Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The economics of Downton Abbey
The economics of Downton Abbey
Dec 30, 2025 3:16 AM

The wildly-popular BBC production, “Downton Abbey” has offices buzzing on Monday mornings. Like the “Upstairs, Downstairs” of old, “Downton” provides the viewer with two distinct lifestyles in one house: that of Lord and Lady of the manor and of the staff that runs the place.

Despite the lavish lifestyle of the fictitious Grantham family, Great Britain in the 1920s was economically stagnant. One percent of the nation held two-thirds of the nation’s wealth, but weren’t investing it. The ruling elite was financially idle – giving and attending parties, while thinking they were doing their part by employing scads of household servants. Running an actual business? Actually creating jobs? Beneath one’s station in life.

The world was shifting: Agrarian-based economies were being phased out as scientific advances gave way to modern production. The British failed to see this. While British youngsters were steeped in Victorian mythology, Germans schools were cranking out scientists and mathematicians. While the United States was enjoying the “Roaring Twenties,” England was suffering from massive unemployment and growing inefficiency in an increasingly mechanized world. Americans were mad for motor cars, but the British elite were slow to pop the clutch, preferring the slower pace of life money afforded them. After all, where did one need to go in such a hurry? They were simply thankful the war was over, and all could return to “normal.”

In the latest episode, the viewer is teased with the troubling fact that new son-in-law Matthew has discovered a tangled mess of finances that the current lord of the manor chooses to ignore. No need to figure it out, in Lord Grantham’s mind: The place is still standing, there’s money in the bank, and the servant staff is up to full-speed. All is right with the world.

Dame Maggie Smith plays the irresistibly cranky Dowager Countess. In the world she inhabits, she and others like her sit atop the heap of old money, with rigid etiquette and severely drawn social lines keeping everything just so. She knows the role the Abbey and its wealthy inhabitants play: “An aristocrat with no servants is as much use to the county as a glass hammer.” Her son, Lord Grantham, is also quite clear on his role in life: “My fortune is the work of others, who labored to build a great dynasty. Do I have the right to destroy their work, or impoverish that dynasty? I am a custodian, my dear, not an owner. I must strive to be worthy of the task I have been set.” A custodian maintains; his role is not necessarily to improve.

“Downton Abbey” is more than just a pretty picture of days of yore; it’s a morality play. The Dowager Countess and her son, Lord Grantham, know their duty: to take care of those beneath them. Today, the European Union acts much the same way. Samuel Gregg, in ing Europe, points out that Western Europe has long held to the social contract and economic culture that provides a “strong welfare state and implement[s] a range of redistributionist policies.” For the residents of “Downton,” it means the servants are provided a place to live and work for life, while recognizing their station in life is not likely to change. As Gregg says, this creates “ … a mutually supportive embrace which many are reluctant to abandon, even when the embrace is evidently undermining the foundations of long-term economic prosperity.”

Great Britain undertook massive insurance and pension schemes in the early 1900s. By 1911, they had unemployment insurance pulsory medical insurance. Tocqueville called this sort of thing “soft despotism” — “the people’s voluntary surrender of their liberty in return for material ease.” The languishing lifestyle of the Granthams of “Downton Abbey” is now within the grasp of all Brits – surely, equality at its best.

The Great Depression and another war brought about the end of places like “Downton Abbey.” The upkeep of such enormous estates became too much for one family, especially one with no e. The lords and ladies had to get jobs (trading their family inheritance for a politician’s pension) and the kitchen staff and livery boys went into manufacturing.

That’s not the end of the story, though. The European welfare state lives on, and once again a lifestyle of relative ease is creeping towards an economic cliff. Great Britain (and the rest of the EU) simply cannot afford to keep paying money out in the form of pensions, unemployment, socialized health care pulsory redistribution. Money goes out, but no money ing in – the same crisis Lord Grantham refuses to face.

Again, it is the Dowager Countess who has the most sensible thing to say. Putting it bluntly to her recently-dumped granddaughter, she says, “Stop whining and find something to do.” Here’s hoping Europe in 2013 can hear that phrase echo from the halls of “Downton Abbey” a century ago.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Economic Freedom Isn’t Enough
We know that, for economies to thrive, people must be free to start their own businesses without taxing regulations, that free trade must be the de facto means of doing business, and that cronyism and corruption must be eradicated. But that’s not enough. At the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, blogger (and former Acton intern) Elise Amyx says we have to have human flourishing as well. Economic freedom is only ponent of human flourishing. We should think about it...
How Anti-Catholic Bias From 140 Years Ago Affects Our Religious Freedom Today
Eleven years ago this week, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Locke v. Davey that continues to have a detrimental impact on religious liberty. But the seeds for that ruling were planted 140 years ago, in another attempt to curb religious liberty. When James Blaine introduced his ill-fated constitutional amendment in 1875, he probably never would have imagined the unintended consequences it would have over a hundred years later. Blaine wanted to prohibit the use of state funds...
Death And Redemption In Ukraine
Bohdan Solchanyk was not a materialistic young man. He did not seek worldly pleasures, but rather took delight in his studies, his fiancee, his faith. What Bohdan wanted -what they both wanted – was live in the Ukraine with dignity and freedom. Bohdan’s dream died last week at a peaceful protest against the government, where he and 80 others were “brutally shot and killed by government snipers in the central square of the capital of Ukraine, as the world’s TV...
Religious Activists Push Back Against ‘Blunt Instrument’ of Fossil Fuels Divestment
Your faithful correspondent last week exposed the fossil-fuel divestment endgame of religious shareholder activists. As You Sow President Danielle Fugere sees her group’s activities as awareness-raising exercises for climate change, but AYS’s alignment with environmentalist and divestment firebrand Naomi Klein suggests they’d settle for nothing less than nationalizing panies. This week, I’m happy to report another group frequently called to task in this space, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, opposes the AYS divestment onslaught. Reporting in last week’s Wall...
Marie Harf May Have Stumbled Into Something
I do not believe Marie Harf is an eloquent speaker, but I did think her “jobs for ISIS” remarks made some sense. We know that in American cities, for instance, if young men do not have education and jobs, they get into mischief. The kind of mischief that includes gangs and drugs and violence. Why would we expect that young men in Libya, Iraq, and elsewhere would be any different? Apparently, I’m not the only one. While others have sneered...
Radically Communitarian Islam
Graeme Wood’s excellent piece in The Atlantic has justly been making the rounds for the past week or so. It is well worth reading with a number of insights and points that strike at the heart of the contemporary conflict between modernity and religious violence. mend “What ISIS Really Wants” to your reading. (Rasha al Aqeedi’s “Caliphatalism,” which looks more closely at the situation in Mosul, makes a panion read.) One of the elements of Wood’s piece that stuck out...
Florist Chooses Conscience Over Settlement
Last year Washington State’s Attorney General sued Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts on the basis of consumer protection. Florist Barronelle Stutzman had refused to sell flowers to a long time customer when the arrangements were to be used for a same-sex marriage ceremony. Although Stutzman did not have any qualms about serving serving gay customers, she “didn’t want to be involved in a same-sex marriage.” “I just put my hands on his and told [the customer who made the request] because...
First Comprehensive Health Study Of Trafficking Victims Reveals Complex Needs
The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the International Organization for Migration has just published the prehensive study regarding the health of human trafficking victims. The study, which looked at men, women and children, reveals that victims of both labor and sex trafficking have severe plex health concerns. The study was carried out in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam, working with people who had been rescued and were entering programs for victims of human trafficking. Researchers asked participants about...
Does Innovation Triumph Over Regulation?
Do government regulations squelch marketplace innovation? A new study from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Nathan Goldschlag and George Mason University’s Alex Tabarrok says, “Not really.” According to Ryan Young at the Competitive Enterprise Institute: …the underlying institutions of social cooperation, market exchange, and dynamism are strong enough that federal regulation has, according to Goldschlag and Tabarrok’s analysis, so far been unable to squelch them. Just as a balloon pressed on one end pushes air to the other end, people will...
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
During last night’s Oscar ceremony, Best Supporting Actresswinner Patricia Arquette used her acceptance speech to rail against unfair pay for women: To every women who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time … to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America. The wage equality that Arquette is referring to is the gender wage gap—the difference...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved