Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
Jul 11, 2026 1:06 PM

On Wednesday, rioters broke into the U.S. Capitol building, vandalized the halls of government, and caused mayhem that left five people dead, including Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick. These sickening scenes of destruction did e out of the blue. They grew naturally out of cascading failures rippling through the culture, the government, and the church.

The D.C. riots reveal the deep failure of the government. How could rioters breach the sanctuary of our republic? “Enormous strategic and planning failures” by multiple police forces under numerous layers of government according to Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, who chairs the panel responsible for funding the Capitol Police. He said that the D.C. Metropolitan Police – who are under the control of the local government – were supposed to join Capitol Police, the D.C. National Guard, and SWAT teams in preparations to assure the protesters would not be “anywhere near the Capitol” – a concern echoed by a “senior law enforcement official from a major department.” Instead, the Capitol Police erected a weak barrier and found themselves overwhelmed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday that the riots “represented a massive failure of institutions, protocols, and planning that are supposed to protect the first branch of our federal government.”

Those angered by the disparity between the National Guard’s response to the MAGA pared to Black Lives Matter protesters, or puzzled that law enforcement did not conduct background intelligence of the crowd, can thank D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. She insisted the government deploy only 114 National Guard members at a time and ordered, “No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance.” Instead, D.C. Metropolitan Police Chief Robert Contee said Guardsmen would be restricted to “crowd management” and overseeing traffic, mostly at the city’s Metro subway stations. “Under these authorities, the Guard was essentially acting like traffic cops,” one defense official told Time magazine. Incredibly, Bowser cited her response as proof that “we must get statehood.”

D.C.’s local government apparently made it harder to prevent furry-hatted invaders from storming the walls of a soon-to-be fully Democratic-controlled Congress. This is the territory progressives want to make the 51st state? Why should D.C. have a greater voice in ruling over all U.S. citizens when it cannot furnish the most basic government functions to its own? The District of Columbia’s abysmal performance in safeguarding the seat of our government should thoroughly discredit any push to grant it statehood.

The Capitol vandalism uncovers the failure of our coarsening political culture, which has normalized and celebrated political violence. Partisan hatred – which already burned intensely long before the 2016 election – sparked into depicting the president’s assassination or beheading, glorifying mass arson and looting as “reparations,” and intimidating a helpless couple who refused to mouth the political slogans of a crazed mob. This list of politicians mainstreaming the verbal or physical assault of their opponents, drawn up by Bill Donohue of the Catholic League, proves depressingly instructive.

The Capitol invaders uniquely embodied the failure of conservatism. Early claims that Antifa led the riots proved mistaken. Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, told Glenn Beck on Thursday morning that the vandals he saw “were just kind of normal people, but they got carried away.”

For the first time in modern history, political violence has e bipartisan.

Facial recognition software disclosed the presence of neo-Nazi members of the Alt-Right. True conservatives have protested through legal channels, because they hold with John Locke that “[l]iberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others; which cannot be where there is not law.”

Yet a growing number of pundits on the Right believe the ends justify trashing all legal barriers that stand in the way of their designs, including the U.S. Constitution. They have accepted the progressive (read: Marxist) belief that free speech and private property will be respected only if they advance one political ideology. The difference between those who barge into Nancy Pelosi’s office and those who want to use the levers of the state to seize private colleges’ endowments is one of degree, not of kind.

Most critically, the D.C. riots display the failure of faith. Presumably, some of those who stormed the U.S. Capitol are Christians. Believers must be subject to the authorities or risk resisting God mitting a parable to “witchcraft.” The fact that Christians are willing mit property damage demonstrates the grip that “the mystery of lawlessness” has over people of faith. In A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More expounds on why Christians should uphold the law for everyone:

Roper:So now you’d give the Devil benefit of law?

More:Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper:I’d cut down every law in England to do that!

More: Oh? And, when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat. This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast – man’s laws, not God’s – and, if you cut them down – and you’re just the man to do it – do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.

Obedience to secular authorities is never absolute. Christians must disobey laws forcing them promise their faith or morality. When Christians have no alternative but to choose between fealty to God or government, they follow God’s law – and, like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., they willingly suffer the penalty. “Unearned suffering is redemptive,” MLK said, because God’s grace let us “transform the suffering into a creative force.”

Christianity has always brought redemption out of righteous suffering. “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church,” wrote Tertullian. The blood spilled at the U.S Capitol on Wednesday sows only our impending social disintegration.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bradley Cited in News Roundup on Millenials Leaving Church
Last week, Rachel Held Evans wrote an article discussing millennials leaving the church. This piece quickly went viral prompting responses from mentators, debating “why those belonging to the millennial generation are leaving the church and what should be done about it.” Research fellow at Acton, Anthony Bradley, discusses Evans’ piece in “United Methodists Wearing A Millennial Evangelical Face.” Jeff Schapiro, at the Christian Post, discusses this debate and summarizes mentators’ opinions, including Bradley’s: Anthony Bradley, associate professor of Theology and...
The Rise of Free-Market Alternatives to Obamacare
Referring to the Affordable Care Act, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus (D-Mont.) stated earlier this year, “Unless we implement this properly, it’s going to be a train wreck.” And indeed, from looking at the Obamacare implementation timeline alone, the law seems to have gotten off to a shaky start. The implementation of the so-called employer mandate, which would require businesses with more than 50 workers to offer insurance to all full-time employees, or else pay a fine...
For America’s Elites, Religious Freedom is a Non-Issue
America’s Founding Fathers considered religious liberty to be our “first freedom.” But as Ken Blackwell notes, that view is no longer shared by our media and foreign policy elites: All such understandings of the religious freedom foundation of American civil liberty and foreign policy seem long forgotten by the elites of today. The media cares little about religious freedom. The famous Rothman-Lichter study of 1981 surveyed 240 journalists from the prestige press. Of course, 80 percent of them voted one...
Spirit-and-Body Economics
Over at the Kern Pastors Network, Greg Forster points to Rev. Robert Sirico’s speech from this year’s Acton University, drawing particularly on Sirico’s emphasis on Christian anthropology.“One may not say that we are spirits inside of flesh,” Sirico said, “but that we are spirits and flesh.” Forster summarizes: Christianity teaches that the human person is, in Sirico’s words, both corporeal and transcendent. We cannot make sense of ourselves if we are only bodies. How could a strictly material body think...
Do the Poor Vote for More Welfare?
A popular saying (often misattributed to Alexis de Tocqueville) states that a democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. If this is always the case then we should expect the poor to vote themselves even more welfare payments. However, as Dwight R. Lee explains, the desire for transfers that others will pay for has almost no effect on people’s voting behavior: This argument that a significant financial gain from...
Dispersing Poor People And Crime
Emily Badger at The Atlantic Wire posts mon sense story regarding the debate about whether or not the dispersing of poor people out of inner-city housing projects into suburban neighborhoods, through government housing voucher programs, increases crime rates. The article reflects recent research by Michael Lens, an assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA. A growing stack of research now supports [the] hypothesis that housing vouchers do not in fact lead to crime. Lens has just added another study to...
Lord Acton and America’s Moral Absolutes Concerning Liberty
Lord Acton once said of the American revolution: “No people was so free as the insurgents, no government less oppressive than the government which they overthrew.” It was America’s high view of liberty and its ideas that cultivated this unprecedented freedom ripe for flourishing. Colonists railed over 1 and 2 percent tax rates and were willing to take up arms in a protracted and bloody conflict to secure independence and self-government. In a chapter on Lord Acton in The Moral...
Was Gordon Gekko Catholic?
Is greed really good? Does self-interest equal sin? Samuel Gregg takes on these questions at Aleteia.org, in an excerpt from his new book, Tea Party Catholic: the Catholic Case for Limited Government, a Free Economy and Human Flourishing. In many ways, the free economy does rely upon people pursuing their self-interest rather than being immediately focused upon promoting the wellbeing of others. One response to this challenge is to recognize that fallen humanity cannot realize perfect justice in this world....
Disability and Discipleship: God Don’t Make No Junk
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Disability, Service, and Stewardship,” I write, “Our service of others may or may not be recognized by the marketplace as something valuable or worth paying for. But each one of us has something to offer someone else. All of us have ministries of one kind or another. Our very existence itself must be seen as a blessing from God.” During a sermon a couple weeks ago at my church, the preacher made an important point...
What Distributists Get Wrong
Last week, we took a look at what distributists get right in terms of economics, through the eyes of David Deavel at Intercollegiate Review. Now, Deavel discusses where distributism goes off the rails in that same series. It is a rather long list, but here are the highlights. First, Deavel says that simple economics escapes distributists. Despite the fact that economics teaches that actions in the real world have real world consequences, distributists tend to ignore this fact. They scoff...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved