Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The two most important principles to remember during a pandemic
The two most important principles to remember during a pandemic
Jan 13, 2026 3:03 AM

Like everyone else, I’m trying to wrap my mind around the blizzard of information on the coronavirus pandemic and the sudden change in my daily routine. It’s all a bit surreal. Yes, I still retrieve myWall Street Journalin the morning—but with gratitude that this is not my sole medium of information.

Ubiquitous access to information—good or bad; accurate or inaccurate—can be unsettling during a crisis. But the free flow of information is always preferable to censorship or state-orchestrated disinformation, which onlyserve to exacerbate catastrophes as we saw with Chernobyl. There can be a price for upholding the principle of freedom of the press: Spain’s relatively free press in 1918 served toaffix its name to the global flu pandemicof that time. But it’s better to pay that price than pursue the alternative.

It’s important during troubled times to recall first principles.The Acton Institute is founded on the basis of10 Core Principles,and these core principles undergird our entire mission.Two of them are particularly relevant at this moment: theDignity of the Personand theSocial Nature of the Person.

The Dignity of the Person

It is not without reason that these are the first two on Acton’s list: Just listen for yourself as Acton’s president and co-founder recalls his childhood encounter with his neighbor,Mrs. Schneider. As Rev. Robert Siricopoints out, a proper anthropology is a precondition for a sound economic and political order.

There are important economic lessons underlying these principles. What is clear now, and will e increasingly clear as this situation unfolds, is that human beings arethe ultimate resource. We are in a race against time to save people from a deadly disease, and thereby preserve the economic wellbeing of all. And the word “thereby” is crucial: Of all the economic resources of the earth, the human being and his or hercreative mindandentrepreneurial capacityare by far the most consequential for human flourishing.

Each individual has aninherent dignity, because God has created him or her in His image and likeness. And although human beings are indeed the ultimate resource from an economic standpoint, their dignity is not based on their economic value or productivity. The response to the coronavirus pandemic from all levels of society (as individuals, among families, through various sodalities, and across various levels of government)—must therefore be rooted in the primacy of the human person and his or herinherent dignity.

The Social Nature of the Person

The second principle—theSocial Nature of the Person—has embedded in it one of the most consequential sources of human flourishing:the division of labor. We thrive on applying our unique gifts and talents. Those gifts and talents are to be used creatively in the service of others, whetherwithin the context of marketplace exchange or non-market relationships like the family or a high school sports team. Our wellbeing is dramatically enhanced by parative advantage we leverage as unique individuals and unique nations.

Perhaps this is the root of much of the current market fear: At its extreme, a pandemic could induce the division of labor to collapse on itself—whether through a dramatic scaling back of international trade or the evaporation from the marketplace of unique gifts and talents brought about by high unemployment. Though free and rational individuals, we are all dependent on one another. We are social beings.

Social distancing is difficult for social beings: We were created for God and for each other. Thankfully, modern technology has not only facilitated the exchange of critical information to defeat the virus, it has also enabled some of us to work remotely and maximize physical distance from others. Nevertheless, our continued use of gifts and talents still entails social interactions and the division of labor.

Human interaction and exchange will always be fundamental to human flourishing. As we endeavor to buy time by following the guidance of epidemiologists, medical professionals, and other experts, Acton’s first two core principles serve as important reminders of thecentrality of the human person to the global economyand how our social naturehas enabled the specialization and expertise that lead to human flourishing.

Though e and eventually pass, these principles will always remain.

CC BY-SA 4.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religion, economics, and the zoo
Ota Benga Sometimes the spirit of an age prevails with such force that it moves the highest pinnacles of cultural influence to support the grossest indignities. Consider the early 1900s. During this time, the prevailing zeitgeist of Darwinism gave rise to the tragic dehumanization of a Pygmy named Ota Benga. What follows are a few salient points from Cynthia Crossen’s story as published in The Wall Street Journal’s Déjà vu column “How Pygmy Ota Benga Ended Up in Bronx Zoo...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Economic turmoil in Zimbabwe
Where in the world would you pay $145,750 for a roll of toilet paper? According to an article in the New York Times, inflation in Zimbabwe is soaring higher than ever — about 900 percent since President Mugabe began seizing land from wealthy landowners in 2000. And inflation is climbing at unparalleled rates. What problems result from such rampant inflation? If inflation is climbing daily and you have $100 one day, it might be worth only $90 the next. People...
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Anthony Bradley discusses Duke lacrosse on Fox
Anthony Bradley, a research fellow at the Acton Institute, was interviewed on “Heartland with John Kasich” on Fox News last Saturday. He was talking about the need for a “hero to emerge” from the Duke lacrosse team in the wake of a sexual assault scandal. Bradley emphasizes the need for moral leadership in the United States as a whole and why we should discourage markets from promoting the dehumanization of women. Bradley earned quite a bit of attention after writing...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved