Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Christian’s Hard Affluence and Easy Hardship
The Christian’s Hard Affluence and Easy Hardship
Feb 19, 2026 9:50 AM

In the parable of the Good Samaritan, imagine you’re the one who’s been left by the side of the road. The change in perspective will work wonders for your sense of contingency—and generosity.

Read More…

From sociologists Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton’s worries over “moral therapeutic deism” in their 2005 book, to the Pew Research Center’s documentation of the growing trend of religious “nones” (people who claim no religious affiliation), mon claims that we now live in a “post-Christian” culture, the idea that religion and modern affluence cannot coexist has deep roots. Indeed, one might go back further and cite sociologist Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Peter Berger wrote an excellent rejoinder to the secularization thesis 12 years ago, noting that on the whole the phenomenon has not panned out as many feared. And yet … one cannot deny that, even in the United States, affluence and faith stand in inverse relationship. In 2014, Pew recorded that 14% of people who make over $100,000 per year identify as pared to half that, 7%, among those who make $30,000 or less.

So it makes some sense to expect that increased affluence means decreased faith and religiosity, but why? And is this something modern and new? Or is it timeless?

While orders of magnitude more people, due to modern market economies, enjoy the blessings of affluence today than in the preindustrial world, human nature stays the same. Jesus warned, “Woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation” (Luke 6:24). When a rich young man came to him and asked, “What must I do that I may have eternal life?” (Matt 19:16), Jesus told him to follow mandments, which the man claimed to do. Yet apparently he still felt unfulfilled, further asking Jesus, “What do I still lack?” (Matt 19:20). To which Jesus replied, “Go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; e, follow me” (Matt 19:21). Instead, the young man goes away sorrowful, and Jesus laments, “How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God!” (Mark 10:23).

The data above seem to indicate that Jesus’ lament holds for our modern affluence.

But wait a minute. Isn’t salvation a “free gift” (see Rom 5:15­–16)? Don’t Christians believe “by grace you have been saved” and “not of works” (Eph 2:8–9)? How then can it also be “hard”?

The es from one’s perspective, not just materially but spiritually. Jesus not only said, “Blessed are you poor” (Luke 6:20), but also “Blessed are the poor in spirit” (Matt 5:3). And when his disciples asked him, “Who then can be saved?” he responded, “With God all things are possible” (Mark 10:26–27). Moreover, forted all those “who labor and are heavy laden,” by assuring them that “my yoke is easy and my burden is light” (Matt 11:30).

So for “those who have riches,” the life in Christ is “hard.” But for the “heavy laden,” it is “easy.”

While Christians disagree over the place of good works in our salvation, few would deny their importance. At the end of all things, all will be judged “according to their works” (Rev 20:12). Jesus even says that when we care for others, “You did it to me” (Matt 25:40). Moreover, he says this will be the basis by which he will separate the just from the wicked. So one way or another, works matter. But works are, well, “hard.” Have you ever tried actually loving your neighbor? It can be hard enough just to like them!

But imagine for a moment—if you have no personal experience to draw from—that you desperately needed your neighbor. Many of us have experienced such hardship. Maybe your family wasn’t loving and supportive. Maybe you lost your job and couldn’t pay the bills. Maybe no one believed that you had something to contribute, and your efforts and ideas were dismissed or marginalized. All you wanted was someone to listen to you and understand. Whether or not that’s you, Jesus calls out, “Come to me … for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls” (Matt 11:28-29). parison with the hardships this world brings, following Jesus is a cakewalk. Prayer? Fasting? Almsgiving? Simplicity? Forgiveness? Repentance? No problem! The work of loving our neighbor is easier the more we understand how much we need both God and them.

Many saints of the Church, such as Jerome, Augustine, and Ambrose, urge us to see ourselves in Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan—but not as the Samaritan! Rather, they emphasize that we are all, affluent or otherwise, the man that “fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead” (Luke 10:30). Jesus is our Good Samaritan, and only when we’ve realized our true condition and experienced his mercy can we be Good Samaritans to others.

Which brings us back to affluence. Healthy families and friendships, sufficient material provision, meaningful work—these are all blessings for which we should be grateful if we have them. But we must also beware not to place our worth in these things. Clinging to Christ is indeed “easy” for those who’ve been deprived of such blessings, for whom much of life has been toil and curse. With the scales of affluence removed from our eyes through ascetic practices, we can see our condition as it really is and use our resources to serve others, and Christ in them.

And if you haven’t had the bittersweet blessing of personal hardship to draw from, look around. No doubt with the right perspective, you can find the face of Christ in those suffering beside you. With all our affluence today, rather than worrying over waning faith and despairing over our salvation, we ought to see the tremendous opportunity that affluence affords us to love our neighbors on a scale premodern people could never imagine. Such different outlook could make all the difference in the world—and beyond.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg On Ratzinger And A Culture Of Ignorance
We are five months into 2015, and life is still unjust. People are still ignorant and hurting each other. All the things we hope and pray for – peace, love, faith, understanding – still seem unattainable. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger) has spent his life thinking, theologically, about these things. In today’s Crisis Magazine, author James Day examines Ratzinger’s writings and teachings regarding “the source of mankind’s pervading unhappiness and alienation from each other and God.” Ratzinger has seen...
The Moral Limits of Psychology
“Indifference to the moral dimension distorts the study of human action in economics,” says Rev. Gregory Jensen in this week’s Acton Commentary, “so too does it deform the discipline that reaches behind that action to the human mind: psychology.” Built on a sound anthropological foundation and guided by an equally sound morality that is clear on the proper goals of human life, the empirical findings and practical techniques of psychology can foster the flourishing of both persons munities. Unfortunately, as...
How Free Trade Helps the Poor
Several years ago economist Bryan Caplan provided the most succinct and helpful statement about how we should think about free trade: “We’d be better off if other countries gave us stuff for free. Isn’t ‘really cheap’ the next-best thing?” As with any simplification, critics could find many reasons to grumble about what that leaves unstated (e.g., trade leads to offshoring of jobs). But it highlights an important point about why free trade matters. Free trade is about as close to...
‘Rule Of Law’ Sounds Boring, But It Is Essential To Human Flourishing
Rule of law is not something we hear much about, nor do we really want to. It’s kind of … dull. Tedious. Yawn-inducing. Unless, of course, you live somewhere where there is no rule of law. Every year, 5 million people are chased from their homes. Some lose their homes due to violence; others lose their homes simply because they cannot prove they own it. Someone bigger, stronger, more powerful, more es in and takes it. And the victims have...
The Federal Government Spent $100 Billion on 18 Food Programs Last Year
The federal government spent more than $100 billion providing food assistance to Americans last year, according to recent testimony by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Eighteen federal programs provided food to 46 million people—approximately 1 out of every 7 Americans. Here are the programs and the dollar amount spent: The GAO found significant overlap between these programs which “can create unnecessary work and waste administrative resources, resulting in inefficiency.” The GAO identified several food assistance programs that provide the same...
Video: Hilton and Alderman on the Tragedy of Human Trafficking
Detail from Pamela Alderman’s “The Scarlet Cord” Those of you who are regular readers here at the Acton PowerBlog are very familiar with Elise Graveline Hilton’s extensive research and work on the subject of human trafficking, both here on the blog and also through her recently published monograph,A Vulnerable World.(For those of you who don’t have a copy, you can pick up a paperback version atthe Acton Bookshop; a Kindle version is available as well.) As Elise was doing the...
‘Advocacy Investors’ Are Activist Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
Over at GreenBiz last week, reporter Keith Larson profiled Andrew Behar, chief executive officer of shareholder activist group As You Sow. In the article, Behar attempts to rebrand AYS activities as “advocacy investment.” For some capital market watchers, the term “activist investor” may bring to mind corporate raiders such as Carl Icahn or Bill Ackman. That’s why Andrew Behar, CEO of the nonprofit As You Sow, prefers to call social and environmental activist investors something a little more aspirational: “advocacy...
Why It’s Every Citizen’s Job to Interpret the Constitution
A few days ago I mentioned Michael Stokes Paulsen’s crash course on how to interpret the Constitution. Paulsen outlined five techniques of constitutional interpretation that courts mentators employ: (1) arguments from the straightforward, natural, original linguistic meaning of the text; (2) arguments from the structure, logic, and relationships created by the document as a whole; (3) arguments from history, original intention, or purposes behind an enacted text; (4) arguments from precedent; and (5) arguments from policy. Today, Paulsen has another...
What ‘The Profit’ teaches us about ethics and enterprise
I’ve written before on howtelevision can be a powerful tool for illuminating the deeper significance of daily work and the beauties of basic trade and enterprise. Shows like Dirty Jobs, Shark Tank, Undercover Boss, and Restaurant Impossible have used the mediumto this end, and today at The Federalist, I reviewa newcontender inthe mix. CNBC’s The Profit is arguably the best reality show currently on television. Starring Marcus Lemonis, a Lebanese-born American entrepreneur and investor, each episode highlights an ailing businesses...
Are You Breaking the Eighth Commandment?
When is the last time you broke the mandment? (Depending on how you count them, thatusuallythe one about “Thou shalt not steal.”) Most of us would say we never (or almost never) break that one rule. We’re not thieves. We’re not swindler. We’re not plunderers. We don’t break that one at all. Or do we? As Kevin DeYoung (and the Heidelberg Catechism) point out, the mandment forbids more than outright robbery: In God’s sight, theft also “includes cheating and swindling...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved