Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Years of Living Dishonestly
The Years of Living Dishonestly
Jan 31, 2026 11:47 PM

A bit of honesty, please. The premium network Showtime is airing an original series, The Years of Living Dangerously, which pits such intrepid reporters as Hollywood B-list hotties Jessica Alba, Olivia Munn and America Ferrera against climate-change “deniers.” The May 19 episode featured Ms. Ferrera attempting to grill The Heartland Institute’s James Taylor (full disclosure: Taylor is a professional colleague and cigar buddy) on his efforts to roll back renewable energy standards on a state-by-state basis. On this, more below.

In the meantime, clergy, nuns and other religious shareholders are rending their respective garments over lobbying and political contributions performed panies in which they invest. Never mind the religious shareholders directly benefit from corporate lobbying and political donations, what really matters to them is whether panies’ efforts kowtow to the progressive agenda.

Witness the following religious groups and their 2014 shareholder resolutions submitted to the panies:

Sisters of St. Francis, Lobbying: CVS Caremark Corporation; JPMorgan Chase & Co.Episcopal Church, Lobbying: Comcast CorporationWalden Asset Management, Lobbying: United Parcel Service of North America, Inc.; ConocoPhillips Co.; Google; Time Warner Inc.Oblates of Mary Immaculate, Lobbying: United Parcel ServiceBenedictine Sisters of Mount St. Scholastica: Lobbying, FacebookDomini Social Investments, Political Contributions: JetBlue Airways CorporationUnitarian Universalist Association and Mercy Investment Services, Enhance Board Oversight of Political Contributions: Aetna, Inc.Trillium Asset Management, Political Contributions: Yahoo! Inc.

This leads me back to Ms. Ferrera’s attempted gotcha interview with Taylor. Ferrera loves wind turbines and those who build them, and she just, like, you know, is soooo worried about global warming. To prepare for her showdown with Taylor, Ferrera visits Lisa Graves and Brendan DeMelle. Both dish the dirt on Taylor (turns out he’s a lawyer by education, but just ignore the fact he’s quite the polymath) and his employer, including funding sources for the think tank.

Never mind, of course, that Graves is executive director for the George Soros-funded Center for Media and Democracy and an attorney by reputation. DeMelle is executive editor and managing editor of DeSmogBlog, a website that notoriously published purloined documents from The Heartland Institute in 2012. DeMelle, coincidentally, holds a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology and Environmental Sciences, and his website frequently references Center for Media and Democracy and its affiliate SourceWatch for often incorrect information on who funds climate-change skepticism, which Ms. Ferrera dutifully parrots upon meeting Taylor.

Ferrera, of course, never asks Graves and DeMelle who funds their efforts. Further, she never questions the talking points the pair provides her prior to her confrontation with Taylor. When Taylor tells Ferrera her “facts” are, indeed, anything but, the actress sneers at him with disbelief. However, Graves and DeMelle are given plete pass by Ferrera and, one assumes, the program’s producers, which include film director James Cameron.

The gall displayed by the Showtime producers is much the same as the shareholder activists listed above. The investors aren’t really concerned about lobbying and donations per se, but only ensuring proper issues are furthered. Readers doubting this assertion are encouraged to read about the dozens of resolutions filed over the years by the very same religious pertaining directly to hydraulic fracturing, carbon emissions and genetically modified organisms. Likewise, The Years of Living Dangerously crew isn’t interested in candid debate or even educating their audience. What they and religious shareholder activists hold mon is an affinity for agitprop. A little honesty, please.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
France settles for Macron and malaise
What should American citizens think of Emmanuel Macron and the impact he will have as the next president of France? His outsider status, entrenched opposition, andimprecise political platform may createthe perfect storm for France to continue marching in place, according to anew essay in Religion & Liberty Transatlantic. “The French don’t like change; they like what’s new,” writes Christophe Foltzenlogel, a jurist for the European Centre for Law and Justice (the counterpart to the ACLJ, founded by Jay Sekulow). How...
Understanding the President’s Cabinet: Attorney General
Note: This is post #16 in a weekly series of explanatory posts on the officials and agencies included in the President’s Cabinet. See the series introductionhere. Cabinet position:Attorney General Department:Department of Justice Current Secretary:Jeff Sessions Succession:The Attorney General is seventh in the presidential line of succession. Department Mission:“The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Office of the Attorney General which evolved over the years into the head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal...
To fight poverty, Oxfam must measure what matters
If people of faith want to reduce global poverty, they must begin by accurately measuring the problem. But a well-publicized report on international poverty distorts the problem and promotes solutions that would leave the world’s poorest people worse off, according to two free market experts. Every year, Oxfam releases a report on global wealth inequality to further the agenda of the World Economic Forum. This year’s entry, titled “An economy for the 99 percent,” was released with the headline: “Just...
Federalist Society’s Leonard Leo speaks at Acton May 11 on the ‘Trump judges’ and Supreme Court
pictured: Leonard Leo With Neil Gorsuch elected to the Supreme Court in mid April, and a slate of other candidates on Trump’s radar for the lower courts, there is a mitment by the Trump administration to the election of conservative appointees to the federal judiciary. Could this be a judicial renaissance of sorts? Will there be a resurgence of true conservatism and originalism in the courts? To find e join us on Thursday May 11 at Acton’s headquarters in Grand...
The disordered soul of Frank Underwood
“Frank Underwood, masterfully played by the award-winning Kevin Spacey, embodies the corruption that so often attends to the pursuit of political power,” says Jordan Ballor in this week’s Acton Commentary, “and as the new season nears it’s worth looking back at where it all began for Francis and Claire Underwood.” In their review of the show’s first season, David Corbin and Alissa Wilkinson rightly observe that the example of Frank Underwood provides an important negative lesson about the need for...
State Department releases 2017 report on international religious freedom
The State Department recently released its International Religious Freedom Report for 2017.A wide range of U.S. government agencies and offices use the reports for such efforts as shaping policy and conducting diplomacy. The Secretary of State also uses the reports to help determine which countries have engaged in or tolerated “particularly severe violations” of religious freedom in order to designate “countries of particular concern.” A major concern addressed in this year’s report is that “international religious freedom is worsening in...
Development malpractice: When failure in ‘doing good’ is worse than ‘doing nothing’
What happens when governments, NGOs, charities, and churches all converge in scurried attempts to alleviate global poverty, whether through wealth transfers or other top-down, systematic solutions? As films like PovertyCure and Poverty, Inc. aptly demonstrate, the results have been dismal, ranging from minimal, short-term successes to widespread, counterproductive disruption. Surely we can do better, avoiding grand, outside solutions, and ing alongside the poor as partners. Yet even amid the menu of smaller and more direct or localized “bottom-up” solutions, there...
What is comparative advantage?
Note: This is post #32 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What parative advantage? And why is it important to trade? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Don Boudreaux guides us through a specific example surrounding Tasmania — an island off the coast of Australia that experienced the miracle of growth in reverse. Through this example we show what can happen when a civilization is deprived of trade, and show why trade is essential to economic...
This Eastern European nation shows how foreign investment is patriotic
At a time when populist sentiments are on the rise on both sides of the Atlantic, the leader of one former Communist nation has affirmed that free markets open acrossborders area blessing. In anew essay at Religion & Liberty Transatlantic,Mihail Neamtu, Ph.D., argues that the wealth created by foreign investment furthers the national interest. In his mentary, titled“Romania chooses prosperity over populism,”he recounts thenation’s unusually bold embrace of international capital. Urged to keepforeigners out of its economy or restricttheir investment,...
5 Reasons you’ll love Acton University (even if you hate conferences)
I have confession to make: I don’t like conferences. I don’t like seminars or conventions, either. I also don’t like colloquiums, symposiums, forums, or summits. I love people (really, I do) and I love discussions about ideas. But something happens when you put them together into a “conference” that causes my introverted tendencies to spike. I’m just not a conference-going kinda guy. That’s probably an odd admission to make, especially in a post in which I try to convince you...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved