Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The human rights threat and the North Korean Regime
The human rights threat and the North Korean Regime
Apr 23, 2026 4:10 PM

“North Korea –Pyongyang” by Stephan (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Update: The full interview is now available online.

What’s going on in North Korea? The First Issue of Religion & Liberty in 2017 will explore this question in depth. The main feature will be an interview with Suzanne Scholte, president of the Defense Forum Foundation. She has spent the last two decades fighting for the freedom, human rights, and dignity of the North Korean People and is considered one of the world’s leading activists. Along with 20 years of es a wealth of knowledge on North Korea, totalitarian regimes, and the plight of Korean refugees. Unfortunately, there wasn’t enough room in the print version of Religion & Liberty to run the entirety of the interview. As a preview for this publication — which will be available soon — enjoy a snippet of our conversation. A link will be added as soon as the entire issue is available online.

###

R&L: We are constantly seeing news out of North Korea, that is—for lack of a better phrase—bizarre. Articles about Kim Jong Un feeding his uncle to dogs and that sort of thing. Do you think the regime is that sadistic and cruel? Do you think we’re just so fascinated by a pletely cut off that we believe this could be going? Maybe a little of both?

Scholte: I think, yes, on all that. This regime is sadistic and cruel. Just talking about recent events, Chang Sŏng-t’aek, who was Kim Jong Un’s uncle, devoted his entire life to that regime and was successful in helping the regime and then all of a sudden he falls out of favor and is basically publicly humiliated and then brutally killed. It just shows the level of cruelty that this regime represents. There is, unfortunately, a tendency for people to pay attention to the suffering in North Korea because of the sensationalist stories. And some of them I’m not sure about. I do not believe he was fed to dogs; that report came out of China.

Part of the problem with reporting about North Korea, is that we cannot go and see the political prison camps. We cannot freely go and travel the country. We can only go there under close watch of the government. So it’s difficult to try to corroborate some of the stories. Sometimes the media will jump on some of the more sensational stories. One interesting thing about the defectors is that there’s a self-policing among them. They know that they were doubted. And therefore their credibility is always on the line. So they’re very careful, the defectors that I work with, they’re very careful to make sure that if we have a witness es over, that they’ve been vetted, and they’re really telling their true story.

We saw this happen with a terrible, terrible incident with a young man born in a prison camp, Shin Dong Hyok. It is a fact he was born in a political prison camp. It is a fact he suffered in the political prison camp. But he lied about which particular political camp he was in. I have a great deal passion for him, but I always was suspicious of his story because he wouldn’t work with the defectors that we’re close to, including other political prison camp survivors. And you know that when you’ve had a shared experience, you tend to want to be around people that have been through your same experience. We had hosted a number of survivors of the political prison camps, but he didn’t really want to be part of that. That was suspicious to me. They knew that some of the things he was saying were not true. But I do want to say that his story…what he went through was horrific—he is the living proof that children are in these camps. Another North Korean defector that we work very closely with, he is the living proof that children are sent to these camps. Because he was in a camp from 8 to 18 years old, because his grandfather was accused of showing disfavor to the regime and doubting the regime. So three generations of the family being sent to jail. But in conclusion, because we cannot go freely to North Korea and see with our own eyes, sometimes there will be stories that will be picked up that haven’t really been vetted properly. As a result, we are very careful about the witnesses that we bring to testify and speak in the United States.

Why do you think governments and Western journalists have put so much focus on the nuclear issue and not the human rights threat for the citizens of North Korea?

This has been a deadly and costly mistake from the very beginning. I mentioned the Congressional hearing we organized in 1999 on the North Korean political prison camps. Well, a reporter from Voice of America wrote this op-ed about that hearing and the Clinton Administration spiked it. The reporter was so upset he actually leaked it to me. So this is April 1999, “The Department of State does not clear the attached VOA editorial for the following reasons…” Number one, it’s not based on U.S. government verified information, only reports from defectors.” Big question mark. “A question of accuracy. Number two, the timing is not good. The four-party talks pleted and visit to underground construction site is ing,” which was their nuclear site. The policy of George W. Bush was the same as Bill Clinton’s: we have to reach a deal on the nuclear issue first, then, we can talk about human rights.

That has been a horrible mistake.

During all the talks whether Four Party talks or Six Party talks, millions of North Koreans have died. And, not talking about the human rights atrocities fed into the lie that the North Korean people tell their own citizens, which is we hate them. North Koreans are told by the regime that Americans are Yankee imperialist wolves that occupy South Korea, and they want to destroy them, and so we have to build these nuclear weapons, because the United States is ready to attack us. They’re evil people. And they’re occupying South Korea. We fed into that lie because we didn’t talk about these human rights issues. We kept talking about the nuclear issue. But this was the policy up until the latter years of the Bush Administration, when Ambassador Chris Hill, who was so bound and determined to have a nuclear deal with the North Koreans, sidelined human rights concerns, even though President Bush was very passionate about the North Korean human rights situation. But during the talks, they would not address these things at all. Because Chris Hill was bound and determined to have a negotiation on the nuclear issue. That was in the most recent years. The Obama Administration has been very careful to keep the focus on human rights and the nuclear issue and give them equal importance. During this period the North Korean defectors kept telling us, “They will never give up their nuclear weapons. They only use negotiation to extract aid.” Hwang Jang yop (highest ranking North Korean defector and author of juche ideology) said that in 1997 when he defected, “Human rights is their Achilles heel. Human rights is what you have to talk about. They’re killing their own people. They’re using you in these talks. And they’ll never give up their nuclear weapons.” Of course he said that years ago. Nobody listened to him. But we know that he was right. But at least e to that point now where we realize that.

Regarding journalists reporting on these issues, it is hard for journalists to report on this unless they’ve talked to the defectors, because Western journalists can’t go see a political prison camp. So that’s been part of the difficulty.

They can verify the existence of the political prison camps. We have satellite images. And that’s why through my work, I have put such an emphasis on bringing defectors hear, eyewitnesses, who can testify because you can’t go to the political prison camps and see them for yourself. But guess what? We can bring the camps to you by having you talk to Kim Young Sun, whose entire family was sent to a camp because she mentioned that she knew Kim Jong-il’s mistress. And she spent years in the camp and lost her entire family except for one son. You can talk to her and learn about the camps. I have this problem again, and again, and again. Trying to get reporters to pay attention to the story. But they want to see things with their own eyes.

It’s really difficult for journalists to get on-the-ground intelligence to be able to report about this because it’s so dangerous in the area and they can’t freely go to North Korea. So that’s another challenge.

What is the relationship between South Korea and China?

Actually it’s really great. South Korean culture including K-pop music is really popular in China. So they have a very good relationship. But China is very upset that South Korea wants to develop the missile defense system. So that’s caused a lot of tension right now. And also the fact that China blocks the Commission of Inquiries’ referral of Kim Jong-un to the International Criminal Court. They won’t support the human rights agenda, because China and Russia’s attitude is, “That’s not our job to interfere in how a nation deals with its own citizens.” They do not think that states at the UN and the Security Council have any right to talk about anybody’s human rights issues. And of course, what’s the whole purpose of the UN? It’s to promote security and human rights.

Editorial cartoon created by North Korean Regime shows Scholte approaching South Korea and attracting conservative flies with propaganda. Image courtesy of Suzanne Scholte.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A word from the man who inspired Greta Thunberg
As the leader of a Christian think tank in Sweden, Per Ewert watched Greta Thunberg’s global crusade unfold earlier than most of the world. But when he saw her demonstrating outside parliament with her school strike movement, he got a jolt: The book Greta was reading was co-written by … him. In a new essay for the Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website, Ewert writes: When I think of the school book Greta was reading when it all began,...
The sermons that sparked a socialist revolution
1917 was the year of socialist revolutions. In the United States, an abortive revolt took place in Oklahoma that August, fueled by revolutionaries twisting the Gospel. The “Green Corn Rebellion” took place August 2 and 3 in Seminole County, in the rural, central portion of the Sooner State. Two weeks earlier, the draft lottery had begun during World War I. Hundreds of members of the secretive Working Class Union – many of them under threat of violence from the WCU’s...
Acton Line rebroadcast: Alexis de Tocqueville’s enduring insights
Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy In America is renowned as one of the best examinations of early American society and politics, and remains one of the most mentaries ever written on the practice of democracy in the United States. In this edition of Acton Line, John Wilsey, Professor of History and Christian Apologetics at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, discusses Tocqueville’s masterwork and its continuing relevance for modern America. Wilsey also addresses the work of Tocqueville’s panion, Gustave de Beaumont, who wrote...
Remember the trees
In this week’s Acton Commentary I argue that pathos and politics isn’t enough to address the contemporary challenges of environmental stewardship in general and climate change in particular. I point to the necessity to recognize the gifts and responsibilities that God has given to humanity. This includes natural resources like trees and human endowments like ingenuity and creativity. And in case you think remembering the trees is too basic of an idea, I will say that I once attended an...
Boris Johnson emphasizes transatlantic links, optimistic post-Brexit future (video)
Despite a series of setbacks on the most important political issues of his day, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson still envisions a free, innovative future that links the transatlantic sphere in prosperity. He recently outlined his vision of a post-Brexit future that will unleash the creativity and wealth-creating powers of citizens on both sides of the Atlantic. Johnson made surprisingly forward-looking and optimistic remarks shortly after the Supreme Court of the UK ruled his decision to prorogue Parliament “unlawful.” The...
Pope Francis makes connection between aid and corruption
Much has been written about the unintended consequences of foreign aid flowing from the West to “developing” countries. Economists such as Dambisa Moyo, William Easterly, and Angus Deaton have mented on the downright pernicious effects of government to government aid. Not too long ago, a new voice was added to this chorus of foreign aid critics: Pope Francis. During his recent visit to the East African nation of Mozambique, Pope Francis made ments which suggested a link between foreign aid...
Angela Dills on Uber and the social good
In recent years, Uber and other ride-sharing services have caused a lot of turmoil in urban transportation markets that have long been dominated by traditional panies. And with the arrival of a disruptive force in a market, many questions arise: who benefits from the disruptions caused by new technologies? How do those technologies and services fit into markets that have traditionally been heavily regulated? And what level of regulation is appropriate for the new styles of services? Angela Dills, Professor...
What you need to know about Bernie Sanders’ ‘Tax on Extreme Wealth’
Senator Bernie Sanders announced his new “Tax on Extreme Wealth” proposal by tweeting, “Billionaires should not exist.” Under his wealth tax plan, far fewer would. Billionaires should not exist. — Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) September 24, 2019 There should be no billionaires. We are going to tax their extreme wealth and invest in working people. Read the plan: — Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) September 24, 2019 Here are the facts you need to know. What are the details of Sanders’ wealth tax?...
Adam Smith wasn’t laissez-faire: Samuel Gregg responds to Adrian Vermeule
To Adrian Vermeule, the theory at the core of liberalism is Adam Smith’s “invisible hand,” the name Smith gave to the process through which participants in the market indirectly benefit from the collective actions of self-interested individuals. Likewise, Vermeule argues, “Liberalism as a concrete sociopolitical order rests upon a series of invisible hand systems: petition in explicit economic markets, petition in the marketplace of ideas, petition among branches of government, and so on.” But using the invisible hand to define...
Creativity vs. innovation for the Christian entrepreneur (and beyond)
As human persons made in the image of a creative God, we are uniquely fashioned to produce and create, contribute and collaborate, give and receive, trade and exchange. Such a reality has a wide range of implications for our economic activity and institutions, whether in our daily work and mundane interactions or the pioneering of new products, services, and enterprises. Economists and policymakers have long had their eyes on such matters, of course—constantly observing and analyzing the role of creativity...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved