Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
The Right to Keep and Bear Property
The Right to Keep and Bear Property
Mar 18, 2025 7:46 PM

  Bump-stock devices, which are firearm accessories that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire more quickly, are a niche possession. They were used in the mass murder in Las Vegas in 2017 at the Route 91 Harvest Festival, and in the wake of that horror, their legality is up for debate. It is easy enough to understand why people with little interest in guns would take a dim view of firearm accessories that have helped to facilitate mass murder. Yet, those who favor banning bump-stock devices are not merely supporting restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms, but restrictions on the right to keep and bear property.

  On Arms

  In December 2018, Donald Trump’s Justice Department through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) banned bump-stock devices. While rubber bands, belt loops, and shoe strings can all facilitate bump firing, such methods have been around for as long as there have been semi-automatic firearms, the first patented bump-stock device was the Akins Accelerator in 1998. This device is beneficial because it allows the shooter to fire a semi-automatic quickly and accurately, but also safely, since the device, when properly attached, is part of the gun rather than jury-rigged methods like belt loops. Since bump-stock devices are simulacra of fully-automatic weapons, they do not fire at a constant rate like machine guns.

  The ATF determined in 2002 that a firearm with a bump stock does not qualify as a machine gun, and it made further clarifications between 2008 and 2017 regarding bump-stock devices. Most importantly, as of 2010, they were considered by the ATF as an unregulated firearm part, since the device does not mechanically alter the firearms function to fire fully automatic. Yet, under the direction of the Trump Administration, the ATF created a regulation that made what was previously legal illegal by classifying firearms with bump-stock devices as machine guns and hence, illegal by the National Firearms Act of 1986. Last fall, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case regarding the legality of this ban.

  The bump-stock device ban is a regulation created by a federal agency under the direction of the executive that renders previously common and lawful private property illegal.

  A note on terminology before we proceed. Rather than using the phrases “gun owners,”“gun rights,” and the like that are commonly used even by those who support the natural right for self-defense absolutely, here the more accurate phrases such as “arms owners,” “arms rights,” and “arms laws” will be used. The Second Amendment correctly refers to “the right to keep and bear arms,” which includes guns, ammunition, and their accouterments rather than merely the right to keep and bear guns. This broader terminology correctly emphasizes that the natural right of self-defense includes not only guns, but that which they need to work, e.g. ammunition, and that which will allow them to work in a certain way, e.g. bump-stock devices. Recall that the American Revolutionary War began when the British army stole gunpowder from civilian colonists: the last straw of British misrule was the confiscation of non-gun arms.

  On property

  The regulation that made bump-stock devices illegal was not enacted by the US Congress, but rather created under a very expansive view of executive authority. Then-President Trump decreed that what was once legal and protected by the Second Amendment is now illegal. Both Trump and President Joe Biden (the Biden administration is supporting Trump’s position before the Supreme Court), believe that the Chief Executive has the right to create a regulation that should only be passed as a law (even if the law would be unconstitutional). The justification for such bans as the one regarding bump-stock devices is not based on the Constitution nor natural right, but rather on a purported right to safety.

  The bump-stock ban directly and unequivocally limits the right to keep and bear arms that are already commonly owned and in use. In other words, those who own bump-stock devices are required either to turn in their private property to the government or else to destroy them without any recompense. This is a gross and indefensible use of executive power. To reiterate: the bump-stock device ban is a regulation created by a federal agency under the direction of the executive that renders previously common and lawful private property illegal and makes it a felony (up to 10 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine) to continue to own it even after the same agency stated it was legal two decades before.

  John Locke understood that owning private property gives the individual freedom by natural law, which is why Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the intellectual progenitor of the Committee on Public Safety, believed rather in natural compassion. Rousseau’s natural compassion is based on a subjective utopian ideal, hence there is no private property. It is natural compassion that led Trump, after the mass murder in Las Vegas, to ban bump stocks. It is this same natural compassion that led so many in the government, including Trump, to allow violations of liberty during Covid. Natural compassion is by its nature anti-liberty, and those who act according to it have, in Thomas Sowell’s terminology, the Unconstrained Vision of the Anointed.

  However, there is a particular type of individual property that is met with the most loathing by those with the Unconstrained Vision. Arms frustrate totalitarian designs in government, which is why many consider the right to bear arms to be a second-class right. Arms are not only property, but the actuality of belief in the natural law rather than natural compassion. Thus, arms and those who keep and bear them are the particular enemy of the Compassionate Anointed. Arms are private property; arms owners mock the claim of the government’s monopoly over public safety by the mere action of owning arms; arms owners assert the right of the individual to protect himself, his family, and other property without dependence on the government; and civilian-owned arms remind the government to tread carefully when it comes to violating the rights of the individual.

  While bump-stock devices can be used in conjunction with semi-automatic rifles for nefarious purposes by malevolent men, this does not justify the violation of natural rights in the name of natural compassion that occurs when the government bans these devices or other arms, particularly by executive-cum-administrative fiat.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Money and morality: The Christian moral tradition and the best monetary regime
The economic difficulties of the past several years in the United States have led more and more people to take an active interest in monetary policy and in the Federal Reserve System. Many possess an inchoate sense that there must be a connection between past monetary policy and our current doldrums. At a time when monetary matters are attracting so much attention, therefore, it may be particularly opportune to consider the moral dimensions of the present monetary regime. As...
The Good of Affluence
“We are going to see a revival in this country, and it's going to be led by rich people.” — Michael Novak, cited in Dinesh D' Souza's Virtue of Prosperity The title of my ing book, The Good of Affluence: Seeking God in a Culture of Wealth, might raise an eyebrow or two. Readers who are at all familiar with contemporary Christian scholarship on the subject of economic life under capitalism will immediately catch that my approach is not...
Latin America imprisoned in liberation theology
Old-style leftist politics is making a eback in Latin America. In Brazil, an avowed socialist and anti-capitalist has taken power in a landslide vote. Luiz Lula da Silva’s first day as president ended with a dinner with Cuba’s Fidel Castro. Also joining him was Venezuela president Hugo Chavez, who is pursuing a leftist agenda and promising a full crackdown on “terrorists” and “traitors” who oppose him. In Ecuador, new president Lucio Gutierrez, a retired army colonel, holds similar political...
A subtle threat to freedom
Conventional understanding may tend to gloss over the distinction between the concepts munity or society and of state or government. Many in the popular media often use the munity, society, state, and government interchangeably. mon usage of these terms introduces a fallacy with potentially dire consequences. Communal or social obligations are those that all people have mon. This does not mean that every social obligation is, or should be, enforceable by the state or government. While honest debate may...
A primer for love: Personalist ethics
One need not search far to find the supreme ethic by which we should evaluate all of our actions. The holy Scripture is clear that we must love the Lord our God with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our mind, and that we must love our neighbors as ourselves (Matt. 22:36, 39). Love for God and neighbor must serve as the basis for any ethics. Here I am primarily interested in examining the...
The Cross of Christ for 8 Mile Road
As anyone who lives in the Detroit Metropolitan area knows, the divisions between city and suburbs, which run along race and class lines, are deep and seemingly intractable. These divisions are what make a Catholic high school in Detroit, at one of which I am a teacher,so different from a Catholic high school in the suburbs. Like Rabbit, the protagonist in the recently debuted movie 8 Mile, my students hail from the south monly considered the “wrong” – side...
Living truth for a post-Christian world: The message of Francis Schaeffer and Karol Wojtyla
To my knowledge, the evangelical Protestant Francis Schaeffer (1912-1984) and the evangelical Roman Catholic Karol Wojtyla (1920-) never met. Francis Schaeffer, founder of L’Abri Fellowship in Switzerland, was a Christian intellectual and cultural critic, practical theologian, author, noted speaker, and evangelist, whose ministry in the last half of the twentieth century incited worldwide study and discipleship centers. Karol Wojtyla (1920-) is a philosopher, university professor, theologian, priest, bishop, cardinal, author, noted speaker, evangelist, and, last but not least, the...
Free Religion
It is worth remembering what George Washington said in his farewell address about religion: “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports …. Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be...
Categorical imperatives impair Christianity in culture
Contrary to the libertine assumptions pervading our contemporary society, property rights, liberty, and even life itself – the bases of any functional economic order – do not exist as ends in themselves, but rather as elements within a greater framework of religious faith and morality. Historically, Christianity established this religious and moral framework for Western culture. Today, to the extent a larger framework is recognized at all, contemporary advocates, both Christian and secular, tend to rely on human dignity...
Christendom, Power, and Authority
The conceptual distinction between the exercise of authority and the exercise of power provides an essential guide to understanding the present and future status of Christendom, which has not been abolished but, rather, has taken on new forms in our times. The Second Vatican Council, in its document Lumen Gentium, clarified that the Kingdom of God is not a place or a government, much less an earthly end-state arrived at through the political process. Instead, it is “established by...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved