Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The top 5 insights of RNC 2020, day 1
The top 5 insights of RNC 2020, day 1
Feb 20, 2026 6:56 AM

The 42nd Republican National Convention, the first virtual convention in GOP menced on Monday in Charlotte, North Carolina. Its lineup of speakers highlighted the fact that the American dream is an enduring reality for minorities and immigrants, the harms that teachers unions inflict on students (and some teachers), and the patibility of socialism with Christian teaching.

1. Christianity and socialism are patible.

Maximo Alvarez, the Cuban emigré who became a successful American businessman, recounted the way socialism came to dominate his homeland by deception. “When Fidel Castro was asked if he was munist, he said he was a Roman Catholic. He knew he had to hide the truth,” Alvarez said.

When Castro came to power, aided by media deception that portrayed him as a liberator, the American people understood that Christianity and Marxism are antithetical to one another. “Religious socialism, Christian socialism, are contradictory terms,” wrote Pope Pius XI in Quadragesimo Anno. “[N]o one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist.” A generation earlier, Pope Leo XIII wrote in Rerum Novarum that “it is clear that the main tenet of munity of goods, must be utterly rejected.” Socialism, he added, “only injures those whom it would seem meant to benefit, is directly contrary to the natural rights of mankind,” and would “destroy the structure of the home.”Historically, all branches of Christianity – Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Protestant – condemned socialism as patible with the faith.

This message should be heard by the Jesuit publication America, which ran a glowingobituaryof Fidel Castro and has made a putative “Catholic Case for Communism,” or by the National Catholic Reporter which has dubbed democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez the “future of the [Roman] Catholic Church.”

2. Medical innovation saves lives; socialized medicine kills.

When doctors diagnosed Natalie Harp with “a rare and a terminal bone cancer,” she saw her options dwindle. After traditional cancer treatments did not work for her, “no one wanted me in their clinical trials; I’d make them look bad.”

Some in the medical profession implied that she should embrace death as a sacrifice to scarcity. “I was told I was a burden to my family and to my country – and that by choosing to die early, I’d actually be saving the lives of others by preserving resources for them rather than wasting them on a lost cause like myself,” she said, heartbroken.

Harp warned that, under “government-run healthcare,” her nightmare would be nationalized:

We wouldn’t just be unable to keep our doctors, we’d be lucky if we could see any doctor. Even then, some of us would be denied care – for in socialized medicine, you don’t beat the odds; you e the odds. And I would lose my Right-to-Try, just like Charlie Gard, that terminally-ill British baby whose government-run healthcare system decided it was too expensive and too “cruel” to keep him alive.

Baby Charlie Gard’s tragic fate would be repeated by Alfie Evans. Harp’s pares best with that of Barbara Wagner, a cancer patient told by the Oregon Health Plan that the state would not cover the cost of her treatment – but it would pay $50 for her assisted suicide. Citizens learn quickly that, under socialized medicine, healthcare is anything but universal.

Thankfully, unlike these cases, Harp survived due to the Right to Try Act, which gives people with life-threatening illnesses to avail themselves of as-yet unapproved treatments. Harp expressed her gratitude to President Trump, who signed the bill into law on May 30, 2018. “Without you, I’d have died waiting for [the cure] to be approved,” she said.

3. Teachers unions put their members’ interests above children (and some teachers).

As the school mences, “states with stronger teachers unions … are significantly less likely to reopen in person,” according to Corey DeAngelis of the Cato Institute. Some union bosses made unrelated demands, like the abolition of charter schools and defunding the police, a precondition for reopening.

“When other dedicated teachers and I served within the unions, we spoke up in defense of children, parents, scientific fact, and American values,” said Rebecca Friedrichs. “For our trouble, we were brutalized, booed off the platform, barred mittees, shouted down, and even spit upon by union leaders” and called “spawns of Satan.”

Friedrichs led her fellow teachers in a battle pulsory union fees, which violate the educators’ consciences while facilitating the NEA’s radical political agenda. The U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 in her case, following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but pulsory public union fees in its 2018 decision in Janus v. AFSCME.

Like all unions, teachers unions exist to extract the highest possible advantage for its members, not to look after mon good. This is why Franklin D. Roosevelt believed public sector unions should not exist. Teachers unions “spend hundreds of millions annually to defeat charter schools and school choice – trapping so many precious, e children in dangerous, corrupt, and low-performing schools,” Friedrichs said – although students who attend Chicago’s charter schools are 7% more likely tograduate and 11% more likely to enroll in college. Unions have even blocked thousands of children from accessing online public charter schools, because traditional public schools could pete.

However, teachers unions do not wait for a virus to threaten children’s education. Public school teachers in multiple states held strikes before the coronavirus pandemic, despite the fact that studiesfindteachers’ strikes have a “statistically significant” and “negative” impact on students’ test scores.

Denying students an adequate education not only impacts children but has implications for the civic health of our nation. “The only way to keep a free republic is with a well-educated, moral citizenry that can self-govern,” she noted. “Unions are subverting our republic.”

4. The American Dream is alive and well for the munity.

Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., explained how the “evolution of the Southern heart” let his family go “from cotton to Congress in one lifetime.” He drew on family history to show how hard work and opportunity allowed his family to enjoy nearly miraculous progress since his grandfather’s generation:

Growing up, he had to cross the street if a white person ing. He suffered the indignity of being forced out of school as a third grader to pick cotton, and never learned to read or write. Yet, he lived to see his grandson e the first African American to be elected to both the United States House and Senate. Our family went from cotton to Congress in one lifetime. And that’s why I believe the next American century can be better than the last.

That one lifetime – his mother’s – traveled the difficult road of work, private poverty alleviation, and sacrifice. “We lived in a two bedroom house with my grandparents – me, my mom, and my brother sharing a room and a bed,” he said. “My mom worked 16 hours a day.”

In time, a Chick-fil-A employee taught Scott that “having a job was a good thing, but creating jobs would be better. That having an e could change my lifestyle, but creating a profit could change munity.” Finding his place in our system of free exchange allowed Scott to say, “I am living my mother’s American Dream.”

Until the COVID-19 pandemic, so were many others in the munity. Tax cuts and deregulation created the lowest black unemployment level in U.S. history, and the number of business startups founded by black women more than doubled between 2016 and 2018.

Scott’s story echoes the even more dramatic life of Robert Smalls, a runaway slave who fought in the Union army, then bought his former owner’s plantation and served five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. Smalls is featured in our ing issue of Religion & Liberty. Both lives eloquently refute the notion that black lives do not matter.

5. The American Dream is indispensable for the rest of the world.

Maximo Alvarez delivered by far the most moving speech of the night because he, too, invoked family. His father, who had a sixth-grade education, fled totalitarianism in Spain, then again in Fidel Castro’s Cuba. When his family arrived in America, his father gave him the heavy charge of American citizenship: “Don’t lose this place. … There is nowhere left to go.”

“By the grace of God, I have lived the American Dream – the greatest blessing I’ve ever had,” Alvarez told the RNC. “I’m speaking to you today because my family is done abandoning what it’s rightfully earned.”

Americans stand in danger of losing their republic, he warned. Demands for socialism, couched as an ever-expanding patchwork of government programs, echo in the voice of Castro and Ché Guevara:

Those false promises – spread the wealth, free healthcare, defund the police, trust a socialist state more than your family and munity – they don’t sound radical to my ears. They sound familiar. …

When I watch the news in Seattle and Chicago and Portland and other cities, when I see history being rewritten, when I hear the promises – I hear echoes of a former life I never wanted to hear again. I see shadows I thought I had outrun. …

I still hear my dad: “There is no other place to go.”

Alvarez’s emotional speech underlines the importance of preserving American freedom – not merely for “ourselves and our posterity” but for those all over the world yearning to breathe free. Legal immigration (let alone illegal immigration) has not reached an historic high over the last 30 years because of “our tragic history” or because the United States employs a secret racial “caste system.” Immigrants risk their lives because they see the United States the way Ronald Reagan did, as “the last best hope of man on Earth,” or as what Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeline Albright called “the indispensable nation.” The United States remains the land of constitutionally limited government, unalienable rights, and free enterprise – a land whose inclusion and acceptance allows well-meaning people of every race, language, and culture to offer their gifts and rise as high as their God-given talent allows.

You may watch Maximo Alvarez’s passionate speech below:

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Commentary: The Pope, the Rabbi, and the Moral Economy
In mentary, “The Pope, the Rabbi, and the Moral Economy,” Samuel pares recent statements by Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, and Pope Benedict XVI, on the market economy and other social questions. “Benedict and Sacks rigorously deny that markets are intrinsically flawed,” Gregg writes. “Each also maintains that there are fundamental limits to state power. They do, however, insist that morality’s ultimate e from neither state nor market.” Gregg demonstrates the parallels between Pope Benedict XVI’s Caritas in Veritate...
Academic Journals in the ‘Network’ Economy
John Hartley, the founder and editor of the International Journal of Cultural Studies, does for that journal something like what I did for the Journal of Markets & Morality awhile back. He takes his experience as an editor to reflect on the current state of the scholarly journal amid the challenges and opportunities in the digital age. Hartley opens his study, “Lament for a Lost Running Order? Obsolescence and Academic Journals,” by concluding that “the academic journal is obsolete,” at...
Townhall: Jayabalan Talks About Caritas in Veritate
Kathryn Lopez, editor of National Review Online, has a column on Caritas in Veritate titled, “Liberal Catholics Can’t Handle the Truth.” Lopez looks at mentary on Caritas in Veritate, especially by the left, and shows why the encyclical should not be politicized. The encyclical is about truth, which can not be bent to advance a political agenda, she asserts. Kishore Jayabalan, director of Acton’s Rome office, was also quoted in Lopez’s article: Neither side . . . seems ready to...
Card Check Gets Checked at the Senate’s Doors
This morning, the New York Times reported that a broad bipartisan effort of senators convinced Democratic leadership to drop provisions in the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) that would have weakened the right of workers to hold secret ballot elections to determine whether or not they would unionize. EFCA had e known by many of its opponents as the “card check bill” because of its central proposal: if over half of workers at a firm signed cards authorizing a union...
Lord Griffiths on Caritas in Veritate: Pope is the man on the money
Commenting on how Pope Benedict XVI addressed the economic crisis and development challenges in “Caritas in Veritate” is Lord Brian Griffiths of Fforestfach, a member of the British House of Lords and Vice-Chairman of Goldman Sachs International. He has served in an advisory capacity to the Acton Institute and delivered published papers on globalization and Third World development at the Institute’s international conferences. Click here for the original article appearing in The Times. July 13, 2009 The Times Pope Benedict...
Health Care is More Important than Class Warfare, America!
“I vote for Democrats for one primary reason. They raise taxes on the rich.” So says Michael Sean Winters at In All Things, the blog of the contributors to America Magazine. Of course, most Americans, perhaps even Mr. Winter, generally need excuses to raise taxes on the rich. The hottest reason at the moment is to pay for universal health care coverage. Winter likes this reason. If passed, he says that it will be the “first outstanding example of a...
Caritas in Veritate: Schmiesing and Jayabalan Radio Interviews
Kevin Schmiesing, research fellow at the Acton Institute, was interviewed by Ave Maria Radio recently on Caritas in Veritate. Schmiesing explains how the idea of human development and progress figure as central themes of the encyclical. It is important to remember that our ethical advancement must be ahead of material human development, and our ethics must be paired with our personal development. Furthermore, Schmiesing explains that Caritas in Veritate warns against an all passing role for the state. [audio: Kishore...
Health Care and Veterans
Ray Nothstine, Associate Editor at the Acton Institute, had his Acton Commentary, “Veterans First on Heath Care” republished by The Citizen, a newspaper in Fayetteville, Georgia. Nothstine explains in the article that the federal government needs to prove that it can provide adequate health care for 8 million veterans before we can trust them to provide health care reform for the entire United States. Nothstine points out flaws with medical system operated by the Veterans Administration. It is a timely...
Caritas in Veritate: Jayabalan and Gregg Radio Interviews
Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton (the Acton Institute’s Rome office), was interviewed by Vatican Radio concerning the authentic human development concerns of the whole person, which is a topic discussed in Caritas in Veritate. Jayabalan discussed how development schemes throughout the world should look at the aspirations of each individual person. Furthermore, in Caritas in Veritate there is a mention of a “breathing space” used a few times in the encyclical. This breathing space aspect means developing a vibrant...
Primacy of Culture in Caritas in Veritate
Zenit published my article on the pope’s new social encyclical: Encyclical Offers Opportunity to “Think With the Church” By Jennifer Roback Morse SAN MARCOS, California, JULY 17, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI’s “Caritas in Veritate” is his contribution to the course of Catholic social teaching. mentators seem to read this document as if it were a think-tank white paper, and ask whether the Pope endorses their particular policy preferences. I must say that I surprised myself by not reflexively reading it...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved