Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The necessity of boring politics
The necessity of boring politics
Dec 8, 2025 5:48 PM

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Read More…

Movie audiences experience high emotional engagement when they identify personally with the characters. The same is true in modern American politics, which increasingly have e treated as a source of social identity and entertainment.

But should politics be a source of entertainment? Or should politics be boring?

The founding fathers explicitly ordained six essential functions of government:

Establish justiceEnsure domestic tranquilityProvide for mon defensePromote the general welfareSecure the blessings of libertyEstablish the constitution for the United States of America

The constitution stresses the importance of unity under this one government, in which citizens focus on mon vision. The government’s purpose was never intended to be held in the social sphere as a hot take or to create division among its people.

Outside of these functions, the founders’ view was that the role of the government should be extremely limited. These six functions are imperative to our “perfect union.”

So it’s concerning that American political discourse is gravitating toward glamorizing governance. Benjamin Gelman from The Daily Princetonian suggests that “we are slowly being wired to pay less attention to nuance and detail … through only skimming the headlines of articles sent to us.”

An obsession with party politics diminishes the primary purpose of government. For citizens to experience genuine human flourishing, the government was ordained those six (and only six) functions. A large government that has its reach in many parts of social society hinder the ability of their citizens to experience their purpose – sustained by a life rooted in liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By finding entertainment in politics and placing identity in the party they align with, citizens are more prone to radical ideas, allowing those who have been chosen to represent them in maintaining a “perfect union” to dictate much more than functions ordained by the founding fathers.

On a fundamental level, the government was intended to be the backstage employee at the hands of its employer: the citizens of the nation. A government works best for itself and for its citizenry when it works in the background of social life. In this way, its citizens should consider themselves lucky to converse about other topics, or e more involved in entertainment that induces a sense radery, not division.

The government is working well when no one pelled ment on it. As poet Henry David Thoreau said: “That government is best which governs least.”

Converting governance into a spectator sport that pits us against our neighbors distracts from and destroys the essential functions of government. Politics as entertainment ensures mutual destruction for our Democratic republic – and ourselves – by tearing apart the social fabric that holds us together.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The miracle apple: Co-creative lessons from the fall of the Red Delicious
In the Age of Information, much of our work now takes place in the realm of the “intangible”—creating and trading products and services that can feel somewhat obscure or abstract. Even still, in our technological, data-driven world, we should remember that we are cooperating withnatureandco-creating with our Creator. From the social-media giants to the sawmills, from the blockchain banks to the barbershops, we are using our God-given intellect and creativity to transform a mix of matter and information into something...
Church and politics: Necessary definitions and distinctions
A few weeks ago The Gospel Coalition ran a review of Jonathan Leeman’s book, Why Nations Rage: Rethinking Faith and Politics in a Divided Age. A snip: Leeman’s analysis is guided by a few central convictions. One is represented in Psalm 2 and the title itself. He explains, “History’s greatest political rivalry, it would seem, is between the nations of the earth and the Messiah.” Another guiding insight is that all of life is religious, including politics. This is true...
Bernie Sanders is not a socialist. Socialism is dead.
I recently gave a presentation to students about foreign aid in the developing world. I tried to explain that many ing to the conclusion that what is really necessary is to establish conditions suitable for a market-based society. In other words, there must be a transparent administration of justice, the predictable rule of law, private property rights, ease in doing business, a real lack of arbitrariness, etc. Both as I prepared and as I spoke, however, I realized that some...
Justice Scalia explains why the ‘living Constitution’ is a threat to America
A majority of Americans—55 percent—now say the U.S. Supreme Court should base its rulings on what the Constitution “means in current times,” while only 41 percent say rulings should be based on what it “meant as originally written,” according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. Not surprisingly, the divide is mostly along partisan lines. According to Pew, nearly eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (78 percent) now say rulings should be based on the Constitution’s meaning in current...
How geography affects economic growth
Note: This is post #78 in a weekly video series on basic economics. You could fit most of the U.S., China, India, and a lot of Europe, into Africa. But if pare Africa to Europe, Europe has two to three times the length of coastline that Africa. Why does this matter? As this video by Marginal Revolution University explains, geography can have profound effects on a nation’s economic growth. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d...
Liberalism needs natural law
The great British political thinker Edmund Burke regarded what some call “liberalism” today as prehensible, unworkable and unjust in the absence of mitment to natural law.A similar argument can be made in our own time, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg: Without natural law foundations, for instance, how can we determine what is and isn’t a right other than appeals to raw power or utility, neither of which can provide a principled case for rights? Or, on what other basis...
The forgotten Catholic founders of economics
Many people acclaim Adam Smith as the father of economics. Others trace the origins of economics to the eighteenth century Physiocrats, while others look back far asAristotle. “The real founders of economic science actually wrote hundreds of years before Smith,” wrote Lew Rockwell at Mises.org. “They were not economists as such, but moral theologians, trained in the tradition of St. Thomas Aquinas, and they came to be known collectively as the Late Scholastics.” These thinkers, who were associated with Spain’s...
Dalio’s animated adventure in common grace-infused wisdom
Ray Dalio is a fascinating character. Founder of the“world’s richest and strangest hedge fund,”he’s been dubbed the “Steve Jobs of investing” and “Wall Street’s oddest duck.” He’s currently #26 on Forbes list ofrichest people in Americaand Time magazine once included him on their list of the world’s 100 most influential people. In 2011, Dalio outlined his personal philosophy on life and business in a self-published 123-page PDF called “Principles.” (It was re-released as a book in 2017 and e the#1Amazon...
The (just) price of salt (and cancer drugs)
A recent episode of the very fine podcast EconTalk reminded me of one of the more remarkable episodes during my time here at the Acton Institute involving our internship program. The EconTalk episode is about the price of cancer drugs, and the various factors that go into the often astronomical prices of the latest cancer-fighting drugs. These can run up to an in excess of $300,000 per year. A question implicit in the discussion is whether such high costs are...
Radio Free Acton: Discussing Pope Francis’ views on Economics; Upstream on Bob Dylan and Thomas Merton
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Dan Hugger, librarian and research associate at Acton, speaks with Robert Whaples, research fellow at the Independent Institute and professor of economics at Wake Forest University on Pope Francis’ views on capitalism in a preview of Prof. Whaples’ ing Acton Lecture Series talk. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to author, musician, and poet Robert Hudson, on the connections between the singer Bob Dylan and writer Thomas Merton. Check out...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved