Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
The four cultural crises revealed by the D.C. riots
Jul 28, 2026 10:50 PM

On Wednesday, rioters broke into the U.S. Capitol building, vandalized the halls of government, and caused mayhem that left five people dead, including Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick. These sickening scenes of destruction did e out of the blue. They grew naturally out of cascading failures rippling through the culture, the government, and the church.

The D.C. riots reveal the deep failure of the government. How could rioters breach the sanctuary of our republic? “Enormous strategic and planning failures” by multiple police forces under numerous layers of government according to Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, who chairs the panel responsible for funding the Capitol Police. He said that the D.C. Metropolitan Police – who are under the control of the local government – were supposed to join Capitol Police, the D.C. National Guard, and SWAT teams in preparations to assure the protesters would not be “anywhere near the Capitol” – a concern echoed by a “senior law enforcement official from a major department.” Instead, the Capitol Police erected a weak barrier and found themselves overwhelmed. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday that the riots “represented a massive failure of institutions, protocols, and planning that are supposed to protect the first branch of our federal government.”

Those angered by the disparity between the National Guard’s response to the MAGA pared to Black Lives Matter protesters, or puzzled that law enforcement did not conduct background intelligence of the crowd, can thank D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. She insisted the government deploy only 114 National Guard members at a time and ordered, “No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance.” Instead, D.C. Metropolitan Police Chief Robert Contee said Guardsmen would be restricted to “crowd management” and overseeing traffic, mostly at the city’s Metro subway stations. “Under these authorities, the Guard was essentially acting like traffic cops,” one defense official told Time magazine. Incredibly, Bowser cited her response as proof that “we must get statehood.”

D.C.’s local government apparently made it harder to prevent furry-hatted invaders from storming the walls of a soon-to-be fully Democratic-controlled Congress. This is the territory progressives want to make the 51st state? Why should D.C. have a greater voice in ruling over all U.S. citizens when it cannot furnish the most basic government functions to its own? The District of Columbia’s abysmal performance in safeguarding the seat of our government should thoroughly discredit any push to grant it statehood.

The Capitol vandalism uncovers the failure of our coarsening political culture, which has normalized and celebrated political violence. Partisan hatred – which already burned intensely long before the 2016 election – sparked into depicting the president’s assassination or beheading, glorifying mass arson and looting as “reparations,” and intimidating a helpless couple who refused to mouth the political slogans of a crazed mob. This list of politicians mainstreaming the verbal or physical assault of their opponents, drawn up by Bill Donohue of the Catholic League, proves depressingly instructive.

The Capitol invaders uniquely embodied the failure of conservatism. Early claims that Antifa led the riots proved mistaken. Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, told Glenn Beck on Thursday morning that the vandals he saw “were just kind of normal people, but they got carried away.”

For the first time in modern history, political violence has e bipartisan.

Facial recognition software disclosed the presence of neo-Nazi members of the Alt-Right. True conservatives have protested through legal channels, because they hold with John Locke that “[l]iberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others; which cannot be where there is not law.”

Yet a growing number of pundits on the Right believe the ends justify trashing all legal barriers that stand in the way of their designs, including the U.S. Constitution. They have accepted the progressive (read: Marxist) belief that free speech and private property will be respected only if they advance one political ideology. The difference between those who barge into Nancy Pelosi’s office and those who want to use the levers of the state to seize private colleges’ endowments is one of degree, not of kind.

Most critically, the D.C. riots display the failure of faith. Presumably, some of those who stormed the U.S. Capitol are Christians. Believers must be subject to the authorities or risk resisting God mitting a parable to “witchcraft.” The fact that Christians are willing mit property damage demonstrates the grip that “the mystery of lawlessness” has over people of faith. In A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More expounds on why Christians should uphold the law for everyone:

Roper:So now you’d give the Devil benefit of law?

More:Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper:I’d cut down every law in England to do that!

More: Oh? And, when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you – where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat. This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast – man’s laws, not God’s – and, if you cut them down – and you’re just the man to do it – do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.

Obedience to secular authorities is never absolute. Christians must disobey laws forcing them promise their faith or morality. When Christians have no alternative but to choose between fealty to God or government, they follow God’s law – and, like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., they willingly suffer the penalty. “Unearned suffering is redemptive,” MLK said, because God’s grace let us “transform the suffering into a creative force.”

Christianity has always brought redemption out of righteous suffering. “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church,” wrote Tertullian. The blood spilled at the U.S Capitol on Wednesday sows only our impending social disintegration.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The End of Secularism and the HHS Mandate
The primary point of my first book, The End of Secularism, was to demonstrate that secularism doesn’t do what it claims to do, which is to solve the problem of religious difference. As I look at the administration’s attempt to mandate that religious employers pay for contraceptive products, I see that they have confirmed one of my charges in the book. I wrote that secularists claim that they are occupying a neutral position in the public square, but in reality...
Creeping Crony Corporatism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Corrupted Capitalism and the Housing Crisis,” I contend we need to add some categories to our thinking about political economy. In this case, the idea of “corporatism” helps understand a good deal of what we see in the American system today. Adding corporatism to our quiver helps us to make some more nuanced distinctions than simple “socialism” and “capitalism” allow. Take, for instance, Mitt Romney’s contention this week while campaigning in Michigan that the bailouts...
Madison on Religious Conscience
The HHS Mandate is troubling to so many simply because it’s a clear Constitutional violation. Any basic understanding of Constitutional rights and our religious freedom sees that this is primarily about religious liberty, and not solely an issue concerning contraceptives or Roman Catholics. Last week we heard from James Madison on religious liberty in my post “Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?” In 1792, Madison wrote an essay titled “Property” in the National Gazette. This is a brilliant piece by Madison...
Gleaner Technology
Gleaning is the traditional Biblical practice of gathering crops that would otherwise be left in the fields to rot, or be plowed under after harvest. The biblical mandate for the es from Deuteronomy 24:19, When you reap your harvest in your field and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it. It shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work...
The “Right to Be Insured” Trumps Religious Liberty?
New York pundit Al Sharpton and California Senator Barbara Boxer agree: The “right” to insurance paid for by an employer trumps freedom of conscience and religion. Senator Boxer warned yesterday that if the HHS contraception mandate was repealed it would set a dangerous precedence of religious rights trumping the right to be insured. On MSNBC’s Politics Nation with Al Sharpton last night, Boxer affirmed that under the proposed amendment proposed by Sen. Roy Blunt, an employer would not be forced...
Befuddled Bureaucrats on the Bayou
I’ve tried to stay on top of the federal government’s response to natural disasters here at Acton. I’ve written a number mentaries, blog posts, and a story in Religion & Liberty covering the issue. “Spiritual Labor and the Big Spill” specifically addressed the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. For extensive background on this short clip of Bobby Jindal at CPAC 2012, see my post “Bobby Jindal on Centralized Disaster Response.” ...
Gleaner Tech #1: Solar Bottle Lights in the Philippines
[Note: This is the first in an occasional series on gleaner technology.] In the Philippines, the cost of electricity often means poor citizens are left in the dark—even when the sun is shining. Social entrepreneur Illac Diaz e up with an indigenous and ingenious solution for lighting problems in the country’s e areas: He use plastic bottles, water, and chlorine to lighten up the dark homes of poor. The solution provides both a cheap source of lighting and environmentally friendly...
Subsidiarity vs. Soft Totalitarianism
While the recent contraceptive mandate controversy has exposed the Obama Administration’s disregard for religious freedoms, it has also reveled their natural disdain for subsidiarity. As George Weigel notes, this incident tells us “something very important, and very disturbing, about the cast of mind in the Executive Branch.” It is no exaggeration to describe that cast of mind as “soft totalitarianism”: an effort to eliminate the vital role in health care, education and social service played by the institutions of civil...
How Conservatives Fight Poverty
At Public Discourse, Ryan T. Anderson reviews Lawrence Mead’s From Prophecy to Charity: How to Help the Poor: The loudest voices in our national debates about political economy tend to be libertarians and social welfare statists. To our detriment, most public policy discussions are filtered through these two lenses. At the same time, we tend to conflate the policy issues facing our nation as if they were one and the same. But consider the range of America’s political-economic challenges: How...
Politicians and the Pursuit of Happiness
In this week’s Acton Commentary I conclude, “The American people do not need politicians to tell them what happiness is and how it should be pursued.” I admit that I didn’t have this quote in mind (or I would have used it!), but Art Carden (follow him here and read him here) notes the following from Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: What is the species of domestic industry which his capital can employ, and of which the produce is likely...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved