Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Issachar Project: The importance of film
The Issachar Project: The importance of film
Jan 8, 2026 11:17 PM

Last weekend I had the joy of sharing in a special meeting in Newport Beach, California, that was appropriately named the Issachar Project. This small project is the work, primarily, of my friend Andrew Sandlin of the Center for Cultural Leadership. Andrew is convinced that there must be an intellectual and existential coalition of (1) Christians working in Hollywood and elsewhere in the film industry and (2) serious Christian thinkers in the arts.

You may recall that the sons of Issachar are described in the Scriptures as “men who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chronicles 12:32). Their number was small but their impact was great. This unique gathering included men and women, mostly under forty. The purpose of this group was not to form a “think tank” but rather to explore the neglected dimension of knowing God through beauty and imagination, in other words to explore how we know him incarnationally, not merely intellectually.

Most of the invited participants at this unusual meeting were film and television script writers, producers, teachers of the arts and reviewers. We heard four presentations on subjects like how Genesis 1 provides a storyline for narrative, how we should understand Acts 17 as it relates to the Mars Hill context of our times, and why we should watch films in the first place. Brian Godawa, author of the outstanding, and highly mended new book Hollywood Worldviews: Watching Films With Wisdom & Discernment (InterVarsity Press), was a major contributor to the event, as was Jack Hafer, who produced the fantastic feature film, “To End All War.”

I did not have much to contribute to this event, since I am not directly involved in movies myself. (I am an amateur movie reviewer now and then and I confess a real love for film as a modern art form.) I do believe the active presence of serious Christians in Hollywood is an important step forward in the culture. There is clear evidence that incremental gains are being made through the work of many of those who were present at the Issachar Project gathering.

There were so many gems shared in this meeting that I can’t begin to relate them all. I will list only a few. My friend David Bahnsen, who is a businessman, and a non-film maker like me, stated that he mitted, as I am mitted, to plete annihilation of the sacred and secular distinction.” It appears to me that this is the fundamental problem most conservative Christians have with film. Until Bahnsen’s goal is realized among serious Christians we will not impact the world in a Kuyperian (and truly Christian) sense. Andrew Sandlin reminded us of Karl Barth’s statement, that fits nicely with my own teaching of apologetics, when he noted: “Apologetics is not a prelude to the gospel, apologetics is the gospel.” Several speakers reminded us of the need to understand and use metaphors if we would connect with people. (I am amazed at how badly Christians miss this point when the Bible is so clear about it.) Here was a blunt statement that I resonated with deeply: “You can treat people like crap so long as you are sure you are right!” Whew, that about says it for some modern evangelical Christians who think they believe nothing but the truth and thus can treat other people as they wish. This is precisely why we have so little impact in places like film and television. Another note I took said, “Christians must not resist telling their own story. If we have a story, which we do, then we ought to tell it and tell it well.”

One point stood out to me at several different junctures. The single most important evangelical thinker, at least in getting Christians back into the culture, was the late Francis Schaeffer. His name was cited again and again as the singularly most important pioneer who helped people “see” these issues clearly when Christians were on the cultural sidelines in the 1970s. I don’t think we appreciate Schaeffer enough. His weaknesses, to my mind, are quite apparent, but his positive contribution was huge.

Producer Jack Hafer ended our day on Saturday by giving us three reasons to watch film. (Jack was converted to faith in Christ in fundamentalism and thus had to undergo a real change in life views to enter this industry!) He urged us to watch film for discernment, in order to understand the zeitgeist of our time, the “spirit of the age.” We must grow our ability to discern he argued. Second, we should watch film for enrichment. We need to enjoy life and film can help that to happen. We also need to grow personally and film helps that as well. Bach said this well: “Music is for the glorification of God and the entertainment of the mind.” So is film. Finally, we should watch film for conversation. Citing my fellow Wheaton evangelism professor Rick Richardson’s Evangelism Outside the Box:New Ways to Help People Experience the Good News (InterVarsity Press) book, Jack urged us to look for “soul awakenings” that e through movies. Movies open doors to conversation and allow us to talk about things that truly matter to people. We were challenged to understand that “We can let the world change us with movies or we can change the world with movies.”

ACT 3 mitted, in its third mitment, to “advancing the mission Christ’s kingdom by teaching believers and churches to engage both people and culture with the story of Jesus Christ.” Maybe this was why I was present at the Issachar Project. Thanks Andrew Sandlin for having the vision to take on such a culture changing project. I was gratified to be present and to meet so many cool Christians from such a wide and diverse background. I will never watch movies the same way in the future and I will continue to pray for my friends who work diligently within this industry. I look forward to more dialogue and deeper friendships with the folks I met this weekend.

John H. Armstrong is founder and director of ACT 3, a ministry aimed at “encouraging the church, through its leadership, to pursue doctrinal and ethical reformation and to foster spiritual awakening.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Addicted to influence
A brief but timely editorial appears in this month’s issue of Christianity Today, “We Are What We Behold.” Here’s a taste: “…evangelicals have wrestled with our relationship to power. When in a position of influence (and in our better moments), we leverage power to better the lives of our neighbors. Cultural savvy enables us to successfully translate the gospel for a changing world. But it’s a double-edged sword—influence and savvy can also dull the gospel’s transcendence. We achieve a royal...
Bonhoeffer’s legacy
Earlier this month, we marked the 100th anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s birth on February 4, in what is now Wroclaw, Poland. In a message before the International Bonhoeffer Conference on February 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a man immersed in a specific cultural heritage, and untroubled by the fact; he was a person of profound and rigorous (and very traditional) personal spirituality; he was mitted to the ecumenical perspective from very early on in his...
Stewardship and economics: two sides of the same coin
In yesterday’s Acton Commentary, I argued that the biblical foundation for the concepts of stewardship and economics should lead us to see them as united. In this sense I wrote, “Economics can be understood as the theoretical side of stewardship, and stewardship can be understood as the practical side of economics.” I also defined economics as “the thoughtful ordering of the material resources of a household or social unit toward the self-identified good end” and said that the discipline “helps...
The dignity of every human being
The February 11 issue of WORLD Magazine includes a culture feature, “Giving their names back.” Profiled in the article is Citizens for Community Values (CCV), a nonprofit in Memphis that does a victim assistance program called “A Way Out.” It’s a reclamation program of sorts, literally reclaiming women ensnarled in the sex trade industry, and giving them back their lives, reclamation evidenced by names. The very nature of the sex industry, be it topless dancing, stripping or prostitution, requires anonymity–no...
Moral posturing on Africa
Over the weekend, the Daily Telegraph’s Charles Moore asked, “Why should the Left win the scramble for Africa?” : [T]he trouble with this subject – perhaps this is why the Left dominates it – is that it attracts posturing. Africa is, among other things, a photo-opportunity. As our own educational system makes it harder and harder to get British pupils to smile at all, so the attraction for politicians of being snapped with rows of black children with happy grins...
Western Europe’s political homogeneity
Western Europeans often talk about the homogeneity of American politics and how the parties hardly differ from one another. One reason why Europeans believe this is because they often pay attention to US politics only during a presidential campaign, so they do have some justification. But while their opinion is understandable not only does it fail to reflect the real difference between the left and the right in America; it obscures the homogeneity of Western European political life. What is...
Nonprofits beware!
A friend forwarded a Website link for The Nonprofit Congress recently that was downright scary. It appears to be the epitome of good intentions fraught with unintended consequences. Or perhaps the consequences are not unintended. The Congress is an apparent call to advocacy (i.e., political pressuring) within the National Council of Nonprofit Associations. To the group’s credit, the “why” is a forthright statement of their view and values: The time e for nonprofits of all sizes and scope e together....
Jack Hafer at the Acton Lecture Series
Jack Hafer, the producer of the award-winning film, To End All Wars, will be speaking at the 2006 Acton Lecture Series on Wednesday, February 15. This luncheon (which does include a lunch) will be held in the David Cassard room of the Waters Building in downtown Grand Rapids from 12:00pm – 1:30. Mr. Hafer will discuss the challenges of making movies with profound moral messages in today’s Hollywood culture. He will also talk about plans for future projects that break...
Concerns about consensus
George H. Taylor, the State Climatologist for Oregon, writes at TCS Daily, “A Consensus About Consensus.” The article is worth reading. It shows that scientific consensus is often overrated, both in terms of its existence and in terms of its relevance. With resepct to global warming, Taylor looks at some of the claims for scientific consensus, and states, “But even if there actually were a consensus on this issue, it may very well be wrong.” This simply means that the...
‘Captialism’ according to the academy
For a quick overview of the current state of appreciation for economics and capitalism among various ‘academics,’ see the newly inaugurated e-journal Fast Capitalism. It might as well be subtitled: Marxism, Alive and Well. Most of the contributors to the first issue are in munications, or political science. Here’s a sampling: In “Beyond Beltway and Bible Belt: Re-imagining the Democratic Party and the American Left,” Ben Agger, who teaches sociology and humanities at the University of Texas at Arlington, writes,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved