Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The economics behind the COVID-19 baby bust
The economics behind the COVID-19 baby bust
Dec 5, 2025 8:29 PM

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, some academics predicted a “baby boom,” as couples found themselves locked down with nothing to do. But those familiar with economics knew differently – and the data have now backed us up.

The coronavirus “baby boom” has turned into a “baby bust.” The CDC reported that U.S. births in the month of December 2020, nine months after the lockdowns began, fell by pared with December 2019. The same pattern is seen in state-by-state results reviewed by the media in places like Hawaii (30%), California (10%), Florida (8%), Ohio (7%), and Arizona (5%).

The impact will be enormous. The Brookings Institution has estimated 300,000 to 500,000 American babies will never be born due to the global pandemic. And there is no end in sight. The Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research forecasts that the baby bust will last until August – the longest streak of lowered fertility in 100 years, including the Great Depression and the 2008 recession.

The baby bust has made life harder for those who wish to adopt children. And it likely increased the number of abortions.

What brought this birth dearth on? Uncertainty and economic hardship.

“People make long-term decisions when they have confidence about the future, andif there’s anything that undermines confidence about the future, it’s this massive pandemic,” Philip Cohen, a demographer at the University of Maryland, told NBCLX. Cohen also found that marriages had declined due to COVID-19. In Italy, the number of new marriages fell by more than half.

“The longer this period of uncertainty lasts, the more it will have lifelong effects on the fertility rate,” said Tomas Sobotka, a researcher at the Vienna’s Wittgenstein Center for Demography and Global Human Capital.

Undoubtedly, the U.S. fertility rate – which has been falling for years – is adversely impacted by the culture of death. Figures including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and (former) Prince Harry have all questioned or asserted that people in the West should have fewer children. But the globalfood supply,dietary supply adequacy, andlife expectancyhave risen asinfant mortality ratesfell – refuting decades of Cassandra warnings that overpopulation would cause a Malthusian depletion of global resources. The rhetoric became so pitched that a UN climate chief told young people to stop worrying and have babies.

Ironically, a higher birthrate may have slowed the spread of COVID-19.

Right or wrong, economics plays a large role in couples’ decisions to have a baby. Government lockdowns decimated the previously roaring U.S. economy, and short-term “stimulus” checks provide no security about the real status of the workplace. “When the labor market is weak, aggregate birth rates decline; when the labor market improves, birth rates improve,” wrote Brookings scholars Melissa Kearney and Philip Levine.

Economics impact all of life, including the formation of new life. Its effects may be worse in poorer and more secular nations. But, as I wrote in 2016:

[T]he life-sapping effects remain the same across continents and cultures.

Witness the fact that, according to one recent study, due to the Great Recession 151,082 American women will never be mothers. Princeton researchers Janet Currie and Hannes Schwandt found that more than 400,000 Americans will never be born, because women became skittish about marriage and childbearing after living through a period of high unemployment and the uncertainty it brings.

This underscores a simple yet underappreciated truth: Economic policy affects the health and well-being of families. Healthy family life and economic flourishing walk hand in hand.

This should hardly be surprising. The root word of “economics,” οἰκονομικά, means the management of a home. Social conservatives concerned about the nation’s plunging marriage and fertility rates should support policies that lead to economic prosperity.

For now, we should all understand that the government has provided incentives to violate God’s very mandment to mankind: “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
5 Minute Explainer: Competitive Federalism
Concepts you should know about explained in five minutes (or less). Leo Linbeck III, President and CEO of Aquinas Companies, provides an explanation petitive federalism and petition and governance relate in society. See also: 5 Minute Explainer: Subsidiarity ...
Rev. Sirico on Pope Francis and the Morality of Money
Earlier this week, Rev. Robert Sirico appeared on Fox Business’ Varney & Co with Stuart Varney and Judge Andrew Napolitano to discuss Pope ments on economics. Watch the video clip below: Watch the latest video at ...
Like Grocery Shopping Isn’t Bad Enough, Now You’ll Be Accosted By Obamacare Zealots
President Obama, in a move that highlights exactly how out-of-touch he is with most of America, is recruiting mothers to spread the good news of Obamacare…in the grocery store. In a meeting with “eight moms from around America,” according to a White House pool report, President Obama encouraged the mothers to sing the praises of Obamacare while they’re out shopping at grocery stores. Obama, speaking to the moms in the Oval Office, acknowledged that there have been problems with the...
ICCR’s 2013 Proxy Follies
As 2013 draws to a close, it’s time to inventory the year’s proxy resolutions introduced by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. ICCR, a group purportedly acting on religious principles and faith, is actually nothing more than a shareholder activist group engaged in the advancement of leftist causes at the expense of their fellow shareholders and the world’s poorest. ICCR recently released its 2013 Annual Report. Its “2013 Proxy Season Recap” (pp. 16, 17) presents a snapshot of initiatives ICCR...
How the KKK Got Its Way on Separation of Church and State
The phrase “Separation of Church and State” is not in the language of the First Amendment, and the concept was not favored by any influential framer at the time the Bill of Rights was drafted. So how did it e part of the jurisprudence surrounding the First Amendment? As Jim Lindgren, a law professor at Northwestern, explains, the Ku Klux Klan had something to do with it . . . 7. The first mainstream figures to favor separation after the...
Now Available: Kuyper’s ‘Guidance for Christian Engagement in Government’
Christian’s Library Press has just released the first-ever English translation of Abraham Kuyper’s Our Program (Ons Program), under the title Guidance for Christian Engagement in Government. First published in 1879 with the goal of preparing citizens for participation in the general elections, Kuyper’s stated purpose was twofold, as summarized by translator and editor Harry Van Dyke: “to serve antirevolutionaries as a guide for promotional activities and to prepare them for the formal establishment of an Anti-Revolutionary Party.” As for what...
O Tannenbaum and Fair Trade
A couple of further points in reply to Micah Mattix’s response on buying Christmas trees, based on his original post here. 1) I think Mattix’s characterization of the buyer as “selfish” goes a bit too far, and is not an accurate characterization of a good deal of market activity. “Self-interested” would be more accurate, and would allow for selfish actors, but would also allow more generally for benevolent actors. For instance, a nun who runs an orphanage has decided that...
A Living Wage for a Living Tree?
The Ballors went with a live tree this year. We bought it at Flowerland and I do not know the name of the farm whence it came. Over at the American Conservative, Micah Mattix reflects on the Christmas tree market, which in his neck of the woods is “notoriously unstable.” In Ashe County, North Carolina, says Mattix, a dilemma faces the small tree farmer: “It is not sell or starve, but it is sell or go without a new septic...
The Fountainhead of Bedford Falls
[Note: A version of this article ran last year around Christmastime. I’m posting it again because I love talking about Frank Capra and everyone else seems to love talking about Ayn Rand.] Frank Capra and Ayn Rand are two names not often mentioned together. Yet the cheery director of Capra-corn and the dour novelist who created Objectivism have more mon than you might imagine. Both were immigrants who made their names in Hollywood. Both were screenwriters and employees of the...
The Bandwagon Of Our Own Uncertainty
Comedian Taylor Molly reminds us to, you know, like, be certain of our convictions? ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved