Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The return of ‘Tariff Man’, nemesis of the poor
The return of ‘Tariff Man’, nemesis of the poor
Jan 29, 2026 4:34 AM

“I am a tariff man,” said the Republican president. He based his strong support of tariffs on the idea that industries within the U.S. needed “protection” from petition. A vocal opponent of free trade, his view was that America could tax its way to prosperity. Prices on consumer good rose, which helped to cause the Republicans to lose their majority in the House. But “tariff man” never wavered from his protectionist impulses, no matter how much damage they caused.

By “Tariff Man” I’m referring, of course, to our 25th president,William McKinley.

History never repeats itself, as the old adage notes, but it sometimes rhymes. A prime example is a recent tweet by President Trump, which sounds like it came from the 1890s:

I am a Tariff Man. When people or e in to raid the great wealth of our Nation, I want them to pay for the privilege of doing so. It will always be the best way to max out our economic power. We are right now taking in $billions in Tariffs. MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN

Such economic ignorance was already inexcusable when McKinley (then still a congressman) imposed his Tariff Act of 1890. But it’s truly baffling how anyone living in the twenty-first century could think raising taxes on America consumers is the way to make America rich again.

Normally, a policy that has been repudiated by empirical evidence for more than 100 years would never even be considered. But as history has shown, politicians tend to have more power than sense. And because we give the executive branch too much power, there’s not much we can do about it plain.

plain we should. es a point, after all, when such economic ignorance es a matter of immorality. As the Heritage Foundation’s Logan Kolas andPatrick Tyrrell pointed out last year, tariffs and regressive trade policies hurt the poor:

While all Americans stand to benefit from free trade, we must not lose sight of who has the most to lose.

Tariffs are just taxes on Americans by another name. However, some Americans shoulder a larger burden under protectionism than others.

Unlike our progressive e tax, taxes on imports (tariffs) are regressive and take a bigger percentage of e from poor families. e individuals and families thus may bear a significant burden from tariffs, while those of fortable means are not as affected.

In fact, cutting tariffs could be the biggest tax cut e families will ever see.

As I noted last week, Trump’s latest round of tariffs will decrease economic growth and increase unemployment. They will also cost households to suffer losses equivalent to $2,357 per household, or $915 per person.

For a multi-millionaire like President “Tariff Man” Trump, losing $915 a year is no burden. But for most Americans—and especially for the working poor—the tariffs are going to make their lives even more difficult, and push them deeper into poverty.

There may not be many economic policies that all American Christians can agree on, but refusing to allow the poor to be harmed by discredited 19th century mercantilist policies should be one of them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Columbus Day: Why Does It Matter?
The second Monday of October is designated as “Columbus Day” in the United States, ostensibly to give honor and tribute to the man, Christopher Columbus, who “discovered” America. Every American school kid learns to sing-song, “In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.” Today, the reason most people in the U.S. notice Columbus Day is because they don’t get any mail, and federal workers get the day off. (Of course, with the federal mail system dying a slow death and the...
Video: Samuel Gregg Discusses Tea Party Catholic on EWTN
Acton Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Raymond Arroyo last Thursday evening on EWTN’s The World Over to discuss his latest book, Tea Party Catholic, and addressed some of mon objections Catholic proponents of limited government often encounter. [product sku=”1415″] ...
Greece: Back to the Future
From Australia’s SBS Television: Greeks with Australian citizenship are returning here in the hope of finding jobs and a better life, away from the instability crippling Greece’s economy. Which is why so many Greeks left home and family behind for the American Dream in the early 20th Century: Greeks began to settle in America at the end of the 19th century and the influx of migrants continued up until the 1920s. Around 400,000 Greeks migrated to America at that time,...
‘Okay, We’ll Pay:’ Business Owners Prefer Penalty To Obamacare
, Debbie and Larry Underkoffler, owners of North Georgia Staffing, are considering paying government-imposed penalties rather than offering Obamacare to temporary employees. The couple offers excellent health care to their full-time staff, but with hundreds of temporary employees, the cost of offering health insurance could sink their business. [U]nder ObamaCare, the pany now faces a tough choice — cover all of its temporary workers as well, or pay a hefty fine. Aside from its full-time staff, pany also manages about...
What the Obamacare Website Failure Teaches Us About Crony Capitalism
As everyone from political pundits to late-night talk show hosts have pointed out, HealthCare.gov, the flagship technology portion of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare), went live a couple of weeks ago — and was plete failure. A very, very expensive failure. Andrew Couts points out that taxpayers “seem to have forked up more than $500 million of the federal purse to build the digital equivalent of a rock.” Clouts puts that figure in perspective paring it to other websites:...
Deneen and Creative Destruction
Among many other bizarre claims in his most recent article at The American Conservative, Patrick Deneen writes, Today’s conservatives are liberals — they favor an economy that wreaks “creative destruction,” especially on the mass of “non-winners,” increasingly controlled by a few powerful actors who secure special benefits for themselves and their heirs…. Pace Inigo Montoya, I actually have no idea what Deneen thinks creative destruction means in this context. Setting aside the question of whether or not it is a...
When a Church Matches Missions with Entrepreneurship
Pastor Daniel Harrell had a heart for missions, so upon unexpectedly receiving roughly $2 million from a land sale, his Minnesota church was energized to use the funds accordingly. Though they had various debts to pay and building projects to fund, the church mitted to allocating at least 20 percent to service “outside of their walls.” “The sensible way to spend the 20 percent would have been to find a successful service agency and write the check,” Harrell writes, in...
Rand Paul on the Global Slaughter of Christians
“From Boston to Zanzibar, there is a worldwide war on Christianity,” declared Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky). He made ments in a speech discussing the slaughter of Christians at the 2013 Values Voter Summit on October 11. The Kentucky Senator added, Across the globe, Christians are under attack, almost as if we lived in the Middle Ages or if we lived under early Pagan Roman rule. . . It’s almost as if that is happening again throughout the Middle East. Last...
The Public Witness Of Adoption
One the best arguments against the growing tentacles of the social assistance welfare state into the lives of people who are suffering is the practice of the Christian practice of adoption and orphan care. Progressives often charge classical liberals and conservatives as being heartless toward the poor because only progressives are willing to make sacrifices for the poor. Of course, the progressive method is usually to use force to solicit the help. Nevertheless, one of the ways in which Christians...
Why Christians Should Oppose the Debt Ceiling Charade
When es to political policy, Christians in America have a wide-range of opinions about what should be done. Even when we agree on a general principle, we tend to disagree about how that informs our policy choices. We recognize, for instance, that we have an obligation to care for the poor but differ on the type and degree of government involvement. Such differences can lead us to believe that there is nothing we can agree on. But I don’t believe...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved