Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Issachar Project: The importance of film
The Issachar Project: The importance of film
Dec 11, 2025 2:09 PM

Last weekend I had the joy of sharing in a special meeting in Newport Beach, California, that was appropriately named the Issachar Project. This small project is the work, primarily, of my friend Andrew Sandlin of the Center for Cultural Leadership. Andrew is convinced that there must be an intellectual and existential coalition of (1) Christians working in Hollywood and elsewhere in the film industry and (2) serious Christian thinkers in the arts.

You may recall that the sons of Issachar are described in the Scriptures as “men who understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chronicles 12:32). Their number was small but their impact was great. This unique gathering included men and women, mostly under forty. The purpose of this group was not to form a “think tank” but rather to explore the neglected dimension of knowing God through beauty and imagination, in other words to explore how we know him incarnationally, not merely intellectually.

Most of the invited participants at this unusual meeting were film and television script writers, producers, teachers of the arts and reviewers. We heard four presentations on subjects like how Genesis 1 provides a storyline for narrative, how we should understand Acts 17 as it relates to the Mars Hill context of our times, and why we should watch films in the first place. Brian Godawa, author of the outstanding, and highly mended new book Hollywood Worldviews: Watching Films With Wisdom & Discernment (InterVarsity Press), was a major contributor to the event, as was Jack Hafer, who produced the fantastic feature film, “To End All War.”

I did not have much to contribute to this event, since I am not directly involved in movies myself. (I am an amateur movie reviewer now and then and I confess a real love for film as a modern art form.) I do believe the active presence of serious Christians in Hollywood is an important step forward in the culture. There is clear evidence that incremental gains are being made through the work of many of those who were present at the Issachar Project gathering.

There were so many gems shared in this meeting that I can’t begin to relate them all. I will list only a few. My friend David Bahnsen, who is a businessman, and a non-film maker like me, stated that he mitted, as I am mitted, to plete annihilation of the sacred and secular distinction.” It appears to me that this is the fundamental problem most conservative Christians have with film. Until Bahnsen’s goal is realized among serious Christians we will not impact the world in a Kuyperian (and truly Christian) sense. Andrew Sandlin reminded us of Karl Barth’s statement, that fits nicely with my own teaching of apologetics, when he noted: “Apologetics is not a prelude to the gospel, apologetics is the gospel.” Several speakers reminded us of the need to understand and use metaphors if we would connect with people. (I am amazed at how badly Christians miss this point when the Bible is so clear about it.) Here was a blunt statement that I resonated with deeply: “You can treat people like crap so long as you are sure you are right!” Whew, that about says it for some modern evangelical Christians who think they believe nothing but the truth and thus can treat other people as they wish. This is precisely why we have so little impact in places like film and television. Another note I took said, “Christians must not resist telling their own story. If we have a story, which we do, then we ought to tell it and tell it well.”

One point stood out to me at several different junctures. The single most important evangelical thinker, at least in getting Christians back into the culture, was the late Francis Schaeffer. His name was cited again and again as the singularly most important pioneer who helped people “see” these issues clearly when Christians were on the cultural sidelines in the 1970s. I don’t think we appreciate Schaeffer enough. His weaknesses, to my mind, are quite apparent, but his positive contribution was huge.

Producer Jack Hafer ended our day on Saturday by giving us three reasons to watch film. (Jack was converted to faith in Christ in fundamentalism and thus had to undergo a real change in life views to enter this industry!) He urged us to watch film for discernment, in order to understand the zeitgeist of our time, the “spirit of the age.” We must grow our ability to discern he argued. Second, we should watch film for enrichment. We need to enjoy life and film can help that to happen. We also need to grow personally and film helps that as well. Bach said this well: “Music is for the glorification of God and the entertainment of the mind.” So is film. Finally, we should watch film for conversation. Citing my fellow Wheaton evangelism professor Rick Richardson’s Evangelism Outside the Box:New Ways to Help People Experience the Good News (InterVarsity Press) book, Jack urged us to look for “soul awakenings” that e through movies. Movies open doors to conversation and allow us to talk about things that truly matter to people. We were challenged to understand that “We can let the world change us with movies or we can change the world with movies.”

ACT 3 mitted, in its third mitment, to “advancing the mission Christ’s kingdom by teaching believers and churches to engage both people and culture with the story of Jesus Christ.” Maybe this was why I was present at the Issachar Project. Thanks Andrew Sandlin for having the vision to take on such a culture changing project. I was gratified to be present and to meet so many cool Christians from such a wide and diverse background. I will never watch movies the same way in the future and I will continue to pray for my friends who work diligently within this industry. I look forward to more dialogue and deeper friendships with the folks I met this weekend.

John H. Armstrong is founder and director of ACT 3, a ministry aimed at “encouraging the church, through its leadership, to pursue doctrinal and ethical reformation and to foster spiritual awakening.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Explainer: The Hobby Lobby Amicus Briefs
Last week, over 80 amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court on both sides of Hobby Lobby’s challenge to the HHS contraceptive-abortifacient mandate. Here’s what you need to know about amicus briefs and their role in this case. What is an amicus brief? An amicus brief is a learned treatise submitted by an amicus curiae (Latin for “friend of the court”), someone who is not a party to a case who offers information that bears on the case but...
‘Breeders:’ A Cautionary Tale
The Center for Bioethics and Culture (CBC) is an mitted to “bioethical issues” such as surrogacy, stem cell research and human cloning, amongst other issues. They have recently produced a documentary entitled “Breeders: a subclass of women?” It is a cautionary tale, and a very sad one. The film focuses on women who chose to be surrogates (one chose surrogacy several times), and the turmoil that arose. The issue of es down to the buying and selling of children, one...
Post-Super Bowl Thoughts on Theology and America
How ’bout them Seahawks? As a Chicago Bears fan the answer to that question means very little to me, but I did enjoy the annual ritual of binge-eating and loudly talking over friends and loved ones who gathered together around the TV for Super Bowl 48. One thing that stood out was the tradition of having various NFL players and civil servants recite the Declaration of Independence before the game. Some of the powerful (and unmistakably religious) lines from our...
Business and the Option for the Poor
There is no reason to assume that the preferential option for the poor is somehow a preferential option for big government, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg. Gregg writes that lifting people out of poverty — and not just material poverty but also moral and spiritual poverty — does not necessarily mean that the most effective action is to implement yet another welfare program: What does living out the option for the poor mean in practice? We must engage in...
Audio: Samuel Gregg Discusses ‘Tea Party Catholic’
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Mike Murray on his show “Faith, Culture and Politics” on the Guadalupe Radio Network to discuss his latest book, Tea Party Catholic. The interview lasted nearly a half an hour, and you can listen to it via the audio player below. ...
Hobby Lobby Owners Speak Out on HHS Mandate
In a new video from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the Green Family, owners of the embattled retail chain, Hobby Lobby, discusses the religious foundation of their business and the threat the federal government now poses to those who share their beliefs. “What’s at stake here is whether you’re able to keep your religious freedom when you open a family business,” says Lori Windham, Senior Council at The Becket Fund, “whether you can continue to live out your faith...
What Liberal Evangelicals Should Know About the Economic Views of Conservative Evangelicals
We read the same Bible and follow the same Jesus. We go to the same churches and even agree on the same social issues. So why then do liberal and conservative evangelicals tend to disagree so often about economic issues? The answer most frequently given is that both sides simply baptize whatever political and economic views they already believe. While this is likely to be partially true, I don’t think it is a sufficient explanation for the views of more...
A Wesleyan Approach to Faith, Work, and Economic Transformation
“[Wealth] is an excellent gift of God, answering the noblest ends. In the hands of his children, it is food for the hungry, drink for the thirsty, raiment for the naked: It gives to the traveller and the stranger where to lay his head. By it we may supply the place of an husband to the widow, and of a father to the fatherless. We may be a defence for the oppressed, a means of health to the sick, of...
Video & Audio: Why Libertarians Need God
The 2014Acton Lecture Seriesgot underway last week with an address from Jay Richards on the topic of “Why Libertarians Need God.” In his address, Richards argued that core libertarian principles of individual rights, freedom and responsibility, reason, moral truth, and limited government make little sense in an atheistic and materialist context, but make far more sense when grounded in a theistic belief system. The video of the full lecture is available below; I’ve embedded the audio after the jump. ...
What Does Religious Liberty Stand Upon?
With everything from the HHS mandate to Duck Dynasty to Sister Wives, there is much in the news regarding religious liberty. What are we to make of it? Is religious liberty simply being tolerant of others’ religious choices? Michael Therrien, at First Things, wants to clear up the discussion, from the Catholic point of view. He starts by looking at an article quoting Camille Paglia, atheist, lesbian and university professor. In it, Paglia rushes to the defense of Phil Robertson,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved