Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The necessity of boring politics
The necessity of boring politics
Dec 10, 2025 7:17 AM

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Read More…

Movie audiences experience high emotional engagement when they identify personally with the characters. The same is true in modern American politics, which increasingly have e treated as a source of social identity and entertainment.

But should politics be a source of entertainment? Or should politics be boring?

The founding fathers explicitly ordained six essential functions of government:

Establish justiceEnsure domestic tranquilityProvide for mon defensePromote the general welfareSecure the blessings of libertyEstablish the constitution for the United States of America

The constitution stresses the importance of unity under this one government, in which citizens focus on mon vision. The government’s purpose was never intended to be held in the social sphere as a hot take or to create division among its people.

Outside of these functions, the founders’ view was that the role of the government should be extremely limited. These six functions are imperative to our “perfect union.”

So it’s concerning that American political discourse is gravitating toward glamorizing governance. Benjamin Gelman from The Daily Princetonian suggests that “we are slowly being wired to pay less attention to nuance and detail … through only skimming the headlines of articles sent to us.”

An obsession with party politics diminishes the primary purpose of government. For citizens to experience genuine human flourishing, the government was ordained those six (and only six) functions. A large government that has its reach in many parts of social society hinder the ability of their citizens to experience their purpose – sustained by a life rooted in liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By finding entertainment in politics and placing identity in the party they align with, citizens are more prone to radical ideas, allowing those who have been chosen to represent them in maintaining a “perfect union” to dictate much more than functions ordained by the founding fathers.

On a fundamental level, the government was intended to be the backstage employee at the hands of its employer: the citizens of the nation. A government works best for itself and for its citizenry when it works in the background of social life. In this way, its citizens should consider themselves lucky to converse about other topics, or e more involved in entertainment that induces a sense radery, not division.

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Converting governance into a spectator sport that pits us against our neighbors distracts from and destroys the essential functions of government. Politics as entertainment ensures mutual destruction for our Democratic republic – and ourselves – by tearing apart the social fabric that holds us together.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Return of Intercollegiate Review
The Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) recently relaunched their flagship publication, Intercollegiate Review, and added a brand new daily website, . As panion site to the decades-old magazine, the online daily will mainly serve undergraduate readers interested in learning more about the principles of conservatism. Here are some of the featured stories you should check out: ·The Five Lamest Core Courses in America: In lieu of a solid core curriculum, what courses do students take at elite schools in America to...
Video: The Sirico-Winters Debate on Government’s Role in Helping Poor
On Monday, Jan. 28, The Aquinas Institute for Catholic Thought in Boulder, Colo., hosted its Sixth Annual Great Debate which addressed the question, “Can the free market adequately care for the poor?” Acton President and co-founder Rev. Robert A. Siricoargued for the side of the free market, debating Michael Sean Winters, a writer for National Catholic Reporter. Watch the entire debate here: Can the Free Market Adequately Care for the Poor? from Aquinas Institute on Vimeo. ...
Audio: Samuel Gregg Discusses ‘Becoming Europe’ on the Jack Riccardi Show
Recently Samuel Gregg talked with Jack Riccardi from KTSA 550 San Antonio about Gregg’s new book ing Europe. Listen to the entire interview here: [audio: Theodore Dalrymple also recently reviewed ing Europe on the Library of Law and Liberty’s Liberty Law Blog. He said: In this well-written book, Samuel Gregg explains what can only be called the dialectical relationship between the interests of the European political class and the economic beliefs and wishes of the population as a whole. The...
When Little Government Foxes Spoil the Vines of Business and Ministry
Joe Carter has done a marvelous jobofoutlining the details surrounding the Obama administration’s abortion/contraceptive mandate. In a recent cover story for WORLD Magazine, these details are brought to life through a series of snapshots of real businesses and non-profits facing a real choice to either violate their Christian consciences or e economic martyrs. Thus far, Hobby Lobby has received much of the national spotlight—due in part to their visibility in the marketplace and corresponding outspokenness. In the WORLD article, we...
Christians in the New Industrial Economy
The Acton Institute recently partnered with the Christian History Institute to produce the latest issue of Christian History magazine. The issue (which you can download as a free PDF) examines the impact of automation on Europe and America and the varying responses of the church to the problems that developed. Topics examined are mission work, the rise of the Social Gospel, the impact of papal pronouncements, the Methodist phenomenon, Christian capitalists, attempts munal living and much more. Check out these...
Faith and Football: Patriots’ Zoltan Mesko
New England Patriots’ punter Zoltan Mesko is undoubtedly upset that his team didn’t make it to the Super Bowl again this year, but it’s hardly the toughest ordeal of his life. As Romanian refugees, Mesko’s family endured Communist oppression, deprivation and violent revolution. Mesko, who holds an M.A. from the University of Michigan, shared his family’s experience and how faith plays a role in his life in an interview with the National Catholic Register. When asked if he found it...
The Moral Case for Conservatism
Lee Habeeb and Mike Leven explain why it’s essential to make the moral case for conservatism: If there is a single reason why conservatives continue to lose the battle of ideas, it’s because we don’t make the moral case for freedom and free markets. Our political class instead makes the economic case for our philosophy. Our smart guys are so impressed with their own intelligence, they think we can win the debate using numbers and data, charts and graphs, and...
So God Made Paul Harvey
Last night millions of young Super Bowl viewers were introduced to one of the most influential conservatives in modern America. And it was done with mercial. Rush Limbaugh is often credited with the dubious honor of bringing conservative talk radio to the masses. And it is certainly true that Rush paved the way for Hannity, O’Reilly, and other pundits by perfecting the three-hour babblefest. But the true pioneer and undisputed king of conservative radio is Paul Harvey, a man who...
Belief Without Action: Becoming a Shell of Who You Are
“The Constitution protects your right to believe and worship, not force your beliefs on others.” That’s a response Acton received via Twitter regarding a blog post on the HHS Mandate. This type of statement is a typical one in our society: you can believe whatever you want, but don’t force your beliefs on anyone else. Religious belief and worship should be a wholly private affair; bringing your beliefs into the public square constitutes “forcing” them onto others. In the latest...
The FAQs: Obamacare’s Contraceptive-Abortifacient Mandate
On Friday the Obama administration proposed a rule that it says will appease the concerns religious organizations have about the controversial abortion/contraceptive mandate issued last year by the Department of Health and Human Services. Here’s what you should know about the mandate and the proposed changes. What is this contraception mandate everyone keeps talking about? As part of the universal health insurance reform passed in 2010 (often referred to as “Obamacare”), all group health plans must now provide—at no cost...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved