especially those of the historic past — they are not repenting at all. They are condemning others in a way that makes themselves feel superior. Rather than making the penitents moral, it stimulates pride, which Lewis, following the traditional Christian view, once called “the utmost evil.” As I write at Providence:

This invitation for protesters to rail against those whom they already hate, Lewis writes, “is emphatically not the exhortation which your audience needs. munal sins which they should be told to repent are those of their own age and class—its contempt for the uneducated, its readiness to suspect evil, its self-righteous provocations of publicobloquy, its breaches of the Fifth Commandment” to honor thy father and mother. “Of these sins I have heard nothing among them.”

Lewis’ words on this and so many other subjects stand the test of time, because they are built on eternal spiritual realities. That same genius animated our Founding Fathers and infused the governing documents they produced.

The ongoing drive to topple statues, public and private, strikes at the three pillars of America’s founding:

1. Faith. The United States was purposefully conceived to propagate the Gospel, and the Founders intended faith to inform future generations of governance. As the recent report of theU.S. Commission on Unalienable Rights asked, “Can faith in such rights be sustained without faith in God?”Secular British writer Douglas Murray similarly questioned whether the West’s “structure of rights, laws and institutions” could “exist even without the source that had arguably given them life,” namely the Christian religion. Socialism facilitates atheism, and vice versa. Those consumed with ideological fanaticism now believe they are serving the greater good by desecrating statues of Jesus and vandalizing sanctuaries consecrated to His worship. America’s founding faith is being replaced by a false religion.

2. Property. The greatest disregard for other’s property is to destroy it, which eliminates the possibility of restitution. Protecting property is the first and most fundamental duty of the state. “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals,” wrote James Madison, the father of the Constitution. “[T]hat alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.” The mob’s all-but-officially-sanctioned destruction of property undermines the Founders’ view of government in a tangible way.

3. History. George Orwell famously observed in 1984, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” Both political and religious leaders hear in the current war on history the mild echoes of China’s Cultural Revolution. The American Founders saw themselves as part of the grand history of the West, drawing lessons on governmental structure from ancient Greece and Rome, as well as the “Anglo-American heritage of law.” If this history can be rendered toxic, the Constitution it produced must be jettisoned as the fruit of the poisonous tree.

You can read more of C.S. Lewis’ words and Clarence Thomas’ example for rioters here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Dr. Andrew Abela Receives 2009 Novak Award
Maltese-American marketing professor, Dr. Andrew Abela, is the winner of the Acton Institute’s 2009 Novak Award. Dr. Abela’s main research areas include consumerism, marketing ethics, Catholic Social Teaching, and internal munication. Believing that anti-free market perspectives seem to dominate discussion about the social impact of business, Dr. Abela is working to explore Christian ethics further to show how these issues can be resolved more humanely and effectively through market-oriented approaches. To aid this work, Dr. Abela is currently preparing a...
Of Men, Mountains, and Mining
Here’s a brief report from The Environmental Report on mountain-top removal mining, and the increasing involvement of religious groups weighing in on the question. One of these groups is Christians for the Mountains. A quote by the group’s co-founder Allen Johnson was noteworthy, “We cannot destroy God’s creation in order to have a temporal economy.” One other thing that struck me about the interview is that the AmeriCorp involvement smacks of “rebranding” secular environmentalism. Add the magic words “creation care”...
America’s Secular Challenge
I’ve been reading America’s Secular Challenge by NYU professor and president of the Hudson Institute Herb London. The book is essentially an extended essay about how elite, left-wing secularism undercuts America’s traditional strengths of patriotism and religious faith during a time when the nation can ill afford it. The assault on public religion and love of es in a period when America faces enemies who have no such crisis of identity and lack the degree of doubt that leaves us...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
PBR: The Faith-Based Initiative
Last week’s National Prayer Breakfast featured a speech by President Obama which was his most substantive address concerning the future of the faith-based initiative since his Zanesville, Ohio speech of July 2008. In the Zanesville speech, then-candidate Obama discussed “expansion” of the faith-based initiative, and some details were added as Obama announced his vision for the newly-named Office for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. The announced priorities of the office are fourfold: The Office’s top priority will be munity groups an...
More on ‘The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts’
“Government budgets are moral documents,” is the often quoted line from Jim Wallis of Sojourners and other religious left leaders. Wallis also adds that “When politicians present their budgets, they are really presenting their priorities.” There is perhaps no better example of a spending bill lacking moral soundness than the current stimulus package being debated in the U.S. Senate. In mentary this week, “The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts,” I offer clear reasons how spending more does not equate to...
Debunking the New Deal
It’s long been my contention that the mythology surrounding the New Deal in large swaths of the popular imagination plays an ongoing, important, and harmful role in politics and policy debate. For that reason, I e periodic attempts to debunk the myth. Jonah Goldberg offers a perceptive and enlightening perspective on New Deal historiography and its current uses and abuses. Unlike Daniel Gross (cited by Goldberg), I don’t care whether the analyst is an historian, economist, policy wonk, or journalist,...
PBR: Monsma and Carlton-Thies Speak Out
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” As part of Christianity Today’s Speaking Out (web-only) feature, Stephen V. Monsma and Stanley Carlson-Thies, of Calvin College’s Henry Institute and the Center for Public Justice respectively, address the future of the faith-based initiative under President Obama. Monsma and Carlton-Thies outline five “encouraging signs” and one “major concern.” The encouraging signs include the naming of the office executive director (Joshua DuBois) and advisory council (including “recognized evangelicals”...
PBR: A Genuine Challenge to Religious Liberty
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Jordan Ballor kindly asked me to offer a few words in response to this question, as I made it an area of expertise during the previous Administration. I’ve been working up to writing something more formal, but I’ll begin by thinking aloud here, as well as at my my home blog. Without further ado, here’s what I posted over there: By now, you’ve probably heard about the...
PBR: Socialism Tyrannizes
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” In answering this question we could point to the historical instances of socialist regimes and their abhorrent record on treatment of human beings. But the supporters of socialism might just as well argue that these examples are not truly relevant because each historical instance of socialism has particular contextual corruptions. Thus, these regimes have never really manifested the ideal that socialism offers. So on a more abstract or ideal level,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved