Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
Mar 11, 2026 9:32 AM

On Wednesday, rioters broke into the U.S. Capitol building, vandalized the halls of government, and caused mayhem that left five people dead, including Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick. These sickening scenes of destruction did e out of the blue. They grew naturally out of cascading failures rippling through the culture, the government, and the church.

The D.C. riots reveal the deep failure of the government. How could rioters breach the sanctuary of our republic? “Enormous strategic and planning failures” by multiple police forces under numerous layers of government according to Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, who chairs the panel responsible for funding the Capitol Police. He said that the D.C. Metropolitan Police – who are under the control of the local government – were supposed to join Capitol Police, the D.C. National Guard, and SWAT teams in preparations to assure the protesters would not be “anywhere near the Capitol” – a concern echoed by a “senior law enforcement official from a major department.” Instead, the Capitol Police erected a weak barrier and found themselves overwhelmed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday that the riots “represented a massive failure of institutions, protocols, and planning that are supposed to protect the first branch of our federal government.”

Those angered by the disparity between the National Guard’s response to the MAGA pared to Black Lives Matter protesters, or puzzled that law enforcement did not conduct background intelligence of the crowd, can thank D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. She insisted the government deploy only 114 National Guard members at a time and ordered, “No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance.” Instead, D.C. Metropolitan Police Chief Robert Contee said Guardsmen would be restricted to “crowd management” and overseeing traffic, mostly at the city’s Metro subway stations. “Under these authorities, the Guard was essentially acting like traffic cops,” one defense official told Time magazine. Incredibly, Bowser cited her response as proof that “we must get statehood.”

D.C.’s local government apparently made it harder to prevent furry-hatted invaders from storming the walls of a soon-to-be fully Democratic-controlled Congress. This is the territory progressives want to make the 51st state? Why should D.C. have a greater voice in ruling over all U.S. citizens when it cannot furnish the most basic government functions to its own? The District of Columbia’s abysmal performance in safeguarding the seat of our government should thoroughly discredit any push to grant it statehood.

The Capitol vandalism uncovers the failure of our coarsening political culture, which has normalized and celebrated political violence. Partisan hatred – which already burned intensely long before the 2016 election – sparked into depicting the president’s assassination or beheading, glorifying mass arson and looting as “reparations,” and intimidating a helpless couple who refused to mouth the political slogans of a crazed mob. This list of politicians mainstreaming the verbal or physical assault of their opponents, drawn up by Bill Donohue of the Catholic League, proves depressingly instructive.

The Capitol invaders uniquely embodied the failure of conservatism. Early claims that Antifa led the riots proved mistaken. Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, told Glenn Beck on Thursday morning that the vandals he saw “were just kind of normal people, but they got carried away.”

For the first time in modern history, political violence has e bipartisan.

Facial recognition software disclosed the presence of neo-Nazi members of the Alt-Right. True conservatives have protested through legal channels, because they hold with John Locke that “[l]iberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others; which cannot be where there is not law.”

Yet a growing number of pundits on the Right believe the ends justify trashing all legal barriers that stand in the way of their designs, including the U.S. Constitution. They have accepted the progressive (read: Marxist) belief that free speech and private property will be respected only if they advance one political ideology. The difference between those who barge into Nancy Pelosi’s office and those who want to use the levers of the state to seize private colleges’ endowments is one of degree, not of kind.

Most critically, the D.C. riots display the failure of faith. Presumably, some of those who stormed the U.S. Capitol are Christians. Believers must be subject to the authorities or risk resisting God mitting a parable to “witchcraft.” The fact that Christians are willing mit property damage demonstrates the grip that “the mystery of lawlessness” has over people of faith. In A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More expounds on why Christians should uphold the law for everyone:

Roper:So now you’d give the Devil benefit of law?

More:Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper:I’d cut down every law in England to do that!

More: Oh? And, when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat. This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast – man’s laws, not God’s – and, if you cut them down – and you’re just the man to do it – do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.

Obedience to secular authorities is never absolute. Christians must disobey laws forcing them promise their faith or morality. When Christians have no alternative but to choose between fealty to God or government, they follow God’s law – and, like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., they willingly suffer the penalty. “Unearned suffering is redemptive,” MLK said, because God’s grace let us “transform the suffering into a creative force.”

Christianity has always brought redemption out of righteous suffering. “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church,” wrote Tertullian. The blood spilled at the U.S Capitol on Wednesday sows only our impending social disintegration.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘A habit of the heart’: Michael Novak on social justice
What is “social justice”? For some, it represents an ideal or a vision of a certain kind of society. For others, it’s a placeholder for particular government policies. For others, it’s a mere marker of ideology. For Michael Novak, the answer is “none of the above.” In his final book, Social Justice Isn’t What You Think It Is,published prior to his recent passing, Novak argues that social justice is a virtue — a “habit of the heart” that is “embodied...
Radio Free Acton: Scott Lincicome on how free trade benefits everyone
On this edition of Radio Free Acton, international trade attorney and Cato Institute Adjunct Scholar Scott e joins us to give us the real story on the benefits of international trade for the United States, and dispels some myths about the impacts of trade on U.S. industry and consumers. Often, free trade is portrayed as the enemy of American workers, stealing away jobs and creating massive trade deficits. e explains that while free trade does contribute to the process of...
Interview: Rev. Robert Sirico on Pope Francis and ‘Poverty Inc.’
In a recent interview on The Soul of Enterprise Radio Show, Acton President and Co-founder Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Ron Baker and Ed Kless about the free economy and Acton’s unique role in upholding individual freedom and human dignity. In the first segment, Rev. Sirico discussed his book Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy as well as its recent translation into Italian. Additionally, Ed asked Rev. Sirico about his meeting with Pope Francis. Rev....
How price controls can hurt the poor
Note: This is post #25 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Suppose there is a mild winter on the West Coast and a harsh winter on the East Coast, says Alex Tabarrok, in this video by Marginal Revolution University. As a result of the weather, people on the East Coast will demand more home heating oil, bidding up the price. Under the price system, entrepreneurs will be incentivized to take oil from where it has lower value on...
Explainer: What’s the difference between a free trade union and a customs union?
On Monday, Great Britain stood poised to enact Brexit with Her Majesty’s blessing. UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that her government would send the letter officially triggering the UK’s exit from the European Union, in accordance with Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, on March 29 – more than nine months after the British people voted to extract themselves from the global governance institution. The notification will touch off a two-year-long period of negotiations that will determine the UK’s...
Is foreign aid a sacred cow?
Last week a group of 106 faith leaders have collaborated on a letter they have signed and sent to the Democrat and Republican leadership of both houses of Congress. In this week’s Acton Commentary, Victor V. Claar explains that it hasn’t been aid that has lifted people out of poverty, but trade and access to markets. While many of the world’s politicians would like to take credit for cutting extreme global poverty in half in just 20 years, and the...
What is the role of tradition in renewing Western civilization?
Does tradition harm progress? Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, in a recent article for Library of Law and Liberty, describes “tradition” as the handing down of beliefs, cultural molds, and historical ways of thinking and living, but also as a means to promoting human flourishing in renewing civilization. He affirms that valuable wisdom that can be found in looking to past traditions, including traditions on either end of the political spectrum. In his search to define tradition and answer...
Explainer: What you should know about the Meals on Wheels controversy
Embed from Getty Images What’s the story? Last week, numerous media outlets falselyreported that the Trump administration proposed 2018 budget would eliminate charities like Meals on Wheels. The reports also claimedthat White House budget director Mick Mulvaney had said during a press conference that Meals on Wheels “doesn’t work.” (Representative headlines included Time’s “Trump’s Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens” and Slate’s article: “Trump’s budget director says Meals on Wheels doesn’t work.” What is “Meals...
Pope Francis and populism: How Christian leaders should respond to populism
In a recent article for the Federalist, Samuel Gregg discusses Pope Francis’s ments on populism. Pope Francis explicitly denounces populism saying: “Populism is evil and ends badly, as the past century shows.” However, Gregg points out that many populist sentiments could be attributed to this Pope: Nor are some of Francis’s principal supporters averse to invoking populist language when defending his program for the Catholic Church. Consider, for example, Archbishop Victor Fernández. The Argentine theologian is close enough to the...
Judge Gorsuch, the rule of law, and David Foster Wallace’s fish
Embed from Getty Images “We’re now like David Foster Wallace’s fish,” said Judge Neil Gorsuch earlier today in his nomination hearing. “We’re surrounded by the rule of law, it’s in the fabric of our lives.” Gorsuch made a similar claim in an article on “Law’s Irony” for theHarvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. The judge wondered “whether the law’s greatest irony might just be the hope obscured by the cynic’s shadow” and “whether cynicism about the law flourishes so...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved