Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Toppling statues tears at the 3 pillars of the West
Toppling statues tears at the 3 pillars of the West
Jan 13, 2026 4:20 AM

Were he alive today, what would C.S. Lewis say about the ongoing, violent riots and church desecration being led by “trained Marxists”? As it turns out, we know. The answer lies in a letter that Lewis wrote about UK social protests 80 years ago, which reads as though it were a news dispatch from Portland’s federal courthouse.

Christians should have keen interest in his views on this topic. The current unrest, which kicked off 63 days ago, has expanded its circle of destruction from toppling public statues to church iconoclasm. As I wrote recently at Intellectual Takeout:

Let it never be said that Shaun King of Black Lives Matter has no influence. On June 22, Kingcalledfor BLM protesters to desecrate all depictions of a European-looking Jesus, essentially inviting thewholescale vandalismof every Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox parish in the world. Within 24 hours, misguided activists half a world apart obeyed.

The reality is that the oldest continuous Christian art tradition does not depict Jesus as a “white European,” and the Western art tradition has at times shown itself remarkably inclusive. (Read the details here.)

But since its publication, the profanation campaign has only intensified. Earlier this month, a statue of Christ in Whitefish, Montana, was doused in brown paint and made to hold flags saying, “Rise Up” and “#BLM.” Rioters have increasingly targeted places of worship.

The bad news is that too many faith leaders have been silent about their flocks’ suffering. The good news is that the words of Christian statesmen echo through the ages, shedding light and offering direction for our present crises.

At least three faithful leaders have addressed the mass looting and civil unrest we are facing, as I note in my new article, “C.S. Lewis, Leo XIII, and Clarence Thomas on Riots” at Providence magazine. Pope Leo XIII has clear instructions for leaders about protecting property inRerum Novarum. Justice Clarence Thomas’ has repented of his own painful history with rioting. But as usual, C.S. Lewis captures the moment best.

In the early days of World War II, young activists had begun decrying the UK’s excesses during the Great War. C.S. Lewis brought his brilliant insights to the issue in a 1940 letter to the editor subsequently published in his book, God in the Dock, under the title, “Dangers of National Repentance.” When people repent of other people’s sins — especially those of the historic past — they are not repenting at all. They are condemning others in a way that makes themselves feel superior. Rather than making the penitents moral, it stimulates pride, which Lewis, following the traditional Christian view, once called “the utmost evil.” As I write at Providence:

This invitation for protesters to rail against those whom they already hate, Lewis writes, “is emphatically not the exhortation which your audience needs. munal sins which they should be told to repent are those of their own age and class—its contempt for the uneducated, its readiness to suspect evil, its self-righteous provocations of publicobloquy, its breaches of the Fifth Commandment” to honor thy father and mother. “Of these sins I have heard nothing among them.”

Lewis’ words on this and so many other subjects stand the test of time, because they are built on eternal spiritual realities. That same genius animated our Founding Fathers and infused the governing documents they produced.

The ongoing drive to topple statues, public and private, strikes at the three pillars of America’s founding:

1. Faith. The United States was purposefully conceived to propagate the Gospel, and the Founders intended faith to inform future generations of governance. As the recent report of theU.S. Commission on Unalienable Rights asked, “Can faith in such rights be sustained without faith in God?”Secular British writer Douglas Murray similarly questioned whether the West’s “structure of rights, laws and institutions” could “exist even without the source that had arguably given them life,” namely the Christian religion. Socialism facilitates atheism, and vice versa. Those consumed with ideological fanaticism now believe they are serving the greater good by desecrating statues of Jesus and vandalizing sanctuaries consecrated to His worship. America’s founding faith is being replaced by a false religion.

2. Property. The greatest disregard for other’s property is to destroy it, which eliminates the possibility of restitution. Protecting property is the first and most fundamental duty of the state. “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals,” wrote James Madison, the father of the Constitution. “[T]hat alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.” The mob’s all-but-officially-sanctioned destruction of property undermines the Founders’ view of government in a tangible way.

3. History. George Orwell famously observed in 1984, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” Both political and religious leaders hear in the current war on history the mild echoes of China’s Cultural Revolution. The American Founders saw themselves as part of the grand history of the West, drawing lessons on governmental structure from ancient Greece and Rome, as well as the “Anglo-American heritage of law.” If this history can be rendered toxic, the Constitution it produced must be jettisoned as the fruit of the poisonous tree.

You can read more of C.S. Lewis’ words and Clarence Thomas’ example for rioters here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Sirico Responds to NPR’s ‘Christian Is Not Synonymous With Conservative’
Jon Erwin, director of the pro-life October Baby movie, was recently interviewed by National Public Radio and, in the background article that panied the audio, the network reported his view that Christians didn’t feel very e in Hollywood’s munity. This provoked a lot ment by NPR listeners about what, really, a Christian is. The title of the NPR article, “‘October Baby’ Tells A Story Hollywood Wouldn’t” probably had something to do with that. Ombudsman Edward Schumacher-Matos followed up the interview...
Musings for Good Friday
A marvellous and mighty paradox has thus occurred, for the death which they thought to inflict on Him as dishonour and disgrace has e the glorious monument to death’s defeat. ~ Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Word. Job in the Old Testament called out to God begging for a mediator or advocate, begging for somebody who could understand the depth of his affliction and agony (Job 9). Such is the beauty of Christ that he came not to teach...
Market Economies with Churches and Market Economies without Churches
Zhao Xiao, a government economist in China, on the differences between market economies with Churches (like the U.S.) and market economies without churches (like China): Is it not integrity that you are pursuing? Then you ought to know: places with faith have more integrity. For China’s crawling economic reforms, this ought to be an important inspiration. Market economies with churches are different in another respect from those without: in the former, it is much easier to establish monly respected system....
Who Keeps the Keepers?
Sam Gregg’s response to President Obama’s latest invocation of the “my brother’s keeper” motif brings out one of the basic problems with applying this biblical question to public policy. As Gregg points out, the logic of the president’s usage points to the government as the institution of brotherly love: But who is the “I” that President Obama has in mind? Looking carefully at his speech, it’s most certainly not the free associations munities that Alexis de Tocqueville thought made 19th-century...
Jimmy Carter, Liberation Theologian
I came across this news story via Catholic World News. And this intriguing passage about President Carter’s disagreements with Pope John Paul II: Carter wrote that he exchanged harsh words with the late Pope John Paul II during a state visit over what Carter classified as the Pope’s “perpetuation of the subservience of women.” He added, “there was more harshness when we turned to the subject of ‘liberation theology’.” I haven’t read the book, so I’m awfully curious to know...
On Call Through Video
We are continuing to interview people in different areas of work to showcase what being On Call in Culture looks like on a daily basis. Today we introduce Rachel Bastarache Bogan, video editor for SIM. Learn more about Rachel at As a child, Rachel was surrounded by creativity including music and painting. Her favorite gift was a “box full of opportunity” that someone had filled with random knick knacks from a craft store. When she was five years old, she...
Events of Note Next Week
Here are some events worth noting next week: On Wednesday, April 11, Victor Claar will join us for an Acton on Tap. Victor Claar is a professor of economics at Henderson State University in Arkansas, and previously taught for a number of years at Hope College. I’ll be introducing Victor and the topic for the evening, “Envy: Socialism’s Deadly Sin.” We’ll begin to mingle at 6pm, and the talk mence at 6:30, followed by what’s sure to be some lively...
Consumers Acting Badly
I found this video on NPR’s ‘Planet Money’ intriguing. A young woman reflects on the cost of her wedding dress, which she’s obviously worn once. She recognizes that there is enormous emotional attachment to this garment, but there is something going on in terms of how much she spent; she just can’t quite put her finger on it. She eventually finds out that she probably over-paid by about $1200. She believes she has been ripped off. There are a few...
Commentary: Leviathan, Civil Society and National Morality
Don’t blame the culture wars for the recent debates about contraception, says Phillip W. De Vous in this week’s Acton Commentary (published Apr. 4), the real culprit is statism.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weeklyActon News & Commentaryand other publicationshere. Leviathan, Civil Society and National Morality byPhillip W. De Vous Political campaigns in every era have included talk of morality and moral principles in general. They rarely shy away from discussing even very specific moral...
Jayabalan: Vatican Statement Shows Business and Faith Compatible
Reporter Carol Glatz of the Catholic News Service has a story on the new Vatican document titled “Vocation of the Business Leader: A Reflection” aimed at educators, entrepreneurs and business people. Glatz interviews Kishore Jayabalan, director of Acton’s Rome office, who praised the document for its pastoral approach: “It’s trying to encourage and inspire business people” and prompt them to “think about how to incorporate their faith more into what they do,” Jayabalan told Catholic News Service. It shows that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved