Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Ten Commandments or ‘Ten Thousand Commandments’
The Ten Commandments or ‘Ten Thousand Commandments’
Mar 22, 2026 6:20 AM

On Mt. Sinai, the Lord handed Moses the Ten Commandments divinely traced by His own finger. The Torah expounded these into 613 laws; but in 2018 the collected regulations issued by the federal government, known as the Federal Register, took up 61,308 pages.

The quantity did nothing to improve the laws’ quality, as the Competitive Enterprise Institute notes in the latest edition of its annual report, Ten Thousand Commandments.

Incredibly, the code has been trimmed by more than one-third from its historic high of 95,894 pages under President Barack Obama. In fact, in 2017 it had the lowest number of rules since they were first measured in the 1970s.

Still, federal regulations cover life in a prehensive, and costly, way. They establish “standards for grades of canned baked beans” and the “tobacco product standard for characterizing flavors in cigars,” among other trifles.

The damage federal regulation does is real, notes the report’s author, Wayne Crews, CEI’s vice president for policy.

Here are five ways federal regulations harm society:

1. Direct cost: $1.9 trillion. By imposing additional burdens on businesses, federal regulations amount to a hidden tax of $1.9 trillion. Businesses pass this cost on to consumers, costing each American family $14,615 annually. This amounts to “20 percent of average e before taxes, and more as a share of after-tax e,” Crews writes – more than “every annual household budgetary expenditure item except housing.” He continues:

Regulatory costs amount to up to 24 percent of the typical household’s expenditure budget of $60,060. The average U.S. household “spends” more on hidden regulation than on health care, food, transportation, entertainment, apparel, services, and savings. Of course, some costs of regulation are not hidden. Consumers pay for regulatory agencies more directly through taxes.

On top of the tax burden, the government claims another fifth of the family’s e to spend on its own priorities, not the family’s needs or desires.

2. Cost to constitutional order and the rule of law. When Congress defers its constitutional law-making power to unelected – and unaccountable – federal regulators, rules multiply in ways the Founding Fathers never intended. Crews writes:

The “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of rules issued by agencies relative tolaws passed by Congress and signed by the president—underscores the triumph of the administrative state over the Constitution. There were 11 rules for every law in 2018 … In calendar year 2018 regulatory agencies issued 3,368 final rules, while the 115th Congress passed and President Trump signed into law 313 bills. While Trump’s rule count was lower, the number of laws enacted was higher than in recent years. The average over the past decade has been 28 rules for every law.

Since federal bureaucracies usually “administer earlier legislation,” new regulations would be written even if Congress never passes another law. Through creative interpretations, statutory law can take new forms and permutations for years, or decades, e.

3. Cost in transparency, justice, and self-government. “Unlike on-budget spending, regulatory costs are largely obscured from public view,” Crews writes – shrouded like the top of Mt. Sinai when Jehovah delivered the Decalogue. But unlike the divine law, we often have no idea where federal regulations originate. As the late John Lukacs wrote:

The bureaucracy (and its language) are anonymous and impersonal. The first mention of the decision may be in the minutes of a National Security Council Task Force or of a Curriculum Steering Committee of the Faculty. But who pushed the decision? … [T]he anonymity and the hypocrisies of the bureaucratic process, disguised by democratic trappings, go hand in hand. The proponents of an idea or of a decision – whether within a government or a faculty – know how to efface themselves.

The lack of transparency in federal rule-making authority invites corruption and collusion.

4. Cost to small businesses, while distorting the market in favor of Big Business. Federal regulations cost businesses $9,991 per employee, according to the National Association of Manufacturers – “but,” CEI notes, “the effects by firm size vary.” Large, established corporations are better able to pliance costs than small and medium enterprises “(SMEs). The cost to “firms of fewer than 50 workers can be 29 percent greater than those for larger firms—$11,724 for smaller pared with $9,083 for larger ones.”

No wonder big businesses often favor regulations as a way to shut down petitors. Ralph Nader and his fellow progressives call this “regulatory capture”; conservatives call this “crony capitalism.” In either case, it corrodes creates the appearance – and sometimes the presence – of impropriety.

5. Cost in jobs never created. Regulations impose costs for every existing employee. However, “regulation affects not only current jobs, but also the inclination for entrepreneurs to create them in the future.” The number of jobs never created due to the self-defeating costs of pliance, CEI notes, are “immeasurable.”

Overregulation is a transatlantic problem. Germany, the UK, France, and Italy are among the eight nations with a greater overall regulatory burden than the U.S. Canada, Russia, Australia, and Spain lag just behind. Much of this is due to the endless stream of EU ing from Brussels, which member states are obliged to adopt in full.

Society thrives when individuals are not drowning in edicts and diktats50-times longer than War and Peace– or, more to the point, the Bible. Bureaucratic rules stifle innovation and merce to a crawl. When they are intended to protect society – say, from pollution – they regulate external behavior.

But for those who wish to live in prosperous, dynamic economies, a better choice is to encourage self-restraint. The Ten Commandments, joined with the two mandments of love, e “the perfect law of liberty.” The believer who gives himself over to a Spirit-led process of sanctification, as Matthew Henry writes in mentary, es “happily disabled for sin. There is a restraint, an embargo (as we may say), laid upon his sinning powers.” He now uses his God-given talents by creating wealth to meet his own needs and serve others, as he deems most prudent.

The government should leave people alone to regulate their own lives according to the inner light of conscience, not multiply regulations that violate their conscience, hinder the economy, and harm national well-being.

This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A European social democrat critiques Bernie Sanders’ ’21st Century Bill of Rights’
Senator Bernie Sanders has refused to grapple with the fact that socialist governments regularly suppress human rights and devolve into despotism, according to a social democrat from Germany. Even as Sanders proposed an economic “Bill of Rights” this week, he ignored the fact that civil liberties depend on preserving “private economic initiative,” the political scientist said. In a major speech on Wednesday afternoon, Sanders invited his audience to “ask yourself: what does it actually mean to be free?” Then he...
Why you’ll love Acton University (even if you hate conferences)
I don’t like conferences. I don’t like seminars or conventions, either. I also don’t like colloquiums, symposiums, forums, or summits. I love people (really, I do) and I love discussions about ideas. But something happens when you put them together into a “conference” that causes my introverted tendencies to spike. I’m just not a conference-going kinda guy. That’s probably an odd admission to make, especially in a post in which I try to convince you e toActon University. But it...
Philip K. Dick, Lord Acton, and the nineteenth century that never ended
The American science fiction author Philip K. Dick was a strange guy. In addition to being a prolific author of many science fiction classics like The Man in the High Castle, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, and Minority Report (All these and many more adapted for film and television) he was also a prolific diarist. Many of these diary entries were edited and published as The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick in 2011. A recurring theme in these diary...
The Acton Institute’s transatlantic website publishes its first article in French
The Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website marked a milestone today: It released its first article in French. While the transatlantic website has diligently followed events in France and published an array of mentators since its launch in January 2017, until today all its articles had been published in English. This denied us access to the 275 million people worldwide who speak French. The Acton Institute takes seriously our mission to take our message of liberty, human dignity, and...
New French language article: « Bonne nouvelle, même les socialistes aiment le marché libre! »
The Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website has published its second article translated into French: « Bonne nouvelle, même les socialistes aiment le marché libre! » It is a translation of the article, “Great news: Even ‘socialists’ love the free market (poll),” which notes that the same Gallup poll showing socialism’s growing popularity also finds that the vast majority of Americans trust the free market, rather than the government, to regulate the economy. Translating this into French not only...
New York’s rent regulations: people over profit?
Last week, the New York State Legislature arranged a series of regulations designed to protect tenants and control rents. This action was quickly repeated by the California Assembly, which passed a rent-cap bill, both following in the footsteps of Oregon’s statewide rent control law enacted this past February. Landlords in New York City were quick to argue that the new legislation would cost local construction jobs and prevent owners from making needed repairs, leading to buildings in disrepair. Nevertheless, these...
Why Simonetti is wrong to slander David French
We live in a strange age when good Christian men are slandered in defense of men of low character. Still, I would have never suspected to see such calumny on the Acton PowerBlog. Unfortunately, my new colleague Silvio Simonetti has used our site to assassinate the character of my friend—and Acton ally—David French. Simonetti says that French is “One of the most outspoken instigators of conspiratorial theories about the collusion between Vladimir Putin and Trump. . .” Perhaps if Simonetti...
The BBC scraps free TV for the elderly: A lesson from Boxer in ‘Animal Farm’
The BBC is renowned for its educational programming, but its most valuable lesson is being presented on a global stage right now. The BBC is facing backlash for doing away with a universal beneft for the elderly and, in the process, teaching an audience of millions how government programs really work. The BBC is severely restricting a benefit that pensioners e to rely on: free TV licenses. The main beneficiary of this decision is BBC executives. Artistic license The BBC...
The Laymen’s Lounge: Everyday Theology for Everyday Life
I was happy to be interviewed recently for The Laymen’s Lounge, a new site focused on providing everyday theology to encourage and edify Christians in everyday life. My interview is titled, “Work and the Mundane,” and I get some plugs in for resources by figures including Lester DeKoster, Abraham Kuyper, Herman Bavinck, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Many of these thinkers are influential in my own life and work, and are represented as well in my collection of essays, Get Your Hands...
Why not to be a “polite” conservative in the age of French/Ahmari debate
The debate surrounding David French-ism started by New York Post’s Sohrab Ahmari in First Things is, in my view, less about content — or political proposals, to use another term — than about the future and, to a large extent, the recent past of the American Conservative movement. This debate is not about the benefits of the free market or whether a religiously-based moral philosophy should guide government, but about how mainstream “conservatism” lost its way and what the future...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved