Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Success of Avatar Is Nothing to Celebrate
The Success of Avatar Is Nothing to Celebrate
Apr 4, 2025 12:28 PM

The sequel to the record-breaking box office success Avatar is here. The enemy is still America/Europeans. The victims this time: whales. For all its technological innovation, the sheer banality of its theme is the most remarkable thing about it.

Read More…

The biggest box office success in cinema history, strictly in dollars taken in, is Avatar, the 2009 movie that made 3D a technology audiences would finally flock to. The movie made some $785 million in America, more than another $2 billion in the rest of the world, adding up to about $2.9 billion. Since then, it’s sold an additional $430 million in DVDs (including 3D Blu-ray editions). We have to use our imaginations when es to how much the movie was watched online in pirated copies. One is tempted to say that everyone has seen it. If there’s globalization, Avatar is it.

In 2022 we finally got a sequel, Avatar: The Way of Water, which is also an incredible success, having grossed more than $620 million in America in its first month, with another $1.5 billion in the rest of the world. I’m confident it will make more than $700 million in America. Very few movies attain this kind of success, fewer still since the COVID panics have crippled the movie theater business. Three more of these movies are slated to appear and perhaps rather quicker than the 13 years between the first two, given the astonishing success and the technological achievements involved in the production so far.

James Cameron is the man who made this franchise, which married his interest in science fiction, going back to Terminator (1984), and his interest in blockbuster success—that is, strong appeals to American passions—for example, Titanic, the movie he made before Avatar, which also became the most popular movie of its time (1997). One thing that has changed is that Cameron started out trying to appeal to men, then changed to appealing to women, but found astonishing success with a sentimentality missing from his early works, and now wants to appeal to families, to children especially. Some of the more perceptive critics pointed out how simpleminded the original was, even how it functioned as a kind of faux religion all its own. The sequel has also been panned by others as stunningly unoriginal and “full of itself.” This suggests to me they think the Avatar movies themselves to be childish.

The arrival of Avatar: The Way of Water at least makes clear what it is Cameron wants America’s children and, by extension, the world’s children to see and to believe. The first movie was an obvious retelling of Euro-American conflicts with Native Americans in the 19th century. The story summarizes, of course, but it also focuses on a simple teaching: Americans are evil and possibly monstrous. The Natives were innocent and, though proud warriors, peaceful. One may say this is nonsense and historically dubious; one may add that it is unpatriotic. But it may nevertheless be rather persuasive, especially because Cameron makes no arguments and starts no fights—he merely uses images that speak to things most kids are ready to believe.

The sequel continues this story of American rapacity in the 19th century with the same malefactors looking to exploit the sea after they have already exploited the earth. This would be the whalers and mercial invaders of island paradises like Hawaii. The whales, also mighty and yet pacific, are the good guys in this movie. This is a remarkable advance for Cameron. In terms of Hollywood storytelling, it’s his answer to other blockbuster franchises of the last decade that have tried to reimagine paganism: Planet of the Apes, King Kong, Godzilla, Jurassic World.

The Pandora of Avatar is the New World, the Euro invasion a desperate escape from the Old; the discovery of the New is, however, not a good thing, much less anything providential. Lest you think I’m reading into the narrative, Cameron himself has admitted as much. (And Native American activists, ironically, are not exactly on his side, even if he claims to be on theirs.) Religion in the story is reduced to some kind of nature worship, a vague spirituality that should please people today. Sentimentality and amazement are the dominant attitudes to nature today, and Cameron shares them. They make a very good opposition to patriotism, which is much more particular and demanding. They also give Cameron the opportunity to make his movies about the discovery of the elements, a convenient device for storytelling and for focusing the attention of the audience.

Much of these movies, accordingly, is an animated version of the documentaries that now charm audiences without the limits reality imposes on living beings and panies. Very long sequences explore forests and oceans and have nothing to do with the plot and might seem altogether pointless. But they certainly encourage a mood as they amaze the audience, making the case for technological imagination as the truest nature we can find. It’s hard to say as yet how persuasive the young find it, not least since no one is asking. But it is on the basis of this sentimental mood that the anti-Americanism of the story es not only plausible but necessary, as sentimentality must always lead to cruelty. Cameron, I believe, shares this strange piety about nature and an idea that somehow America is guilty of making the world ugly. He seems to believe audiences are also ready to believe this; I don’t know, for my part, that he is wrong.

These are movies with the simplest plots and, accordingly, the most moralistic conflicts you can imagine, and that is why they are powerful. They have a boring protagonist who wants to save the equally boring natives, indeed, to e one of them, and so he fights against the evil invaders who were once his people. The villains have the lowest motives—they’re capitalists!—and no redeeming features. In short, it’s the kind of caricature that describes much of our political discourse and our partisanship. It is unsurprising that our storytelling should have the same character—what is most familiar is most popular.

Intellectually, the Avatar stories seem worthless, beneath contempt, indeed, beneath argument. This leads people to underestimate them but also to feel themselves somehow disarmed. One looks ridiculous if plains that the stories are anti-American. It takes a certain courage to deal with that problem, and courage is in very short supply in our times. Cameron seems to have proven his point in terms that are almost impossible to reject, especially for many conservatives—incredible profits and broad popularity without any scandal attached.

I expect the future Avatar movies to continue this retelling of American history for a new America that damns the past while suggesting wondrous images of a future ahead. It’s funny enough that the evidence for moral progress the movie gives is inventing new technologies that approach closer and closer to reality while purging it of its ugliness. Of course, readers may hold me to this prediction. For my part, I advise blunt honesty about this anti-Americanism. If conservatives wish to abandon the culture, especially the entertainment of the young, to such products, they’re free to do so. But it’s still better to see the problem for what it is.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Breathing with one lung?
Bishop Hilarion (Alfeyev) of Vienna and Austria, the Russian Orthodox Church’s representative to the European Union, is once again urging a Roman Catholic-Orthodox alliance bat secularism, liberalism and relativism in Europe — and lands outside it. “The social and ethical teachings of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches are extremely close, in many cases practically identical,” Bishop Hilarion said. “Why, then, should we not be able to reveal our unity on all these major issues urbi et orbi?” Since the election...
Journalism professor calls for Helter Skelter
In 1969 Charles Manson and his gang set out to ignite a race war that pitted the wealthy white establishment against underprivileged blacks. The apocalyptic battle would be called “Helter Skelter,” after the Beatles’ song written by Paul McCartney. The white Manson reasoned that America’s angry black population would eventually win this war; at which time he and his group would emerge from their Mojave Desert hideout to assume leadership over what he perceived to be an inferior race. es...
Hurricane relief – Small organizations to the rescue
In the wake of overwhelming need of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, thankfully a number of us are voicing irritation with the inquiry, “How important do you think that faith-based organizations are to helping people”? Before ANY organization — government agency of any kind or national nonprofit — made a move, faith organizations had already moved. In San Antonio, where several Russian students were among New Orleans evacuees, Victory Fellowship, a faith-based, privately funded substance abuse treatment program, simply did the...
Spendthrift republicans
A wonderful piece by Deroy Murdock today on NRO. Though most fiscal conservatives understandably vote Republican, the record substantiates the theory that spending is less responsible when Congress is dominated by one party—either party—than when each party has enough votes to frustrate the other. Others have drawn attention to the problem of Republican pork, but Murdock does so in an especially devastating way. ...
Fab labbing, Fu-Fu, and the ovine entrepreneur
The BBC reports today a great illustration of human creativity and the intersection of technology and subsidiarity. MIT has set up what they called Fab Labs (Fabrication Labs) in what many might consider the least likely places for technological invention. These Labs consist of basic tools and software than enable people in sometimes remote and rural locations to invent and fabricate the technology they need in their daily work. MIT professor Neil Gershenfeld: In a world of Fab Labs, you...
CAFTA, prudence, and volleyball
After receiving some responses to a previous post (CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?), I thought I would post the the exchange with my most recent dissatisfied critic. Here’s to volleying! (I have edited the emails for confidentiality.) Mr. Phelps, It was with great interest that I recently read your blog entry “CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?” as for some strange reason it recently appeared on the Google Alerts. I found it amusing how you worked John Paul’s teachings in without actually quoting...
Submerged subsidiarity
Because too much has already been said about the recent gulf hurricanes, I won’t put in my two cents. I will, however, direct the reader to the most insightful take on this situation that I have yet to stumble across. As you read it, think again about the importance of the definitions of the words we use, such as ‘responsibility’ and ‘authority’ as are discussed in the mentioned article. ...
Questions about the Red Cross
The Remedy, the Claremont Institute‘s blog, links to an article in the Los Angeles Times by Richard M. Walden, head of Operation USA, that raises concerns about how the Red Cross spends the money it receives for specific disasters. Walden levels some important and serious charges against the Red Cross, and may or may not be convincing depending on if you approve of the Red Cross’ fund-raising precedents and other activities. But Walden is undeniably right is when he raises...
The right pass at the right time
If you haven’t heard of this story yet, read about what Notre Dame head football coach Charlie Weis did this past weekend. His expression passion for a dying boy, 10-year-old Montana Mazurkiewicz, transcends sports. Weis honored a promise to Montana despite the fact that he is a first-year coach in the big business of college football, in what might be the most scrutinized and storied programs in the country. In a personal visit to the boy last week, in addition...
The nose of a camel: The federal government and education
Federal involvement in education has grown steadily throughout the nation’s history, encroaching on what is still viewed by American’s as mostly a state and local responsibility. Kevin Schmiesing looks at a new book that examines U.S. education policy, the red tape and bureaucracy that has resulted, and the opposition to federal control that arose from parochial school administrators. Read the full text here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved