Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Ten Commandments or ‘Ten Thousand Commandments’
The Ten Commandments or ‘Ten Thousand Commandments’
Jan 18, 2026 9:03 PM

On Mt. Sinai, the Lord handed Moses the Ten Commandments divinely traced by His own finger. The Torah expounded these into 613 laws; but in 2018 the collected regulations issued by the federal government, known as the Federal Register, took up 61,308 pages.

The quantity did nothing to improve the laws’ quality, as the Competitive Enterprise Institute notes in the latest edition of its annual report, Ten Thousand Commandments.

Incredibly, the code has been trimmed by more than one-third from its historic high of 95,894 pages under President Barack Obama. In fact, in 2017 it had the lowest number of rules since they were first measured in the 1970s.

Still, federal regulations cover life in a prehensive, and costly, way. They establish “standards for grades of canned baked beans” and the “tobacco product standard for characterizing flavors in cigars,” among other trifles.

The damage federal regulation does is real, notes the report’s author, Wayne Crews, CEI’s vice president for policy.

Here are five ways federal regulations harm society:

1. Direct cost: $1.9 trillion. By imposing additional burdens on businesses, federal regulations amount to a hidden tax of $1.9 trillion. Businesses pass this cost on to consumers, costing each American family $14,615 annually. This amounts to “20 percent of average e before taxes, and more as a share of after-tax e,” Crews writes – more than “every annual household budgetary expenditure item except housing.” He continues:

Regulatory costs amount to up to 24 percent of the typical household’s expenditure budget of $60,060. The average U.S. household “spends” more on hidden regulation than on health care, food, transportation, entertainment, apparel, services, and savings. Of course, some costs of regulation are not hidden. Consumers pay for regulatory agencies more directly through taxes.

On top of the tax burden, the government claims another fifth of the family’s e to spend on its own priorities, not the family’s needs or desires.

2. Cost to constitutional order and the rule of law. When Congress defers its constitutional law-making power to unelected – and unaccountable – federal regulators, rules multiply in ways the Founding Fathers never intended. Crews writes:

The “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of rules issued by agencies relative tolaws passed by Congress and signed by the president—underscores the triumph of the administrative state over the Constitution. There were 11 rules for every law in 2018 … In calendar year 2018 regulatory agencies issued 3,368 final rules, while the 115th Congress passed and President Trump signed into law 313 bills. While Trump’s rule count was lower, the number of laws enacted was higher than in recent years. The average over the past decade has been 28 rules for every law.

Since federal bureaucracies usually “administer earlier legislation,” new regulations would be written even if Congress never passes another law. Through creative interpretations, statutory law can take new forms and permutations for years, or decades, e.

3. Cost in transparency, justice, and self-government. “Unlike on-budget spending, regulatory costs are largely obscured from public view,” Crews writes – shrouded like the top of Mt. Sinai when Jehovah delivered the Decalogue. But unlike the divine law, we often have no idea where federal regulations originate. As the late John Lukacs wrote:

The bureaucracy (and its language) are anonymous and impersonal. The first mention of the decision may be in the minutes of a National Security Council Task Force or of a Curriculum Steering Committee of the Faculty. But who pushed the decision? … [T]he anonymity and the hypocrisies of the bureaucratic process, disguised by democratic trappings, go hand in hand. The proponents of an idea or of a decision – whether within a government or a faculty – know how to efface themselves.

The lack of transparency in federal rule-making authority invites corruption and collusion.

4. Cost to small businesses, while distorting the market in favor of Big Business. Federal regulations cost businesses $9,991 per employee, according to the National Association of Manufacturers – “but,” CEI notes, “the effects by firm size vary.” Large, established corporations are better able to pliance costs than small and medium enterprises “(SMEs). The cost to “firms of fewer than 50 workers can be 29 percent greater than those for larger firms—$11,724 for smaller pared with $9,083 for larger ones.”

No wonder big businesses often favor regulations as a way to shut down petitors. Ralph Nader and his fellow progressives call this “regulatory capture”; conservatives call this “crony capitalism.” In either case, it corrodes creates the appearance – and sometimes the presence – of impropriety.

5. Cost in jobs never created. Regulations impose costs for every existing employee. However, “regulation affects not only current jobs, but also the inclination for entrepreneurs to create them in the future.” The number of jobs never created due to the self-defeating costs of pliance, CEI notes, are “immeasurable.”

Overregulation is a transatlantic problem. Germany, the UK, France, and Italy are among the eight nations with a greater overall regulatory burden than the U.S. Canada, Russia, Australia, and Spain lag just behind. Much of this is due to the endless stream of EU ing from Brussels, which member states are obliged to adopt in full.

Society thrives when individuals are not drowning in edicts and diktats50-times longer than War and Peace– or, more to the point, the Bible. Bureaucratic rules stifle innovation and merce to a crawl. When they are intended to protect society – say, from pollution – they regulate external behavior.

But for those who wish to live in prosperous, dynamic economies, a better choice is to encourage self-restraint. The Ten Commandments, joined with the two mandments of love, e “the perfect law of liberty.” The believer who gives himself over to a Spirit-led process of sanctification, as Matthew Henry writes in mentary, es “happily disabled for sin. There is a restraint, an embargo (as we may say), laid upon his sinning powers.” He now uses his God-given talents by creating wealth to meet his own needs and serve others, as he deems most prudent.

The government should leave people alone to regulate their own lives according to the inner light of conscience, not multiply regulations that violate their conscience, hinder the economy, and harm national well-being.

This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Want to ‘change the world’? Embrace the glories of economic scale
As the latest crop of college graduates enters the workforce, many ing fully loaded with grandiose plans for “social transformation,” “giving back to munities,” and “making a difference.” Unfortunately, such phrases have e slippery slogans based on a cultural imagination that is far too narrow in its basic assumptions. Whether spurred along by the idealism of college professors, the hurrahs of mencement speeches, or the hedonistic calls of cultural tropes (“follow your passion!”), today’s youth are often clouded with a...
6 Quotes: Free Expression, Religious Freedom, and the Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling
Earlier today the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the most important religious freedom case of the year. Despite being a win for the bakery and its owner, Jack Phillips, the future implications of this case for religious liberty are rather narrow in scope. “In this case the adjudication concerned a context that may well be different going forward in the respects noted above,” said the Court. “However later cases raising these...
6 Quotes: G.K. Chesterton on freedom and virtue
Yesterday was the 144th birthday of G.K. Chesterton. In his honor, here are six quotes by the great British writer on freedom and virtue. On defending virtue: “The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.” On modern freedom: “Most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities.” On courage:...
Physical capital and diminishing returns
Note: This is post #81 in a weekly video series on basic economics. How did Germany and Japan achieve record economic growth following World War II? A primary reason is physical capital. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok explains two specific concepts that deal with physical capital and the success of Germany and Japan. The first is the iron logic of diminishing returns which states that, for each new input of capital, there is less and less...
Winners of 2018 Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics
The Acton Institute Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics program accepts proposals from faculty members at colleges, seminaries, and universities in the United States and Canada in order to promote the scholarship and teaching of market economics. This program allows for collaboration between faculty from different universities, as well as help future leaders to emerge, strengthen, and expand the existing network of scholars within economics. Entrants may submit proposals in two broad categories: course development and faculty scholarship. Here is plete...
Unemployment as economic-spiritual indicator — May 2018 report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
6 facts about the brewing U.S.-EU trade war
Late last week, President Donald Trump announced he would impose steel and aluminum tariffs against U.S. allies across the transatlantic sphere. Here are the facts you need to know: President Trump applied a 25 percent tariff on steel and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum against the European Union, as well as NAFTA trade partners Canada and Mexico. The tariffs, originally targeting China in March on the grounds of national security, contained an exemption for U.S. allies. Last Thursday, Trump...
France’s 200 roads to serfdom
One of Europe’s most robust welfare states may be proving that government intervention and true social solidarity are inimical forces. Many economic interventionists on both sides of the Atlantic cite the Catholic social teaching of “solidarity” – or, at least, their own conception of it – to justify far-reaching government policies of wealth confiscation and redistribution. The British philosopher Julian Baggini wrote in The Guardian that “Tax Freedom Day” should be celebrated as “Social Solidarity Day.” But heavy-handed government policy...
How eschatology transforms our economic action
As the church continues to navigate the challenges of the modern economy, we’ve seen a renewed recognition of the “earthiness” of our God-given callings—embracing the mundane and material aspects of our daily work and rejecting the “sacred-secular divide.” Yet in our earnest efforts to e more “earthly minded” for heavenly good, we face new temptations toward a different sort of lopsidedness. In an article for FULLER Studio, Vincent Bacote reminds us of this risk, recognizing the need for balance and...
Why tariffs and protectionism makes Americans poorer
Earlier today President Trump imposed tariffs on imported steel (25 percent) and aluminum (10 percent) from the European Union, Canada and Mexico. Not surprisingly, the tariffs triggered immediate retaliation from U.S. allies against American businesses and farmers. “This is protectionism, pure and simple,” said Jean-Claude Junker, president of the European Commission.Junker is correct. The tariffs are are a form of protectionism that is frequently proposed by populists and Democrats. But what is wrong with protectionism? The short answer is that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved