Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The necessity of boring politics
The necessity of boring politics
Jul 11, 2025 11:59 PM

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Read More…

Movie audiences experience high emotional engagement when they identify personally with the characters. The same is true in modern American politics, which increasingly have e treated as a source of social identity and entertainment.

But should politics be a source of entertainment? Or should politics be boring?

The founding fathers explicitly ordained six essential functions of government:

Establish justiceEnsure domestic tranquilityProvide for mon defensePromote the general welfareSecure the blessings of libertyEstablish the constitution for the United States of America

The constitution stresses the importance of unity under this one government, in which citizens focus on mon vision. The government’s purpose was never intended to be held in the social sphere as a hot take or to create division among its people.

Outside of these functions, the founders’ view was that the role of the government should be extremely limited. These six functions are imperative to our “perfect union.”

So it’s concerning that American political discourse is gravitating toward glamorizing governance. Benjamin Gelman from The Daily Princetonian suggests that “we are slowly being wired to pay less attention to nuance and detail … through only skimming the headlines of articles sent to us.”

An obsession with party politics diminishes the primary purpose of government. For citizens to experience genuine human flourishing, the government was ordained those six (and only six) functions. A large government that has its reach in many parts of social society hinder the ability of their citizens to experience their purpose – sustained by a life rooted in liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By finding entertainment in politics and placing identity in the party they align with, citizens are more prone to radical ideas, allowing those who have been chosen to represent them in maintaining a “perfect union” to dictate much more than functions ordained by the founding fathers.

On a fundamental level, the government was intended to be the backstage employee at the hands of its employer: the citizens of the nation. A government works best for itself and for its citizenry when it works in the background of social life. In this way, its citizens should consider themselves lucky to converse about other topics, or e more involved in entertainment that induces a sense radery, not division.

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Converting governance into a spectator sport that pits us against our neighbors distracts from and destroys the essential functions of government. Politics as entertainment ensures mutual destruction for our Democratic republic – and ourselves – by tearing apart the social fabric that holds us together.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
One More Reason the Government Shouldn’t Subsidize Ethanol
Excerpts from Clifford Krauss’ article in the New York Times (cross-posted at )… The ethanol boom of recent years — which spurred a frenzy of distillery construction, record corn prices, rising food prices and hopes of a new future for rural America — may be fading. Only last year, farmers here spoke of a biofuel gold rush, and they rejoiced as prices for ethanol and the corn used to produce it set records. panies and farm cooperatives have built so...
C.S. Lewis vs. Sigmund Freud
Awhile back, I finished reading Armand Nicholi’s book, The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life. Dr. Nicholi is an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard and has taught a seminar on Freud & Lewis at Harvard for the past 35 years. The course eventually led to this book and a PBS series by the same name. The book is an interesting read for anyone modestly interested in one or...
Positive Freedom and Paternal Government
A quote from T. H. Green, refuting the view that the law’s “only business is to prevent interference with the liberty of the individual,” construed as doing what you like as long as it does not infringe on others’ rights to do what they want. Green writes: The true ground of objection to ‘paternal government’ is not that it violates the ‘laissez faire’ principle and conceives that its office is to make people good, to promote morality, but that it...
Two Perspectives on Climate Change
These two brief essays provide a good juxtaposition of two perspectives that view immediate and mandated action to reduce carbon emissions as either morally obligatory or imprudent. For the former, see Vaclav Havel’s, “Our Moral Footprint,” which states rhetorically, “It is also obvious from published research that human activity is a cause of change; we just don’t know how big its contribution is. Is it necessary to know that to the last percentage point, though? By waiting for incontrovertible precision,...
Patterson Stops Too Short In Jena Six New York Times Piece
Orlando Patterson, professor of sociology at Harvard University, penned a challenging piece on Jena 6 and our current racial tensions. I have learned much from Patterson over the years. For example, he was the first person to help me realize that we often confuse issues of race and class in America by assuming the race as the single variable accounting for the cyclical plight of poor blacks. In a September 30th New York Times op-ed piece Patterson rightly says that...
Mugabe: Rotten from the Start
An interesting article in the Los Angeles Times detailing how badly wrong Robert Mugabe’s supporters in the West have been from the very beginning (requires “free” registration; may I suggest BugMeNot?): From the beginning of his political career, Mugabe was not just a Marxist but one who repeatedly made clear his intention to run Zimbabwe as an authoritarian, one-party state. Characteristic of this historical revisionism is former Newsweek southern Africa correspondent Joshua Hammer, writing recently in the liberal Washington Monthly...
Clarence Thomas Interviews
You are probably aware by now that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has published a memoir. The interview-avoiding judge has lately been giving, as Kathryn Jean Lopez puts it, “a lifetime of interviews.” Given the controversy surrounding his public life since his nomination to the Court, not much remains to be said about him, good or bad, that has not already been said. Suffice it to say that I draw attention to him now because: 1) My own view is...
Faith, Funding, and Substance Abuse
Why might there be “increasing participation by religious organizations in offering substance abuse treatment funded by federal government vouchers”? Perhaps because, at least in part, “A program’s faith element relates to the people they serve and the type of help they provide, as programs with more explicit and mandatory faith-related elements are likely to be substance-abuse programs.” Thus, the more explicitly faith-filled substance abuse programs will increasingly face a special temptation to take federal funds for such purposes. And this...
Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South
Related to last week’s post about Reformed education and Pentecostalism, I point you to this post by Rod Dreher, who discusses his interview with Josiah Idowu-Fearon, the Anglican Archbishop of Kaduna state in Nigeria. Dreher relates the following: Pentecostalism is growing like wildfire, but there’s less to it than you might think. He said that in many cases, people are drawn to the emotional experience, and can tell you exactly when they gave their life to Jesus — but can’t...
The Uniqueness of Christian Ecology – Abundance
"Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will they go among so many?" [John 6:9] Among all the many good things going on last weekend in Boise, I (and a few others) noticed something a bit disconcerting. The way many of the topics were covered shows how prone Christians are to being consumed by doom and gloom messages of scarcity and lack and overpopulation and an "ever smaller earth." While it’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved