Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘The Road to Serfdom’ at 75: Reflecting on Hayek’s enduring work
‘The Road to Serfdom’ at 75: Reflecting on Hayek’s enduring work
Jul 12, 2025 3:50 AM

This is the first in a series celebrating and exploring the enduring legacy and significance of Friedrich A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom.

Friedrich A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom was first published 75 years ago this month. Initially written as a brief memo in 1933, it eventually grew into a book and is probably theNobel Laureate economist’s most well-known work.

How does TRS hold up this many years later? What does it have to say about where we find ourselves today as a civilization and where we might be headed? This blog series will highlight some of its less widely known but just as critical political-economic lessons, which are as relevant today as at its publication in 1944.

For this first installment, let’s put into current context Hayek’s initial goals, motives, and approach for this influential text, so that we might better understand it’s continuing significance. (Citations throughout will point to “the definitive edition” available for purchase at the Acton Bookshop.)

Hayek’s Goals and Objectives

TRS is primarily known for its argument against central planning, a perennial concern for those who value human dignity, rule of law, and liberty.

But the book was not initially intended as a text for generations. Hayek wrote for a specific audience in a particular time. According to economist and Hayek biographer Bruce Caldwell, “Hayek’s immediate objective was to persuade his British audience that their heritage of liberal democracy under the rule of law should be viewed as a national treasure rather than an object of scorn, as a still-vital roadmap for organizing society rather than an embarrassing relic of times gone by.” (31) At the time, the British populace was in clear opposition to Nazism, but less clear about the dangers of socialism. (“Planning” seemed scientific and modern.) Hayek found traction for his argument against planning in the consensus about Nazism. He specifically argued that Nazism and even fascism were “not a reaction against the socialist trends of the preceding period but a necessary e of those tendencies.” (59) That is, socialism is one step along the road to similarly totalitarian regimes.

Is this warning any less pertinent today?

Despite what some thought to be the end of history following the fall munism and subsequently bringing to light its consequences, there seems to be a perennial temptation toward planning. In the U.S. context today, this manifests in myriad forms — democratic socialism, wide-scale redistribution schemes, anti-free trade populism, the regulatory state, and technocracy. TRS is no less timely just because few claim to be aiming for revolution.

In the foreword to the 1956 American edition of TRS, Hayek offers the following caution:

Just because in the years ahead of us political ideology is not likely to aim at a clearly defined goal but toward piecemeal change, a full understanding of the process through which certain kinds of measures can destroy the bases of an economy based on the market and gradually smother the creative powers of a free civilization seems now of the greatest importance. Only if we understand why and how certain kinds of economic controls tend to paralyze the driving forces of a free society, and which kinds of measures are particularly dangerous in this respect, can we hope that social experimentation will not lead us into situations none of us want. (45)

Non-Political Motives

The book is timely, too, because of this “heritage of liberal democracy,” given how many prominent thinkers are beginning to question the future of liberalism. Is liberalism failing as it es more of what it inherently is, or is the mitting collective suicide? (For my view, please see the second essay in this Values & pilation.)

Hayek was a classical liberal who respected time-tested institutions, including traditional morality and religion. This is something he faced criticism for later in his professional life. But in 1944, he knew that taking on a political topic (through the context of economics) would bring largely negative consequences for him personally.

On the first page of the original preface to TRS, he wrote:

Though this is a political book, I am as certain as anyone can be that the beliefs set out in it are not determined by my personal interests. I can discover no reason why the kind of society which seems to me desirable should offer greater advantages to me than to the great majority of the people of my country. In fact, I am always told by my socialist colleagues that as an economist I should occupy a much more important position in the kind of society to which I am opposed—provided, of course, that I could bring myself to accept their views. … For those who, in the current fashion, seek interested motives in every profession of a political opinion, I may, perhaps, be allowed to add that I have every possible reason for not writing or publishing this book. It is certain to offend many people with whom I wish to live on friendly terms; it has forced me to put aside work for which I feel better qualified and to which I attach greater importance in the long run; and, above all, it is certain to prejudice the reception of the results of the more strictly academic work to which all my inclinations lead me. (37)

In our polarized times characterized by identity politics and a new tribalism, it is important to note that Hayek was not looking to narrow self-interest or benefits for his class or profession in writing TRS. This stands in stark contrast to some contemporary caricatures of liberal motivations, which might dissuade us from exploring classical liberal ideas. For example, Patrick Deneen, in his popular book, Why Liberalism Failed, claims that liberalism appealed to its “architects” largely and “precisely because they anticipated being its winners” (135). About Hayek, specifically, Deneen says that economic growth and progress were important values mainly because they made Hayek’s preferred economic system more politically feasible by “lead[ing] to nearly universal endorsement” of liberalism. (139)

Refusing Determinism

Also, unlike Deneen, Hayek refuses determinism. The fact that, even if we’re currently on the road to serfdom, we can turn to our liberal roots (rightly understood) and avoid totalitarianism, should give us renewed interest in the heritage of those ideas and motivation to heed the words of TRS.

In the final preface to the TRS, reissued in 1976, Hayek clarifies his stance on how slippery the slope to totalitarianism is:

It has frequently been alleged that I have contended that any movement in the direction of socialism is bound to lead to totalitarianism. Even though this danger exists, this is not what the book says. What it contains is a warning that unless we mend the principles of our policy, some very unpleasant consequences will follow which most of those who advocate these policies do not want. (55)

In this blog series, we’ll explore further the lessons of TRS for mending our principles. Hayek would agree that we can do so with some (earthly) hope of turning the tides away from planning and perhaps best by being students of history. “Although history never quite repeats itself,” Hayek writes, “and just because no development is inevitable, we can in a measure learn from the past to avoid a repetition of the same process. One need not be a prophet to be aware of impending dangers.” (57)

For an overview of some of Hayek’s major contributions, see this free ebook and this popular rap video.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The FAQs: Are Ministers in Idaho Required to Conduct Same-Sex Weddings?
What is the Idaho wedding chapel story all about? Same-sex marriage became legal in the state of Idaho earlier this month after a federal court ruled in the case of Latta v. Otter that the state’s statutes and constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. This ruling affected an anti-discrimination ordinance in the city of Coeur d’Alene, which was enacted last year to cover “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.” (Since there is currently no similar state or federal non-discrimination laws,...
7 Figures: Family Structure and Economic Success
Family structure is one of the most significant, though oft-overlooked, factors that affect the economic fortunes of Americans. A new study from AEI titled “For Richer or Poorer” documents the relationships between family patterns and economic well-being in America and shows how radically it can affect e. Here are seven figures you should know from the study: 1. The growth in median e of families with children would be 44 percent higher if the United States enjoyed 1980 levels of...
Public Health: Is ‘Social Justice’ More Important Than Sound Science?
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) has been criticized recently for its handling of the Ebola cases in the United States, and for its lax suggestions regarding travelers from countries where Ebola is rampant. In today’s City Journal, Heather Mac Donald suggests that the CDC’s lack of leadership has more to do with political correctness in the public health arena and their version of “social justice” than with science. Science would assert that people make choices that have an effect...
Child Soldiers: Another Form Of Human Trafficking
Children in poor and war-torn countries are often trafficking victims. They are lured from their homes with promises of making money in factories or at farms. Sometimes they are kidnapped. And sometimes, they are recruited for war. Tom Burridge of BBC News reports on the war in South Sudan, and the prevalence of “recruiting” young boys to fight. On a normal school day, Burridge says that more than 100 boys are kidnapped from their classroom and told they must fight...
Samuel Gregg: The Envy-Inequality Nexus
Acton’s Director of Research, Sam Gregg, ponders “Envy In A Time Of Inequality” in today’s American Spectator. Envy, he opines, is the worst human emotion. From the time that Cain killed Abel to today’s “near-obsession with inequality,” Gregg says envy is driving public policy…and that’s not good. The situation isn’t helped by the sheer looseness of contemporary discussions of economic inequality. Inequality and poverty, for instance, aren’t the same things. That, however, doesn’t stop people from conflating them. Likewise, important...
The Complexities of Airport Capitalism
Over at The Federalist today, I ruminate on a conversation I overheard at an airport recently. I was an innocent auditor, I assure you. In the words of Sam Gamgee to Gandalf, “I ain’t been droppin’ no eaves sir, honest.” The conversation had to do with the prices of goods and services on offer atairports. To simply blame (or credit) capitalism with the situation is misleading. As I conclude, “We should try to understand the words people are using, the...
Are Commercial Transactions Inherently Shady?
By giving us the ability to buy and sell, says Wayne Grudem, God has given us a wonderful mechanism through which we can do good for each other. Buying and selling are activities unique to human beings out of all the creatures that God made. Rabbits and squirrels, dogs and cats, elephants and giraffes know nothing of this activity. Through buying and selling God has given us a wonderful means to bring glory to him. We can imitate God’s attributes...
What’s the Right Minimum Wage?
What’s the perfect minimum wage? $10 an hour? $20? $50? Economist David Henderson explains why it should be “zero.” As Henderson explains, when the state mandates a minimum wage (or an increase), it makes harder for unemployed people to find work and forces business owners to cut the hours of lower-skilled employees. ...
Italian Edition of ‘The Good That Business Does’ Launched in Rome
Italian edition of “The Good That Business Does” by Robert G. Kennedy (Fede e Cultura, 2014) On Oct. 23, before a capacity-audience at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, the Acton Institute and Italian publishing house Fede e Cultura launched Robert G. Kennedy’s Il bene che fanno gli affari (original title “The Good That Business Does,” Acton, 2006, Christian Social Thought Series). The pontifical university’s research center, Markets, Culture and Ethics, acted as co-sponsor with its vice academic director...
Radio Free Acton: Gerard Lameiro on Renewing America’s Heritage of Freedom
Gerard Lameiro speaks at the 2014 Acton Lecture Series Earlier this month, Acton ed Gerard Lameiro to the Mark Murray Auditorium to deliver a lecture as part of the fall 2014 Acton Lecture Series. He spoke on the topic of “Renewing America and Its Heritage of Freedom,” which also happens to be the title of his latest book. Following his lecture, I sat down with Lameiro to discuss his thoughts on the gradual loss of freedom we’ve experienced in the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved