Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Christian’s Hard Affluence and Easy Hardship
The Christian’s Hard Affluence and Easy Hardship
Apr 27, 2026 7:42 AM

In the parable of the Good Samaritan, imagine you’re the one who’s been left by the side of the road. The change in perspective will work wonders for your sense of contingency—and generosity.

Read More…

From sociologists Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton’s worries over “moral therapeutic deism” in their 2005 book, to the Pew Research Center’s documentation of the growing trend of religious “nones” (people who claim no religious affiliation), mon claims that we now live in a “post-Christian” culture, the idea that religion and modern affluence cannot coexist has deep roots. Indeed, one might go back further and cite sociologist Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Peter Berger wrote an excellent rejoinder to the secularization thesis 12 years ago, noting that on the whole the phenomenon has not panned out as many feared. And yet … one cannot deny that, even in the United States, affluence and faith stand in inverse relationship. In 2014, Pew recorded that 14% of people who make over $100,000 per year identify as pared to half that, 7%, among those who make $30,000 or less.

So it makes some sense to expect that increased affluence means decreased faith and religiosity, but why? And is this something modern and new? Or is it timeless?

While orders of magnitude more people, due to modern market economies, enjoy the blessings of affluence today than in the preindustrial world, human nature stays the same. Jesus warned, “Woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation” (Luke 6:24). When a rich young man came to him and asked, “What must I do that I may have eternal life?” (Matt 19:16), Jesus told him to follow mandments, which the man claimed to do. Yet apparently he still felt unfulfilled, further asking Jesus, “What do I still lack?” (Matt 19:20). To which Jesus replied, “Go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; e, follow me” (Matt 19:21). Instead, the young man goes away sorrowful, and Jesus laments, “How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God!” (Mark 10:23).

The data above seem to indicate that Jesus’ lament holds for our modern affluence.

But wait a minute. Isn’t salvation a “free gift” (see Rom 5:15­–16)? Don’t Christians believe “by grace you have been saved” and “not of works” (Eph 2:8–9)? How then can it also be “hard”?

The es from one’s perspective, not just materially but spiritually. Jesus not only said, “Blessed are you poor” (Luke 6:20), but also “Blessed are the poor in spirit” (Matt 5:3). And when his disciples asked him, “Who then can be saved?” he responded, “With God all things are possible” (Mark 10:26–27). Moreover, forted all those “who labor and are heavy laden,” by assuring them that “my yoke is easy and my burden is light” (Matt 11:30).

So for “those who have riches,” the life in Christ is “hard.” But for the “heavy laden,” it is “easy.”

While Christians disagree over the place of good works in our salvation, few would deny their importance. At the end of all things, all will be judged “according to their works” (Rev 20:12). Jesus even says that when we care for others, “You did it to me” (Matt 25:40). Moreover, he says this will be the basis by which he will separate the just from the wicked. So one way or another, works matter. But works are, well, “hard.” Have you ever tried actually loving your neighbor? It can be hard enough just to like them!

But imagine for a moment—if you have no personal experience to draw from—that you desperately needed your neighbor. Many of us have experienced such hardship. Maybe your family wasn’t loving and supportive. Maybe you lost your job and couldn’t pay the bills. Maybe no one believed that you had something to contribute, and your efforts and ideas were dismissed or marginalized. All you wanted was someone to listen to you and understand. Whether or not that’s you, Jesus calls out, “Come to me … for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls” (Matt 11:28-29). parison with the hardships this world brings, following Jesus is a cakewalk. Prayer? Fasting? Almsgiving? Simplicity? Forgiveness? Repentance? No problem! The work of loving our neighbor is easier the more we understand how much we need both God and them.

Many saints of the Church, such as Jerome, Augustine, and Ambrose, urge us to see ourselves in Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan—but not as the Samaritan! Rather, they emphasize that we are all, affluent or otherwise, the man that “fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead” (Luke 10:30). Jesus is our Good Samaritan, and only when we’ve realized our true condition and experienced his mercy can we be Good Samaritans to others.

Which brings us back to affluence. Healthy families and friendships, sufficient material provision, meaningful work—these are all blessings for which we should be grateful if we have them. But we must also beware not to place our worth in these things. Clinging to Christ is indeed “easy” for those who’ve been deprived of such blessings, for whom much of life has been toil and curse. With the scales of affluence removed from our eyes through ascetic practices, we can see our condition as it really is and use our resources to serve others, and Christ in them.

And if you haven’t had the bittersweet blessing of personal hardship to draw from, look around. No doubt with the right perspective, you can find the face of Christ in those suffering beside you. With all our affluence today, rather than worrying over waning faith and despairing over our salvation, we ought to see the tremendous opportunity that affluence affords us to love our neighbors on a scale premodern people could never imagine. Such different outlook could make all the difference in the world—and beyond.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A Stark contrast
Kishore has helpfully pointed out the discussions going on elsewhere about Rodney Stark’s piece and the related NYT David Brook’s op-ed. He derides some of menters for their lack of economic understanding, but I’d like to applaud menter’s post. He questions, as I do, the fundamental validity of Stark’s thesis (which essentially ignores such an important strand of Christianity as Eastern Orthodoxy). Among other astute observations, Christopher Sarsfield asks: “Was it the principles of Christianity that put the ‘goddess of...
The Coventry Carol
The Coventry Carol (Words Attributed to Robert Croo, 1534; English Melody, 1591). Click here for MIDI version (and sing along!) Lully, lulla, thou little tiny child, By by, lully lullay. Lully, lulla, thou little tiny child, By by, lully lullay. O sisters, too, how may we do, For to preserve this day; This poor Youngling for whom we sing, By, by, lully, lullay. Herod the King, in his raging, Charged he hath this day; His men of might, in his...
Ethics & Economics reviews
The Acton Institute has placed three titles from the Lexington Books Studies in Ethics & Economics series, edited by Acton director of research Samuel Gregg. The first is Within the Market Strife: American Catholic Economic Thought from Rerum Novarum to Vatican II, by Acton research fellow Kevin Schmiesing. The reviews are here. Daddypundit says, “Schmiesing has made his book accessible to persons of all faiths regardless of their own background. He has meticulously researched his book and it shows in...
Petrol-socialism
Predictions, anyone? Chavez continues to flex his socialist muscles as he has now given ExxonMobil an ultimatum: either give him the controlling interest in pany, or lose their Venezuelan operation altogether. This story is notable because ExxonMobil is the pany who has thus far refused Chavez’s “offer they can’t refuse.” Now, I don’t think anyone had any misconceptions that Chavez would be a ‘nice socialist’, but what was that proverb about being doomed to repeat history? What worries me about...
“Brain Drain” reconsidered
A while back I mentioned a new ing out questioning conventional wisdom on the “brain drain” problem caused by emigration from developing nations. The book will not be out for a while yet, but the author, Michele Pistone, has a long post on Mirror of Justice describing her findings and how they relate to traditional moral concerns raised by Catholic social teaching. ...
Public v. private services
Fast Company Now is reporting that “for the first time, customer satisfaction with federal agency Websites has surpassed offline government services,” according to an American Customer Satisfaction Index report. What is especially noteworthy, however, is that online private sector services consistently rank higher in satisfaction than their governmental counterparts. “Where the gap between offline public and private services has narrowed, the report said, e-government is trailing far behind the private sector online. That, said ACSI chief Claes Fornell, shows room...
One more reason…
Here’s the best ad hominem (no pun intended) reason to deplore the creation of chimeras: Stalin, the self-proclaimed “Brilliant Genuis of Humanity,” wanted them. The Scotsman reports that “Soviet dictator Josef Stalin ordered the creation of Planet of the Apes-style warriors by crossing humans with apes, according to recently uncovered secret documents.” According to the documents, the order came from Stalin’s wish to create a race of super-soldiers: “I want a new invincible human being, insensitive to pain, resistant and...
Perusing Peru
Fr. Philip De Vous, chaplain of Thomas More College in Crestview Hills, KY and an adjunct scholar of public policy at the Acton Institute, writes of a recent trip to see operations of the Doe Run Company in Lima, Peru. It seems that the Doe Run Company has been accosted by “criticism from certain journalists and certain sectors of the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations” regarding its practice of business ethics. What Fr. De Vous experienced in Peru, however,...
There’s no such thing as “free” health care
Remember: when you recieve a “free” service from the government, it’s not actually free. You’re paying for that service through your taxes. And when the government sets up a monopoly in an area like health care, it’s probably going to end up being more expensive and cheaper at the same time – more expensive because people are less likely to use a “free” service prudently, and cheaper because the overuse of the service will force officials to impose major restraints...
Amy Welborn’s blog on capitalism and Catholicism
The Acton debate on the relationship has featured blog posts on Rodney Stark and David Brooks’s column on Starks. Amy Welborn’s site has more in these two posts (here and here), with a somewhat lively debate in ments sections. Several of ments regard Max Weber’s thesis on the Protestant work ethic and capitalism, and reveal a misunderstanding of what makes for economic growth in Ireland and the lack of it in Latin America. It’s pretty obvious there are few Actonites...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved