Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
The Moral Nature of Free Enterprise
The Moral Nature of Free Enterprise
Oct 26, 2026 7:36 AM

In the marketplace, the consumer is “king.” To e wealthy in free enterprise usually involves mass production for mass material consumption. The free market rewards entrepreneurs for their correct anticipation of consumer demand. It showers people like Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Alexander Graham Bell, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie with tremendous wealth, because they dramatically improved the consumer’s quality of life.

Contrast this with socialist or pre-capitalist society. Those societies excel in producing an abundance of grinding poverty, famine, disease and oppression. Their parasitic government officials live in opulence while creating only misery and chaos. Free enterprise radically changes this picture by creating a broad based, middle class and consumer society.

The productive achievements of capitalism should render it the most loved system in the world. Yet, it is hated, denounced, and routinely smeared by many intellectuals. When the Left clings stubbornly to socialism, its logic reaches an impassable chasm, asserting “while the free market works, it is not ethical.” Who legitimately claims the moral high ground, entrepreneurs or enlightened socialists?

Business executives generally have no clue why free enterprise is under assault. What enrages the Left are capitalism’s greatest moral virtues. The ethical trinity of free enterprise consists of political freedom, individual rights, and private property.

Capitalism rests upon a foundation of private property rights. Voluntary cooperation, mutual reciprocity and human respect are its guiding principles.

The market setting is an amazing triumph of existential architecture. Free enterprise is “a social temple” serving no collective purpose, end or value. Rather, it serves billions of divergent human needs. Everyone, producer and consumer, is free to pursue their own vision of the good life. plishing that goal requires an elevation of contract to the center of social relations.

Force and fraud demolish the foundation of contractual society and are inconsistent with free enterprise. Contracts are based upon respect for the property rights of others. Bargaining replaces violence and domination in moral and legal disputes. Honesty and integrity uphold the spirit of contract as well as reinforce human character. Prosperity and social harmony naturally flow from the ethical virtues of free enterprise.

The “moral consensus” implied by contract directs unbridled human greed into socially beneficial es. The market, then, es a win-win process, not a “zero-sum game” where the victors plunder the losers in their acquisition of wealth. Both parties to the transaction must gain, or voluntary social cooperation ends. Compare the ethics of capitalism with any variant of socialism. Socialism requires sacrificial animals for the politically defined “National Purpose.” What if someone does not fit into the goals of the PLAN? Inevitably, government begins denying our right to exist and grow as free autonomous human beings. “The Gulag System” is not an accident, rather it is a rational extension of socialist moral/economic policy.

Before free enterprise, society was based upon class, status, race, caste, power, and exploitation. Free markets and property rights elevate individuals above routine barbarism and destruction to the moral stature of traders. Individuals trading human values in peaceful cooperation defines the social morality of free enterprise. Capitalism demolishes all economic barriers unleashing our maximum human potential.

Not only does free enterprise lead to social cooperation within a given society, it also produces international peace. During the nineteenth century, the world came closest to a free-trade regime, including goods, capital and human migration. This was a century of unprecedented peace and economic growth. Once countries began trading and investing freely within each others borders, they formed a vested interest in the peace and stability of their neighbors. People preoccupied with earning money have little time to engage in warfare.

Once human appetites for conquest and domination are suppressed, the desire for profits and mutual gain increases. Profits are the moral symbol of human growth earned from productive enterprise. In the free marketplace, no one can advance without making others in society profit as well. Entrepreneurial prosperity is created only through voluntary cooperation.

Yet profits have a bad name. They are incessantly castigated everyday by political, academic, and media elites. It is all mon to hear our so-called “leaders” denounce profits as if they were wrong and shameful. American presidents routinely condemn profits and self-interest as “obscene,” yet the munity retaliates with dead silence.

The politics of class warfare is a conscious war on this economy’s most industrious, creative, and risk-taking individuals. Blaming business for inept political failures is mon that it has e the norm. While the country faces a “crisis” caused by misguided public policy, politicians blame industry for our economic woes. Industries such as steel, oil, chemical, pharmaceutical and insurance, are prominent on the political roulette wheel of scapegoating.

While Americans enjoy a standard of living unparalleled in the world, it is not because we work harder than other people. Rather, our prosperity was created by great business heroes of yesteryear. Where would America be without the “greed” of Eli Whitney (interchangeable parts); John D. Rockefeller (oil refining technology); Thomas Edison (electric lights, phonograph, and motion pictures); Alexander Graham Bell (telephone); Henry Ford (assembly line-automobiles)?

Look at the life of Henry Ford, this century’s premier entrepreneurial capitalist. Within a few years, Ford’s organizational genius lowered the price of cars by a factor of 15, while tripling labor productivity and wages at the same time. Along the way, he became the richest man in the world.

How much of this nation’s wealth owes its creation to Henry Ford? More than is ever acknowledged.

Politicians, on the other hand, trade in envy and resentment, and are always assuming the fruits of entrepreneurial creativity will somehow just always “be there”! This illustrates a lack of moral and economic understanding. There are categorical differences between looters stealing for a living and the genuine creators of wealth.

Remember the story of Prometheus in Greek mythology? His crime consisted of bringing fire to man. For this, the Gods’ chained Prometheus to a rock to have his liver pecked out by a vulture. This story has it’s own parallels in modern America’s cultural environment; our political Gods’ have declared that business success in the 1980’s was “evil” and “unfair.” Now they intend to chain down free enterprise to have government peck it to death.

Today, for instance, the anti-trust laws make every business pricing decision illegal. With arbitrary law, everything is illegal. It is against the anti-trust laws to raise your price (evidence of monopoly power), lower your price (incipient predatory theory), or charge the same price as petition (evidence of tacit price fixing).

When a creative genius prospers petition, he is certain to get on government’s “hit list.” Look at Microsoft. Bill Gates created and organized the puter pany in the world. Microsoft employs thousands of highly paid, highly skilled professionals who make every e to life. Bill Gates made the mistake of serving the consumers and getting rich and now the anti-trust authorities are preparing to destroy Microsoft.

Today, we punish our best corporations with discriminatory taxation, arbitrary regulations, and continuous slander from the political, artistic and munities. If Thomas Edison invented electric lights today, the government would descend upon him with excess profits taxes, new regulations, and anti-trust prosecution, all in the name of preserving free enterprise!

Remember the old saying, “Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door”? Do that today, and a flurry of bureaucrats will break down your door, impound your records, seize your property, and initiate legal proceedings!

In spite of modern cultural trends, America should not despair. Every new entrepreneur means hope for tomorrow. For while America seems to have forgotten the moral and economic virtues of free enterprise, the rest of the world is just discovering them anew. We should rejoice in the prospect of free enterprise transforming the lives of our global family.

Unlimited prosperity and opportunity allows every human to fulfill their deepest values in the peace of social harmony. Maybe in the next century, America will relearn that important lesson from our global neighbors.

And maybe, just maybe, a greater vigilance for economic freedom will preserve the great spiritual treasure of entrepreneurship that is hidden within each of us.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Solzhenitsyn and the Modern World
Why should it have been so hard to understand a writer who expresses himself with so little ambiguity? Or is it possible that his ideas were understood quite clearly but clearly hated, leading to futile attempts to discredit him? Ericson maintains his professional courtesies, but it’s hard to escape the conclusion that intellectual confusion alone cannot account for the hatchet jobs done on the expatriate Russian writer. Ericson quotes the socialist economist Robert Heilbroner to the effect that only...
When Austrians Came to America
Economists of the Austrian school in recent years, writes Karen Vaughn, “present no less than a fundamental challenge” to how members of their field view their work and the world around them. “At the very least,” she says, “Austrian economics is plete reinterpretation of the methods, substance, and limitations of contemporary economics. At most, it is a radical, perhaps even revolutionary restructuring of economics.” So she writes in the introduction to her splendid book, Austrian Economics in America: The...
The Catholic Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
In his 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, Leo XIII condemned socialism as contrary to nature, liberty, natural justice, mon sense; predicted its failure; and upheld private property, personal initiative, and natural inequality. Forty years later, Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno established social justice as a central concept in Catholic social teaching. This evolution culminated in John Paul II’s Centesimus Annus (1991), which condemns socialism and the “social assistance state” and endorses a morally conscious capitalism. An plished phenomenological philosopher, author of...
A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America
Don Feder reminds me of Paul Caplan, a Reform rabbi in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and of Peter Himmelman, perhaps the only practicing Orthodox Jew to carve out a career for himself in rock and roll. Like Rabbi Caplan and Peter Himmelman, Feder exhibits a palpable joy about his faith–and a passion strong enough to attract people in search of God. Feder, who writes editorials for the brassy tabloid The Boston Herald, writes about one experience at the office: When...
Public Education: An Autopsy
Market based schooling sounds like a contradiction in terms to public school teachers' unions; it sounds like a non sequitur to hard-pressed denominational schools; it's Greek to the average taxpayer; but it's the next step to education critic Myron Lieberman. Eight years ago, Lieberman published Beyond Public Education, in which he prophesied the emergence of a market-based, non-establishment challenge to the clichés about educational reforms which flooded the nation in the years following publication of A Nation At Risk...
Beyond the New Right
Starting roughly from the mess we all admit we are in, John Gray, fellow in politics at Jesus College, Oxford University, subtly, valiantly, and sometimes brilliantly addresses all of the major problems facing liberal democratic society in this collection of four essays written during the past decade. Avowedly conservative in a lineage that links him with Michael Oakeshott (the greatest conservative theorist of our time, he thinks), F.A. Hayek, eventually with Edmund Burke, and, more tenuously, with Thomas Hobbes,...
Candles behind the Wall
Since the collapse of the Soviet empire, legion has been the number of studies and theories seeking to explain how and why its end came about as it did. However, few are as convincing as that put forth by Barbara von der Heydt in her new book, Candles behind the Wall: Heroes of the Peaceful Revolution That Shattered Communism. Von der Heydt’s thesis can be summed up in a munism failed because it was unable to make people forget...
Environmental Overkill
If one believes what passes for science these days, the world is about to end. The globe is warming, ozone is disappearing, smog is expanding, forests are shrinking, species are dying, and carcinogens are spreading. What were once thought to be good--population growth and technological advance--are actually bad. Without radical change, it is said, the environment and mankind are doomed. Sadly, this is what Vice President Gore, Environmental Protection Agency head Carol Browner, a host of congressmen and senators,...
Earth in the Balance
There has been much talk in the last couple of months about the Religious Right's growing involvement and influence within the Republican Party. Amid all the concern about the threat to our civil liberties represented by Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition, the media has greatly neglected the emergence of a more serious menace: Capture of the Democratic Party by the Ecological Religious Left. Vice President Al Gore has emerged as the spokesman of eco-paganism, a pantheistic prophet of global environmental...
The Churching of America
The award winning book The Churching of America is a dramatic rewriting of American religious history with a free-market bent. The authors write: “[the] most striking trend in the history of religion in America is growth – or what we call the churching of America.” Making use of a traditional church-sect distinction, Finke and Stark argue that historians have seen religion in decline in America, because their assumptions led them to look at the wrong religious institutions. Finke and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved