Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The right attitude about tithing during COVID-19
The right attitude about tithing during COVID-19
Apr 14, 2026 5:35 PM

COVID-19 has caused thousands to lose their jobs and other regular sources of e. As a result, many have had to cut any extra or unnecessary spending to make ends meet. Some of these “extra costs” included donating money to their local church, house of worship, or favorite charity. Whereas many businesses could generate e by moving online during the pandemic, most churches do not have the luxury of pletely “virtual.” In terms of donations, the faithful could certainly wire money, and many others were able to begin tithing online. Yet even such efforts would not offset the losses of parishioners’ offerings made in person during Sunday services.

Now Christian churches of every denomination are finding it ever harder to cover basic costs of running parishes and outreach ministries. About one-third of U.S. churches have no savings, relying heavily on members’ donations to survive. Some denominations and nonprofit organizations reported that donations remained steady or increased in April pared to April 2019. However, as the State of the Plate poll indicates, more than half of U.S. churches saw great decreases in donations during the pandemic, forcing some churches to cut staff, cut salaries, or dip into emergency endowments.

During the quarantine period, many churches offered parishioners the opportunity to donate through popular online applications. According to the website Tithe.ly, roughly 60% of American church-goers say online giving is a positive and safe experience and that they are willing to continue donating this way. However, many churches are not seeing an increase in online giving, despite this positive assessment.

The fact is while some technologically savvy churches and saw their donations remain stable or increase during the lockdowns, many other churches struggled with the shift to online giving and were not as successful in maintaining their pre-coronavirus contributions. Some pastors could not make the shift due to lack of resources, while others simply could not meet the challenge of the required technology. As a direct result of poor funding, many parishioners found themselves without their local Sunday services, because the livestream could not be financed.

This had a further ripple effect of reducing tithing even more, since many “old style” parishioners found themselves progressively disassociated with parish life in general. Simply put, without virtual services and in-person events, parishioners may not have seen the need to continue giving. And, for those whose giving came through a weekly envelope, not attending church services meant not giving at all.

Churches are a primary example of the interconnected nature of human beings. Some are more obvious in everyday life, like the forces of supply and demand in industries or our reliance on farmers for food. Churches and people are also a prime example. It is clear that religious institutions provide spiritual needs to parishioners through worship services or Masses, spiritual guidance, and church charity. These institutions provide the moral instruction and support on which many people depend. The faithful, in turn, respond by financing all these good initiatives. There is a lot of truth to this quid pro quo mentality which we learn in market settings.

While it is perfectly understandable that some people are struggling financially during a global pandemic and simply cannot afford to financially support their local church like they used to, others have chosen not to donate based on “transactional attitudes” because they are not receiving services. This is not what the faithful should be thinking. The church is not a marketplace where only services that are actually rendered deserve to be paid.

Giving without expecting anything in return is an essential part of being human. It teaches us about the gratuitous generosity we are called to in the deepest human relationships. It is what helps us look beyond the useful and transactional to the transcendent, empowering us to fulfill our higher missions on earth. Tithing takes this step higher, as it requires stable giving in good and bad times. Tithing weds our hearts to the Church, which gives us more than we can possibly understand. Our needs might not be met now, but they will in the hereafter. Storing up treasure for that day is the best investment we could ever hope for and one we should cheerfully make.

(Photo credit Glendale United Methodist Church – Nashville. This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg: Ideas, intellectuals and the free economy
In another round of conservative debate on the virtues — or vices — of the market economy, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published a new piece at Public Discourse in which he takes on the critiques of writer Matthew McManus. MacManus’ criticisms were written in reply to an earlier piece in which Gregg addresses the growing criticisms of a free economy by editors and writers at First Things magazine. In Gregg’s article, Capitalism, Conservatives, and the Intellectuals: A Reply to...
Economic man is a myth, but ‘nudging’ is a distraction
The University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler recently won the Nobel Prize for his contributions in behavioral economics, much of which centers on challenging rational choice theory. “Renowned for his use of data to observe and predict how people behave in the real world,” writes Derek Thompson, “Thaler’s career has been a lifelong war on Homo economicus, that mythical species of purely rational hominids who dwell exclusively in the models of classical economic theory.” Victor Claar has helpfully summarized Thaler’s work...
The ‘nudge’ that separated families
Richard Thaler, the co-author of Nudge, has won the Nobel Prize for his contributions to behavioral economics. While he decides how best to spend his $1.1 million in prize money, less prosperous families are paying the price for government policies advancing economic paternalism. Thaler suggested in a 2012 New York Times op-ed that the United States follow Europe’s lead in raising the price of gasoline in order to preserve the environment. Hiking the gas tax would be a more efficient...
3 Reasons income tax cuts (almost) always benefit the wealthy
Death and taxes may be the only certainties in life, but there is a close third: e tax cuts mostly benefit e workers. As Congress discusses tax reform, the debate about who will benefit from tax cuts is back in the news. And many people are concerned with how the changes will favor high e earners. Even President Trump has promised that the reforms won’t give wealthy Americans a massive tax cut. The reality is that there is almost no...
Radio Free Acton: Ben DeGrow on school choice; Econ Quiz on tax reform; Upstream on Ray Bradbury
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Caroline Roberts talks with Ben DeGrow, Director of Education Policy at The Mackinac Center for Public Policy, about school choice, previewing his panel presentation at Acton’s ingEducation & Freedom conference. Then, Caroline Roberts hosts another Econ Quiz with guest Dave Hebert, Professor of Economics at Aquinas college on the topic of the week: tax reform. Finally, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks with Jonathan R. Eller, Chancellors Professor of English at...
Marketers ‘nudge’ us, but should government?
On Monday the University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler won a Nobel Prize for his work in behavioral economics. “Thaler’s work raises important questions about the state’s influence over human action,” says Victor V. Claar in this week’s Acton Commentary. In some years two or three economists share the prize for their collective contributions to a specific line of inquiry, but this year the 72-year-old Thaler was the sole recipient for his accumulated plishments in behavioral economics. Put simply, behavioral economics...
Kuyper the anti-revolutionary
Abraham Kuyper knew that revolutions almost always make life worse, says WORLD magazine’s Marvin Olasky: Theologically, Kuyper followed John Calvin and other Reformers. Politically, he said government must not obstruct proclamation of the gospel, promote a counter-gospel, take away religious freedom, or coerce conscience. Reliance on central government “begets a slow process of dissolution that cannot but end in the demoralization of government and people alike.” Kuyper’s alternative was “sphere sovereignty.” That meant leaders in education, business, religion, media, and...
Sin taxes: The ‘nudge’ that benefits terrorism
Richard Thaler won the Nobel Prize for describe how even small economic incentives can affect behavior. One of those nudges, high “sin taxes,” has helped finance terrorism and organized crime. Sin taxes played some role in his winning the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences this week. The Nobel Committee that awarded Thaler’s prize in economics noted, “The insights of behavioral economics can also be used to inform more traditional policy interventions, for example the taxation of ‘sinful goods,’” adding...
More victims of the $15 minimum wage
The deleterious side effects of the $15-per-hour minimum wage have continued to manifest across the country, affecting cities from Seattle to Minneapolis and states from California to New York. To illustrate the damage, the Employment Policies Instituteis maintaining a catalog of suffering businesses across the country, highlighting stories of raised consumer prices, increased unemployment, reduced working hours, and outright business closures. I’ve pointed to several of those stories in the past, and in four new videos, EPI offers fresh glimpses...
Christian education is not safe
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved