Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Greatest Country in the World: What is it to You?
The Greatest Country in the World: What is it to You?
Apr 26, 2025 12:32 AM

I believe that greatness, if defined by power, economic and cultural influence, requires us to acknowledge that the United States of America was once the greatest country in the world. However, as it ceases to lead the world in these areas – as one survey after another shows – and other countries take its place, it can no longer be considered the greatest. If we change our definition of “greatest” however, America might still be great.

I believe we need a new definition of greatness. Americans are known throughout the globe for patriotism, and this is not something of which to be ashamed. The United States, in its mere 239 years of existence, has built great things, has explored vast areas, has developed nothings into somethings, and has undeniably made enormous impacts on the world. Unfortunately, many Americans have taken this to the extreme, perhaps subconsciously, and have concluded that that is the end of the story. America is the best. Period.

This mentality has often bothered me. I was born and raised in Japan, reached adulthood in the States, and am currently living in Lithuania. I have been to almost 30 countries. Many people are stunned when I say that I do not plan on living my entire life in the United States. Many are taken aback by the fact that my love of culture and travel surpasses my patriotism for the country of my nationality, in my case, the United States.

This is mon exchange with people I meet throughout the world; which is what sparked my interest in this blog post. Where should my loyalties lie? And where do others’? Is it where we are from, or where we want to be? No matter how much love one has for their country, I think everyone would agree that no place is perfect. But what makes a country great?

I asked more than 80 millennials from around the world “What is the greatest country in the world and why?” The people I asked were from the 25 countries listed below.

The countries that they believed to be the greatest were as follows. (This is not a scientific study, nor is it displaying official data. It is a survey I did, with my peers from around the world, in order to gain a broader international perspective.)

As shown, their answers covered an extremely large area, and this is only from my small sample. Though their views of greatness clearly differed, there are certain traits that seemed to be universally valued; traits like freedom, influence and diversity. The thing that stood out the most in this data was that no two people’s definition of greatness was equal. In fact, from the majority of people, their answer included, in some form, that this is a difficult question because every country has its roses and its thorns. So, again, what makes a country great? Here is a roundup of recent surveys ranking countries based on different factors.

2015: Heritage Foundation ordered 178 countries by their economic freedom, the top 5 being Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia and Switzerland. Their measure of economic freedom was based on 4 factors: Rule of Law, Limited Government, Regulatory Efficiency, and Open Markets.

2015: Freedom House researched the freedom of countries, discovering that out of the 195 countries examined 89 (46 percent) were had freedom, 55 (28 percent) were listed as partly free, and only 51 (26 percent) as not free.

2014: The Huffington Post published an article listing the top most culturally rich and culturally influential countries in the world. The top 5 were listed as China, Spain, Italy, France and Mexico.

2013: Columbia University’s Earth Institute conducted a survey of the world’s happiest countries. They engaged in a new study of the economics of happiness and discovered that out of 156 countries, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Netherlands and Sweden were listed as the top five. The survey was on a scale of 1-10 and measured people’s general satisfaction in their lives.

2013: The Washington Post reported an examination of the most diverse and racially tolerant countries in the world. The top 20 most diverse were all African, while the most tolerant were American and Scandinavian countries, as well as Australia and the UK.

2013: Market Business News published an article listing the most powerful countries in the world. This is taking into consideration economic, military, population and technological capabilities along with energy security and foreign affairs. The top 5 were ranked as the U.S., China, Russia, France and Japan.

None of this data supports the claim that the United States is the greatest country in the world, nor does it support identifying any country as the greatest. All of this research has taken place in the last five years. They do not include the most powerful or influential countries throughout history. It is not arguable that the world in which we now live would be pletely different place without the influence of places like Ancient Greece; though there might be little evidence of Greece’s current influence, especially in the fields in which it once lead the world.

I believe that greatness is not something that any amount of surveys can define. There are great leaders, great films, great views, great food, great trains of thought, great historical events, and all of these would be defined differently depending on the person asked. Without civil society, however, no country can be great. Without the people, no war would be won, no ballot would be filled, no job would be done and no country could exist. This is why every dictator fails and why munist has a limit; they kill the personhood of the people, they abolish opinions, they silence debates, and they follow their own agenda, not the one needed or even wanted. Without civil society, without patriotism, to one’s own country or another, no country could be successful. Yes, there are measurable factors to calculate a country’s plishments, all countries are not equal; but I thought the most powerful answers to my survey were those who chose a country, not based on its influence or prosperity, but by their allegiance to that country. This is not to say that any country is great as long as one believes in it; but, any country could fail or prevail at any point. Perhaps there is something in the humility that must be included when calling any country truly great.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved