Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The two most important principles to remember during a pandemic
The two most important principles to remember during a pandemic
Dec 31, 2025 2:15 PM

Like everyone else, I’m trying to wrap my mind around the blizzard of information on the coronavirus pandemic and the sudden change in my daily routine. It’s all a bit surreal. Yes, I still retrieve myWall Street Journalin the morning—but with gratitude that this is not my sole medium of information.

Ubiquitous access to information—good or bad; accurate or inaccurate—can be unsettling during a crisis. But the free flow of information is always preferable to censorship or state-orchestrated disinformation, which onlyserve to exacerbate catastrophes as we saw with Chernobyl. There can be a price for upholding the principle of freedom of the press: Spain’s relatively free press in 1918 served toaffix its name to the global flu pandemicof that time. But it’s better to pay that price than pursue the alternative.

It’s important during troubled times to recall first principles.The Acton Institute is founded on the basis of10 Core Principles,and these core principles undergird our entire mission.Two of them are particularly relevant at this moment: theDignity of the Personand theSocial Nature of the Person.

The Dignity of the Person

It is not without reason that these are the first two on Acton’s list: Just listen for yourself as Acton’s president and co-founder recalls his childhood encounter with his neighbor,Mrs. Schneider. As Rev. Robert Siricopoints out, a proper anthropology is a precondition for a sound economic and political order.

There are important economic lessons underlying these principles. What is clear now, and will e increasingly clear as this situation unfolds, is that human beings arethe ultimate resource. We are in a race against time to save people from a deadly disease, and thereby preserve the economic wellbeing of all. And the word “thereby” is crucial: Of all the economic resources of the earth, the human being and his or hercreative mindandentrepreneurial capacityare by far the most consequential for human flourishing.

Each individual has aninherent dignity, because God has created him or her in His image and likeness. And although human beings are indeed the ultimate resource from an economic standpoint, their dignity is not based on their economic value or productivity. The response to the coronavirus pandemic from all levels of society (as individuals, among families, through various sodalities, and across various levels of government)—must therefore be rooted in the primacy of the human person and his or herinherent dignity.

The Social Nature of the Person

The second principle—theSocial Nature of the Person—has embedded in it one of the most consequential sources of human flourishing:the division of labor. We thrive on applying our unique gifts and talents. Those gifts and talents are to be used creatively in the service of others, whetherwithin the context of marketplace exchange or non-market relationships like the family or a high school sports team. Our wellbeing is dramatically enhanced by parative advantage we leverage as unique individuals and unique nations.

Perhaps this is the root of much of the current market fear: At its extreme, a pandemic could induce the division of labor to collapse on itself—whether through a dramatic scaling back of international trade or the evaporation from the marketplace of unique gifts and talents brought about by high unemployment. Though free and rational individuals, we are all dependent on one another. We are social beings.

Social distancing is difficult for social beings: We were created for God and for each other. Thankfully, modern technology has not only facilitated the exchange of critical information to defeat the virus, it has also enabled some of us to work remotely and maximize physical distance from others. Nevertheless, our continued use of gifts and talents still entails social interactions and the division of labor.

Human interaction and exchange will always be fundamental to human flourishing. As we endeavor to buy time by following the guidance of epidemiologists, medical professionals, and other experts, Acton’s first two core principles serve as important reminders of thecentrality of the human person to the global economyand how our social naturehas enabled the specialization and expertise that lead to human flourishing.

Though e and eventually pass, these principles will always remain.

CC BY-SA 4.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘Breeders:’ A Cautionary Tale
The Center for Bioethics and Culture (CBC) is an mitted to “bioethical issues” such as surrogacy, stem cell research and human cloning, amongst other issues. They have recently produced a documentary entitled “Breeders: a subclass of women?” It is a cautionary tale, and a very sad one. The film focuses on women who chose to be surrogates (one chose surrogacy several times), and the turmoil that arose. The issue of es down to the buying and selling of children, one...
Hobby Lobby Owners Speak Out on HHS Mandate
In a new video from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the Green Family, owners of the embattled retail chain, Hobby Lobby, discusses the religious foundation of their business and the threat the federal government now poses to those who share their beliefs. “What’s at stake here is whether you’re able to keep your religious freedom when you open a family business,” says Lori Windham, Senior Council at The Becket Fund, “whether you can continue to live out your faith...
Video & Audio: Why Libertarians Need God
The 2014Acton Lecture Seriesgot underway last week with an address from Jay Richards on the topic of “Why Libertarians Need God.” In his address, Richards argued that core libertarian principles of individual rights, freedom and responsibility, reason, moral truth, and limited government make little sense in an atheistic and materialist context, but make far more sense when grounded in a theistic belief system. The video of the full lecture is available below; I’ve embedded the audio after the jump. ...
What Does Religious Liberty Stand Upon?
With everything from the HHS mandate to Duck Dynasty to Sister Wives, there is much in the news regarding religious liberty. What are we to make of it? Is religious liberty simply being tolerant of others’ religious choices? Michael Therrien, at First Things, wants to clear up the discussion, from the Catholic point of view. He starts by looking at an article quoting Camille Paglia, atheist, lesbian and university professor. In it, Paglia rushes to the defense of Phil Robertson,...
Business and the Option for the Poor
There is no reason to assume that the preferential option for the poor is somehow a preferential option for big government, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg. Gregg writes that lifting people out of poverty — and not just material poverty but also moral and spiritual poverty — does not necessarily mean that the most effective action is to implement yet another welfare program: What does living out the option for the poor mean in practice? We must engage in...
Post-Super Bowl Thoughts on Theology and America
How ’bout them Seahawks? As a Chicago Bears fan the answer to that question means very little to me, but I did enjoy the annual ritual of binge-eating and loudly talking over friends and loved ones who gathered together around the TV for Super Bowl 48. One thing that stood out was the tradition of having various NFL players and civil servants recite the Declaration of Independence before the game. Some of the powerful (and unmistakably religious) lines from our...
A Wesleyan Approach to Faith, Work, and Economic Transformation
“[Wealth] is an excellent gift of God, answering the noblest ends. In the hands of his children, it is food for the hungry, drink for the thirsty, raiment for the naked: It gives to the traveller and the stranger where to lay his head. By it we may supply the place of an husband to the widow, and of a father to the fatherless. We may be a defence for the oppressed, a means of health to the sick, of...
Audio: Samuel Gregg Discusses ‘Tea Party Catholic’
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Mike Murray on his show “Faith, Culture and Politics” on the Guadalupe Radio Network to discuss his latest book, Tea Party Catholic. The interview lasted nearly a half an hour, and you can listen to it via the audio player below. ...
Stewardship and Thanksgiving
Today at Ethika Politika, I reflect on what it might look like to adopt thanksgiving as one’s orientation toward human experience and society: We may think of gratitude … as an appreciation of the joy that es from what is virtuous and the recognition of “what God has done or is doing.” Now we have a hermeneutic for our experience, grounded in the God-given “‘eucharistic’ function of man,” to borrow from Fr. Alexander Schmemann. It is not enough to simply...
What Liberal Evangelicals Should Know About the Economic Views of Conservative Evangelicals
We read the same Bible and follow the same Jesus. We go to the same churches and even agree on the same social issues. So why then do liberal and conservative evangelicals tend to disagree so often about economic issues? The answer most frequently given is that both sides simply baptize whatever political and economic views they already believe. While this is likely to be partially true, I don’t think it is a sufficient explanation for the views of more...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved