Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Chinese Communist Party Wages War on Religion—Again
The Chinese Communist Party Wages War on Religion—Again
Jan 21, 2026 11:09 PM

Upon the death of Chairman Mao, religious believers in China enjoyed a brief relaxation of persecution, and even a measure of liberty. But as Xi Jinping has demanded increased reverence for Chinese socialism, the faithful have begun paying the price again. Yet the young remain a source of hope.

Read More…

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping secured a third term last October. He continues to transform what once was loose authoritarian rule into a near-totalitarian system. In almost every area, the CCP has increased its power over the Chinese people, demanding absolute obedience. A new report from the group ChinaAid, headed by Bob Fu,details the party’s increasing effortsto “Sinicize” religion, forcing it to serve Xi and the CCP.

Xinjiang’s Muslim Uyghurs sufferparticularly brutal treatmentbecause Beijing fears both their faith and their ethnicity, and the potential for separatism. The CCP also abhors Christianity for its foreign roots. Yet Daoism and Buddhism, faiths with an ancient Chinese heritage, are under assault by the regime as well.

Mao Zedong’s China was a totalitarian hellhole, an imperial throwback, with a red rather than royal emperor. Mao viewed religion munism’s enemy. His death in 1976 resulted in widespread liberalization of Chinese society, though the Tiananmen Square crackdown demonstrated the limits of political reform. Even so, the CCP relaxed its control over people’s lives, including spiritual pursuits.

Persecution was still real but concentrated at the provincial level, varying widely in degree. Believers were often left alone if they avoided politics. When visiting Beijing in 2014, Iglimpsed a Christian “fish” decalon an auto bumper in Beijing, a striking sight with Mao’s portrait still hanging on the Gate of Heavenly Peace bordering Tiananmen Square.

Those were the “good old days.” While devoting more money to maintain domestic order than to protect the country from foreign threats, the People’s Republic of China has constructed an intrusive regulatory bureaucracy over religion. As the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom reports: “The ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its government prehensive and extensive control over religion in China through plex web of state laws, regulations, and policies, which the Party and government agencies implement and enforce at all levels.”

Xi insists that the faithful believe munism, not God. The USCIRF cited a speech in which “he called on state-controlled religious groups to ‘promote patriotism’ and to ‘continuously enhance [their] identification with the great motherland, the Chinese nation, the Chinese Communist Party, and [Chinese socialism].’ Xi also said that representatives of religious groups must be ‘politically reliable’ and able to ‘play a role during critical times.’”

In the aftermath of the 20thNational Congress, which seminarians were required to watch, CCP regulatory agencies organized events at the national and provincial level to instruct employees how to implement the party’s new dictates. These followed earlier programs tied to National Security Education Day. ChinaAid notes that “various activities by state-run Christian churches sprang up before and after this day.” In Sichuan province, for instance, the governing slogan for religious believers was “Establishing a strong sense of national security. Experiencing and understanding the achievements of national security in this new era. Creating a positive atmosphere for the successful launch of the CCP’s 20th National Congress.”

Alas, indoctrination may be the least coercive weapon deployed by the Chinese government. ChinaAid has detailed the CCP’s increasingly brutal assault on religion: demolishing sanctuaries and other church buildings, closing churches and other religious organizations, arresting and imprisoning church leaders and members, “disappearing” church officials, raiding and otherwise disrupting religious services, interfering with baptisms, withholding ministerial credentials, banning online church activities, mistreating religious prisoners, prohibiting evangelism, fining church leaders and other participants, restricting publication and sale of religious materials, punishing Christian political and legal activists, restricting Christian students from studying abroad, closing Christian schools and punishing other forms of religious education, and censoring online religious content.

ChinaAid also publishesan annual guidedetailing the 10 worst cases in which people were punished, often severely, for attempting to exercise the same freedoms Americans take for granted. Other organizations also track the CCP’s assault on religious liberty in China. For instance, International Christian Concerndescribes acts of persecutionby category and number. Noted ICC: “The government’s scrutiny of Christians is part of a wider effort to Sinicize the country by coercing religious groups to submit to munist CCP ideology.”

As noted above, while Christians suffer much religious persecution, other faiths suffer as well, mostly for the same reason.The USCIRF has reportedthat “although China recognizes Buddhism, Catholicism, Islam, Protestantism, and Taoism, adherents of groups with perceived foreign influence—such as underground Catholics, house church Protestants, Uyghurs and other Muslims, and Tibetan Buddhists—and those from other religious movements, such as Falun Gong and the Church of Almighty God, are especially vulnerable to persecution.” Moreover, despite the Vatican’s agreement with Beijing, seen as a surrender by many, munist “authorities continued to harass and detain underground Catholic priests who refuse to join the state-controlled Catholic association.”

Yet even after enhancing surveillance, tightening censorship, and increasing punishments, Xi and the CCP have failed to prevent Chinese from answering God’s call. With between 93 million and 115 million Protestants in Chinaby one estimate, along with 10 to 12 million Catholics and additional adherents to other faiths, CCP members are badly outnumbered by religious believers. No munist apparatchiks are nervous. Hence their desperate campaign to suppress religious faith and coopt religious organizations.

Yet the CCP will fail. People of faith, especially leaders in underground churches, are paying a terrible price for living their beliefs. Yet the regime is stoking, not eradicating, opposition. Most Chinese Christians simply want to be left alone to worship God. By attacking their most important beliefs, the CCP has forced believers to resist ever more vigorously the regime’s dictates.

For example, Christians made up a disproportionate share of human rights lawyers, most of whom have since been disbarred or imprisoned by the Xi government. Many Chinese house churchesfurther decentralizedtheir activities to avoid detection, while some congregationsturned outtodefend their sanctuariesfrom government assault. These battles left them with little doubt that the CCP was not their friend but God’s enemy. As government repression continues to rise, so will resistance, even if largely driven underground. As Duke University’s Lian Xi observed, Christians e to see the political potential of Christianity as a force for change.”

This means that more Chinese are likely to turn to God. The PRC suffers from a spiritual vacuum, in which the Communist Party is unable to meet the Chinese people’s deepest needs. Indeed, the young have unsettled Xi and the regime by rebelling against their elders’ expectations, adopting the memes“lying flat”and“let it rot.”The Chinese people evidently yearn for more than party propaganda.

In fact, popular frustration dramaticallyburst forth last fallwith protests against the regime’s draconian COVID regulations. The CCP has nothing to offer in the battle to win hearts and minds. In contrast, Christians and other believers munity, meaning, and hope. As Lian explained: “What really makes the government nervous is Christianity’s claim to universal rights and values.”

Apparently Xi believes he can suppress one of mankind’s deepest impulses. Thousands of years of human experience demonstrate that he is wrong. Like King Herod Agrippa, Xi might rue demanding that people treat him and his party as demi-gods.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved