Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Economics of Bedford Falls (Part II)
The Economics of Bedford Falls (Part II)
Feb 11, 2026 4:25 AM

[Note: This is the second post in a series highlighting some of the financial aspects and broad economic lessons of Frank Capra’s holiday classic, It’s a Wonderful Life. You can find part one here and part three here.]

George’s Life Savings in a Life Insurance Policy

George attempts to secure a loan from Potter based on his life insurance policy. He says it has a $15,000 face value and a $500 cash value. Why is his life insurance policy worth cash?

George has atype of insurance policy—whole life insurance—that is guaranteed to remain in force for the insured’s “whole lifetime,” provided the required premiums are paid, or to the maturity date. As the New York Department of Financial Services explains,

The face amount is the amount of coverage you wish to provide your beneficiaries in the event of death. The cash value is the value that builds up in the policy. The minimum cash values are set by the Insurance Law and reflect an accumulation of your premiums after allowances pany expenses and claims. When you are young, your premiums are more than the cost of insuring your life at that time. Over time the cash value grows, usually tax-deferred, and the owner may be allowed access to that money in the form of a policy loan or payment of the cash value. The face amount of your policy will be higher than your cash value especially in the early years of your policy. If you surrender your policy you will receive the cash value not the face amount. If you die your beneficiaries will receive the face amount.

George could have cashed out the policy and received $500. But he was, as he says, “worth more dead than alive” since his family could get $15,000 if he died.

But would the pany have paid if mitted suicide? Maybe so. Many policies have a “suicide clause” which states that no death benefit will be paid if the mits suicide within two years of taking out a policy.IfGeorge had the policy for more than two years (which is likely since it was worth $500) his family would have received the full benefit.

The Wealth-Building Benefits of Bailey Park

The primary legacy of the Bailey Bros. Building and Loan is Bailey Park, a housing subdivision that Mr. Potter’s crony refers to as, “Dozens of the prettiest little homes you ever saw.” This section of houses on the outskirts of town seems to be the main buffer than prevents Bedford Falls from turning into the dystopian vision of Pottersville. But how exactly does it do that? By helping the residents create wealth.

Bailey Park provided the customers not only the ability toafford a home of their home, but also provided them a a form of forced savings. By paying monthly principal payments on a mortgage, the homeowner accumulates equity in a valuable asset (the home) that can later be resold or used as collateral for a loan. Since the residents of Bailey Park got the mortgage through the Building and Loan, they likely paid a relatively low interest rate, allowing them to accumulate equity relatively quickly since their monthly payments would primarily go to paying principal rather than interest.

They also benefit from appreciation on their asset (i.e., the house).And that’s just what happened to the house in Bailey Park. As Potter’s crony, Mr. Reinman says, “Every one of these homes is worth twice what it cost the Building and Loan to build.” If they buy the house for $5,000 and it appreciates in value to $10,000 they could sell the house, pay off the loan, and pocket the rest of the money.

Bailey Park also took money out of the hands of Potter since, as Reinman points out, “Ninety per cent [of Bailey Park homes are] owned by suckers who used to pay rent to you.” When they lived in Potter’s Field, they were likely paying rent that was equal to what they paid on mortgage in Bailey Park. Since most of the people are working class or poorer, they likely didn’t have much additional disposable e that could go toward savings. The forced savings of homeownership was the main way they increased their wealth, improved their living standards, and raised the economic prospects of Bedford Falls.

But the B&L also had an indirect effect in preventing Bedford Falls from turning into Pottersville. As Potter says took control of many business in the area during the panic of the depression. If it hadn’t been for the B&L, people like Mr. Gower, the pharmacist, and Giuseppe Martini, the bar owner, would have likely lost their businesses to Potter.

By helping to create wealth that was distributed broadly among the citizens, the Bailey Bros. Building and Loan benefited the munity.

See also: Part I and Part III

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The $15 minimum wage is most likely to hurt ‘economically weaker’ areas
The scenario is familiar: Ontario has passed legislation to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and a new report warns that could increase unemployment. Significant evidence reinforces concerns that this well-intentioned change will harm the poor. Premier Kathleen Wynne announced the minimum wage would rise from $11.40 to $15 an hour across Canada’s most populous province by 2019. That boosts the minimum by nearly one-third. A new report from the Fraser Institute warns such a steep hike leads...
Booth: This reform would improve the ecological, and human, environment
To be good citizens, faithful people must examine policies’ results, not just their intentions.One overly intrusive environmentalist policy alone has prevented the poor from accessing adequate housing and, ironically, reduced the diversity of the environment. If excluding the vulnerable from the economy is evil, as Pope Francis has written, then new approaches are needed, writesPhilip Booth,a distinguished British professor of finance in a new essay forReligion & Liberty Transatlantic. He begins by opening an earnest dialogue with the pontiff’s social...
Why we should reject the erroneous idea that ‘error has no rights’
A recent poll revealed that a near majority of Americans believe free speech should not be extended to extremist groups. Another poll found that a large number of citizens favor permitting the courts to fine news media outlets for publishing or broadcasting stories that are biased or inaccurate. (Almost half of Republicans (45 percent) would favor such a policy, and 35 percent say they simply haven’t heard enough to say.) And in Russia, the government has banned the religious group...
Rev. Robert Sirico praises President Trump’s recent remarks about Venezuela
President and Co-Founder of the Acton Institute, Rev. Robert Sirico is quoted in an article published at Crux, praising President Trump for his remarks concerning Venezuela’s current social and economic state of chaos. “The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented,” said Trump on Tuesday in his first address to the General Assembly of the United Nations. Sirico tells Crux that he was “relieved and encouraged to hear President...
Millennials, marriage, and the ‘success sequence’
“What if large causes of poverty are not matters of material distribution but are behavioral — bad choices and the cultures that produce them? If so, policymakers must rethink their confidence in social salvation through economic abundance.” –George Will According to a recent report from the U.S. Census Bureau, the values and priorities of young adults are shifting dramatically from those of generations past. As it relates to family in particular, millennials are pursuing a range of nontraditional routes, either...
Samuel Gregg: ‘First Things,’ R.R. Reno, and the market economy
The role of free market economics in the West should not be off-limits for debate among religious conservatives. As Samuel Gregg writes in a new essay, that standard should “provide philosophical and theological guidance about how to ground free economies—and liberal institutions more generally—upon more solid foundations than the peculiar mixes of utilitarianism, autonomy-for-autonomy’s sake, and pseudo-evolutionary theory advocated by some liberal thinkers.” In a new article, First Things editor R. R. Reno makes claims about the market economy and...
Radio Free Acton: Mollie Ziegler Hemingway on fake news; Upstream on Fleet Foxes and R.E.M.
In this newest edition of Radio Free Acton, Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist, talks with Sarah Stanley, managing editor at the Acton Institute. Mollie explains how distrust for news in the media has grown and how integrity in journalism can be reclaimed. Mollie’s conversation with Sarah is a sampling of an ing Acton lecture series event taking place on September 28th. Bruce Edward Walker then speaks with writer and musician, Robert Dean Lurie about the newest Fleet...
The connection between property rights and religious freedom
According to Founding Father James Madison, “the rights of persons and the rights of property” constituted the “two cardinal objects of government.” And the “most sacred form of property,” according to Madison, was an individual’s conscience since “other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and inalienable right . . .” Both property and conscience (religious freedom) have been considered foundational rights. But what exactly do they have mon? More than we may...
Czeslaw Milosz: Poet Laureate of Freedom
[A review of Milosz: A Biography by Andrzej Franasszek, edited and translated by Aleksandra and Michael Parker, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge University, 2017, 526 pp., $35] “What is poetry which does not save/Nations or people?” – Czeslaw Milosz (“Dedication”) In the 1970s – the last full decade before Poland finally freed itself from the shackles munist control –Lech Walesa, the leader of Solidarity, the Soviet bloc’s first trade union, was arrested on more than one occasion....
The costs and benefits of monopoly
Note: This is post #49 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What would happen if we eliminated patents for industries with high R&D costs, such as the pharmaceutical industry? Eliminating patents in this case may result in less innovation and, specifically, fewer new drugs being created, explains economist Alex Tabarrok. In this video by Marginal Revolution University he considers some of the tradeoffs of patents and looks at alternative ways to reward research and development such as patent...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved